Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Spz Roubaix fit: 2022 vs 2017

Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Spz Roubaix fit: 2022 vs 2017

Old 05-04-22, 10:08 AM
  #1  
tedder987
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 159
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 54 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
Spz Roubaix fit: 2022 vs 2017

Folks, has anyone here moved from a 2017-19 Roubaix to one of the newer 2020+ models? I am replacing a dead 2017 (seatstay broke right at the dropout/axle in a crash) but have seen reviews saying the newer ones are more of a racy fit. I had a 2017 58cm with all 3 spacers above the futureshock but I am on the line sizewize between a 58 and a 61 so I am wondering if I should go up to get the taller front end of the 61? That said, the published stack/reach don't look so different so maybe its not a big deal? Still impossible to find a store with both sizes available anywhere near me.
Stack. Reach
2017 - 58 : 629 390
2022 - 58: 630. 392
2022 - 61: 665 398

FWIW I am about 6'2.5" with a 35" inseam. So longer legs, shorter torso
tedder987 is offline  
Old 05-04-22, 04:08 PM
  #2  
Iride01
MotuekaCascadeChinook
 
Iride01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 10,656

Bikes: '20 Tarmac Disc Comp '78 Raleigh Competition GS

Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4305 Post(s)
Liked 2,864 Times in 1,993 Posts
IMO, only you can answer that by trying them out.

Don't forget that if they have a Roubaix in the sizes you want but aren't the component tier level you want, you can still judge your fit on them, then order the tier level you want. Might have to go to different places far away to try each, but if you are looking at the mid to high tier price range, I would go where ever it took to try one.
Iride01 is offline  
Old 05-05-22, 05:38 AM
  #3  
redcon1
Senior Member
 
redcon1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: South Central PA
Posts: 521

Bikes: Gary Fisher X-Caliber, Focus Arriba, Specialized Roubaix Expert

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 90 Post(s)
Liked 73 Times in 48 Posts
With those 1 and 2mm differences, you won't notice a change IMO. I would set up the 2022 the same as your 2017 and call it a day. On the 2022 you need the proprietary Future Stock stem to change sizing, so that is also a consideration if you go with a large.

The other factor is weight - by staying with a smaller frame you are saving those precious grams. That will feel more significant with a large frame even if you get it set up perfectly.
redcon1 is offline  
Old 05-05-22, 07:17 AM
  #4  
mstateglfr 
Sunshine
 
mstateglfr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 14,423

Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo

Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8039 Post(s)
Liked 4,959 Times in 2,877 Posts
Fit is individual, there is no singular size for a given height, yada yada. With that out of the way, a 665mm stack height for someone 6'2 is definitely on the extreme end of sizing. If it works best, cool, but in general that is a lot more stack than most anyone riding a drop bar bike needs at that height.
A 35" cycling inseam at 6'2 is not surprising.
mstateglfr is offline  
Likes For mstateglfr:
Old 05-06-22, 08:27 AM
  #5  
FrankTuna
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 69
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 52 Post(s)
Liked 24 Times in 14 Posts
Originally Posted by redcon1 View Post
On the 2022 you need the proprietary Future Stock stem to change sizing, so that is also a consideration if you go with a large.
They ship with an additional spacer that allows you to run any standard stem designed for a 1-1/8" steerer. I'm running a Zipp stem on mine.
FrankTuna is offline  
Likes For FrankTuna:
Old 05-06-22, 05:26 PM
  #6  
Mike F
Senior Member
 
Mike F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,181

Bikes: 2017 Specilized Roubaix, 2012 Scott CR1 Team, Felt Z85

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 2 Posts
I went from a 54 2017 to a 56 2022. The 56 seems to fit ME better. Im just shy of 5'10" and the specialized chart says I should be on a 54. My fitter suggested a 56 since I have long legs and Im a plus on the "ape index". i changed the stem to a 90mm and and got a zero offset seatpost. I couldnt be happier with the fit and ride quality. Im a 60 year old guy whose stem slamming days are far behind him. Try both and see.
Mike F is offline  
Likes For Mike F:
Old 05-09-22, 09:31 AM
  #7  
tedder987
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 159
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 54 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
OP here. A local shop got in a 58 and built it up so I could try it. I think why the reviewers said it was lower up front is because there are 2 different duckbill spacers (not your normal spacers) that shroud the future shock and the smaller is 1.5cm lower than the larger. With the larger and the 3 normal spacers it feels, if anything, slightly taller up front than the old 2017 bike.

What with covid-related shortages and all I decided to buy it. Its Tiagra, I would have preferred 105 or the now discontinued mechanical ultegra like my last bike. The Tiagra is actually just fine, I barely notice the difference in shifting. Also since its using a Praxis crank, that knocks off 1/2 of the weight difference between it and 105. The wheels & tires on this build were serious boat anchors but I still have my Roval Terra's from the old bike so they will just be kept around as spares or for when I sell this bike on. I weighed the fronts with tires installed and it was 360g heavier than the front Terra (tubeless GP5000 with 1.5oz fresh sealant). Didn't want to pull the freewheel to compare the rear wheels but I expect that weight difference is similar if not greater.

So far I have put 100 miles on it and set 27 PRs (plus a bunch of 2nds and thirds). One was on a 3 mile stretch near home that I have ridden 729 times. I'd love to say it is the aero of the new bike, but the reality is that at least for that segment I had a huge tailwind. I do think its made me faster though, mostly from the adrenaline and excitement of the new bike.

Last edited by tedder987; 05-10-22 at 02:54 PM.
tedder987 is offline  
Likes For tedder987:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright © 2021 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.