Carbon fiber bike life span
11-06-22, 07:59 AM
#26
Senior Member
11-06-22, 09:55 AM
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 7,023
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3593 Post(s)
Liked 3,875 Times
in
2,455 Posts
11-06-22, 01:56 PM
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Allen, TX
Posts: 2,593
Bikes: 2021 S-Works Turbo Creo SL, 2020 Specialized Roubaix Expert
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 757 Post(s)
Liked 3,915 Times
in
1,389 Posts
Likes For MattTheHat:
11-06-22, 07:35 PM
#29
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,588
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18044 Post(s)
Liked 4,355 Times
in
3,254 Posts
The new user will surely ride it differently than the original rider. So.
Now, there are several generations of carbon fiber bikes.
- late 70's through 80's. Graftek, Giant CADEX, Colnago Carbitubo. Several other brands too. Steel or aluminum lugs epoxied to carbon fiber tubes.
- 90's. Small carbon fiber tubes and carbon fiber lugs. Constructed like traditional steel bikes, but out of carbon fiber. My Colnago C40.
- 2000's. Oversized tubing, shaped tubes, aero tubes. Some of these are supposed to be quite stiff.
- 2010's. More emphasis on lighter weight. Some compliance with road, but still rigid structure for pedaling.
- 2020's.
Priced equal to their weight in gold.
Rather than simply going by the age of the bike, one might consider the generation of bike, and benefits and flaws with that generation.
I'd probably limit my riding of the first generation metal lugged carbon fiber bikes.
As mentioned, I do ride a 2nd generation carbon fiber lugged bike.
But, realistically, there would be benefits of moving to a third generation Monocoque construction with shaped tubes.
The frames tend to last very well, but they are prone to abrasion and rubbing damage.
Likes For CliffordK:
11-07-22, 12:46 AM
#30
Me duelen las nalgas
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 13,490
Bikes: Centurion Ironman, Trek 5900, Univega Via Carisma, Globe Carmel
Mentioned: 197 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4542 Post(s)
Liked 2,770 Times
in
1,783 Posts
Still have a 1993 Trek 5900 OCLV, their flagship model that year. Don't see any reason not to ride it, other than because it's currently disassembled for a cleanup and rebuild. The frame (minus fork) is a bit lighter than my 2010-era Diamondback Podium, although the hybrid steel/carbon fiber fork on the Trek 5900 that year was a bit heavy. If I could find a reasonably priced all-carbon fiber fork with a one-inch steerer I might try it to lighten the bike even more. But a one-inch carbon fiber steerer might be too narrow to be safe, I dunno.
11-07-22, 03:16 AM
#31
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: insane diego, california
Posts: 8,197
Bikes: 85 pinarello treviso steel, 88 nishiki olympic steel. 95 look kg 131 carbon, 11 trek madone 5.2 carbon
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1591 Post(s)
Liked 2,988 Times
in
1,624 Posts
the 1995 look kg 131 carbon fiber frame is holding up well. well enuff to take it places a road frame shouldn't go.
11-07-22, 06:02 AM
#32
.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Rocket City, No'ala
Posts: 12,760
Bikes: 2014 Trek Domane 5.2, 1985 Pinarello Treviso, 1990 Gardin Shred, 2006 Bianchi San Jose
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 62 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 24 Times
in
11 Posts
I saw many opinions saying that a road carbon fiber bike should be changed after 6,7,10 years, to avoid risk of carbon failure. However, talking about the large pool of riders of carbon bikes from reputable brands, outside of professionals or hard racing world, I wonder:
How many road riders from above category experienced carbon fiber failure from normal riding (no hard crash or misuse), and how long (years or km) did it take for such failure to occur?
How many road riders from above category experienced carbon fiber failure from normal riding (no hard crash or misuse), and how long (years or km) did it take for such failure to occur?
__________________
Likes For bbattle:
11-07-22, 07:30 AM
#33
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: In the south but from North
Posts: 676
Bikes: Turner 5-Spot Burner converted; IBIS Ripley, Specialized Crave, Tommasini Sintesi, Cinelli Superstar, Tommasini X-Fire Gravel
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 391 Post(s)
Liked 367 Times
in
204 Posts
Carbon, while not recyclable (yet), has no "fatigue" life like aluminum and is repairable. To me, that repairability carbon's greatest asset.
11-07-22, 07:40 AM
#34
I don't know.
Join Date: May 2003
Location: South Meriden, CT
Posts: 1,839
Bikes: '90 B'stone RB-1, '92 B'stone RB-2, '89 SuperGo Access Comp, '03 Access 69er, '23 Trek 520, '14 Ritchey Road Logic, '09 Kestrel Evoke, '08 Windsor Tourist, '17 Surly Wednesday, '89 Centurion Accordo, '15 CruX, '17 Ridley X-Night
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 267 Post(s)
Liked 668 Times
in
355 Posts
been wondering about this. I ride a 2009 Kestrel Evoke regularly. The bike has approx. 15k miles on it. I don't want to retire it.
11-07-22, 08:43 AM
#35
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,573
Bikes: too many sparkly Italians, some sweet Americans and a couple interesting Japanese
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 534 Post(s)
Liked 500 Times
in
364 Posts
My 1994 Trek 5500 carbon fiber is 28 this year. It has lots of dings in the paint due to locking it up in the over crowded employee bike enclosure and the lovely Campy Chorus groupset is now pretty sloppy. As a young engineer I worked at Thiokol (rocket motors) and my frame and fork does not have a fatigue limit as said but will degrade from fatigue, differently from metals with a limit which typically surface crack. Fatigue in carbon lay-up can break fibers, cause resin bond to fiber failure or cause fabric layers to separate. Fortunately these conditions can usually be heard if one taps on the fork or frame and the sound is dull, more thud rather than the sharp sound one would expect.
Likes For easyupbug:
Likes For easyupbug:
11-07-22, 11:29 AM
#37
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18882 Post(s)
Liked 10,643 Times
in
6,053 Posts
Road cyclists are terrified of any technology newer than the derailleur.
Likes For Seattle Forrest:
11-07-22, 12:32 PM
#38
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 38,117
Mentioned: 209 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17753 Post(s)
Liked 14,098 Times
in
6,692 Posts
Likes For indyfabz:
11-07-22, 12:59 PM
#39
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Southwestern Ontario
Posts: 4,975
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1487 Post(s)
Liked 1,043 Times
in
527 Posts
Not sure about the acceptability of 'feebray' (feeble phonetic transcription of 'fibré')? A bit lazy, in my opinion, and loses the poseur (fake French) appeal of the original.
Likes For badger1:
11-07-22, 03:41 PM
#40
Klaatu..Verata..Necktie?
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 16,153
Bikes: Litespeed Ultimate, Ultegra; Canyon Endurace, 105; Battaglin MAX, Chorus; Bianchi 928 Veloce; Ritchey Road Logic, Dura Ace; Cannondale R500 RX100; Schwinn Circuit, Sante; Lotus Supreme, Dura Ace
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9267 Post(s)
Liked 10,407 Times
in
5,295 Posts
11-07-22, 04:02 PM
#41
Should Be More Popular
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 42,215
Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix
Mentioned: 556 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21716 Post(s)
Liked 8,158 Times
in
3,815 Posts
11-07-22, 04:05 PM
#42
Klaatu..Verata..Necktie?
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 16,153
Bikes: Litespeed Ultimate, Ultegra; Canyon Endurace, 105; Battaglin MAX, Chorus; Bianchi 928 Veloce; Ritchey Road Logic, Dura Ace; Cannondale R500 RX100; Schwinn Circuit, Sante; Lotus Supreme, Dura Ace
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9267 Post(s)
Liked 10,407 Times
in
5,295 Posts
Likes For genejockey:
11-07-22, 07:01 PM
#43
• —
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Land of Pleasant Living
Posts: 11,574
Bikes: Shmikes
Mentioned: 58 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9599 Post(s)
Liked 5,397 Times
in
2,890 Posts
I’m sure the recommendation is to cut up and landfill your 4 million dollar HH66 after 10 years, lest it disintegrate under you. Not that the people who buy these things have to keep them for that long.
Likes For MoAlpha:
11-07-22, 07:12 PM
#44
Newbie
For most consumer owned bikes, they won't end up in the dump after 10 years. But, will get passed onto someone else that will continue riding the bike, or perhaps stripped to a bare frame and built back up. My Colnago C40 was bought as a bare frame.
The new user will surely ride it differently than the original rider. So.
Now, there are several generations of carbon fiber bikes.
Rather than simply going by the age of the bike, one might consider the generation of bike, and benefits and flaws with that generation.
I'd probably limit my riding of the first generation metal lugged carbon fiber bikes.
As mentioned, I do ride a 2nd generation carbon fiber lugged bike.
But, realistically, there would be benefits of moving to a third generation Monocoque construction with shaped tubes.
The frames tend to last very well, but they are prone to abrasion and rubbing damage.
The new user will surely ride it differently than the original rider. So.
Now, there are several generations of carbon fiber bikes.
- late 70's through 80's. Graftek, Giant CADEX, Colnago Carbitubo. Several other brands too. Steel or aluminum lugs epoxied to carbon fiber tubes.
- 90's. Small carbon fiber tubes and carbon fiber lugs. Constructed like traditional steel bikes, but out of carbon fiber. My Colnago C40.
- 2000's. Oversized tubing, shaped tubes, aero tubes. Some of these are supposed to be quite stiff.
- 2010's. More emphasis on lighter weight. Some compliance with road, but still rigid structure for pedaling.
- 2020's. Priced equal to their weight in gold.
Rather than simply going by the age of the bike, one might consider the generation of bike, and benefits and flaws with that generation.
I'd probably limit my riding of the first generation metal lugged carbon fiber bikes.
As mentioned, I do ride a 2nd generation carbon fiber lugged bike.
But, realistically, there would be benefits of moving to a third generation Monocoque construction with shaped tubes.
The frames tend to last very well, but they are prone to abrasion and rubbing damage.
Likes For znomit:
11-08-22, 05:18 AM
#46
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 7,023
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3593 Post(s)
Liked 3,875 Times
in
2,455 Posts
What?? I guess I totally missed that transition. I'd like to see what you mean by this "burnt MDF plywood" looking material.
11-08-22, 05:19 AM
#47
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 7,023
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3593 Post(s)
Liked 3,875 Times
in
2,455 Posts
Will CF frames outlast this thread?
Likes For PeteHski:
11-08-22, 07:58 AM
#48
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 38,117
Mentioned: 209 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17753 Post(s)
Liked 14,098 Times
in
6,692 Posts
11-08-22, 02:00 PM
#49
Newbie
Not woven fiber. (Seen on late 2000's Campagnolo cranks and I don't know where else it may have started but it's maybe another iteration in your list?)
Likes For Kevinti:
11-08-22, 02:41 PM
#50
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 7,023
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3593 Post(s)
Liked 3,875 Times
in
2,455 Posts
I think what you are seeing there is the use of unidirectional carbon fibre, rather than the more basic bidirectional weave. It is still a layered mat construction (layup), not planks of material. Unidirectional layups can look a little odd because each individual layer is typically pointing in a different direction.
