![]() |
This bike is light.
|
When he does find time to ride it, it will pick up some dust, thereby gaining weight and ruining everything. :) |
Originally Posted by rufvelo
When he does find time to ride it, it will pick up some dust, thereby gaining weight and ruining everything. :)
Picking up dust might double it's weight. |
Actually, there's one that weighs around 8.0lbs made with optimized Record components, and a new '06 Ghisallo frame. I think I saw a pic of it from the interbike show.
|
2 Attachment(s)
The build may be suitable for riding in a vaccuum chamber or possibly on a track (less the 7-speed cluster). I found that anything under 17 starts to lose stability. I have a 17.2 titanium which is perfect , a 16.3 alloy-carbon which rides OK, a 15.6 (S-Works) which is "skiddish" at best, and my Colorado climbing bike (Calfee Tetra) at 14 lbs. 13 oz. which is AWESOME for climbing miles into the atmosphere but an absolute B!&*CH to hold a line when descending. The thing gets so loose on switchbacks and crosswinds that it is almost unreasonable to ride. On flats against the wind, there is no momentum to carry the wheels forward. Heck, flats WITH the wind is almost too much of an effort to keep the cranks turning.
The pic with the scale is without pedals (13 lbs. 15 oz.). |
Originally Posted by rufvelo
When he does find time to ride it, it will pick up some dust, thereby gaining weight and ruining everything. :)
|
Originally Posted by Patriot
Actually, there's one that weighs around 8.0lbs made with optimized Record components, and a new '06 Ghisallo frame. I think I saw a pic of it from the interbike show.
http://www.fairwheelbikes.com/gallery/vicm2.html Personally I would not attempt to ride it, it would probably flex like a noodle, and then I'd break the wheelset. I weigh 170 and my pedaling style tends towards mashing. With enough money I could probably build a 14.0 pound bike I would trust completely. Scott CR1 SL frame, Lightweight wheels, tuned Record, etc. http://www.fairwheelbikes.com/images/m2bike.jpg |
Things were so much simpler in the good ole days...
...all you had to do to look like you had a fast bike was drill a few holes in the brake levers ...frame sizing, you just threw a leg over the bike and if you didn't get hurt too bad, that was one fine bicycle. :) |
Originally Posted by rufvelo
Things were so much simpler in the good ole days...
...all you had to do to look like you had a fast bike was drill a few holes in the brake levers |
Originally Posted by Patriot
Actually, there's one that weighs around 8.0lbs made with optimized Record components, and a new '06 Ghisallo frame. I think I saw a pic of it from the interbike show.
|
Originally Posted by thewalrus
7.9 pound 2006 Ghisallo
http://www.fairwheelbikes.com/gallery/vicm2.html Personally I would not attempt to ride it, it would probably flex like a noodle, and then I'd break the wheelset. I weigh 170 and my pedaling style tends towards mashing. With enough money I could probably build a 14.0 pound bike I would trust completely. Scott CR1 SL frame, Lightweight wheels, tuned Record, etc. http://www.fairwheelbikes.com/images/m2bike.jpg Those weightweenie guys don't really ride their bikes, and when they have 4 page threads about handlebar tape weight, I cannot take them seriously. |
I love the "air+tire glue ca. 20g" followed by the one tenth gram precision! :D
|
Except pro's post at weightweenies and not here...
|
Originally Posted by Roadie Rob
...and my Colorado climbing bike (Calfee Tetra) at 14 lbs. 13 oz. which is AWESOME for climbing miles into the atmosphere but an absolute B!&*CH to hold a line when descending. The thing gets so loose on switchbacks and crosswinds that it is almost unreasonable to ride. On flats against the wind, there is no momentum to carry the wheels forward. Heck, flats WITH the wind is almost too much of an effort to keep the cranks turning.
That all changed when I pulled the AC 350's in favor of some 1500 gram Mike Garcia customs. Sure, it wasn't 15.0 anymore, but it wasn't much more. And I could go downhill with a lot more confidence. 55/Rad |
3 Attachment(s)
My Trinity bike weighs just a hair under 15lbs with no accessories (cages, computer, wedge, etc). I could easily have myself a 14# bike if I was to install all of my components on a CR-1 frame with only a few component changes.
I have actually thought of doing this, just for the heck of it. The one thing that stops me is the fact that I love the paint job I did on this frame. :D |
Originally Posted by CdCf
I love the "air+tire glue ca. 20g" followed by the one tenth gram precision! :D
:p :p :p http://www.scalenet.com/sartorius/gp...light2w400.jpg |
Originally Posted by pinky
Except pro's post at weightweenies and not here...
|
I think he means pro weight weenies.
|
Originally Posted by pelotonracer
I think he means pro weight weenies.
|
I saved this photo from weight weenies, it's a bike owned by a belgian pro...
notice it's built closer to 17.5 pounds with normal componentry - no crazy light frames, derailleurs, carbon chainrings, etc. http://i10.photobucket.com/albums/a1...teamsc12xc.jpg |
^^^yummy
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:20 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.