Landis fights back
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tempe, AZ
Posts: 2,968
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Landis fights back
__________________
"Think of bicycles as rideable art that can just about save the world". ~Grant Petersen
Cyclists fare best when they recognize that there are times when acting vehicularly is not the best practice, and are flexible enough to do what is necessary as the situation warrants.--Me
"Think of bicycles as rideable art that can just about save the world". ~Grant Petersen
Cyclists fare best when they recognize that there are times when acting vehicularly is not the best practice, and are flexible enough to do what is necessary as the situation warrants.--Me
#2
Should be riding
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: S.E. Michigan
Posts: 1,602
Bikes: C-dale- moutain, Pedal Force RS- Campy Record, Quiring Ti XTR, Red line Monocog, S E F@r
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Interesting link. Personally, I think this is appropriate: "Landis received a standing ovation when he entered the room at the Teakwoods Tavern".

#4
On the Move
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 1,219
Bikes: Lots
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Well he is after all the TdF winner, and not yet "convicted" of anything, he deserves the applause.
Its been said so many times before, but just to reiterate this point:
"Landis' sample "A" was mishandled and sample "B," which Landis' people say was degraded before the test, was tested by the same lab tech who did the test on sample "A", which is not in accordance with international policy."
As we know, the final place where any appeals end up is the Court of Arbitration for Sport, where of Inigo Landaluze case was just dismissed 2 months ago for this exact issue.
Ther has been no doubt for months now that at a minimum he will be let off on technical reasons, even if he has to appeal to the same court. Clearly this attempt to retest and find positives from the other B samples where the A samples were originally clean is a desperate attempt to find something to catch him on, just to save face with the French who will go insane when he remains champion.
All so they can hand the title over to a actual confirmed doper. Oh, thats right Pereiro has asthma and can take that stuff, suuuuuurre, asthma, uh huh.
Its been said so many times before, but just to reiterate this point:
"Landis' sample "A" was mishandled and sample "B," which Landis' people say was degraded before the test, was tested by the same lab tech who did the test on sample "A", which is not in accordance with international policy."
As we know, the final place where any appeals end up is the Court of Arbitration for Sport, where of Inigo Landaluze case was just dismissed 2 months ago for this exact issue.
Ther has been no doubt for months now that at a minimum he will be let off on technical reasons, even if he has to appeal to the same court. Clearly this attempt to retest and find positives from the other B samples where the A samples were originally clean is a desperate attempt to find something to catch him on, just to save face with the French who will go insane when he remains champion.
All so they can hand the title over to a actual confirmed doper. Oh, thats right Pereiro has asthma and can take that stuff, suuuuuurre, asthma, uh huh.
#5
RacingBear
Originally Posted by teterider
Well he is after all the TdF winner, and not yet "convicted" of anything, he deserves the applause.
Its been said so many times before, but just to reiterate this point:
"Landis' sample "A" was mishandled and sample "B," which Landis' people say was degraded before the test, was tested by the same lab tech who did the test on sample "A", which is not in accordance with international policy."
As we know, the final place where any appeals end up is the Court of Arbitration for Sport, where of Inigo Landaluze case was just dismissed 2 months ago for this exact issue.
Ther has been no doubt for months now that at a minimum he will be let off on technical reasons, even if he has to appeal to the same court. Clearly this attempt to retest and find positives from the other B samples where the A samples were originally clean is a desperate attempt to find something to catch him on, just to save face with the French who will go insane when he remains champion.
All so they can hand the title over to a actual confirmed doper. Oh, thats right Pereiro has asthma and can take that stuff, suuuuuurre, asthma, uh huh.
Its been said so many times before, but just to reiterate this point:
"Landis' sample "A" was mishandled and sample "B," which Landis' people say was degraded before the test, was tested by the same lab tech who did the test on sample "A", which is not in accordance with international policy."
As we know, the final place where any appeals end up is the Court of Arbitration for Sport, where of Inigo Landaluze case was just dismissed 2 months ago for this exact issue.
Ther has been no doubt for months now that at a minimum he will be let off on technical reasons, even if he has to appeal to the same court. Clearly this attempt to retest and find positives from the other B samples where the A samples were originally clean is a desperate attempt to find something to catch him on, just to save face with the French who will go insane when he remains champion.
All so they can hand the title over to a actual confirmed doper. Oh, thats right Pereiro has asthma and can take that stuff, suuuuuurre, asthma, uh huh.

#6
Should be riding
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: S.E. Michigan
Posts: 1,602
Bikes: C-dale- moutain, Pedal Force RS- Campy Record, Quiring Ti XTR, Red line Monocog, S E F@r
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Perhaps I quoted too much. I thought that the event being held in Tavern was appropriate as he supposedly drank the night before the now infamous ride...
I guess I'm just too subtle.
I guess I'm just too subtle.
