Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Carbon Fiber Warning

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Carbon Fiber Warning

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-12-06, 09:35 AM
  #151  
Senior Member
 
doctorSpoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 523
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by alanbikehouston
I am amazed that any literate person could carefully read, study, and think about Trek's warnings about the nature of how carbon tubes fail and then post to say "Golly, I don't think it is possible that a carbon fork could suddenly fail..." Does anyone really think Trek is making this up?
I was with you when you were simply stating that you need to inspect and give care to carbon parts differently than metal/steel but you are taking it a little far now...

even aluminum over time fails like carbon does too... i've been around long enough to see two seat posts that looked just fine break suddendly as well as a handle bar and last summer an aluminum crank crack just above the pedal and fall off... we had to push the guy for 30 clicks

Originally Posted by alanbikehouston
Several posters have asked: "Well, steel forks break and carbon forks break, so what difference is there between them?"

The difference is simple. Pick up a paper clip. Bend it until it loses its shape. The metal is bent, but it continues to hold together. That is how a steel tube functions under stress. You can take a crowbar, and bend a well-made steel bike frame until the frame is twisted like a pretzel, and the frame still will not break. Heck, you might even be able to realign the tubes enough to make the bike rideable.

In contrast, a carbon tube is like a crisp pretzel. Twist it a little, and nothing happens. Twist or stress a pretzel until it begins to bend, and it suddenly snaps into pieces.
the other difference is that it takes 3 to 5 times more force to get the carbon to break than it does to get the steel to bend out of shape and since the steel is likely built with a 3x safety factor you are likely not going to get the cabon to break unless something really, really, REALLY bad happens..


Originally Posted by alanbikehouston
Does anyone think that the engineers at Easton are lying about their carbon handlebars? Easton warns its customers to ONLY use a torque wrench to tighten the stem around a Easton carbon handlebar. And, they warn that if while tightening the stem, you hear a "cracking" noise, you should immediately replace the bar with a new bar, even if there is no visible damage to the handlebar. So, is Easton lying about their own products?...
everyone knows (should know at least) that carbon has all of it's strength along the fiber, so if you are stessing it perpendicular to the fibers as you would be when clamping it, it has almost no strength so it is easy to crush it (and set yourself up for a catastrophic but easliy forseen failure down the road) unless you use a torque wrench etc. etc. just as carbon parts manufactures say you should... part of the special care, but when installed properly and subjected to the stresses it was intended it will perform as intended... this really has nothing to do with carbon spontaneously self destructing... you are talking here about improper installation.. but irregardless of material improper installation will likely lead to failures... i agree that carbon does requires special care... it's not steel.. but it doesn't just blow it self to bit just because it's Tuesday and Venus is aligned with Pluto.

[Edit]will give you this... it is WAY easier to over torque a carbon seatpost or bars than it is for metal seat post or bars, i.e. get the installation wrong.. that's is one of the bad things about carbon... no strength perpendicular to the fibers[Edit]

Last edited by doctorSpoc; 01-12-06 at 09:42 AM.
doctorSpoc is offline  
Old 01-12-06, 10:57 AM
  #152  
2-Cyl, 1/2 HP @ 90 RPM
 
slvoid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 15,762

Bikes: 04' Specialized Hardrock Sport, 03' Giant OCR2 (SOLD!), 04' Litespeed Firenze, 04' Giant OCR Touring, 07' Specialized Langster Comp

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Sorry, I choose to buy titanium, could've had a cheap carbon bike for LESS.
Don't get your aluminium bike near mercury either!

Originally Posted by DocRay
NO. It will lead to galvanic corrosion and _maybe_ a stuck seat post, which can be fixed with grease, according to Zinn.

Read this (if you can)

Listen guys, if you can't afford CF, too bad, but don't make stuff up just to make yourself feel important. I'm getting sick and tired of BF "expert warnings" that are nothing but fabrications to justify some moronic opinion on a choice of purchase.
slvoid is offline  
Old 01-12-06, 11:01 AM
  #153  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 137
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Hahaha. I have taken graduate level strength of materials classes and destroyed composites in the lab, its fun. And this thread makes me laugh. I want to know where people got the idea to treat carbon fiber like their grandmothers china. Like doctorspoc said just install it right. And if you know what to look for the odds of "spontanious & catastrophic failure" are small.
Also from an engineering standpoint if you impact carbon and it breaks, and you impact steel and it bends, they are both termed as failures of the material. when the steel bends it means that the max stress went past the yeild for the material and plastic deformation takes place. This significantly weakens the material, yup you may be able to ride it for a bit more, but not safely. Whoever made the comment about the imploding fork, thats funny.
spacefuzz is offline  
Old 01-12-06, 11:02 AM
  #154  
Hiracer
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Puget Sound
Posts: 460

Bikes: Bacchetta Aero, Bacchetta Strada, Diamondback MTB, Lemond Sarthe DF

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by roadwarrior
Last...a question for anyone who might know....the guy that was killed...was he wearing a helmet? I am just curious. It sounds like (after sorting through the gobbledygoop in this thread) he hit his head.
Joyce was wearing a helmet per a newspaper article cited in this thread.
hiracer is offline  
Old 01-12-06, 11:07 AM
  #155  
Hiracer
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Puget Sound
Posts: 460

Bikes: Bacchetta Aero, Bacchetta Strada, Diamondback MTB, Lemond Sarthe DF

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by spacefuzz
Whoever made the comment about the imploding fork, thats funny.
Haha. Not funny when there is a nonvisible manufacturing defect in YOUR fork. Or when you buy a used, crash compromised fork.

Old engineering saying: In theory there is no difference between practice and theory. In practice there is.

Bottom line: Carbon is stiff, light, and tough. And it has a dangerous failure mode for bicycles. You can ignore the failure mode only on the assumption that it will not fail. The vast majority of the time, that assumption is valid. Once in a great while, it's not.
hiracer is offline  
Old 01-12-06, 11:17 AM
  #156  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 137
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I never said ignore the failure mode, I said you can sometimes avert failure if you know what your looking for and inspect your bike. I have personally crashed my carbon fork, twice. And both times I brought it in to the trek dealer and also went over every inch of it myself. I still trust it.

And whats funny about an imploding fork is that an implosion implies things getting sucked/crushed inwards, if a carbon fork were to shatter, it would technically explode. Relax all of the carbon bikes arent going to randomly self destruct.
spacefuzz is offline  
Old 01-12-06, 11:34 AM
  #157  
Hiracer
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Puget Sound
Posts: 460

Bikes: Bacchetta Aero, Bacchetta Strada, Diamondback MTB, Lemond Sarthe DF

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by spacefuzz
And whats funny about an imploding fork is that an implosion implies things getting sucked/crushed inwards, if a carbon fork were to shatter, it would technically explode.
Of course you are right from an engineering perspective. But a little literary license never killed anybody. "Imploding" invokes a much more vivid mental image.
hiracer is offline  
Old 01-12-06, 11:49 AM
  #158  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 137
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by hiracer
Of course you are right from an engineering perspective. But a little literary license never killed anybody. "Imploding" invokes a much more vivid mental image.
dont forget the carbon fiber shrapnal that impales the innocent bystandars.
spacefuzz is offline  
Old 01-12-06, 12:08 PM
  #159  
Hiracer
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Puget Sound
Posts: 460

Bikes: Bacchetta Aero, Bacchetta Strada, Diamondback MTB, Lemond Sarthe DF

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by spacefuzz
dont forget the carbon fiber shrapnal that impales the innocent bystandars.
Just to close the circle and maybe this thread, I do believe Trek screwed up and completely forgot to mention any warning about that shrapnel. Somebody should email them. They need better lawyers.
hiracer is offline  
Old 01-12-06, 12:12 PM
  #160  
Shoes For Industry
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: NE Arkansas
Posts: 129

Bikes: Trek Madone 5.2

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by kahn
And I guess Trek is worried about my safety. I got their "carbon fiber letter" today. As a matter of fact they must be very concerned since I got three separate copies. Hmm, wonder if I can get three replacement bikes?

Interesting - three pages - there is the letter, the graphic from the webpage and a 3rd page showing a DECAL and two images of where the decal should be placed. It is as if they expected you to place said decal on the top tube but there is no decal in the packet. (was it originally on the bike and removed?).
I couldn't find it at first, either. Turns out it's stuck to the back of page 2. As an aside, is anyone going to afix this decal to the top tube as per the instructions? Sort of dorks up the paint scheme for me.

Regardless, I inspect my bike prior to every ride.
NickExxon is offline  
Old 01-25-06, 03:48 PM
  #161  
2l8
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 34
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
man now i'm terrified.
here i am deciding on whether to go with a giant tcr2, a specialized roubaix expert, or a trek 5200 for my FIRST BIKE.

now i'm terrified the whole carbon bike will shatter underneath me and i'll be impaled on my frame or worse it'll fail while im going 30+ mph and i'll fly head first into the pavement never to be able to walk again.

how concerned should i be since i am considering a carbon frame as my first bike?
2l8 is offline  
Old 01-25-06, 03:53 PM
  #162  
Bye Bye
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Gone gone gone
Posts: 3,677
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by 2l8
man now i'm terrified.
here i am deciding on whether to go with a giant tcr2, a specialized roubaix expert, or a trek 5200 for my FIRST BIKE.

now i'm terrified the whole carbon bike will shatter underneath me and i'll be impaled on my frame or worse it'll fail while im going 30+ mph and i'll fly head first into the pavement never to be able to walk again.

how concerned should i be since i am considering a carbon frame as my first bike?

Bikes are typically ridden, not crashed on a daily basis.
I would not worry. If you have a wreck, drop, or scratch, take it to your LBS for an inspection.

If you plan on beating the bike with a chain, knocking it over on an hourly basis, running into things, hopping off every single curb, cliff, or drop you find, taking it to the BMX park, getting big air, etc.... carbon may not be for you.
bmike is offline  
Old 01-25-06, 07:24 PM
  #163  
Burning Matches.
 
ElJamoquio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 9,714
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4077 Post(s)
Liked 1,002 Times in 676 Posts
Originally Posted by spacefuzz
dont forget the carbon fiber shrapnal that impales the innocent bystandars.
I hear Trek is making lots of money now. Can I be an innocent bystander? Anyone care to be a paid witness?
ElJamoquio is offline  
Old 01-25-06, 07:36 PM
  #164  
Chairman of the Bored
 
catatonic's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: St. Petersburg, FL
Posts: 5,825

Bikes: 2004 Raleigh Talus, 2001 Motobecane Vent Noir (Custom build for heavy riders)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Good call Alan.

I usually don't agree with many of your posts, but this one I definately agree on.

Composites are not something to just put blind faith into. I retired a fork that might have seen 3 years more service, just out of a safety concern...namely the resin top layer around the bonding point of the CF legs to the alloy crown had a very fine stress mark in it...just enough to give that section of resin a slight haze...polishing didn't get it out...so replacing it was the safe thing to do. For me my bike is not a toy...it's my primary transportation...so I can't afford to take risks like that.

Plus hospitals suck
catatonic is offline  
Old 02-08-06, 01:08 AM
  #165  
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 29
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Hey let's leave all the lawyers alone . If Carbon failure is a real possibility be glad that the lawyers advised Trek, and others to give these warnings so that we as consumers can make an educated selection of equipment. Or do those that want to deny the possible dangers want to blindly choose their equipment? I'd rather be as informed as possible, it's the same reason all medicines have so many warnings. Not to scare people, just to give as much info as possible...
Cayman is offline  
Old 02-08-06, 02:26 AM
  #166  
Now Racer Ex
 
Vinokurtov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,709
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by alanbikehouston
Of course, most of us SAW Lance crack the chainstay on his carbon frame in a very minor low speed crash a couple of years ago, as that crash video has been replayed endlessly. Who has ever seen a steel chain stay snap under similar conditions?
Alan, your initial post was spot on and good advice for riders of ANY material bike (If you crash, check things carefully).

I have not been able to get in touch with Iban Mayo to have him run over my steel bike going 18 MPH, so I can't say if a steel chain stay would snap under similar circumstances. My guess would be if a 140 pound rider rode over a lightweight steel bike at this speed, there might be some damage. And if someone ran you over at that speed, or ran you over at all, I'm somewhat skeptical you'd refer to it as "minor".

I also would note that Mr. Armstrong finished the stage and in fact, won, with a broken chainstay. And I recall that one rider had his steel forks snap during a TDF stage, one of many steel failures in that race over the years. And in my younger days I broke at least a dozen frames, all of which were steel.

Don't dilute an excellent point with revisionist history or by assigning claims of super durability to a particular material.
Vinokurtov is offline  
Old 02-08-06, 03:23 PM
  #167  
Banned
 
wagathon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,728
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Vinokurtov
. . . Don't dilute an excellent point with revisionist history or by assigning claims of super durability to a particular material.
I consider a pedal spindle to be about as beefy as components get. Nevertheless, I was on a ride when a Canadian physical therapy major snapped one off at the crank arm. He hitched a ride to the closest town, which was a small place, and told the first kid he saw that he'd buy a new peddle. When we rode through town, he was surrounded by about five kids on bmx-type bikes, each with an assortment of pedals. My guess is that 20 or more bikes in that town were probably short one pedal that day.
wagathon is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.