Front end shimmy at high speed
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 13
Bikes: 1982 Medici Pro Strada, 1999 Marin Redwood, 2006 Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Front end shimmy at high speed
I did a 40 miler today on Mormon Immigrant Trail by Placerville, CA and on my first serious decent, I had mad front end shimmy. I nearly lost control of the bike, but finally got under control after what seemed for about 30 seconds. I was doing about 40 mph at the time. I clamped my knees on either side of the top tube for the rest of the day and didn't have any more episodes.
Does anyone have any insight for why this may be happening?
Thanks
Does anyone have any insight for why this may be happening?
Thanks
#2
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ffld Cnty Connecticut
Posts: 21,843
Bikes: Old Steelies I made, Old Cannondales
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1173 Post(s)
Liked 927 Times
in
612 Posts
Loose headset ?? Apply front brake, rock bike back & forth. Is there any "clunking" movement or is it nice & tight ?
#3
LOOK, a bike! LOOK! LOOK!
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: tijuana
Posts: 254
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Every bike will do this to some degree at a certain speed. Whether you notice it or not is up in the air. I have never owned a frame that oscillated wildly at speed but I have ridden one.
Things you can do:
Change your weight distribution ("jockey" the saddle)
Clamp the top tube with your knees (good move)
Change your speed (faster or slower)
edit: here's an article on Sheldon's site: https://sheldonbrown.com/brandt/shimmy.html
Things you can do:
Change your weight distribution ("jockey" the saddle)
Clamp the top tube with your knees (good move)
Change your speed (faster or slower)
edit: here's an article on Sheldon's site: https://sheldonbrown.com/brandt/shimmy.html
#4
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 13
Bikes: 1982 Medici Pro Strada, 1999 Marin Redwood, 2006 Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thanks for the post.
All is well when I test the headset. I may take the bike into my LBS and see if they have any perspective on this.
All is well when I test the headset. I may take the bike into my LBS and see if they have any perspective on this.
#5
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 13
Bikes: 1982 Medici Pro Strada, 1999 Marin Redwood, 2006 Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thank you for your post.
I think I just need to "manage" my downhill experiences. The knees on the top tube made a difference. Perhaps too much weight up front exacerbates the situation. I'll check out the link. I'm gratefull for the replys.
JohnnyU
I think I just need to "manage" my downhill experiences. The knees on the top tube made a difference. Perhaps too much weight up front exacerbates the situation. I'll check out the link. I'm gratefull for the replys.
JohnnyU
#6
A Little Bent
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Struggling up a hillside in Vermont, USA... ..........................................
Posts: 2,858
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
__________________
#7
Ride it like you stole it
__________________
"Never use your face as a brake pad" - Jake Watson
The Reloutionaries @ Shapeways
"Never use your face as a brake pad" - Jake Watson
The Reloutionaries @ Shapeways
#8
Senior Member
Lifting your rear off the saddle will also stop the shimmy. It's a little scary at first but it removes a contact point that the shimmy is pivoting off of.
#9
ex frame builder
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 523
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
3 Posts
I tried to explain it in simple terms here.
__________________
History, photos and tech articles on "Dave's Bike Blog." 'dave moulton' Registry including a Picture Gallery https://www.davemoultonregistry.com/
History, photos and tech articles on "Dave's Bike Blog." 'dave moulton' Registry including a Picture Gallery https://www.davemoultonregistry.com/
#10
Bike ≠ Car ≠ Ped.
What about the wheels being out of balance or true?
#11
Senior Member
I have seen the Calfee article before and with current technology and the advent of composite forks I simply don't buy his line of reasoning. It simply doesn't make sense for an item that is made in a mold, unless the fixture was built improperly. I think Calfee was looking for an answer that was out of the norm and happened to think this one up and then said to himself, "It could happen!"
Welding or brazing will also cause parts to move out of alignment. This is likely the reason behind welded steel and aluminum frames taking such a long time to enter the market after 100 years of lugged steel and a shorter time of lugged aluminum.
I actually buy this reasoning for speed wobble. I have one bicycle which has speed wobble starting at around 25-30 mph if I ride no hands. On top of that, it also tends to pull to the right and is very difficult to ride no-handed. I have three other bicycles of various manufacture, design and materials and none of them tend toward speed wobble at any speed, even going 45 mph with no hands.
__________________
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
#12
Bike ≠ Car ≠ Ped.
This is true with car parts as well. Part of the higher cost of higher-quality parts is to cover the losses of throwing away the parts that didn't come out of the mold very well. Different car manufacturers even have different tolerance standards that their parts must meet before leaving the supplier; some will throw away four times as many parts because they're so picky.
#13
W.W.DZ.D?
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,979
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#15
OM boy
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Goleta CA
Posts: 4,368
Bikes: a bunch
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 515 Post(s)
Liked 644 Times
in
438 Posts
anecdotally, a headset which is too tight or is brinnelled (oldstyle with loose bearing) can be a common cause of 'headshake'
'too-tight' even applies in modern 'threadless' and integrated designs (found that out the 'hard' way). I have had to 'readjust' one Cane Creek S2 headset which seems to 'tighten' over periods of months of use, though not recently...
Last year I bought a new Tarmac off the rack and it rode quite 'truckish' and did start a shimmy at about 40 mph. After checking the headset, it did seem too tight. So I readjusted and the handling changed, for the better, instantly. Still was too big a bike though...
I'm surprised 'trail' wasn;t mentioned by some others...
My Limongi, built for me as a 'crit' bike by Pepe, back in '76 has some nasty headshake when it gets much over 40 mph. I still have it, luv it, but know better than to go rippin down extreme downhills. It has a very steep headtube and the original fork (still on it) prolly has too much rake. Makes for a real quick handling bike at 25 to 35, but downright brownstain inspiring at 40+mph downhills.
Bringing your weight back may have the opposite from desired effect. Getting your weight more onto the bars will help stabilze the front, if done before the shake starts. Bringing weight back while its shaking, could make you go down. Bringing weight back on a downhill most likely means you're gonna stiffarm the bars more, exasperating the 'shake'.
Get as much weight on the pedals as possible, clamp the TT and bend the elbows to keep the arms from fighting the shimmy. make sure your will is uptodate.
'too-tight' even applies in modern 'threadless' and integrated designs (found that out the 'hard' way). I have had to 'readjust' one Cane Creek S2 headset which seems to 'tighten' over periods of months of use, though not recently...
Last year I bought a new Tarmac off the rack and it rode quite 'truckish' and did start a shimmy at about 40 mph. After checking the headset, it did seem too tight. So I readjusted and the handling changed, for the better, instantly. Still was too big a bike though...
I'm surprised 'trail' wasn;t mentioned by some others...
My Limongi, built for me as a 'crit' bike by Pepe, back in '76 has some nasty headshake when it gets much over 40 mph. I still have it, luv it, but know better than to go rippin down extreme downhills. It has a very steep headtube and the original fork (still on it) prolly has too much rake. Makes for a real quick handling bike at 25 to 35, but downright brownstain inspiring at 40+mph downhills.
Bringing your weight back may have the opposite from desired effect. Getting your weight more onto the bars will help stabilze the front, if done before the shake starts. Bringing weight back while its shaking, could make you go down. Bringing weight back on a downhill most likely means you're gonna stiffarm the bars more, exasperating the 'shake'.
Get as much weight on the pedals as possible, clamp the TT and bend the elbows to keep the arms from fighting the shimmy. make sure your will is uptodate.
#16
Senior Member
I noticed the Calfee site specified that they have "identified a cause" for speed shimmy. I suspect that there is more than one cause which results in similar symtoms.
__________________
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
#17
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 13
Bikes: 1982 Medici Pro Strada, 1999 Marin Redwood, 2006 Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I found that Dave Moulton's article describes the conditions for shimmy that I experienced. I'm a tall rider (6'3") on an XL compact carbon fiber frame. I must admit that when this was happening, I had a death grip on the handlebars which seemed to make matters worse.
I'll try the lighter grip and the suggestions to get weight off the saddle this weekend. I also will check the headset to see if perhaps it is too tight.
Oh, and the will looks solid.
I'll try the lighter grip and the suggestions to get weight off the saddle this weekend. I also will check the headset to see if perhaps it is too tight.
Oh, and the will looks solid.
#18
staring at the mountains
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Castle Pines, CO
Posts: 4,560
Bikes: Obed GVR, Fairdale Goodship, Salsa Timberjack 29
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 394 Post(s)
Liked 197 Times
in
112 Posts
I'm 6'3" and ride a compact frame, and had some shimmy. It was a loose (integrated) headset. I'd start there...
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Triangle, NC
Posts: 1,480
Bikes: S-Works Tarmac
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 182 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
If you should get a Calfee that exhibits shimmy, rest assured the factory will immediately work with you to get it corrected regardless of the cause. They don't tolerate it. No other manufacturer/dealer should either.
#20
So what did YOU do to it?
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 299
Bikes: 2006 Fetish Penna, 2014 Fuji Cross 2.0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
There are a great many reasons for headshake. Lots of them have been identified. Another reason that hasn't been mentioned is resonance. The front tire of a bike is constantly hunting. left and right. it's never "really" straight. The speed it hunts at varies with forward velocity. The resonant frequency of the forks is defined by the weight of the handlebars, the CG of the bike. Motorcycling tells me that a more flexable frame is more prone to headshake, same for a flexable fork. Your arms are awesome damping devices, typically just having a hand on the handlebars is enough to stop headshake in it's tracks.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 2,339
Bikes: Road, MTB, Folding, Commuting bikes...
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I found that Dave Moulton's article describes the conditions for shimmy that I experienced. I'm a tall rider (6'3") on an XL compact carbon fiber frame. I must admit that when this was happening, I had a death grip on the handlebars which seemed to make matters worse.
I'll try the lighter grip and the suggestions to get weight off the saddle this weekend. I also will check the headset to see if perhaps it is too tight.
Oh, and the will looks solid.
I'll try the lighter grip and the suggestions to get weight off the saddle this weekend. I also will check the headset to see if perhaps it is too tight.
Oh, and the will looks solid.
#22
Extra Medium Member
In light of all of this fork symmetry talk, the only way that it would make a difference is if every last part of the bike was also in perfect (or within .5mm according to the article) alignment. I've designed and built hundreds of custom steel bikes, and the forks that go along with them, and yes, we always worked to have alignments well within the 1mm or better range...but that goes for the ENTIRE frame AND fork. You can not just simply align a fork...the fork and the bike MUST be aligned together, otherwise symmetry is for not. I don't care what anyone at Calfee says, they are not providing a valid service unless they are aligning the entire frame and fork. And that not only covers the the side to side, planar alignment, but you have to make sure the fork blade lengths are identical as well as the seat and chainstay lengths. This can only be accurately achieved AFTER the head tube and seat tube are realized in perfect alignment to the center of the bike. High speed shimmy cannot simply be attributed to one dimension of the bike. One bike may shimmy at a certain speed with one rider on it, yet not with another under as close to identical circumstances. Each case is different and may be attributable to any one of multiple variances.
Honestly, that article that Calfee put out kinda pissed me off, I've always liked their stuff...but that information is just totally misleading. Sending your fork to them without the rest of the frame is useless and is a waste of your money.
Honestly, that article that Calfee put out kinda pissed me off, I've always liked their stuff...but that information is just totally misleading. Sending your fork to them without the rest of the frame is useless and is a waste of your money.
#23
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Vancouver, BC, CA
Posts: 40
Bikes: Cervelo R3 (touring), Dahon Cadenza (commuter), Dahon Speed (trails), Norco Roma (winter), Yamaha FZ6 (moto)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I recently balanced my wheels - it worked. My method only works on a wheel that is minutely heavy on one side of the circumference; it doesn't work if the wheel is imbalanced laterally (left or right side).
I placed the bike on a bike stand, put it into highest gear, then cranked the peddles fast by hand. The rear wheel developed a shimmy vibration. I stopped the wheel, then very very gently turned the wheel ever so slowly by hand to try to get it to reveal its weighted side. Then I placed a small counter weight on the opposite (light) side of the wheel. I used a spare cycling computer spoke magnet on the rear wheel on the outer radius of the spoke. After a bit of trial and error testing, I discovered the exact spoke and radial placement for the counter weight. Now the shimmy is gone.
I placed the bike on a bike stand, put it into highest gear, then cranked the peddles fast by hand. The rear wheel developed a shimmy vibration. I stopped the wheel, then very very gently turned the wheel ever so slowly by hand to try to get it to reveal its weighted side. Then I placed a small counter weight on the opposite (light) side of the wheel. I used a spare cycling computer spoke magnet on the rear wheel on the outer radius of the spoke. After a bit of trial and error testing, I discovered the exact spoke and radial placement for the counter weight. Now the shimmy is gone.
#24
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 13
Bikes: 1982 Medici Pro Strada, 1999 Marin Redwood, 2006 Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Wouldn't you feel the out of balance wheel, though in other ways than shimmy?
#25
Senior Member
In light of all of this fork symmetry talk, the only way that it would make a difference is if every last part of the bike was also in perfect (or within .5mm according to the article) alignment. I've designed and built hundreds of custom steel bikes, and the forks that go along with them, and yes, we always worked to have alignments well within the 1mm or better range...but that goes for the ENTIRE frame AND fork. You can not just simply align a fork...the fork and the bike MUST be aligned together, otherwise symmetry is for not. I don't care what anyone at Calfee says, they are not providing a valid service unless they are aligning the entire frame and fork. And that not only covers the the side to side, planar alignment, but you have to make sure the fork blade lengths are identical as well as the seat and chainstay lengths. This can only be accurately achieved AFTER the head tube and seat tube are realized in perfect alignment to the center of the bike. High speed shimmy cannot simply be attributed to one dimension of the bike. One bike may shimmy at a certain speed with one rider on it, yet not with another under as close to identical circumstances. Each case is different and may be attributable to any one of multiple variances.
Honestly, that article that Calfee put out kinda pissed me off, I've always liked their stuff...but that information is just totally misleading. Sending your fork to them without the rest of the frame is useless and is a waste of your money.
Honestly, that article that Calfee put out kinda pissed me off, I've always liked their stuff...but that information is just totally misleading. Sending your fork to them without the rest of the frame is useless and is a waste of your money.
Isn't the steering axis with respect to the contact patch of the tire dictated soley through the fork and wheel? The frame alignment will have to do more with whether the steering axis is in line with the rest of the bike, but has nothing to do with where the steering axis falls with respect to the contact patch.
They are simply reporting what they found. I have a little trouble with their alignment of 2mm being the difference, seeing as all the other dimensions on a bicycle are an order of magnitude or more larger than this tolerance. But if they found that 2mm fork misalignment tends a bicycle toward speed shimmy, then why wouldn't they report what they found? Why get pissed off about it?
__________________
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter