Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Braze-On Derailleur Issues....

Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Braze-On Derailleur Issues....

Old 10-12-07, 03:06 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Seattle, Washington
Posts: 1,151
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Braze-On Derailleur Issues....

Forgive me, but I'm reposting this question due to lack of specific responses about this issue.

I'm have a difficult time narrowing the gap between the front dérailleur and the largest chain ring on my compact rank to the 1mm-3mm mark(it's a braze-on, so the lowest setting drops it to around 10mm away). Any suggestions on what to do here?

I believe the problem is with the crank being a compact, therefore having a smaller diameter chain ring. If it were bigger, I would not have this issue. I know there are tons of you out there with braze-on frames, so let's settle this once and for all:

Braze-on + Compact = trouble**********
Bike enthusiast is offline  
Old 10-12-07, 03:14 PM
  #2  
It's ALL base...
 
DScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 6,716
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Braze-on + Compact-compatible front derailleur + Compact crank = joy
DScott is offline  
Old 10-12-07, 03:24 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Trevor98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 1,038
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
What compact are you using. Shimano's compact is supposed to use the same dérailleur as the normal 53/39. If you want help give us enough information to help. If you just want to gripe than preface your post with that.
Trevor98 is offline  
Old 10-12-07, 03:27 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Seattle, Washington
Posts: 1,151
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DScott
Braze-on + Compact-compatible front derailleur + Compact crank = joy
Are compact FDs capable of reaching further down? I was aware of these, but I posted a question about the differences between these dérailleurs, but many people said that my FD (a 6600 Ultegra, noncompact specific) should work fine.

Thanks
Bike enthusiast is offline  
Old 10-12-07, 05:04 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Seattle, Washington
Posts: 1,151
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Trevor98
What compact are you using. Shimano's compact is supposed to use the same dérailleur as the normal 53/39. If you want help give us enough information to help. If you just want to gripe than preface your post with that.
I have a Truvativ Rouleur Carbon Compact GXP Double.
Bike enthusiast is offline  
Old 10-12-07, 05:47 PM
  #6  
The mods changed this...
 
damocles1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,346
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DScott
Braze-on + Compact-compatible front derailleur + Compact crank = joy

Not the intended design/use of the compact F/D. The compact F/D has a cage that follows the curve of the smaller chainrings more closely. Therefore making it easier to throw the chain up onto the big ring.
It's not designed to reach further down from abraze-on.

The problem some folks are having is the fact that older frames have the braze-on welded too high for the current crop of compact cranksets. I just ran into this problem with a 10 year old Litespeed frame and Ultegra SL compact cranks. It shifts with the almost 1cm gap, but not well. Because the F/D is too high, it wants to throw the chain off the outside of the big ring.

The easier answer? Get a 52 big ring and run 52/36 and a 12/25 cassette...
damocles1 is offline  
Old 10-12-07, 07:42 PM
  #7  
semifreddo amartuerer
 
'nother's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 4,599

Bikes: several

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Bike enthusiast
Forgive me, but I'm reposting this question due to lack of specific responses about this issue.

I'm have a difficult time narrowing the gap between the front dérailleur and the largest chain ring on my compact rank to the 1mm-3mm mark(it's a braze-on, so the lowest setting drops it to around 10mm away). Any suggestions on what to do here?

I believe the problem is with the crank being a compact, therefore having a smaller diameter chain ring. If it were bigger, I would not have this issue. I know there are tons of you out there with braze-on frames, so let's settle this once and for all:

Braze-on + Compact = trouble**********
I set up a friend's bike like this once. It was an older Trek. They apparently now make a braze-on tab with a longer/deeper slot, to accommodate moving the FD closer to the large ring. If you have a Trek, you might visit a local dealer and ask if they have a replacement braze-on tab that will accommodate a Compact (they're marked with a C on the tab; the tabs are held in place with a couple of 3mm bolts).

If you can't do that and you are handy with a Dremel (and there is sufficient room on the braze-on), you could just extend it yourself.

A 10mm gap is quite a lot; on my friend's bike we were able to get within about 6mm, and we just left it at that. I would just try it; it will probably work just fine even with the big gap. You want to make sure the high limit screw on the FD is adjusted right, because if you overshift going to the outer ring, the danger with that larger gap is that the chain will get caught under there and bend your FD cage.
'nother is offline  
Old 10-12-07, 08:23 PM
  #8  
slow up hills
 
kudude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 4,931

Bikes: Giant TCR, Redline CX, Ritchey Breakaway, Spec S-works epic

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
if you're taking the time to repost. repost with a picture
kudude is offline  
Old 10-12-07, 08:48 PM
  #9  
It's ALL base...
 
DScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 6,716
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by damocles1
Not the intended design/use of the compact F/D. The compact F/D has a cage that follows the curve of the smaller chainrings more closely. Therefore making it easier to throw the chain up onto the big ring.
It's not designed to reach further down from abraze-on.

The problem some folks are having is the fact that older frames have the braze-on welded too high for the current crop of compact cranksets. I just ran into this problem with a 10 year old Litespeed frame and Ultegra SL compact cranks. It shifts with the almost 1cm gap, but not well. Because the F/D is too high, it wants to throw the chain off the outside of the big ring.

The easier answer? Get a 52 big ring and run 52/36 and a 12/25 cassette...
Ah, I see. I was thinking about the current crop of Campy derailleurs, but I realize that doesn't apply here. And, for 2008, Campy went to a single FD for both compact and standard cranks.

I guess one other choice for the OP is to use a clamp on FD if he can get it in the correct position.

What bike are we talking about, anyway?
DScott is offline  
Old 10-12-07, 08:59 PM
  #10  
semifreddo amartuerer
 
'nother's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 4,599

Bikes: several

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by DScott
I guess one other choice for the OP is to use a clamp on FD if he can get it in the correct position.
That's not likely to work, either. The clamp will interfere with the existing braze-on.

The realistic options are:
  • extend the slot in the existing braze-on tab, if possible
  • just leave it with a large gap (and pay close attention to the adjustment)
  • ditch the compact and get at least a 52-tooth large chainring
'nother is offline  
Old 10-12-07, 09:12 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
c_bake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 762

Bikes: Kestrel RT900SL, 1975 Viner, Specialized StumpJumper

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Cheapest route would be to try a Compact specific FD. I bet your problem will be fixed. I nsay this from experience.
c_bake is offline  
Old 10-12-07, 09:42 PM
  #12  
semifreddo amartuerer
 
'nother's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 4,599

Bikes: several

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by c_bake
Cheapest route would be to try a Compact specific FD. I bet your problem will be fixed. I nsay this from experience.
If it does, it's by accident more than by design. So-called compact-specific FDs have a different *curvature*, not necessarily a different depth from the mounting bolt to the bottom of the outer cage plate. That is the issue here.
'nother is offline  
Old 10-12-07, 11:39 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Seattle, Washington
Posts: 1,151
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thank you for all of the helpful responses. I do not believe that a compact specific FD will work due to the nature of the problem.

I currently own a Trek Y-Foil 77 (year 1998) so it is an older model. I'll try to get in touch with Trek and see what they have (thanks for the suggestion).

Sorry about the fact that I didn't provide a pic. I'm at school now and about 200 miles away from my on-going bike build, which will be brought down to me this weekend. I'll get one ASAP.
Bike enthusiast is offline  
Old 10-13-07, 12:26 AM
  #14  
Former Hoarder
 
55/Rad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Portland & Yachats, OR
Posts: 11,735

Bikes: Seven Axiom, Felt Z1, Dave Moulton Fuso

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Older Treks have this problem. I removed the tab, filed it open and it worked perfectly. Then I heard Trek had a replacement tab, so I ordered one for $20. When it arrived, it was nothing more that a regular one that had been filed...just like mine.

55/Rad
__________________
55/Rad is offline  
Old 10-13-07, 12:30 AM
  #15  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Seattle, Washington
Posts: 1,151
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 55/Rad
Older Treks have this problem. I removed the tab, filed it open and it worked perfectly. Then I heard Trek had a replacement tab, so I ordered one for $20. When it arrived, it was nothing more that a regular one that had been filed...just like mine.

55/Rad
May I ask how you filed it (with a dremel as suggested before)? I don't have any power tools with me, but I guess I could "borrow" some from the University....... For a project of course.......
Bike enthusiast is offline  
Old 10-13-07, 12:41 AM
  #16  
Former Hoarder
 
55/Rad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Portland & Yachats, OR
Posts: 11,735

Bikes: Seven Axiom, Felt Z1, Dave Moulton Fuso

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
I used a round "rat tail" file and a vise. Pretty simple actually.
__________________
55/Rad is offline  
Old 10-13-07, 04:44 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Seattle, Washington
Posts: 1,151
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 55/Rad
I used a round "rat tail" file and a vise. Pretty simple actually.
Thanks very much. Awesome Trek 5500 by the way.
Bike enthusiast is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.