Could someone explain % in a climb
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 340
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Could someone explain % in a climb
I'm very new to cycling, starting this year at 44 and riding for fitness mainly but hoping to do some centuries and other club type rides. I've always enjoyed the TDF for what I think it is, a VERY demanding test of endurance, strength and mental capacity.
I know the % is a relation to length of climb and altitude gain. I was wondering at what degree of angle they are climbing for that distance? Is an 8% climb a climb of 8 degrees? Does this question even make sense to anyone?...lol. I told you I was new.
I know the % is a relation to length of climb and altitude gain. I was wondering at what degree of angle they are climbing for that distance? Is an 8% climb a climb of 8 degrees? Does this question even make sense to anyone?...lol. I told you I was new.
#3
pan y agua
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,273
Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1428 Post(s)
Liked 697 Times
in
353 Posts
Rise/Run = % of climb.
i.e. 50 feet vertical over 1000 feet is a 5% grade.
i.e. 50 feet vertical over 1000 feet is a 5% grade.
#4
Cornucopia of Awesomeness
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: not where i used to be
Posts: 4,847
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#5
Banned
Join Date: May 2005
Location: GA
Posts: 5,317
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Lake Stevens, WA
Posts: 1,162
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I understood it to be every 1ft elevation gain in 100ft distance travelled = your percentage. In other words 1ft elevation gain in 100ft distance travelled = 1% incline. 2ft elevation gain in 100ft distance travelled = 2% incline, etc.
Is this incorrect?
Is this incorrect?
#7
Chases Dogs for Sport
#8
Chases Dogs for Sport
Check this out . . . all you could want to know:
https://www.geocities.com/sidestreetluge/grade.html
https://www.geocities.com/sidestreetluge/grade.html
#9
Banned.
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Long Island
Posts: 883
Bikes: Lemond Reno
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
It depends if you use the sine function (opposite over hypotenuse. elevation gain over actual distance traveled) or if you use the Tangent function (opposite over adjacent. elevation gain over horizontal distance.)
In real world cases they come out very close to each other but in extreme cases they begin to differ a lot.
In real world cases they come out very close to each other but in extreme cases they begin to differ a lot.
#10
Better rider 20 yrs ago
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Cheshire, Connecticut, USA
Posts: 378
Bikes: Trek 1500D
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Wikipedia has a pretty good explanation. I think it is more complicated. The answer previously given that a 45 degree angle is a 100% grade is correct.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slope
See the section on calculating the slope of a road/railroad:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slope
See the section on calculating the slope of a road/railroad:
#12
A Little Bent
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Struggling up a hillside in Vermont, USA... ..........................................
Posts: 2,858
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
This is an interesteing tid-bit from your site (https://www.geocities.com/sidestreetluge/grade.html) I did not know...
Q) Why use percent of incline vs. degree of angle?
A) The reason for using percent of incline instead of angle, is that percent gives a direct way to assess the effort required to move forward against the grade, whereas the angle in degrees does not readily reveal this information. For example; a 5% grade requires a forward force equal to 5% of the weight of the
object (above and beyond the force it takes to overcome surface resistance on flat ground at the same
speed).
Q) Why use percent of incline vs. degree of angle?
A) The reason for using percent of incline instead of angle, is that percent gives a direct way to assess the effort required to move forward against the grade, whereas the angle in degrees does not readily reveal this information. For example; a 5% grade requires a forward force equal to 5% of the weight of the
object (above and beyond the force it takes to overcome surface resistance on flat ground at the same
speed).
__________________
#13
Better rider 20 yrs ago
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Cheshire, Connecticut, USA
Posts: 378
Bikes: Trek 1500D
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
According to the link previously given, they say
Measuring the distance along the surface of the road (c) instead of horizontally (b) gives practically
the same result for most road gradients up to 10%. For instance, a 20% grade (11.3 degrees), measuring
along the road surface gives a 19.6% grade (you must have a tangent handbook or calculator to properly
calculate these figures).
the same result for most road gradients up to 10%. For instance, a 20% grade (11.3 degrees), measuring
along the road surface gives a 19.6% grade (you must have a tangent handbook or calculator to properly
calculate these figures).
#14
Chases Dogs for Sport
I didn't know that, either (about % gradient being tied to the force necessary to climb the slope). It gives me a new perspective on the importance of resistance training.
Strength is good!
Strength is good!
#15
pan y agua
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,273
Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1428 Post(s)
Liked 697 Times
in
353 Posts
It depends if you use the sine function (opposite over hypotenuse. elevation gain over actual distance traveled) or if you use the Tangent function (opposite over adjacent. elevation gain over horizontal distance.)
In real world cases they come out very close to each other but in extreme cases they begin to differ a lot.
In real world cases they come out very close to each other but in extreme cases they begin to differ a lot.
I started to add you can get a hell of a lot more complicated about it, but simply rise/run works pretty well for cycling purposes
#16
Banned
Join Date: May 2005
Location: GA
Posts: 5,317
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#17
Banned
Join Date: May 2005
Location: GA
Posts: 5,317
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
This is an interesteing tid-bit from your site (https://www.geocities.com/sidestreetluge/grade.html) I did not know...
Q) Why use percent of incline vs. degree of angle?
A) The reason for using percent of incline instead of angle, is that percent gives a direct way to assess the effort required to move forward against the grade, whereas the angle in degrees does not readily reveal this information. For example; a 5% grade requires a forward force equal to 5% of the weight of the
object (above and beyond the force it takes to overcome surface resistance on flat ground at the same
speed).
Q) Why use percent of incline vs. degree of angle?
A) The reason for using percent of incline instead of angle, is that percent gives a direct way to assess the effort required to move forward against the grade, whereas the angle in degrees does not readily reveal this information. For example; a 5% grade requires a forward force equal to 5% of the weight of the
object (above and beyond the force it takes to overcome surface resistance on flat ground at the same
speed).
#18
Training Wheels
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Indiana
Posts: 173
Bikes: '06 Felt F2c
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Wow, I had absolutely no idea it was this complicated. Makes sense if you think about it though.
#19
Keep on climbing
It is usually calculated with the run being the length of the road, simply to make the math a little easier. For the angles on any sort of "normal" road though -- it simply doesn't make any signifigant difference to the final answer.
#20
LOOK, a bike! LOOK! LOOK!
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: tijuana
Posts: 254
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
It's simple geometry really. I usually use the pythagorean theorem to calculate the slope, IE on a 1 mile , 500 foot climb
a^2+b^2=c^2
a^2+250000=27878400
a=5256
rise/run = b/a = 500/5256 = ~0.095 or 9.5% gradient
a^2+b^2=c^2
a^2+250000=27878400
a=5256
rise/run = b/a = 500/5256 = ~0.095 or 9.5% gradient
#21
Banned
Join Date: May 2005
Location: GA
Posts: 5,317
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I was under the impression that percent grade was synonymous with gradient not just conveniently close around 0 which means that it would be calculated that way and the rise/run method would be the convienent approximation.
#22
Left OZ now in Malaysia
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Lancashire England, but at the moment on an extended tour of South East Asia
Posts: 826
Bikes: Thorn Ravan Catlayst, Bill Nickson tourer, Bill Nickson Time Trial, Claud Butler Cape Wrath, Motobecame Tandem etc etc
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
25% means get off and walk!
#23
Banned
Join Date: May 2005
Location: GA
Posts: 5,317
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#24
LOOK, a bike! LOOK! LOOK!
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: tijuana
Posts: 254
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts