5'7" - 5'8" roadies, tell me what size bike you ride
#55
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NJ
Posts: 233
Bikes: Trek 1200 : Trek 3700
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'm 5'7" - 5'8" and I ride a 100% stock Trek 1200 size 56. Tried the 54 but I felt all cramped on it compared to the 56. I have about a 30" inseam but I guess I have a longer reach. My shirt sleeves are 35" to give some sort of reference.
#56
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 122
Bikes: Kona Kikapu Deluxe
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'm 5'7 1/2" and I'm on a Jamis Quest 53cm. I was leaning toward a 55cm at first in an attempt to get the bars as high as possible (did some reading about fit on Rivendell's site) but the 55cm required me to put the seat all the way fwd and I had almost no seat post showing. The 55cm seemed forced and the guys at my LBS watched me ride both and all agreed the 53cm was a better fit. The 53cm had 170mm cranks where the 55cm had 175mm cranks. Two of the guys working there have are 5'10" and 5'11" and are riding 175mm cranks. I have a 30" inseam.
I went in determined not to be sold too small a bike but they were pretty convincing and so far no regrets. I'm new to the road and feel pretty stretched out w/ my hands on the hoods as it is. I think the 55 cm would have required an immediate and radical stem chg and might still have beeen less than ideal.
53cm-54cm is probably a good place to start but try to find someone you trust who can watch you ride and check things like your knee poistion over the peadal spindles, etc. I know there are different sizing philosophies but in the end, if you come at it from a few different directions and arrive at the same choice, you'll come up w/ something that can be tweaked to your body and you won't go too far astray.
I'm certainly no expert but I just went through exactly what you are doing and that's my $.02.
CPW
I went in determined not to be sold too small a bike but they were pretty convincing and so far no regrets. I'm new to the road and feel pretty stretched out w/ my hands on the hoods as it is. I think the 55 cm would have required an immediate and radical stem chg and might still have beeen less than ideal.
53cm-54cm is probably a good place to start but try to find someone you trust who can watch you ride and check things like your knee poistion over the peadal spindles, etc. I know there are different sizing philosophies but in the end, if you come at it from a few different directions and arrive at the same choice, you'll come up w/ something that can be tweaked to your body and you won't go too far astray.
I'm certainly no expert but I just went through exactly what you are doing and that's my $.02.
CPW
#57
Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 49
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Don't know my measurements, but I have a somewhat short inseam. I wear 29 inch pants. I'm 5'7 and I ride a 50cm Trek 2300. The shop put a longer stem on the bike to stretch me out a little and I am perfectly comfortable.
#59
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 7,143
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 261 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times
in
10 Posts
Originally Posted by 50mph
I'm 5'7" 1/2 and ride a 52cm. I could ride a 54 but i like to have the seat higher than the handle bars and i get that more on the 52. Bianchi makes a 53 that is perfect for me too. On a 54 I can't put the seat high enough.
I'm 5'7 by the way.
#60
Batüwü Griekgriek
Join Date: May 2005
Location: NYC - for the moment...
Posts: 2,911
Bikes: 1986 Trek 500 Tri Series, 2005 Cannondale R1000
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
5' 7.75", 29" inseam. (no shoes, so maybe 29.75-30" shod)
I like standover height so I shoot for 29 inches or so max for the bike, and like to get a 54cm TT if I can. 52 or 53 is okay and I adjust with the stem.
My big beef is finding a low TT bike with a seat tube angle under 74 degrees and short chainstays.
Compact geometry - which I admit took me some time to get used to on an aesthetic level - has really proven to be a blessing. I will say I can ride a slightly bigger frame (50, 51cm or so as opposed to my usual 48 - 49cm).
Oh, and I kinda like 165 cranks, though 170s are pretty nice on long hills. If I HAD to pick one length I think I'd go 165 for better spin with my stubby legs.
I like standover height so I shoot for 29 inches or so max for the bike, and like to get a 54cm TT if I can. 52 or 53 is okay and I adjust with the stem.
My big beef is finding a low TT bike with a seat tube angle under 74 degrees and short chainstays.
Compact geometry - which I admit took me some time to get used to on an aesthetic level - has really proven to be a blessing. I will say I can ride a slightly bigger frame (50, 51cm or so as opposed to my usual 48 - 49cm).
Oh, and I kinda like 165 cranks, though 170s are pretty nice on long hills. If I HAD to pick one length I think I'd go 165 for better spin with my stubby legs.
#61
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 7,143
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 261 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times
in
10 Posts
Originally Posted by mirona
32" inseam; 55 TT; 110mm (or is it 100? I can't remember) stem. Spend a good amount of time in the drops riding somewhere between aggressively and leisurely.
If you can only spend 10 minutes on the hoods, the fitting is wrong. A ton of pressure on the hoods is a good determination the fitting is off.
#62
rider of small bicycles
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Rochester, New York
Posts: 1,687
Bikes: Cannondale
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I'm 5' 8.5" with a 30 inch inseem and ride a 55cm Caad7 frame with a 90mm stem. I have a setback seatpost, but mount the saddle in a neutral position relative to the straight portion of the post. It's very comfy for me. The only changes I make mid-season are to raise the seatpost slightly as the season progresses and possibly lower the bars on the stem by swapping out a spacer (depends upon how I feel).
Mark
Mark
#63
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 15
Bikes: Jamis Xenith Pro '05
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I am more between 5'9" -10" and ride a 54 compact frame, slopping top tube. Couldnt get a 54 standard thought since there was no clearance while standing up. For that I will need 52.
Peace
Peace
#65
human
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: living in the moment
Posts: 3,562
Bikes: 2005 Litespeed Teramo, 2000 Marinoni Leggero, 2001 Kona Major Jake (with Campy Centaur), 1997 Specialized S-Works M2, 1992 Specialized Rockhopper
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
51 cm marinoni, 52 cm kona jake the snake, medium [eff. 53 cm] litespeed teramo.
__________________
when walking, just walk. when sitting, just sit. when riding, just ride. above all, don't wobble.
The Irregular Cycling Club of Montreal
Cycling irregularly since 2002
when walking, just walk. when sitting, just sit. when riding, just ride. above all, don't wobble.
The Irregular Cycling Club of Montreal
Cycling irregularly since 2002
#67
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Northwest NJ/Adirondacks
Posts: 93
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'm 5'8'' with a 32.5 inch inseam, I was looking at 54cm frame sizes, since I assumed a 56cm would be a touch too big. Is that the case or could I get away with a 56cm?
#68
Lanterne Rouge
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,993
Bikes: Time VX Edge
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
5'9" w/ 32 inseam
Ride a 548mm top tube. [54cm frame]
172.5 cranks.
70mm stem.
Short stem is due to my body getting used to riding low.
I figure I'll get a 53 cm C'dale for my next bike instead of changing the stem.
HAHAHAHAHA
Ride a 548mm top tube. [54cm frame]
172.5 cranks.
70mm stem.
Short stem is due to my body getting used to riding low.
I figure I'll get a 53 cm C'dale for my next bike instead of changing the stem.
HAHAHAHAHA
#69
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 9,438
Bikes: Trek 5500, Colnago C-50
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
6 Posts
5'8" 32" bicycle inseam 32" pants size.
Trek 5500 56cm, 56.1 top tube, 90mm stem, 30mm spacers, poor fit but a 54cm Trek would be even worse for me because of the huge saddle to bar drop. No more Treks or LeMonds for me.
Colnogo C-50, 55cm C-T, 53.3 top tube, 105mm stem 30mm spacers (I'm old), good fit, able to bend elbows on long rides.
Trek 5500 56cm, 56.1 top tube, 90mm stem, 30mm spacers, poor fit but a 54cm Trek would be even worse for me because of the huge saddle to bar drop. No more Treks or LeMonds for me.
Colnogo C-50, 55cm C-T, 53.3 top tube, 105mm stem 30mm spacers (I'm old), good fit, able to bend elbows on long rides.
#71
Overacting because I can
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: The Mean Streets of Bethesda, MD
Posts: 4,552
Bikes: Merlin Agilis, Trek 1500
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
5'7", 31.5" inseam
I ride a 54cm (c-t) Trek. Fits pretty well. Some have suggested that a 53cm might have been better, but then the top tube (54.6cm I think) would have been a touch short. Anyway, at that level, I think you can make any necessary adjustments with saddle height, saddle fore aft position and stem length.
I ride a 54cm (c-t) Trek. Fits pretty well. Some have suggested that a 53cm might have been better, but then the top tube (54.6cm I think) would have been a touch short. Anyway, at that level, I think you can make any necessary adjustments with saddle height, saddle fore aft position and stem length.
__________________
“Courage is going from failure to failure without losing enthusiasm." (Churchill)
"I am a courageous cyclist." (SpongeDad)
“Courage is going from failure to failure without losing enthusiasm." (Churchill)
"I am a courageous cyclist." (SpongeDad)
#72
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 365
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times
in
6 Posts
Im about 5'10" and ride a 52in frame. 2003 Felt F65. I am a leuisure/recreational rider that loves sprinting down flats and semi inclined roads. I dont bomb down hills at 50mph, but will do 50 mile rides when I can. I love the extra standover height I got from the 52 instead of the 54. My bike feels lighter and much better to handle like I have total control and can whip it around. I have plenty of seat post height and used a 110mm stem with a 15 degree rise. My fit feels perfect, love riding it under any conditions (traffic, paths, streets) and any pace. I might go out and do 25 miles leisurely around the city at around 12mph, or crank out a 40 mile ride at 17-20 miles per hour. Get the frame that feels best for you, and then adjust by swapping the stem and adjusting the seat. Just my two cents based on my experience. I made some nice changes this year to my fit and the improvement regarding speed and comfort is unbelievable.
#73
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Beautiful Long Beach California
Posts: 3,589
Bikes: Eddy Merckx San Remo 76, Eddy Merckx San Remo 76 - Black Silver and Red, Eddy Merckx Sallanches 64 (2); Eddy Merckx MXL;
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 143 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Five seven riding a 55 center to center
#74
A Little Bent
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Struggling up a hillside in Vermont, USA... ..........................................
Posts: 2,858
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
OLD THREAD
Maybe start a new one...
I am 5' 7" but have an inseam of 32.5"...
Long legs and short torso creates problems...
Height alone is only part of the equation...
I ride 52 cm bikes because I need the short top tube...
I also then need some spacers because I have a short reach...
Maybe start a new one...
I am 5' 7" but have an inseam of 32.5"...
Long legs and short torso creates problems...
Height alone is only part of the equation...
I ride 52 cm bikes because I need the short top tube...
I also then need some spacers because I have a short reach...
__________________
#75
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: A Coffin Called Earth. or Toronto, ON
Posts: 12,257
Bikes: Bianchi, Miyata, Dahon, Rossin
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
nope.
__________________
Food for thought: if you aren't dead by 2050, you and your entire family will be within a few years from starvation. Now that is a cruel gift to leave for your offspring. ;)
https://sanfrancisco.ibtimes.com/arti...ger-photos.htm
Food for thought: if you aren't dead by 2050, you and your entire family will be within a few years from starvation. Now that is a cruel gift to leave for your offspring. ;)
https://sanfrancisco.ibtimes.com/arti...ger-photos.htm