Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Do you think a 70mm stem is to short?

Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Do you think a 70mm stem is to short?

Old 01-01-08, 11:00 AM
  #26  
Speedee
europoseur
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: 310
Posts: 321
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rruff
The "correct" stem length is whatever you need to get the bars in the right place. "Ideal" stem lengths are nothing but fashion statements... it won't effect the handling in any appreciable way.
I couldn't disagree more.
Speedee is offline  
Old 01-01-08, 11:29 AM
  #27  
wagathon
Banned
 
wagathon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,728
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Stem sizing isn't like shoe-sizing where if it's too small it's uncomfortable. It's more like shoe-sizing where ... whatever fits is best, no matter what the size is.

wagathon is offline  
Old 01-01-08, 11:53 AM
  #28  
grey poupon
Banned.
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
unless the top tube is around 30cm, yes--it's WAY too short

it will handle poorly (twitchy) and look very stupid

sorry it's not the answer you want, but it's the truth
grey poupon is offline  
Old 01-01-08, 12:01 PM
  #29  
Bontrager
Senior Member
 
Bontrager's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 2,339

Bikes: Road, MTB, Folding, Commuting bikes...

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
If it works for you then it's the correct length. Ignore all of the pro peleton riders and OCP's above.
Bontrager is offline  
Old 01-01-08, 12:13 PM
  #30  
JeffS
not a role model
 
JeffS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 4,659
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by rruff
The "correct" stem length is whatever you need to get the bars in the right place. "Ideal" stem lengths are nothing but fashion statements... it won't effect the handling in any appreciable way.
+1

I'm glad someone said it before I had to. Key word being appreciable.

There's too much stress in here over spacers, stem angle, and stem length - all to emulate some imaginary "racer ideal".
JeffS is offline  
Old 01-01-08, 12:21 PM
  #31  
Fox Farm
Senior Member
 
Fox Farm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Prague, Czech Republic
Posts: 2,742

Bikes: Merlin Extra Light, Orbea Orca, Ritchey Outback,Tomac Revolver Mountain Bike, Cannondale Crit 3.0 now used for time trials.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 123 Post(s)
Liked 52 Times in 33 Posts
Originally Posted by Nessism
Having to resort to a 70mm stem on a road bike indicates the top tube is too long. A new stem is a reasonable alternative if you don't want to change your frame but it won't change the fact that the bike does not fit properly.
That would be my gut feeing as well.
Fox Farm is offline  
Old 01-01-08, 01:08 PM
  #32  
Nessism
Senior Member
 
Nessism's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Torrance, CA
Posts: 3,043

Bikes: Homebuilt steel

Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2083 Post(s)
Liked 400 Times in 316 Posts
Originally Posted by JeffS
There's too much stress in here over spacers, stem angle, and stem length - all to emulate some imaginary "racer ideal".

There is a reason 95+% of the roadbikes bikes sold have stems between 100 - 120; the steering geometry and weight distribution of the bike is designed around a stem this length. Many pros use frames designed around even longer stems since these guys don't carry a lot of upper body weight and the longer stem allows more weight to be placed on the front end - a good thing for handling.

A 70mm stem indicates the top tube is too long and will result in a rearward weight balance. This is not a tragic situation, but not ideal either. I see nothing wrong with trying it out for the OP, particularly since he already has the frame. No way I'd recommend anyone purchasing a frame/bike knowing the only way to get comfortable is to install a 70mm stem though.
Nessism is offline  
Old 01-01-08, 01:24 PM
  #33  
Bontrager
Senior Member
 
Bontrager's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 2,339

Bikes: Road, MTB, Folding, Commuting bikes...

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
There's a reason 95%+ of the bike shops I've frequented have a basket of various stem lengths next to the fit station... and it's not because the 100-120mm stem is ideal for everybody. If it was then there wouldn't be every conceivable length and angle available aftermarket. I don't see quill's making a comeback, either. Like each individual person, the bike has to be dialed into each individual for their type of riding style and current goals. I went from a 90mm stem flipped up to down to a 110 mm stem as I got more flexible and lost my gut. Now I'm back to wishing I had my 90mm up-flipped stem again because that spare car-tire is back

You can't compare pro's to us mere mortals. They get paid to ride and go as fast as possible over all else.
Bontrager is offline  
Old 01-01-08, 01:55 PM
  #34  
nitropowered
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Athens, Ohio
Posts: 5,104

Bikes: Custom Custom Custom

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Get the 70mm stem and be happy with it. Then consider the overall reach when you buy your next bike. Keep the original stem because you'll want to switch the stem if/when you sell the bike. In the grand scheme of things, most people will swap out stems and bars when they buy a used bike but sometimes people look on ebay for a bike they can ride out of the box. Thats why you should keep the old one and replace it when it comes time for the auction block
nitropowered is offline  
Old 01-01-08, 02:07 PM
  #35  
Pendergast
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,039
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 75 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Try it. If it works, it works. If it doesn't, it doesn't. I always attributed the long stem fashion to the pros' desire to get lower by riding smaller frames, but if the fashion was created by pros with anorexic upper bodies dealing with handling characteristics related to that, all the more reason for "normal" people not to be slaves to that fashion. Do whatever works for you.
Pendergast is offline  
Old 01-01-08, 02:53 PM
  #36  
ExMachina
Senior, Senior Member
 
ExMachina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 681

Bikes: Canyon Ultimate

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Liked 12 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by sunnyside
Do you think a 70mm stem is to short? I have a nice older LItespeed Vortex that the top tube is to long for me, I could buy a 70mm stem and I think it would workout but I don't want handling issues. Buy a stem or sell the bike?
An obvious question is: have you gotten your saddle adjusted as you require? Also, are you happy with the drop from the saddle to the bars?

I'm only suspicious b/c I'm guessing that an "older" Vortex has the traditional, horizontal top tube and a 70mm stem really implies a non-ideal frame-to-rider fit. Can you straddle the top tube w/o difficulty?
ExMachina is offline  
Old 01-01-08, 04:01 PM
  #37  
sunnyside
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 39
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ExMachina
An obvious question is: have you gotten your saddle adjusted as you require? Also, are you happy with the drop from the saddle to the bars?

I'm only suspicious b/c I'm guessing that an "older" Vortex has the traditional, horizontal top tube and a 70mm stem really implies a non-ideal frame-to-rider fit. Can you straddle the top tube w/o difficulty?
I have 3 to 4 inches standover I am 5'10 with a 34 inch inseam, the bike is a 1999 57cm Vortex with a 56.5 TT I had to put a setback seatpost on the frame and move the seat back to get Kops and get some weight off my hands now the bike feels long to me.
sunnyside is offline  
Old 01-01-08, 05:48 PM
  #38  
WheresWaldo
Ride it like you stole it
 
WheresWaldo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Union County, NC
Posts: 4,994

Bikes: 2012 Cannondale EVO Ultegra Di2, Pedal Force Aeroblade, Rue Tandem

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 127 Post(s)
Liked 16 Times in 16 Posts
Originally Posted by botto
i think a 90mm stem is too short, therefor by default my answer is yes.
70mm stem would be a perfect size for a 46cm bike, what are you talking about?
An adult sized bike does need a longer stem.
__________________
"Never use your face as a brake pad" - Jake Watson
The Reloutionaries @ Shapeways
WheresWaldo is offline  
Old 01-01-08, 05:52 PM
  #39  
AnthonyG
Senior Member
 
AnthonyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Queanbeyan, Australia.
Posts: 4,135
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3450 Post(s)
Liked 418 Times in 288 Posts
Originally Posted by sunnyside
I have 3 to 4 inches standover I am 5'10 with a 34 inch inseam, the bike is a 1999 57cm Vortex with a 56.5 TT I had to put a setback seatpost on the frame and move the seat back to get Kops and get some weight off my hands now the bike feels long to me.

Sounds like you would benefit from a custom frame with a shorter top tube. With a shorter top tube you could fit a longer stem and keep the fashion police happy and yes, it would be nicer but at a cost$$$.

Till then fit the 70 mm stem. The steering will likely be a little twitchy but its nothing you can't handle. You could try narrower handlebars but don't downsize too radically. Measure your shoulder width and MAYBE use a bar just a fraction narrower.

I'm using a 60 mm stem and 38 cm wide bars but I'm thinking of getting some 36 cm bars instead. I have REALY narrow shoulders.

Regards, Anthony
AnthonyG is offline  
Old 01-01-08, 05:58 PM
  #40  
WheresWaldo
Ride it like you stole it
 
WheresWaldo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Union County, NC
Posts: 4,994

Bikes: 2012 Cannondale EVO Ultegra Di2, Pedal Force Aeroblade, Rue Tandem

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 127 Post(s)
Liked 16 Times in 16 Posts
Originally Posted by AnthonyG
Sounds like you would benefit from a custom frame with a shorter top tube. With a shorter top tube you could fit a longer stem and keep the fashion police happy and yes, it would be nicer but at a cost$$$.

Till then fit the 70 mm stem. The steering will likely be a little twitchy but its nothing you can't handle. You could try narrower handlebars but don't downsize too radically. Measure your shoulder width and MAYBE use a bar just a fraction narrower.

I'm using a 60 mm stem and 38 cm wide bars but I'm thinking of getting some 36 cm bars instead. I have REALY narrow shoulders.

Regards, Anthony
But Anthony, I seem to recall from earlier posts that you are a rather small person. Surely the 60mm stem you use is more appropriate to a frame sized for you. But on a larger sized road bike the balance is affected by many factors including but not limited to being either too upright or too stretched out. I believe Nessism spoke about overall balance in a previous post.
__________________
"Never use your face as a brake pad" - Jake Watson
The Reloutionaries @ Shapeways
WheresWaldo is offline  
Old 01-01-08, 06:37 PM
  #41  
ExMachina
Senior, Senior Member
 
ExMachina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 681

Bikes: Canyon Ultimate

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Liked 12 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by sunnyside
I have 3 to 4 inches standover I am 5'10 with a 34 inch inseam, the bike is a 1999 57cm Vortex with a 56.5 TT I had to put a setback seatpost on the frame and move the seat back to get Kops and get some weight off my hands now the bike feels long to me.
Ah-ha! So that's it--you're all legs! I've got a 34" inseam too, but I'm 6'2".

Sounds like you know exactly what you need to do then--try a (cheap) 70mm stem and see if you feel in firm control of the bike.
ExMachina is offline  
Old 01-01-08, 07:29 PM
  #42  
AnthonyG
Senior Member
 
AnthonyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Queanbeyan, Australia.
Posts: 4,135
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3450 Post(s)
Liked 418 Times in 288 Posts
Originally Posted by WheresWaldo
But Anthony, I seem to recall from earlier posts that you are a rather small person. Surely the 60mm stem you use is more appropriate to a frame sized for you. But on a larger sized road bike the balance is affected by many factors including but not limited to being either too upright or too stretched out. I believe Nessism spoke about overall balance in a previous post.
Yes I'm short. Even with my custom 650c wheeled bike with its short top tube I'm still using a short stem although this is to do with my short arms/reach I believe. Still I think 80 mm would be the ideal stem length on my bike so 60 mm is still short. Yes getting the overall balance would be ideal but I would put finding KOPS as being more important, which the OP has done which then leaves reach. Short of getting an expensive custom frame built the OP is left with using a short stem which while not ideal, is fine.

Regards, Anthony
AnthonyG is offline  
Old 01-02-08, 12:10 AM
  #43  
StanSeven
Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Delaware shore
Posts: 13,542

Bikes: Cervelo C5, Guru Photon, Waterford, Specialized CX

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1056 Post(s)
Liked 1,893 Times in 1,298 Posts
Sell the frame and get one that fits you better
StanSeven is offline  
Old 12-30-15, 01:18 PM
  #44  
OnyxTiger
Bonafide N00bs
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 442

Bikes: 2015 Cannondale Quick CX 4, 2014 Fuji Sportif 1.3C Disc, 2012 Fuji SST 2.0 Ultegra Di2

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 43 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by AnthonyG
With a shorter top tube you could fit a longer stem and keep the fashion police happy and yes, it would be nicer but at a cost$$$.
Pay the cost to impress fashion police?!? Who in the world would do that?!!

Sorry for resurrecting an almost 7 year thread... but this one interested me. Either the fit on my bike currently is too aggressive or I can actually salvage it before having to sell.
OnyxTiger is offline  
Old 12-30-15, 01:41 PM
  #45  
Doge
Senior Member
 
Doge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,466

Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753

Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3369 Post(s)
Liked 370 Times in 252 Posts
Originally Posted by sunnyside
Do you think a 70mm stem is to short? I have a nice older LItespeed Vortex that the top tube is to long for me, I could buy a 70mm stem and I think it would workout but I don't want handling issues. Buy a stem or sell the bike?
Keep the bike but too short. In context my wife now has my son's bike and I'm going for a 60mm higher rise.
For basic riding it is fine. The buy a bike option is not practical.
Doge is offline  
Old 12-30-15, 02:25 PM
  #46  
RPK79
Custom User Title
 
RPK79's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: SE MN
Posts: 11,239

Bikes: Fuji Roubaix Pro & Quintana Roo Kilo

Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2863 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 31 Times in 14 Posts
#CoastingApproved
RPK79 is offline  
Old 12-30-15, 04:45 PM
  #47  
JeffS
not a role model
 
JeffS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 4,659
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by OnyxTiger
Pay the cost to impress fashion police?!? Who in the world would do that?!!

Sorry for resurrecting an almost 7 year thread... but this one interested me. Either the fit on my bike currently is too aggressive or I can actually salvage it before having to sell.

Same type of person who would use a word like aggressive to describe bike fit probably.

Or who would resurrect an ancient thread for a rhetorical question.
JeffS is offline  
Old 12-30-15, 04:53 PM
  #48  
Maelochs
Senior Member
 
Maelochs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,032

Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE

Mentioned: 143 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7387 Post(s)
Liked 3,019 Times in 1,612 Posts
Yes a 70 mm stem is too short. Would never make it in the NBA, I don't care how well it shoots.
Maelochs is online now  
Old 12-30-15, 05:46 PM
  #49  
fstshrk
Senior Member
 
fstshrk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: WA State
Posts: 1,843
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20 Post(s)
Liked 5 Times in 3 Posts
99% of the bike manufacturers spec their 55-56cm frames with 100mm stems.

But I am sure you know better.


Originally Posted by Nessism
My opinion:

For a small frame - 50 - 53, 100mm is about right

Midsize frame - 54 - 57, 110mm

Large - 58 - 62, 120mm
fstshrk is offline  
Old 12-30-15, 05:46 PM
  #50  
Aubergine 
Bad example
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Seattle and Reims
Posts: 2,925
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 775 Post(s)
Liked 23 Times in 19 Posts
Originally Posted by Maelochs
Yes a 70 mm stem is too short. Would never make it in the NBA, I don't care how well it shoots.
We have a winner!
Aubergine is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information -

Copyright © 2023 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.