Any experience with Michelin Power Cup? Might leave GP5000s behind
#26
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 3,719
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2166 Post(s)
Liked 1,875 Times
in
1,179 Posts
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 3,719
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2166 Post(s)
Liked 1,875 Times
in
1,179 Posts
GP5000 TR S impossible to mount to Farsports Ventoux or FLo60 rims without heating them in the oven AND using the tire jack. It is a multihour ordeal to change a set of tires and get them sealed.
Michelin Power Cup could be mounted by hands or one lever to the same rims. Same with GP5000 clinchers.
Michelin Power Cup could be mounted by hands or one lever to the same rims. Same with GP5000 clinchers.
#28
Advocatus Diaboli
I've got one in my tool box and one in each of my saddle bags (I have big saddle bags), in addition to my quick link tool (that separates and doubles as tire levers). I used to have the VAR bead jack tool in my saddle bags, but this was enough better that I got bigger bags to ensure there was enough room for it.

#29
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 13,314
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3849 Post(s)
Liked 2,666 Times
in
1,592 Posts
I've tried that VAR tool a couple of times (bought one in hopes that I could stop carrying the Koolstop tool and use a smaller saddlebag), but, on tires where I needed it, I quickly turned to the Koolstop for its increased leverage (only tried it at home when I had the Koolstop available as well). I should probably have forced myself to try the VAR more to get better with it so I'd feel comfortable taking it with me as my main tool and leave the Koolstop at home, but, it was just easier to go with the bigger tool because it was available.
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Québec, Canada
Posts: 1,465
Bikes: Propel Pro, TCR Pro, TCR Adv (beater)
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 632 Post(s)
Liked 372 Times
in
286 Posts
GP5000 TR S impossible to mount to Farsports Ventoux or FLo60 rims without heating them in the oven AND using the tire jack. It is a multihour ordeal to change a set of tires and get them sealed.
Michelin Power Cup could be mounted by hands or one lever to the same rims. Same with GP5000 clinchers.
Michelin Power Cup could be mounted by hands or one lever to the same rims. Same with GP5000 clinchers.
2nd consecutive year using Schwalbe Pro Ones and they always mounted by hands. Levers needed only to unmount them.
Likes For eduskator:
#31
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 760
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 324 Post(s)
Liked 394 Times
in
241 Posts
Modern Mavic SLR45 wheels (they pride themselves on being compliant to standards, though), the GP5000 S TR in 25mm width went on easily, helped myself with a lever for the final bit which I always tend to do.
Had to replace one due to a stupid sharp rock at night tearing the sidewall (held just enough pressure to get me home) and that was a breeze, too.
Had to replace one due to a stupid sharp rock at night tearing the sidewall (held just enough pressure to get me home) and that was a breeze, too.
#32
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,333
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 353 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20620 Post(s)
Liked 9,286 Times
in
4,599 Posts
The Pro Ones and the GP5KS TR are both built to the same hookless compatible tubeless spec so I would expect the experience to be similar on modern rims; while I haven't tried the Conti yet, I can only use hookless compatible tires and all that I've tried have been pretty damn easy.
Likes For WhyFi:
#33
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 3,719
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2166 Post(s)
Liked 1,875 Times
in
1,179 Posts
Like I said, the Michelins and clincher GP5000 could go on by hand or just a little help at the very end using a lever but I could do it by hand with some effort.
N = 1 experience.
Likes For GhostRider62:
#34
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 760
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 324 Post(s)
Liked 394 Times
in
241 Posts
N=1 does it's thing, yeah.
Funny, I remember the old GP5000 clinchers were a pain to mount on one alloy (Fulcrum) wheelset. I actually broke one of the rims trying to mount some tubeless tires (Challenge brand ones) - I was trying to lever the damn thing on with a heavy duty steel core lever and the rim gave way.
Kind of suspect the wheel wasn't exactly to spec.
Funny, I remember the old GP5000 clinchers were a pain to mount on one alloy (Fulcrum) wheelset. I actually broke one of the rims trying to mount some tubeless tires (Challenge brand ones) - I was trying to lever the damn thing on with a heavy duty steel core lever and the rim gave way.
Kind of suspect the wheel wasn't exactly to spec.
Last edited by Branko D; 11-01-22 at 04:50 PM.
#35
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Québec, Canada
Posts: 1,465
Bikes: Propel Pro, TCR Pro, TCR Adv (beater)
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 632 Post(s)
Liked 372 Times
in
286 Posts
It's actually not the first time I hear that GP5K tires are a PITA to mount. As WhyFi said, it may be easier to mount on hookless rims, though.
N = more than 1.
N = more than 1.
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,333
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 353 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20620 Post(s)
Liked 9,286 Times
in
4,599 Posts
My point wasn't really about hookless rims, specifically... it's that the two tires mentioned were both built to the same standard - which happens to be hookless compliant but, more importantly, is the most well-defined set of specifications in the (admittedly short) history of road tubeless - and should offer a similar experience when it comes to installation. The handful of ETRTO TSS compliant tires, that I've used, have been among the easiest to mount tires in my tubeless journey, whether I put them on hooked or hookless rims.
IOW, unless there's a significant difference, like tire size or sidewall rigidity, I don't see why my 6th set of ETRTO TSS tires would be meaningfully more difficult to handle than the first 5.
IOW, unless there's a significant difference, like tire size or sidewall rigidity, I don't see why my 6th set of ETRTO TSS tires would be meaningfully more difficult to handle than the first 5.
Likes For WhyFi:
#37
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Palm Desert, CA
Posts: 2,501
Bikes: Speedvagen Steel
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 428 Post(s)
Liked 243 Times
in
155 Posts
My point wasn't really about hookless rims, specifically... it's that the two tires mentioned were both built to the same standard - which happens to be hookless compliant but, more importantly, is the most well-defined set of specifications in the (admittedly short) history of road tubeless - and should offer a similar experience when it comes to installation. The handful of ETRTO TSS compliant tires, that I've used, have been among the easiest to mount tires in my tubeless journey, whether I put them on hooked or hookless rims.
IOW, unless there's a significant difference, like tire size or sidewall rigidity, I don't see why my 6th set of ETRTO TSS tires would be meaningfully more difficult to handle than the first 5.
IOW, unless there's a significant difference, like tire size or sidewall rigidity, I don't see why my 6th set of ETRTO TSS tires would be meaningfully more difficult to handle than the first 5.
#38
Senior Member
I think it is very specific to the rim/tire combo.
Currently have American Classic alloy rims and Conti 5000's are super easy to mount with hands only. In the past I have used various Michelin tires and even the bike shop struggled like crazy to get them on. So once you find one that works, stick with that one.
Note, not tubeless, regular, old 25mm tire with butyl tube.
Currently have American Classic alloy rims and Conti 5000's are super easy to mount with hands only. In the past I have used various Michelin tires and even the bike shop struggled like crazy to get them on. So once you find one that works, stick with that one.
Note, not tubeless, regular, old 25mm tire with butyl tube.
#39
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,333
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 353 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20620 Post(s)
Liked 9,286 Times
in
4,599 Posts
i would tend to agree with this logic, except I wonder if the hookless rim aspect does play a part. Only because we know the many difficulties I e had with the GP5000’s (and yet I keep going back to that well), yet I e had the exact opposite experience with the Schwalbe’s. First couple of sets went on super easy but were harder to seat, the one I just put on the front was freaking incredible. On in seconds, pumped up with my canister pump no soapy water, mounted complete with sealant in maybe 5 minutes
One of the difficulties with discussing Conti is that many are confused by their nomenclature - the GP5000 TL, their first tubeless tire, is the source for the vast majority of complaints/experiences of horribly tight fits. The GP5000 TL is *not* up to the current ETRTO TSS spec and they have, by all reports, undersized bead diameters.
Conti recently released the GP5000S TR; not nearly as many people have used them yet, but they correct the problem with the TL - the S TR *is* ETRTO TSS compliant, so they should have the same bead diameter, which is a key component of the spec, as the aforementioned Schwalbe, Michelin, Pirelli, etc. All accounts that I've seen on the S TR indicate that their far more manageable than the TL version.
#40
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Palm Desert, CA
Posts: 2,501
Bikes: Speedvagen Steel
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 428 Post(s)
Liked 243 Times
in
155 Posts
I've used some, but not all, of these TSS compliant tires on non-hookless wheels as well - all similar and all easy peasy.
One of the difficulties with discussing Conti is that many are confused by their nomenclature - the GP5000 TL, their first tubeless tire, is the source for the vast majority of complaints/experiences of horribly tight fits. The GP5000 TL is *not* up to the current ETRTO TSS spec and they have, by all reports, undersized bead diameters.
Conti recently released the GP5000S TR; not nearly as many people have used them yet, but they correct the problem with the TL - the S TR *is* ETRTO TSS compliant, so they should have the same bead diameter, which is a key component of the spec, as the aforementioned Schwalbe, Michelin, Pirelli, etc. All accounts that I've seen on the S TR indicate that their far more manageable than the TL version.
One of the difficulties with discussing Conti is that many are confused by their nomenclature - the GP5000 TL, their first tubeless tire, is the source for the vast majority of complaints/experiences of horribly tight fits. The GP5000 TL is *not* up to the current ETRTO TSS spec and they have, by all reports, undersized bead diameters.
Conti recently released the GP5000S TR; not nearly as many people have used them yet, but they correct the problem with the TL - the S TR *is* ETRTO TSS compliant, so they should have the same bead diameter, which is a key component of the spec, as the aforementioned Schwalbe, Michelin, Pirelli, etc. All accounts that I've seen on the S TR indicate that their far more manageable than the TL version.