![]() |
Think about it. How long has CF been mainstream? Less than 10 years or so. That isn't nearly long enough to even have a comment on its longevity, unless they self destruct every 6 months. And we all know they don't.
How long does a person even keep a bike? My guess would be 5 years or so. The kind of person who would buy CF is the kind of person(sweeping generalization) that wants the latest and greatest. They may be racers who are hard on their equipment. Are they really going to keep a bike for 10 or 20 years? I doubt it. |
Originally Posted by Jonathan Drake
Another reason to support Performance, Bikesdirect.com, and Probikekit.com.
Too bad the 75 threads about the problems people have had with these companies has escaped you. Every business has good and bad people, and good and bad outlets. Except yours of course. Whatever that might be. |
Originally Posted by roadwarrior
True. They are all geniuses, always have every correct answer, never make any mistakes, and always ship exactly what you order without fail, every time. And never mess up a bill.
Too bad the 75 threads about the problems people have had with these companies has escaped you. Every business has good and bad people, and good and bad outlets. Except yours of course. Whatever that might be. |
Originally Posted by slowandsteady
Think about it. How long has CF been mainstream? Less than 10 years or so.
|
Sounds like a good reason to find another LBS that is better educated.
|
Ill tell you what, go down the Black Sheep Cycles in CLT and they'll set you up right.
|
I'd guess that alot of bike mechanics are probably more comfortable working on a titanium, alum, or steel bike for the simple fact that those materials can stand up to a bit of overzealous overtightening of a part or connection. You make that mistake on a CF frame, and you could cause cosmetic damage, if not structural damage. That's enough to make a mechanic gun-shy.
But that's not a reason to avoid CF. If you like the ride, buy it & choose your mechanic/lbs carefully (or DIY). |
Originally Posted by JollyMon
While I was discussing the services that I needed performed on my Litespeed at the LBS yesterday, I was telling the mechanic that I hadn't really decided on what my next bike would be -- but probably carbon fiber. He then said something to the effect of don't even think about that. I said why not, and he explained that carbon fiber bikes "wear out" after five years or so. I had not heard that one before. He said my titanium bike would last forever. Then he recommended that I should get a much better wheelset (once I lost a bunch more weight)! (Truth hurts on that one.)
Anyway, what about his comment on carbon fiber bikes? I can't believe that someone would lay out $2,000 to $5,000 on a bike that will need to be replaced in five years or so. |
Originally Posted by El Diablo Rojo
And yet most of us don't think twice about spending $40k+ on a car that 'wears out' every 4 years.
|
Originally Posted by Doggus
What car are you referring to? I don't know of a $40k car that will not last longer than 4 years on average. I have a Nissan truck from '86 with 200,000+ miles and still running strong. Minor repairs just like on a bike. Most cars will easily last 10 years with proper maintenance. Many will last longer.
Yeah, sounds pretty dumb to me. There is no way I would spend 40K on a car that won't last longer than 4 years. In fact, I would have a hard time rationalizing spending 40k on a car period and I make good money. I would venture a guess that most people spend closer to 20k on a car. Of course, I have a horse that costs me the equivalent of a porsche payment.... I guess we all have our priorities. |
Originally Posted by slowandsteady
Yeah, sounds pretty dumb to me. There is no way I would spend 40K on a car that won't last longer than 4 years. In fact, I would have a hard time rationalizing spending 40k on a car period and I make good money. I would venture a guess that most people spend closer to 20k on a car.
|
Originally Posted by Jonathan Drake
Try 13-15 years.
|
Originally Posted by recneps
Ill tell you what, go down the Black Sheep Cycles in CLT and they'll set you up right.
Where is Black Sheep Cycles, nevermind I found them, looks like they cater to the more esoteric end of cycling. What do you think of Bolt Brothers in Waxhaw? |
Originally Posted by patentcad
I purchased my first CF Trek in 1989, and it had been out for a year. Try 18+ years.
Kestrel did it in '87. We're up to 20+. Can anyone do better? |
Originally Posted by DrPete
I know plenty of people who buy $50-100K cars and trade it in every couple years. I think the point EDR was trying to make is that it's really not that absurd to buy a new bike every few years.
But the thing is he used the word "last." Sure, plenty of people spend gobs of money on cars and like to be driving a new one every three years, but to spend big money on a car that won't LAST 4 years is kind of crazy. That would mean the trade in value would be near zero. |
Originally Posted by recursive
http://www.kestrel-usa.com/about/index.php
Kestrel did it in '87. We're up to 20+. Can anyone do better? |
Originally Posted by Jonathan Drake
Try 13-15 years.
I said mainstream. Sure it has been around for much longer than that, but by mainstream, I mean readily available to the masses and easily obtained. Finding one manufacturer selling it for $10K isn't mainstream. |
Originally Posted by slowandsteady
I said mainstream. Sure it has been around for much longer than that, but by mainstream, I mean readily available to the masses and easily obtained. Finding one manufacturer selling it for $10K isn't mainstream.
|
Originally Posted by jamiewilson3
Bike Mechanic =/ Materials Scientist
|
Originally Posted by JollyMon
and he explained that carbon fiber bikes "wear out" after five years or so. .
|
Originally Posted by patentcad
Read my post poindexter. TREK was selling these bikes to weenies like me in 1988. For regular prices, under $3K as I recall, not $10K. I'll help you with the arithmetic: that's NINETEEN YEARS. Even better, I still have the nylon/foam rubber bike travel bag I bought for $99 when I bought that 1989 Trek and I use it to air transport my bikes all over the place every year.
They did offer, in 1987, the 2300 with three carbon tubes lugged to aluminum. It's an intersting bike. I've seen two in for service in the last week. Had bright green decals on the carbon tubes. Edit...yep, 1988 was the first seven tube carbon frame. That was the one that Trek said was so bad. I've seen photos of the warranty frames they got back. |
Originally Posted by patentcad
Read my post poindexter. TREK was selling these bikes to weenies like me in 1988. For regular prices, under $3K as I recall, not $10K. I'll help you with the arithmetic: that's NINETEEN YEARS. Even better, I still have the nylon/foam rubber bike travel bag I bought for $99 when I bought that 1989 Trek and I use it to air transport my bikes all over the place every year.
Hm, 3k after 19 years of inflation = $6K today. That isn't mainstream. |
If you buy a new carbon bike with a lifetime warranty, you're going to be OK at least as long as the company lasts.
The whole "fatigue limit" discussion is a bit off. If a bike were designed to have an infinite fatigue life (under what stresses? A 120-pound rail-thin guy who likes to meander around the MUP? A 250-pound bodybuilder who is slamming into potholes and curbs when he's not crit racing?), it would be too heavy. Clearly, some steel and ti bikes in normal operation see stresses over their fatigue limits - some fail in fatigue. Workmanship and the design of the details of the frame are key to good fatigue life. If carbon fiber frames were designed like aircraft, they would have excellent fatigue life - better than metal frames. But who really cares if Trek will give you new frame if you have problems? |
Maybe the LBS comments had to do with mean time to a) failure or 2) just plain breaking - either requiring replacement. There may be data in the industry that shows that - for all accmulated reasons and factors - maybe carbon frames only "last" 5 years. Could have more to do with owners crashing them (or even dropping them in garage or dropping something on them) causing the frame to "fail". Where a Ti or steel frame may be repairable in more cases, the carbon frame under same circumstances needs to be replaced.
Also - do those elite pros really ride the same frame all year? I thought maybe they change frames during the year, and have access to a lot fo different frames, so that they are not really riding the same frame all year. That's what I thought, but I may be wrong - I ain't no elite pro peleton rider !! :) |
Originally Posted by WheresWaldo
Hey Spence, who is the Litespeed dealer in Charlotte, Litespeed does not list any. Is is Ultimate in Pineville?
Where is Black Sheep Cycles, nevermind I found them, looks like they cater to the more esoteric end of cycling. What do you think of Bolt Brothers in Waxhaw? The bolt brothers are awesome, I've known Will Bolt for a while and hes super cool and is really into getting a bike that fits your specific needs and wont put you on a 4k race bike if its not your style. They're also a big moots dealer if you looking for Ti, I couldnt say anything bad about bolt brothers if I wanted to and I never heard anything of the like from anyone else. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:12 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.