Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Health Concerns involving Carbon Nanotube Technology

Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Health Concerns involving Carbon Nanotube Technology

Old 03-05-06, 08:03 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: depends on weather
Posts: 1,513
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Health Concerns involving Carbon Nanotube Technology

A buddy of mind was mentioning some possible health concerns regarding the technology. I was wondering if anyone else had read anything, or considered the risks. CF is known to be toxic, but to what extent I'm not sure. Now that CN is on the market, I'm interested in what risks it poses.

Here's one of many articles
https://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpag...50C0A9629C8B63
But yesterday's report is the latest of several that raise questions about the potential health and environmental effects of synthetic nanoscale materials. Other researchers, including Dr. Oberdörster's father, Günter Oberdörster, a professor of environmental medicine at the University of Rochester, have shown that such particles can enter the brain. The fish studies, however, were the first to indicate destruction of lipid cells, the most common form of brain tissue.
From what I was told, the scary prospect CN technology poses is that the particles are small enough to pass through the blood/brain barrier. Where as normal particles, the kinds we encounter in nature are large enough that the mesh (or whatever the barrier consists of) are large enough, that they are repelled.

Also considering that Easton is probably manufactured in Taiwan or China, I'm conserned about the manufacturing conditions in the factories. Are the employees wearing resporators? Have enough studies been conducted to show if there are real risks with CN tech? Probably not.
brianallan is offline  
Old 03-05-06, 08:11 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,410
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks for the repost?

Why did you choose to make a thread out of your reply?
Pretty lame.
tekhna is offline  
Old 03-05-06, 10:50 PM
  #3  
Prefers Cicero
 
cooker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 12,870

Bikes: 1984 Trek 520; 2007 Bike Friday NWT; misc others

Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3942 Post(s)
Liked 114 Times in 89 Posts
https://www.i-sis.org.uk/nanotubestoxic.php
cooker is offline  
Old 03-05-06, 10:57 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
CPcyclist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,646

Bikes: Lemond Arrivee, Felt F1 Road, Tomac Revolver(full), GT race (hardtail)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Time to quick get a BMC frame and EC 90 SLK cnt fork and bars before they get pulled.....please.
CPcyclist is offline  
Old 03-06-06, 12:04 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 1,453
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
I thought Easton forks were made in Mexico...
K6-III is offline  
Old 03-06-06, 12:22 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Bobatin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Newnan, GA
Posts: 402
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
So Easton is making forks using carbon nanotube technology?

Is it April 1st already?
Bobatin is offline  
Old 03-06-06, 12:44 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 1,453
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
They claim to use Carbon Nanotube Technology on forks and handlebars. As I understand it, they're using nanotubes to reinforce the voids in carbon fiber. They, like everyone else, can't mass produce long strands of nanotubes yet.
K6-III is offline  
Old 03-06-06, 02:13 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Bobatin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Newnan, GA
Posts: 402
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Alright so they are mixing the nanotubes with the resin so the only people who would be exposed are the people making the nanotubes and thos mixing the resin. The people doing any sanding should be wearing respirators any way since carbon fiber dust is realy bad for you.
Bobatin is offline  
Old 03-06-06, 10:38 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: New Jersey, USA
Posts: 1,007
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
The term "synthetic nanoscale materials" covers a wide range of possibilities. I don't think the professor had the simple carbon nanotubes used in bike components in mind. These are no more likely to be a problem that what is currently used for carbon components. In fact, they probably don't really offer any advantages over standard components at the current level of development.

Yes, a lot of these companies probably move their manufacturing to China, Mexico etc. so that the workers and environment can be more effectively exploited. That is a problem that goes way beyond nanotube technology....
jemoryl is offline  
Old 03-06-06, 11:55 AM
  #10  
DocRay
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
Nanotubes are not in use at commercial scale.
Easton advertises "nanotechnology" which is some meaningless marketing term.

CF has been used in auto racing since 1982 - 24 years later, no catastrophies.
 
Old 03-06-06, 01:14 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
turbominnow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 401

Bikes: Schwinn

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I was at a nano symposium a few months ago. Most of the research being presented on the health/enviromental side had to deal with non-functional group buckyballs. Even then the studies were done envitro, however they did find that the said buckyballs were pretty toxic to the lipid layer. SWNT's, single walled nano tubes are pretty harmless.

The biggest problem with nano particles is keeping them from clumping togther. In all honesty I don't think we have to much to worry about. In the US we are still under the assumption that coal is a reasonible source of electricty comapred to nuclear power.
__________________
Merlin TR3/2.5
The only Grey Matter, Ride Ti, everything else is...just a toy
turbominnow is offline  
Old 03-06-06, 01:23 PM
  #12  
Dumb@s$ Jarhead
 
mrt10x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Woodland Park CO
Posts: 1,110

Bikes: Calfee Dragon Fly Pro 1984 Pinarello Montello

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by turbominnow
I was at a nano symposium a few months ago. Most of the research being presented on the health/enviromental side had to deal with non-functional group buckyballs. Even then the studies were done envitro, however they did find that the said buckyballs were pretty toxic to the lipid layer. SWNT's, single walled nano tubes are pretty harmless.

The biggest problem with nano particles is keeping them from clumping togther. In all honesty I don't think we have to much to worry about. In the US we are still under the assumption that coal is a reasonible source of electricty comapred to nuclear power.
he said buckyballs
mrt10x is offline  
Old 03-06-06, 01:24 PM
  #13  
Globo Gym lifetime member
 
Cypress's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Salem, Oregon
Posts: 5,204

Bikes: Fast ones

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 410 Post(s)
Liked 614 Times in 306 Posts
indicate destruction of lipid cells
Weight loss!
__________________
Cypress is offline  
Old 03-06-06, 03:31 PM
  #14  
DocRay
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
Originally Posted by turbominnow
I was at a nano symposium a few months ago. Most of the research being presented on the health/enviromental side had to deal with non-functional group buckyballs. Even then the studies were done envitro, however they did find that the said buckyballs were pretty toxic to the lipid layer. SWNT's, single walled nano tubes are pretty harmless.

The biggest problem with nano particles is keeping them from clumping togther. In all honesty I don't think we have to much to worry about. In the US we are still under the assumption that coal is a reasonible source of electricty comapred to nuclear power.
Buckyballs are also being used for drug delivery, and carbon fibres are even implanted to replace some bad ligament damage.
You will get 1000X more carbon toxicity from downtown traffic, or the current republican emission policies.

Don't smoke your forks kids.
 
Old 03-06-06, 03:39 PM
  #15  
Brifters!
 
MrDepictor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 32

Bikes: Handbuilt Litespeed & Kona

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Crap.. and here I am Dremeling the top of my carbon steerer off over the bathroom sink. There's no warning label on the fork to not do that ya know
MrDepictor is offline  
Old 03-06-06, 03:43 PM
  #16  
DocRay
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
Originally Posted by MrDepictor
Crap.. and here I am Dremeling the top of my carbon steerer off over the bathroom sink. There's no warning label on the fork to not do that ya know
this is gonna kill the carbon fiber bong market.
 
Old 03-06-06, 06:44 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
Bobatin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Newnan, GA
Posts: 402
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Nanotubes are not in use at commercial scale.
Easton advertises "nanotechnology" which is some meaningless marketing term.

CF has been used in auto racing since 1982 - 24 years later, no catastrophies.
Did you read how they are using it? It is not the same sa what we are used to. The people who could get hurt by the cf are not going to be reported on, are a small group, and the potential health problems are cumulative so they would take a long time to show up. Be careful of cf splinters they have to be cut out.
Bobatin is offline  
Old 03-06-06, 08:47 PM
  #18  
Member
 
ebikeva's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: SW virginia
Posts: 31

Bikes: Bianchi Daytona

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Carbon nanotubes! Run away! Run away!

Actually nanotubes are quite large, tens of microns long. And they clump up really badly. They have been used to strengthen some creamics, but are a bit fragile.

Worry instead about small micron sized particulates from engines and powerplants that get lodged in your lungs.
ebikeva is offline  
Old 03-06-06, 10:08 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 76
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
It's nice that you consider the health risks to the employees of American companies in other countries. I can't speak for Taiwan, but in China American companies abide by the same manufacturing standards and OSHA regs as their home base state. They are obligated to, as if they didn't and they were found to be negligent, it owuld be business gloom and doom for them. The days of Dow Chem polluting the Earth are basically going away, fortunately. (But Chinese companies in China are still bastards! 2008 "Green" Olympics? I don't think so!)
It's a good supposition, and there may be plenty of scientific info on the web about it. Look for it.
sunday driver is offline  
Old 03-06-06, 10:18 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 76
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Didn't they say the same thing about asbestos in the 50's and catalytic convertors in the 70's?
sunday driver is offline  
Old 03-06-06, 10:50 PM
  #21  
Prefers Cicero
 
cooker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 12,870

Bikes: 1984 Trek 520; 2007 Bike Friday NWT; misc others

Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3942 Post(s)
Liked 114 Times in 89 Posts
Originally Posted by sunday driver
Didn't they say the same thing about asbestos in the 50's and catalytic convertors in the 70's?
Yeah, well, asbestos is highly toxic. Tiny airborne fibres are spikey and sharp, and get trapped in the narrowest passages of the lung where they cause chronic progressive inflammation and permanent damage. They can also cause a serious cancer called mesothelioma.

One worry about carbon nanotubes is that tiny airborne fragments will also be spiculated and capable of lodging in the lung and doing permanent damage. Airborne diesel particulate pollution is nasty, but at least those particles are smoother, so a greater proportion of the inhaled load can be coughed out.

Carbon fibre is not nanotubes. Here is a link to an article suggesting inhaled carbon fibre particles are much less toxic than quartz or chrysotile (asbestos) dust, and much more like fairly harmless titanium dust. So fork dremelers like MrDepictor can relax a bit.
cooker is offline  
Old 03-07-06, 10:07 AM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
turbominnow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 401

Bikes: Schwinn

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DocRay
You will get 1000X more carbon toxicity from downtown traffic
I dunno about that Doc

Simple fix found for toxicity of fullerene clusters in water
Much attention has been paid recently to the toxic effects of nanomaterials, especially a water-soluble form of the molecule known alternately as C60, buckminsterfullerene or, simply, buckyball. These hollow, soccer-ball shaped molecules can cluster together into nanoscale crystals—dubbed “nano-C60”—that become active in watery environments. Soluble nano-C60 clusters have been shown in the lab to be cytotoxic, that is, to kill cells in culture and have been linked by a CBEN collaborator to brain damage in large-mouth bass. Researchers Vicki Colvin, Jennifer West, and Joe Hughes at Rice University’s Center for Biological and Environmental Nanotechnology have discovered a simple way to turn the toxicity off, like sliding a dimmer switch on a lamp, by attaching small molecular fragments to the surface of the hollow cages in a process known as functionalization. Figure 6.1 shows the differential cytotoxicity of a series of nano-C60 clusters where the C60 molecules have been functionalized to varying degrees. Non-functionalized fullerenes, the form used in the fish study, are toxic to half of the cells in culture at a concentration of 20 parts per billion (ppb). This is more toxic than many other organic molecules including paraquat, which is used as a pesticide. However, by attaching an increasing number of small molecular fragments to the surface of the cages, the cytotoxicity can be made to decrease steadily until, for a fully functionalized fullerene, it was not possible to add enough nano-C60 to kill half the cells. This important study demonstrates that the risks of nanomaterials are highly dependent on the specific form of the material, and that simple strategies can be found to minimize these risks.
Link for toxicity here: https://cben.rice.edu/about.cfm?doc_id=4999
Link for functionalization here: https://cohesion.rice.edu/centersandi...fm?doc_id=5101


or the current republican emission policies.
I would love to see the imperical data on that.
__________________
Merlin TR3/2.5
The only Grey Matter, Ride Ti, everything else is...just a toy
turbominnow is offline  
Old 03-07-06, 02:44 PM
  #23  
DocRay
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
You mean empirical data, but that's not what you want, you want the statistical data with measures. Check out asthma and lung disease rates since GW dropped most industrial emission standards, especially in Texas.
Fullerenes are not nanotubes.

for those with steel frames:

https://www.vitamins-nutrition.org/vi...-overdose.html

and someone should really start a thread about the danger of water in waterbottles. Water can drown. I read it on the internet.
 
Old 03-07-06, 03:41 PM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
turbominnow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 401

Bikes: Schwinn

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DocRay
Fullerenes are not nanotubes.
I know, and if you follow the link they test the toxicity of both.

Check out asthma and lung disease rates since GW dropped most industrial emission standards, especially in Texas.
I would still love to see the data. I am checking out the ALA website and thier most current data is from 2002. Are you talking about the clear skies program? Has that even pasted through congress? If I am not mistaken the clear skies program deals with future air qualty atainment issues enacted from the '70 clean air act.
__________________
Merlin TR3/2.5
The only Grey Matter, Ride Ti, everything else is...just a toy
turbominnow is offline  
Old 03-07-06, 04:04 PM
  #25  
DocRay
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
Go to a political forum for the details, but Texas now has environmental emissions worse than Mexico, and Houston is one of the most polluted cities on earth. All from GWB policies since governor.
 

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.