Does anyone make a carbon wheelset suitable for daily training rides?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: "Gosh honey, you pass more like Tony Rominger..."
Posts: 3,218
Bikes: 2005 Scott CR1 Pro - 1992 Panasonix Fixed Conversion 60tx20t
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Does anyone make a carbon wheelset suitable for daily training rides?
Thinking about making foray into carbon tubulars, but it seem that most of them are race- day wheels only...kinda sucks when they can cost almost as much as a bike itself.
Any carbons wheels suitable for daily life? I can understand if there aren't any, given that they are as light as 1000g /wheel, but it would be nice!
Any carbons wheels suitable for daily life? I can understand if there aren't any, given that they are as light as 1000g /wheel, but it would be nice!
__________________
"How did all those 'Keep Off the Grass' signs get there?"
"How did all those 'Keep Off the Grass' signs get there?"
#2
Mad Scientist
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Seven Hills, WI
Posts: 1,156
Bikes: Dean TI fixie... Viner ProComp... NEXT pink sparkely!
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
not that i'd recommend training on them, but reynolds stratus wheels are pretty darn tough... or get a custom set of zipp pave 303 or 404s built up with some sweet hubs, they would be strong enough for training
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 914
Bikes: Trek 1000, Giant TCR Composite 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Lightweights and Cosmic Carbones are the only two that come to mind as really being suitable for daily rides. Hanging out at weight weenies and reading about zipp rim failure leads me to believe they're not really the best for everyday wheels (perhaps their Pave rims though?). Mavic has a new wheel coming out soon so it may be another option.
#5
Making a kilometer blurry
Training on carbons on purpose is ridiculous. Lance doesn't even do that, and he surely has an unlimited supply of wheels.
Here's Lance's retirement bike at this year's Giro. Note the 32h wheels (3x rear, and 2x front). Sensible wheelset for someone who doesn't have sag support. Also note the saddle bag:
Here's Lance's retirement bike at this year's Giro. Note the 32h wheels (3x rear, and 2x front). Sensible wheelset for someone who doesn't have sag support. Also note the saddle bag:
#6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: "Gosh honey, you pass more like Tony Rominger..."
Posts: 3,218
Bikes: 2005 Scott CR1 Pro - 1992 Panasonix Fixed Conversion 60tx20t
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by Coyote2
Don't you have better ways of spending money than this?
I would think that somebody would be able to build a 1200g wheelset that is durable enough for a non-Clyde to train on everyday, given the prices that they are charging...
__________________
"How did all those 'Keep Off the Grass' signs get there?"
"How did all those 'Keep Off the Grass' signs get there?"
#7
Industry Maven
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Wherever good bikes are sold
Posts: 2,936
Bikes: Thylacines...only Thylacines.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Who gives a rat's arse what Lance rides?
I don't know that doing heaps of training miles on some mega expenisve carbon wheels is that sensible, clincher or tubular. There's heaps of really light wheels that you could very easily train and race on. The Rolf Prima Elan Aeros spring to mind at 1295g a pair. You could also build up some Soul-Kozak/DT Supercomp/IRD Cadence Aero wheels for about 100g more that have a more aero profile rim section.
I guess it boils down to also how many kms a year you're doing, how crap the weather and roads are, and how much cash you have to burn too.
Personally, if I was a racing fool, I'd just train on some DA/DT Comp/Open Pro wheels, and get some 404's for racing and posing on. Then again, if I was doing 500 miles a week I wouldn't be training and racing on the same bike anyway.
I don't know that doing heaps of training miles on some mega expenisve carbon wheels is that sensible, clincher or tubular. There's heaps of really light wheels that you could very easily train and race on. The Rolf Prima Elan Aeros spring to mind at 1295g a pair. You could also build up some Soul-Kozak/DT Supercomp/IRD Cadence Aero wheels for about 100g more that have a more aero profile rim section.
I guess it boils down to also how many kms a year you're doing, how crap the weather and roads are, and how much cash you have to burn too.
Personally, if I was a racing fool, I'd just train on some DA/DT Comp/Open Pro wheels, and get some 404's for racing and posing on. Then again, if I was doing 500 miles a week I wouldn't be training and racing on the same bike anyway.
#8
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: "Gosh honey, you pass more like Tony Rominger..."
Posts: 3,218
Bikes: 2005 Scott CR1 Pro - 1992 Panasonix Fixed Conversion 60tx20t
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by Thylacine
Who gives a rat's arse what Lance rides?
I don't know that doing heaps of training miles on some mega expenisve carbon wheels is that sensible, clincher or tubular. There's heaps of really light wheels that you could very easily train and race on. The Rolf Prima Elan Aeros spring to mind at 1295g a pair. You could also build up some Soul-Kozak/DT Supercomp/IRD Cadence Aero wheels for about 100g more that have a more aero profile rim section.
I guess it boils down to also how many kms a year you're doing, how crap the weather and roads are, and how much cash you have to burn too.
Personally, if I was a racing fool, I'd just train on some DA/DT Comp/Open Pro wheels, and get some 404's for racing and posing on. Then again, if I was doing 500 miles a week I wouldn't be training and racing on the same bike anyway.
I don't know that doing heaps of training miles on some mega expenisve carbon wheels is that sensible, clincher or tubular. There's heaps of really light wheels that you could very easily train and race on. The Rolf Prima Elan Aeros spring to mind at 1295g a pair. You could also build up some Soul-Kozak/DT Supercomp/IRD Cadence Aero wheels for about 100g more that have a more aero profile rim section.
I guess it boils down to also how many kms a year you're doing, how crap the weather and roads are, and how much cash you have to burn too.
Personally, if I was a racing fool, I'd just train on some DA/DT Comp/Open Pro wheels, and get some 404's for racing and posing on. Then again, if I was doing 500 miles a week I wouldn't be training and racing on the same bike anyway.
get some 404's for racing and posing on
__________________
"How did all those 'Keep Off the Grass' signs get there?"
"How did all those 'Keep Off the Grass' signs get there?"
#9
Banned.
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Woodstock
Posts: 5,761
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Coyote2
Don't you have better ways of spending money than this?
Seriously, heck if you're training why not ride on the heaviest bike you can
#11
Whateverthehell
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: U.S.S.A.
Posts: 7,432
Bikes: '06 Blue Competition RC5AL w/ritchey pro fork, spinergy stealth PBO, etc.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
what constitutes a "carbon wheelset" to you?
my just-about-everyday/race-wheels are spinergy stealths. they aren't all that light, and they aren't tubular, but they do look pretty dope if that's all you're worried about. plus, they're bomb-proof, if that matters.
my just-about-everyday/race-wheels are spinergy stealths. they aren't all that light, and they aren't tubular, but they do look pretty dope if that's all you're worried about. plus, they're bomb-proof, if that matters.
__________________
"When once you have tasted flight, you will forever walk the earth with your eyes turned skyward, for there you have been, and there you will always long to return." - Leonardo daVinci
"When once you have tasted flight, you will forever walk the earth with your eyes turned skyward, for there you have been, and there you will always long to return." - Leonardo daVinci
#12
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: "Gosh honey, you pass more like Tony Rominger..."
Posts: 3,218
Bikes: 2005 Scott CR1 Pro - 1992 Panasonix Fixed Conversion 60tx20t
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by waterrockets
Training on carbons on purpose is ridiculous. Lance doesn't even do that, and he surely has an unlimited supply of wheels.
Here's Lance's retirement bike at this year's Giro. Note the 32h wheels (3x rear, and 2x front). Sensible wheelset for someone who doesn't have sag support. Also note the saddle bag:
Here's Lance's retirement bike at this year's Giro. Note the 32h wheels (3x rear, and 2x front). Sensible wheelset for someone who doesn't have sag support. Also note the saddle bag:
__________________
"How did all those 'Keep Off the Grass' signs get there?"
"How did all those 'Keep Off the Grass' signs get there?"
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Newcastle Australia
Posts: 1,185
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Sincitycycler
What model of wheels are these? They look sturdy!
bontrager something, cant quite make it out from the pic
#14
.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 40,375
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 27 Times
in
12 Posts
OMG and look! He has SOOOOOO many spacers!
Originally Posted by waterrockets
Training on carbons on purpose is ridiculous. Lance doesn't even do that, and he surely has an unlimited supply of wheels.
Here's Lance's retirement bike at this year's Giro. Note the 32h wheels (3x rear, and 2x front). Sensible wheelset for someone who doesn't have sag support. Also note the saddle bag:
Here's Lance's retirement bike at this year's Giro. Note the 32h wheels (3x rear, and 2x front). Sensible wheelset for someone who doesn't have sag support. Also note the saddle bag:
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Newcastle Australia
Posts: 1,185
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by botto
OMG and look! He has SOOOOOO many spacers!
Damn Lance you are loosing some OCP points
#16
.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 40,375
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 27 Times
in
12 Posts
and the crank isn't lined up with the seat tube. oh... the OCP faux pas are rampant!
Originally Posted by mrkott3r
chain not on the big ring.
Damn Lance you are loosing some OCP points
Damn Lance you are loosing some OCP points
#17
Making a kilometer blurry
Originally Posted by mrkott3r
bontrager something, cant quite make it out from the pic
#18
Go big or go home
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gainesville, VA
Posts: 269
Bikes: Cannondale Ironman 800
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I know this is a newb question but what is the difference between clincher and tubular rims? Which is better? And what is a spacer?
Sorry but every one starts off new at some point
Sorry but every one starts off new at some point
#20
Baby it's cold outside...
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SK, Canada
Posts: 7,310
Bikes: Trek 5000, Rocky Mountain Wedge, GT Karakoram K2, Litespeed Tuscany
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#21
DEADBEEF
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Catching his breath alongside a road near Seattle, WA USA
Posts: 12,234
Bikes: 1999 K2 OzM, 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
4 Posts
Originally Posted by Jstyle
I know this is a newb question but what is the difference between clincher and tubular rims?
In contrast, a tubular rim has no hook cross section for a bead to seat into. This is because the tyre itself is glued onto the rim. There is no inner tube. The tyre is both the casing and pneumatic container.
Note that tubulars should not be confused with MTB tubeless tyres. Think of a tubular as a very thick inner tube but it directly contacts the road. It is fully sealed whereas a tubeless tyre is like an automobile tyre. it relies on the the rim to form the other part of the pneumatic containment. Tubeless tyre rims and clinchers share much in common in terms of cross-section design. However clinchers rims are not necessarily airtight.
Originally Posted by Jstyle
Which is better?
Tufo in fact has a good explanation on their website of the applicability of tubular vs. clinchers.
Originally Posted by Jstyle
And what is a spacer?
__________________
1999 K2 OzM 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte
"Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send." -- Jon Postel, RFC1122
1999 K2 OzM 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte
"Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send." -- Jon Postel, RFC1122
#22
Making a kilometer blurry
Originally Posted by khuon
A clincher rim accepts clincher tyres. These are the more common of tyre variety for most riders. It consists of the tyre itself which has a bead that sits inside a hooked rim. An inner tube is used to hold the air.
In contrast, a tubular rim has no hook cross section for a bead to seat into. This is because the tyre itself is glued onto the rim. There is no inner tube. The tyre is both the casing and pneumatic container.
Note that tubulars should not be confused with MTB tubeless tyres. Think of a tubular as a very thick inner tube but it directly contacts the road. It is fully sealed whereas a tubeless tyre is like an automobile tyre. it relies on the the rim to form the other part of the pneumatic containment. Tubeless tyre rims and clinchers share much in common in terms of cross-section design. However clinchers rims are not necessarily airtight.
Performance-wise, tubulars are better. They roll nicer, accelerate better and are lighter. They can also be inflated to higher pressures because in most cases the pressure limitations of a clincher tyre is its ability to maintain a rim/bead contact and this would not be a factour with tubulars. However, they can be impractical for recreational and everyday riding because a puncture means a little bit more of an involved repair process and you can't just simply throw a new tube in to get you quickly back on the road as you would a clincher. Clinchers have come a long way and unless you're racing, is usually the recommended choice. Now bear in mind that there are also hybrid designs of tyre such as the Tufo Tubular-clincher. These tyres are essentially a tubular tyre that have a mounting bead so they can be used on clincher rims.
Tufo in fact has a good explanation on their website of the applicability of tubular vs. clinchers.
In general, a spacer is simply a piece of material that adds more space between to specified points for the purpose of aligning things or increasing distances. On a bicycle, spacers are used in a variety of places such as between the cogs in the rear sprockets or in the pedal spindle to adjust how far out from the bike frame someone's foot can be. In the above reference to spacers, the term is used to identify the rings between bottom of the handlebar stem and the headset. These are usually called headset spacers and they are used to position the stem and thus handlebars at a proper height.
In contrast, a tubular rim has no hook cross section for a bead to seat into. This is because the tyre itself is glued onto the rim. There is no inner tube. The tyre is both the casing and pneumatic container.
Note that tubulars should not be confused with MTB tubeless tyres. Think of a tubular as a very thick inner tube but it directly contacts the road. It is fully sealed whereas a tubeless tyre is like an automobile tyre. it relies on the the rim to form the other part of the pneumatic containment. Tubeless tyre rims and clinchers share much in common in terms of cross-section design. However clinchers rims are not necessarily airtight.
Performance-wise, tubulars are better. They roll nicer, accelerate better and are lighter. They can also be inflated to higher pressures because in most cases the pressure limitations of a clincher tyre is its ability to maintain a rim/bead contact and this would not be a factour with tubulars. However, they can be impractical for recreational and everyday riding because a puncture means a little bit more of an involved repair process and you can't just simply throw a new tube in to get you quickly back on the road as you would a clincher. Clinchers have come a long way and unless you're racing, is usually the recommended choice. Now bear in mind that there are also hybrid designs of tyre such as the Tufo Tubular-clincher. These tyres are essentially a tubular tyre that have a mounting bead so they can be used on clincher rims.
Tufo in fact has a good explanation on their website of the applicability of tubular vs. clinchers.
In general, a spacer is simply a piece of material that adds more space between to specified points for the purpose of aligning things or increasing distances. On a bicycle, spacers are used in a variety of places such as between the cogs in the rear sprockets or in the pedal spindle to adjust how far out from the bike frame someone's foot can be. In the above reference to spacers, the term is used to identify the rings between bottom of the handlebar stem and the headset. These are usually called headset spacers and they are used to position the stem and thus handlebars at a proper height.
#23
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: "Gosh honey, you pass more like Tony Rominger..."
Posts: 3,218
Bikes: 2005 Scott CR1 Pro - 1992 Panasonix Fixed Conversion 60tx20t
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by ViperZ
Campagnolo Hyperon, you could ride those all the live long day. But like all carbon rims, Rain riding will be hard on them.
__________________
"How did all those 'Keep Off the Grass' signs get there?"
"How did all those 'Keep Off the Grass' signs get there?"
#24
Baby it's cold outside...
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SK, Canada
Posts: 7,310
Bikes: Trek 5000, Rocky Mountain Wedge, GT Karakoram K2, Litespeed Tuscany
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Sincitycycler
Those are purdy. How many money kostet?
Link Here
__________________
-Trek 5000* -Project Litespeed* -The Italian Job* -Rocky Wedge* -The Canadian Connection*
-Trek 5000* -Project Litespeed* -The Italian Job* -Rocky Wedge* -The Canadian Connection*
Last edited by ViperZ; 07-12-06 at 10:09 PM.
#25
Former grouch, now happy
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Austin
Posts: 988
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I assume that you're just trolling for attention.
"Training" wheels by definition are relatively inexpensive and therefore disposable.
"Training" wheels by definition are relatively inexpensive and therefore disposable.
__________________
Spectrum Ti Super | Landshark Roadshark | Serotta Colorado | Gunnar Crosshairs | Trek 9800 | Santana fillet brazed tandem | K2 Easy Roller | Dawes (BD) Bullseye 1x1
Spectrum Ti Super | Landshark Roadshark | Serotta Colorado | Gunnar Crosshairs | Trek 9800 | Santana fillet brazed tandem | K2 Easy Roller | Dawes (BD) Bullseye 1x1