Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Seat tube angle on a 58...

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Seat tube angle on a 58...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-10-07, 05:08 PM
  #1  
R.E.Member
Thread Starter
 
brians647's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: CT
Posts: 863

Bikes: Cannondale, Kirk

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Seat tube angle on a 58...

Does anybody know of a manufacturer that makes a bike in a size 56-58cm frame with a seat tube angle in the 72 or 72.5 degree range? At that size, I'm finding that the slackest that most manufacturers go with is a 73 degree seat tube, with some going as high as 73.5 or 74. The only time that I find a 72 or 72.5 degree seat tube is on a 60cm and up frame, and that would be waayy too big for me in the top tube area.

I'm asking this as my LBS measured me in the shop and found that not only do I have a short torso, but I have a very long femur. One of the fixes recommende to finding a better fitting frame for me is one with a slack seat tube (a short top tube would be nice too). I really don't want to go custom for various reasons.

Any suggestions? Thanks in advance!
brians647 is offline  
Old 03-10-07, 05:16 PM
  #2  
*
 
vpiuva's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,458
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
You'll probably be able to find a touring frame with slack angles, but then you'll have a longer chainstay & wheelbase, too. Not sure if that's what you want.
vpiuva is offline  
Old 03-10-07, 05:41 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
biker7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,850
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I am the same...long femurs and short torso. In the old days frames with 72deg, sta's abounded but not many around these days due to setback seatposts. I therefore always look for a frame with a 72.5 deg. sta. Look 555 for '06...not '07 has such a frame in a 57 c-t-c which is what I ride. Look however I believe...changed this for '07...would have to double check. If you want a CF frame, for the dollar they are hard to beat for ride, finish and stiffness.
HTH,
George
biker7 is offline  
Old 03-10-07, 07:17 PM
  #4  
R.E.Member
Thread Starter
 
brians647's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: CT
Posts: 863

Bikes: Cannondale, Kirk

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by biker7
I am the same...long femurs and short torso. In the old days frames with 72deg, sta's abounded but not many around these days due to setback seatposts. I therefore always look for a frame with a 72.5 deg. sta. Look 555 for '06...not '07 has such a frame in a 57 c-t-c which is what I ride. Look however I believe...changed this for '07...would have to double check. If you want a CF frame, for the dollar they are hard to beat for ride, finish and stiffness.
HTH,
George
Good advice, thanks for the suggestion.

As for what Vpiuva said, I know I'm slow, but I don't think I need to go the touring bike route just yet (emphasizing YET). But the Look is a pretty cool frame, maybe I can find a leftover '06.

Thanks again!
brians647 is offline  
Old 03-11-07, 07:11 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
biker7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,850
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by brians647
Good advice, thanks for the suggestion.

As for what Vpiuva said, I know I'm slow, but I don't think I need to go the touring bike route just yet (emphasizing YET). But the Look is a pretty cool frame, maybe I can find a leftover '06.

Thanks again!
I have stated this before, its a jump ball between any of the top brand CF frames out there. Big companies become big because of demand for good products. So in summary, my view is buy the frame with the most value, i.e. performance per dollar. Fit is key and most buy on aesthetics anyway...lol.
You can pick up a new '06 Look 555 on e-bay for $1200. I have a hard time spending $2K for a frame as a recreational cyclist. If I had the talent to race competitively and a sponsor wanted to give me a Look 595, that would be fine.
If I felt I could buy more frame for the money in another brand, I would have but couldn't find a better new frame for less then this amount.
Cheers,
George
P.S. will add based upon the comment above about slack angles...I rode a large Bianchi with classic Bianchi geometry which I felt was a bike with outstanding handling. It isn't even close with the Look frame. It will handle circles around the Bianchi. The Bianchi by comparison is BMW 7 series and the Look a 911. What would take me a full curve at 25mph on the Bianchi, I can track around the inside of the same curve on the Look which I have. If you compare the geometry the Look has a bit more upright head tube and shorter chain stay and wheel base but it is the entirety of the bike that makes it handle this way. I didn't think it was possible to have a bicycle track so precisely and yet turn so immediately.

Last edited by biker7; 03-11-07 at 07:24 AM.
biker7 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.