View Poll Results: Spin Rate
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 126. You may not vote on this poll
What’s Your Spinning RPM on Flats?
#1
😵💫
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Seattle-ish
Posts: 3,778
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1466 Post(s)
Liked 2,711 Times
in
1,557 Posts
What’s Your Spinning RPM on Flats?
I know one rate doesn’t fit all, but am interested in how fast one spins to either maintain or increase speed. Been doing a Zwift training series where the spin rates go what I consider quite high since I am usually happy on the flats about 82 RPM, but that probably is not the most efficient. I read its better to tax the heart by spinning fast on the hills than using ‘hero’ gears and mashing it out. But was is your go-to on the flats and if you are climbing then don’t use the multiple-guess but write out what you spin at on say a 5% sustained climb.
__________________
Road and Mountain 🚴🏾♂️
Road and Mountain 🚴🏾♂️
Last edited by rsbob; 12-06-22 at 03:48 PM.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 36,010
Mentioned: 204 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16569 Post(s)
Liked 11,526 Times
in
5,550 Posts
Whatever suits me at the moment. I’m almost always too busy enjoying the ride to calculate my cadence, but I’d guesstimate around 90 during a road bike ride. Can’t recall ever calculating cadence while touring.
#4
Habitual User
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 3,920
Bikes: 2019 Trek Procliber 9.9 SL, 2018 Storck Fascenario.3 Platinum, 2017 Bear Big Rock 1, 2003 Time VX Special Pro, 2001 Colnago VIP, 1999 Trek 9900 singlespeed, 1977 Nishiki ONP
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2376 Post(s)
Liked 3,696 Times
in
1,765 Posts
On my road bike, rolling along on the flats, I tend to be in the 80s. On sustained climbs I usually feel best around 75-80. On short punches, if I'm seated, I'll usually shoot for a higher cadence (95+).
On my singlespeed MTB, I use whatever it takes, because I'm always in the wrong gear.
On my singlespeed MTB, I use whatever it takes, because I'm always in the wrong gear.
Likes For Eric F:
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Hotel CA / DFW
Posts: 1,405
Bikes: 83 Colnago Super, 87 50th Daccordi, 79 & 87 Guerciotti's, 90s DB/GT Mtn Bikes, 90s Colnago Master and Titanio, 96 Serotta Colorado TG, 95/05 Colnago C40/C50, 06 DbyLS TI, 08 Lemond Filmore FG SS, 12 Cervelo R3, 20/15 Surly Stragler & Steamroller
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 475 Post(s)
Liked 527 Times
in
342 Posts
Depends on bike and gearing but generally I mash around 80
Likes For joesch:
#6
Should Be More Popular
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 39,925
Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix
Mentioned: 539 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19584 Post(s)
Liked 6,244 Times
in
3,023 Posts
Likes For datlas:
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 3,391
Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Volae Team, Focus Mares AL, Nimbus MUni, Trek Roscoe 6, 1987 Centurion SS/FG.
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 697 Post(s)
Liked 1,585 Times
in
810 Posts
When I'm warmed up and comfortable, 90 is where I'll settle. When I'm tired, spinning along at 90 is the fastest way to the finish.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2021
Posts: 1,337
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1770 Post(s)
Liked 331 Times
in
238 Posts
Is the idea of frequent shifting to maintain a desired/efficient cadence becoming more popular with electronic shifting etc? I tend not to switch gears much (out of habit, due to bike limitations) and think my cadence hovers between 70-95. Some of the people I ride with seem to be shifting constantly.
Likes For LarrySellerz:
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 6,558
Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5969 Post(s)
Liked 9,034 Times
in
3,907 Posts
This is a weird question, as it implies that there is some correct answer, some optimal cadence -- and there is not. Even for the same individual, cadence will vary not just according to terrain, but according to ride distance, goals, etc. A lower cadence is generally more metabolically efficient -- so if the goal is to ride for a very long distance, a lower cadence is often desirable. But higher cadences produce more power, and hence are more desirable for, say, a TT, a sprint, or even just a fast training ride or group ride.
And we haven't even gotten into individual physiology, which renders interpersonal comparisons moot. (Or is it mute?
)
And we haven't even gotten into individual physiology, which renders interpersonal comparisons moot. (Or is it mute?

#10
😵💫
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Seattle-ish
Posts: 3,778
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1466 Post(s)
Liked 2,711 Times
in
1,557 Posts
This is a weird question, as it implies that there is some correct answer, some optimal cadence -- and there is not. Even for the same individual, cadence will vary not just according to terrain, but according to ride distance, goals, etc. A lower cadence is generally more metabolically efficient -- so if the goal is to ride for a very long distance, a lower cadence is often desirable. But higher cadences produce more power, and hence are more desirable for, say, a TT, a sprint, or even just a fast training ride or group ride.
And we haven't even gotten into individual physiology, which renders interpersonal comparisons moot. (Or is it mute?
)
And we haven't even gotten into individual physiology, which renders interpersonal comparisons moot. (Or is it mute?


__________________
Road and Mountain 🚴🏾♂️
Road and Mountain 🚴🏾♂️
#11
😵💫
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Seattle-ish
Posts: 3,778
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1466 Post(s)
Liked 2,711 Times
in
1,557 Posts
Yes to both, however they vary significantly based on the type of work out and what stage it is in the workout. However a prescribed cadence/spin of 60 at 120 Watts is not unusual. What is unusual is that there is more effort in just pedaling out of the saddle than being applied to the pedals as IRL. Todays out of the saddle one minute intervals were at 210 Watts and a cadence of 60. By the third and fourth sets my puny legs start screaming for the last 15 seconds.
__________________
Road and Mountain 🚴🏾♂️
Road and Mountain 🚴🏾♂️
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 6,558
Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5969 Post(s)
Liked 9,034 Times
in
3,907 Posts

I will say this: back when I was road racing, I did a lot of high cadence training -- mostly because I had a weak sprint and needed to improve it. Learning to spin smoothly at 115-120 rpm is beneficial -- not just in a sprint, but when bridging up to a group, closing a gap after railing around a corner, etc. It's worth doing, if you're planning to race or just want to keep up on a fast group ride.
Beyond that, anyone who recalls watching Lance Armstrong and Jan Ullrich riding side-by-side will easily recognize that difference cyclists ride well at very different cadences, in normal circumstances.
#13
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 15,117
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 120 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9436 Post(s)
Liked 5,811 Times
in
3,357 Posts
Flat road and no headwind? 80rpm. I'll even drop a cog and fall to 75 for a minute, then shift and get back to 80ish.
No desire to 'spin to win'. I also stand to climb about 500% more than would be 'ideal'. But I am clearly faster when standing to climb- it's been years of climbing to know.
I have a weak spin game.
No desire to 'spin to win'. I also stand to climb about 500% more than would be 'ideal'. But I am clearly faster when standing to climb- it's been years of climbing to know.
I have a weak spin game.
#14
Over the hill
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 23,750
Bikes: Giant Defy
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 688 Post(s)
Liked 750 Times
in
450 Posts
A looooooong time ago, I read an article that claimed that, while there is no set formula, a higher cadence should accompany a higher wattage output. It made sense to me, and I now noticed that I was very comfortable at 90-100 when I was racing and trying to ride fast, but now prefer 80-90 now that I'm just trying to enjoy the ride and stay fit.
__________________
It's like riding a bicycle
It's like riding a bicycle
Likes For urbanknight:
#15
Perceptual Dullard
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,019
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 647 Post(s)
Liked 703 Times
in
292 Posts
Yes to both, however they vary significantly based on the type of work out and what stage it is in the workout. However a prescribed cadence/spin of 60 at 120 Watts is not unusual. What is unusual is that there is more effort in just pedaling out of the saddle than being applied to the pedals as IRL. Todays out of the saddle one minute intervals were at 210 Watts and a cadence of 60. By the third and fourth sets my puny legs start screaming for the last 15 seconds.

#16
😵💫
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Seattle-ish
Posts: 3,778
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1466 Post(s)
Liked 2,711 Times
in
1,557 Posts
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 7,908
Mentioned: 67 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2758 Post(s)
Liked 1,929 Times
in
1,203 Posts
I'm in that 81-90 range during normal conditions, but I generate a lot of heat. If the weather's hot, I might be loping along in the 70ish range in a big gear to keep the heat production down. I rode the Hotter N Hell last year. My average cadence was 69 for the day.
Last edited by seypat; 12-07-22 at 08:18 AM.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 1,520
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 538 Post(s)
Liked 837 Times
in
478 Posts
Probably between 90-100 RPM when cruising.
I am proud to brag that, according to my calculations using gear ratios and speed, I can maintain short bursts over 220rpm when I put my mind/legs to it.
I am proud to brag that, according to my calculations using gear ratios and speed, I can maintain short bursts over 220rpm when I put my mind/legs to it.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 3,119
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1822 Post(s)
Liked 1,504 Times
in
961 Posts
I select RPM based on power output. Higher power = higher RPM. Lower power = lower RPM. It gets into efficiency and which muscle fibers you wish to emphasize.
Lower = 67-73 rpm
Higher = 88-95 RPM
I don't do middle.
Lower = 67-73 rpm
Higher = 88-95 RPM
I don't do middle.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 4,410
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2144 Post(s)
Liked 2,278 Times
in
1,457 Posts
I deliberately mix it up depending on how I feel in the moment. But flats typically 80-90 rpm and sustained seated climbing 70-80 rpm when not gear restricted. Out of the saddle climbing around 60-70 rpm. I also try to train in a very wide range of cadence from 50-130 rpm to provide as much flexibility as possible. In practice I don't like pedalling at a constant cadence for extended periods. I would rather vary my cadence to balance strength vs cardio load.
Likes For PeteHski:
#22
Klaatu..Verata..Necktie?
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 13,016
Bikes: Litespeed Ultimate, Ultegra; Canyon Endurace, 105; Battaglin MAX, Chorus; Bianchi 928 Veloce; Ritchey Road Logic, Dura Ace; Cannondale R500 RX100; Schwinn Circuit, Sante; Lotus Supreme, Dura Ace
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7321 Post(s)
Liked 7,777 Times
in
3,963 Posts
When I'm riding along, not thinking about it on the flats, I'll look down at the Garmin and I'm spinning between 95 and 105. Same thing on Zwift, if I'm riding "alone". If I'm in a pack in a Zwift race following a Pacebot, though, I find myself around 89, and I think it's because at that cadence it's easier for me to do the little spurts of power if I find myself drifting back in the group.
On climbs, both IRL and in Zwift, I find myself seeking a gear which has me at about 85-90 rpm.
On climbs, both IRL and in Zwift, I find myself seeking a gear which has me at about 85-90 rpm.
__________________
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
#23
Newbie racer
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 3,374
Bikes: Propel, red is faster
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1566 Post(s)
Liked 1,535 Times
in
954 Posts
There's practical reasons to both be able to perform at lower and higher cadences with the terrain you encounter or group/race scenario you find yourself in.
I'm going to throw it out there that the mashing phenomenon might work fine for folks riding greenways and C-group rides with zero accelerations. But if you're moving on out and require acceleration, mashing leaves you needing to significantly increase torque rapidly. Which you can do, but you can't do it repeatedly many times. It deals with the type 1, 2a/2b fibers recruited for each type of effort.
Also in situations where an acceleration could happen, it behooves you to not sit around at a lope cadence and caught trying to hammer gear changes to catch up.
Being able to mash some can mean you make it up sharp inclines on gravel rides or cyclocross racing. Being able to spin you can respond to aggressive road situations.
So, you can optimize this for an hour effort or TT or something and self select.........but if you are a one trick pony you probably won't win much or perform well.
Personally I find it super interesting that many folks self select running cadences that are nearly exactly double their cycling one (as cycling requires a full revolution but running counts each foot strike). I ride z2 thru z5 from like 85 to 100 rpm. I run z2 thru z5 at 170 to 190 run cadence. Which would be 85 to 95 equivalent on the bike.
I have a personal theory the bike cadence is some odd physiological adaptation of humans responding over the thousands of years to run stress and stride optimization.
I'm going to throw it out there that the mashing phenomenon might work fine for folks riding greenways and C-group rides with zero accelerations. But if you're moving on out and require acceleration, mashing leaves you needing to significantly increase torque rapidly. Which you can do, but you can't do it repeatedly many times. It deals with the type 1, 2a/2b fibers recruited for each type of effort.
Also in situations where an acceleration could happen, it behooves you to not sit around at a lope cadence and caught trying to hammer gear changes to catch up.
Being able to mash some can mean you make it up sharp inclines on gravel rides or cyclocross racing. Being able to spin you can respond to aggressive road situations.
So, you can optimize this for an hour effort or TT or something and self select.........but if you are a one trick pony you probably won't win much or perform well.
Personally I find it super interesting that many folks self select running cadences that are nearly exactly double their cycling one (as cycling requires a full revolution but running counts each foot strike). I ride z2 thru z5 from like 85 to 100 rpm. I run z2 thru z5 at 170 to 190 run cadence. Which would be 85 to 95 equivalent on the bike.
I have a personal theory the bike cadence is some odd physiological adaptation of humans responding over the thousands of years to run stress and stride optimization.
Likes For burnthesheep:
#24
Perceptual Dullard
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,019
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 647 Post(s)
Liked 703 Times
in
292 Posts
Personally I find it super interesting that many folks self select running cadences that are nearly exactly double their cycling one (as cycling requires a full revolution but running counts each foot strike). I ride z2 thru z5 from like 85 to 100 rpm. I run z2 thru z5 at 170 to 190 run cadence. Which would be 85 to 95 equivalent on the bike.
I have a personal theory the bike cadence is some odd physiological adaptation of humans responding over the thousands of years to run stress and stride optimization.
I have a personal theory the bike cadence is some odd physiological adaptation of humans responding over the thousands of years to run stress and stride optimization.
#25
Newbie racer
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 3,374
Bikes: Propel, red is faster
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1566 Post(s)
Liked 1,535 Times
in
954 Posts
Bike racing requires accelerations you don’t do running. So running you can kind of hone in on a cadence a bit more I feel like. Especially if you do not run a bunch of demanding hills.