busted carbon fork, what to do???
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Ositoland
Posts: 372
Bikes: Lemond Tourmalet
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
busted carbon fork, what to do???
I took my tourmalet to the lbs to ck on damage after my lil accident. It turned out the Carbon post did not brake but it got bent in the alum part. Well I need a new fork. Now, should I replace it with another original fork for the tourmalet (lemond) or should I look to get another fork??? The lbs guy told me that he would sell me a carbon fork for $75 that he had there (new) but it sort of curves fwd. The original one was straight down. He said only diference would be that with the one curving fwd my feet wont hit the front wheel making it more convenient but the ride would be the same. What would u guys do? Go for the original one from lemond?? Get the one offered from my LBS??? Buy another one??? Price is not really an issue as the insurance of the park where it happened will pay for it... thanks for your suggestions!!!!
#2
Carbon Fiber Bones
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 980
Bikes: '07 Scott Speedster S30
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I would go with an exact replacement of the original fork.
Your guy at the LBS is wrong about the effect of the different fork. Because it has more "rake" (ie. it curves forward more) it could quite significantly alter the handling of the bike. As a general rule, the further forward the fork curves, the more stable the bike will be in a straight line, but it will also be more difficult to corner at speed, as the steering will feel slower and less responsive.
Your guy at the LBS is wrong about the effect of the different fork. Because it has more "rake" (ie. it curves forward more) it could quite significantly alter the handling of the bike. As a general rule, the further forward the fork curves, the more stable the bike will be in a straight line, but it will also be more difficult to corner at speed, as the steering will feel slower and less responsive.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 6,900
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
By your description, the first thing I would do is get another LBS. The fork rake is what matters and can have the same rake straight leg or curved leg fork. Throwing you a line of bs to sell what they have on hand.
You need to find out what rake fork came with the bike and find an appropriate replacment. Lots of lighter and in my humble opinion better forks than the stock one that needs replaced.
You need to find out what rake fork came with the bike and find an appropriate replacment. Lots of lighter and in my humble opinion better forks than the stock one that needs replaced.
#4
mountain troll
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: santa cruz mountains
Posts: 1,127
Bikes: the hummer brand mountain bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
uhm, a fork can look straight, but still have the same rake as a fork that appears to have more curve... these things can't be measured with the naked eye... all road forks will have very close/similar rakes. to an amateur, not really an issue... most proprietary forks seem to be kind of lame compared to those sold by the bigger fork companies like alpha q, easton, reynolds... im sure the one that comes with that lemond is el cheapo taiwanese bleh.. check sheldon's site for a lesson in rake...
#5
R.E.Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: CT
Posts: 863
Bikes: Cannondale, Kirk
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I would go with an exact replacement of the original fork.
Your guy at the LBS is wrong about the effect of the different fork. Because it has more "rake" (ie. it curves forward more) it could quite significantly alter the handling of the bike. As a general rule, the further forward the fork curves, the more stable the bike will be in a straight line, but it will also be more difficult to corner at speed, as the steering will feel slower and less responsive.
Your guy at the LBS is wrong about the effect of the different fork. Because it has more "rake" (ie. it curves forward more) it could quite significantly alter the handling of the bike. As a general rule, the further forward the fork curves, the more stable the bike will be in a straight line, but it will also be more difficult to corner at speed, as the steering will feel slower and less responsive.
#6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Ositoland
Posts: 372
Bikes: Lemond Tourmalet
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
ok now im getting confused...which one is it??? I been looking at the easton forks as an alternative....the ec70 is actually a lil lighter than the stock one..then I'll have to choose btwn the ec70 aereo and the ec70 sl....
#7
Headset-press carrier
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Corrales New Mexico
Posts: 2,137
Bikes: Kona with Campy 8, Lynskey Ti with Rival, Bianchi pista, Raleigh Team Frame with SRAM Red, Specialized Stump Jumper, Surley Big Dummy
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Here's Dave Moulton's blog on rake
https://davesbikeblog.blogspot.com/20...le-bit-of.html
-- Whether it curves or is straight you also have to account for the angle in contrast to the steerer tube (steering aixs) Your LBS dude may be right. I thing there is a bit of springness from slightly curved forks, which you may or may not want!
https://davesbikeblog.blogspot.com/20...le-bit-of.html
-- Whether it curves or is straight you also have to account for the angle in contrast to the steerer tube (steering aixs) Your LBS dude may be right. I thing there is a bit of springness from slightly curved forks, which you may or may not want!
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Detroit
Posts: 282
Bikes: LS Archon T1, LS Ghisallo, QR TiPhoon
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
There are two major factors at play here.
1. Fork Rake (as mentioned by the other posters) is hugely important. Rake can range from 40mm to 45mm and a 1mm difference can be huge.
2. Crown Height, or the distance from the center of the axel to the crown race of the headset. This difference cna effectively change head tuble angle and also adversely affect handling.
you must make sure that these two things are the exact same with any new fork if you want to preserve the old handling of the bike. (or make sure you can take it back if you get something different). I would not try to guess at handling differences as the 'more/less stable' rule is only a guide and may change depending on your crown height (I changed from a 40mm rake to a 43mm and got a more stable ride) so be really careful in selecting a new fork.
1. Fork Rake (as mentioned by the other posters) is hugely important. Rake can range from 40mm to 45mm and a 1mm difference can be huge.
2. Crown Height, or the distance from the center of the axel to the crown race of the headset. This difference cna effectively change head tuble angle and also adversely affect handling.
you must make sure that these two things are the exact same with any new fork if you want to preserve the old handling of the bike. (or make sure you can take it back if you get something different). I would not try to guess at handling differences as the 'more/less stable' rule is only a guide and may change depending on your crown height (I changed from a 40mm rake to a 43mm and got a more stable ride) so be really careful in selecting a new fork.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Fort Worth
Posts: 415
Bikes: Specialized, Moots, Bridgestone
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
+1 for going with something like an Easton 70/90 or Alpha Q or Ouzo Pro (Look makes some nice forks these days, though they are now only building integrated). Making sure the rake is correct is the key.
#11
Ha ha ha ha ha
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Gold Coast; Australia
Posts: 4,554
Bikes: 2004 ORBEA Mitis2 Plus Carbon, 2007 Cannondale Bad Boy Si Disc, 2012 Trek Gary Fisher Collection Marlin WSD 29er Aldi Big Box (Polygon) 650b
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times
in
7 Posts
#12
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Ositoland
Posts: 372
Bikes: Lemond Tourmalet
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Giantcfr1 the brakeage occured in exactly same place as mine!!!
Thank you for all the posts!!!
BTW the Lemond distributor here just told me he is waiting on answer from the cocmpany as they told him they dont have it on stok... Easton looks like a major contender!!! Thanks on the rake and crown height comments!
Thank you for all the posts!!!
BTW the Lemond distributor here just told me he is waiting on answer from the cocmpany as they told him they dont have it on stok... Easton looks like a major contender!!! Thanks on the rake and crown height comments!