PT Pro vs PT SL
#1
Mitcholo
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Oost Vlaanderen in mind, Cleveland in body
Posts: 8,850
Bikes: 2010 Mitcholo w/ Sram Force/Red
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
PT Pro vs PT SL
I'm about to 'pull the trigger' on one of these. I'm not asking which one is better, but is the cost of the SL justified? Hub weight means nothing in a wheel, and I think they have the same internals, right? My Fulcrums are in the beginning stages of crapping out, and they're too heavy, to the point where I think I'm being held back some by them. They're even beginning to flex during sprints and climbs and I can feel it rubbing the rear brake under torque.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,496
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 30 Times
in
19 Posts
Here is the comparison chart. https://www.saris.com/comparison/powertapcomparison.htm
The weight is the primary difference.
The weight is the primary difference.
#3
Used to be a climber..
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Santa Clarita, CA
Posts: 6,849
Bikes: 2016 Ridley Fenix SL, 2020 Trek Emonda ALR (rim brake)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
3 Posts
I recently got the SL, and picking up the bike with the PT wheelset (Bonty Race X Lite Aeros) versus my old wheelset (Mike Garcia POS Niobium 30's), it is noticeable. Hasn't really slowed me down at all, but an extra half pound with the Pro over whatever I added with the SL would kinda suck more.
Plus the carbon looks cooler. That's a huge bonus.
Plus the carbon looks cooler. That's a huge bonus.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 177
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I recently got the SL, and picking up the bike with the PT wheelset (Bonty Race X Lite Aeros) versus my old wheelset (Mike Garcia POS Niobium 30's), it is noticeable. Hasn't really slowed me down at all, but an extra half pound with the Pro over whatever I added with the SL would kinda suck more.
Plus the carbon looks cooler. That's a huge bonus.
Plus the carbon looks cooler. That's a huge bonus.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Orange Park, FL
Posts: 1,343
Bikes: Ever changing..as of 2-24-09: 2003 Giant TCR Team Once, Sampson titanium, 1992 Paramount Series 3, 2003 Cervelo P3, 70s Raleigh Record fixed gear, 70s Fuji SL-12 commuter, mid 90s Klein MTB. Plus two or three frames lurking, plus 5 wife/kids rides
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
If you're considering an older Pro (yellow plastic cap) vs. the SL, I think the plus would be in the SL's water resistance. It's supposed to be more weatherproof. I don't have an SL, but I have two older Pros, and they will quit working in any sort of rain or heavy spray from the road. They dry out and start working again, but it's still a pain in the ass.
#6
Glimmers of form
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Escondido, CA
Posts: 1,542
Bikes: Cannondale SystemSix 3, Specialized Stumpjumper M4 Comp
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The only difference between the new generation Pro and the SL is the axle and and the bearings. The seals are the same, and they look practically identical. It really just depends on how much the weight difference vs. cost matters to you.
#7
Glimmers of form
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Escondido, CA
Posts: 1,542
Bikes: Cannondale SystemSix 3, Specialized Stumpjumper M4 Comp
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Or... you could be like Floyd and get a custom built PT SL with a hand built carbon axle (dropped 100 grams). Lace it to a Zipp 202 and you're good to go.
#9
Senior Member?
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Denver
Posts: 1,977
Bikes: orbea onix, Cervelo SLC, Specialzed Allez, Cervelo P3 Alu
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
the ligther SL has an aluminum freehub body which will wear out in a matter of months, requiring replacement and extra $$.
I ended up buying the steel freehub body instead of the AL one, essentially paying to downgrade. I wish I would have bought the PT PRO instead of the SL in the first place.
I ended up buying the steel freehub body instead of the AL one, essentially paying to downgrade. I wish I would have bought the PT PRO instead of the SL in the first place.
#10
Making a kilometer blurry
If my SRM deal doesn't come to fruition, I'm getting a Pro. What do I care if my bike goes from 19 lbs to 19.5 lbs? I'll still carry all six cans of whoopass.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 177
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The cassette free body is also steel on the Pro vs aluminum on the SL. If you're using the wheel for training, the Pro is a much better choice.
#12
Mitcholo
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Oost Vlaanderen in mind, Cleveland in body
Posts: 8,850
Bikes: 2010 Mitcholo w/ Sram Force/Red
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Okay, THERE WE GO! I hate aluminum freehubs, so this is a great plus for the Pro. You're all saying that the new Pro is more weather resistant, too, and with carbon or no?
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 2,698
Bikes: 1999 Norco ht mtb/2006 C'dale road bike/2007 Colnago CLX
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Not sure whether it's more weather resistant, since I've never disassembled my Pro and mine only came with SL manual. It does look like the SL though; as well as coded hrm belt and the newer computer with more memory (same as the SL; not the old Pro).