Zipp 303S owners... Please step on in.
#76
Advocatus Diaboli
The logic that they have to push hookless because they don't have an alternative makes no sense. Zipp has sold hooked/tubeless rims for years.
They currently sell rim-brake versions of the 303, 404 and 808 and they are all hooked/tubeless.
l
They currently sell rim-brake versions of the 303, 404 and 808 and they are all hooked/tubeless.
l

#77
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Midwest
Posts: 2,509
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1251 Post(s)
Liked 1,260 Times
in
740 Posts
On a hooked rim this 74psi is a recommendation, not a maximum. You can run higher pressures on hooked rims. If you like higher pressures you shouldn't get hookless.
#78
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Well I put the wheels on today and I am very pleased with the look. Now to wait for springtime in Michigan!

__________________
BMC Roadmachine
Kona Jake the Snake
BMC Roadmachine
Kona Jake the Snake
Likes For garysol1:
#79
Senior Member
Hookless in MTB rims equates to better impact resistance. That was the biggest benefit that lead to the practically universal (vast majority of manufacturers anyway) adoption of hookless carbon MTB rims. I'm not sure that is as important on road at 60-70 PSI but the odd pothole can suddenly decide to show up. Is there a disadvantage if you don't run more than 70 PSI? I'm running 55-65 PSI and my new road bike has hookless carbon rims. It works well with tubeless 32s. Being a mountain biker primarily, I'm comfortable with hookless and tubeless on road and gravel, though hooked rims are fine too. In fact, I almost bought a hooked tubeless carbon wheelset last year, giving up mainly due to the shifting delivery time.
Likes For Chandne:
#80
Method to My Madness
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 2,616
Bikes: Trek FX 2, Cannondale Synapse, Cannondale CAAD4, Santa Cruz Stigmata GRX
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1329 Post(s)
Liked 917 Times
in
667 Posts
Hookless in MTB rims equates to better impact resistance. That was the biggest benefit that lead to the practically universal (vast majority of manufacturers anyway) adoption of hookless carbon MTB rims. I'm not sure that is as important on road at 60-70 PSI but the odd pothole can suddenly decide to show up. Is there a disadvantage if you don't run more than 70 PSI? I'm running 55-65 PSI and my new road bike has hookless carbon rims. It works well with tubeless 32s. Being a mountain biker primarily, I'm comfortable with hookless and tubeless on road and gravel, though hooked rims are fine too. In fact, I almost bought a hooked tubeless carbon wheelset last year, giving up mainly due to the shifting delivery time.
Likes For SoSmellyAir:
#81
Full Member
Hookless in MTB rims equates to better impact resistance. That was the biggest benefit that lead to the practically universal (vast majority of manufacturers anyway) adoption of hookless carbon MTB rims. I'm not sure that is as important on road at 60-70 PSI but the odd pothole can suddenly decide to show up. Is there a disadvantage if you don't run more than 70 PSI? I'm running 55-65 PSI and my new road bike has hookless carbon rims. It works well with tubeless 32s. Being a mountain biker primarily, I'm comfortable with hookless and tubeless on road and gravel, though hooked rims are fine too. In fact, I almost bought a hooked tubeless carbon wheelset last year, giving up mainly due to the shifting delivery time.
#82
Senior Member
Yeah, if running narrower tires, there is no need. It may even be preferable to run hooked on 25 for sure and even 28s or the tires bead MAY fall away from the rim bead when deflated. I run 32s though and am very comfortable with tubeless in general. I am currently waiting for my custom ZIPPs. The FedEx guy will not escape with them today.