Trek killed Klein, Gary Fisher brand?
#51
SLJ 6/8/65-5/2/07
Originally Posted by Patentcad
I bought my first Trek CF road bike in 1989, they were on the cutting edge at that time, and I think Lance was still in high school.
I was at the U of Central Florida when they cut their wrestling program. They kept the athletes on scholarship and one of them used to ride with the group I rode with. Very nice Trek with SunTour Superbe. Now, that dude was fast. The irritating kind of fast. Fast without really trying to be fast and, since he'd been a very good wrestler, more than a bit cocky about it. If you're in shape to wrestle at the collegiate level riding a bike fast isn't too hard.
I had been in shape to play football at the college level and riding a bike fast was damn hard.
__________________
“Life is not one damned thing after another. Life is one damned thing over and over.”
Edna St. Vincent Millay
“Life is not one damned thing after another. Life is one damned thing over and over.”
Edna St. Vincent Millay
#52
Firm but gentle
I wish you people who are new to the sport would quit ragging on Trek, you are flaunting your ignorance. Gary Fisher couldn't hang on to his company during the most prosperous time of rampant growth for mountain bikes of any stature, let alone for one of the most desireable names out there. If you figure out why, let me know. I am guessing that Bontrager got tired of the labor intensive nature of his business, and he could have easily told Trek to take a hike. OCLV carbon frames took the racing world by storm, the only other carbon frames made in any quantity were Calfee and Kestrel, and racers were slow to embrace them in enough number to be taken seriously. Trek made a huge investment in OCLV, and it paid off for them. Trek's biggest sin is being successful. They never did anything except throw tons of money at the competition for the rights to their name, none of whom objected .
#53
Firm but gentle
Also, the only people who rode Kleins never rode enough to realize their fat ***** aluminum frames were jackhammering their molars out of their heads.
#54
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Blacksburg, VA
Posts: 4,850
Bikes: Yeti ASRc, Focus Raven 29er, Flyxii FR316
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Gary Fishers aren't what they used to be . . . and that's a GOOD thing. Technology has marched forward. Trek has provided the capital for the Gary Fisher brand to continue to thrive and improve.
My closest Trek dealers all sell many times more Gary Fishers than they do Trek. In fact, for two of them, for a long time I thought they were Gary Fisher dealers without Trek. (My Gary Fisher is in the garage waiting for me.)
My closest Trek dealers all sell many times more Gary Fishers than they do Trek. In fact, for two of them, for a long time I thought they were Gary Fisher dealers without Trek. (My Gary Fisher is in the garage waiting for me.)
The horse being the store owner, whom I ride with on occasion.
#55
Senior Member
Before Trek got into carbon, they were the first (only?) American bike maker to bring silver-brazed lugged machine-built frames to the masses. That was cutting-edge technology at a time when everybody else was silver-brazing by hand or brazing with brass. Their early MTBs were boring, middle-of-the-road or misfires (e.g. early rear suspension) but their top-end road bikes have always been good.
The main problem is they seem to be ubiquitous nowadays.
The main problem is they seem to be ubiquitous nowadays.
#57
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,639
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
TREK is a great brand and they produce very good bikes. Honda is a great brand and they produce very good cars. Personally I didn't want a brand that I see by the dozens in a group ride. Hence, TREK, Specialized, Giant, and Cannondale were eliminated. Also, the Euro brands were off the table due to their pseudo-chic marketing. I bought a Litespeed; made in the USA by expert craftsmen. Of course I paid a premium, but don't regret it in the least.
#59
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St Peters, Missouri
Posts: 30,225
Bikes: Catrike 559 I own some others but they don't get ridden very much.
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1572 Post(s)
Liked 643 Times
in
364 Posts
I've had a 2,000 Klein Quantum Race for 8 years. I like it fine and don't subjectively feel any ride difference from my Steel Bridgestone that I can't attribute to tires. If I were to buy myself a new road bike in that price range today, however, I don't think that I'd choose aluminum just because the the industry is changing.
I don't think that Trek is what killed Klein. I think that reduced demand for aluminum framed bikes is what killed Klein.
#60
Firm but gentle
Kleins always felt very harsh to me, but I never put any real time on them, just test rides for repairs. This was when I weighed 150 lbs. Other than my full suspension MTB, I haven't ridden any new aluminum bikes.
#61
30 YR Wrench
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Oxford, OH
Posts: 2,006
Bikes: Waterford R-33, Madone 6.5, Trek 520
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
I always viewed Kleins as being the ultimate in a smooth road crit bike. They took off when you got on the gas, but after spending a few hours on beat up farm roads in Indiana, I was ready to get back on my relatively plush Waterford R33!
#62
Chases Dogs for Sport
Probably 65% MTBs (of all levels). Cervelo and Felt capture a lot more of the market (and of dealer stock) around here than Trek does. You can buy a Trek around here, but the selection is relatively poor.
#63
Newbie
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Where are Klein's carbon frames made?
Hi, Im a newbie and I owned a Quantum Race before Trek bought Klein. I had to sell it due to health issues which I have now alleviated, and I would like to re-adquire a Klein bike, provided the Q series frames (Elite) are made by Trek at their Wisconsin facility. Can someone confirm or deny this? Also, if you have a Klein with a carbon frame, can you comment on your reliability and experience? Thanks.
bigec2002
bigec2002
#66
Bike Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: South of Raleigh, North of New Hill, East of Harris Lake, NC
Posts: 9,622
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Specialized Roubaix, Giant OCR-C, Specialized Stumpjumper FSR, Stumpjumper Comp, 88 & 92Nishiki Ariel, 87 Centurion Ironman, 92 Paramount, 84 Nishiki Medalist
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 68 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 37 Times
in
27 Posts
Interesting thread. I have to wonder what's better/worse, being bought out by Trek or Dorel/Pacific. It will be interesting to see what Dorel does with Cannondale. Will it become a Klein/Lemond (slowly fade away) or a Gary Fisher (in many ways seems to be a very strong brand). IMHO Mongoose suffered as a brand after being purchased by Dorel, GT I'm not sure if they're better or worse off.
__________________
Roccobike BF Official Thread Terminator
Roccobike BF Official Thread Terminator
#67
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 902
Bikes: Seven Cycles Odonata
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
This thread is full of parlour talk. Amusing, but not very grounded in fact.
Outsourced? Sure, but mostly only the low end to mid-level and you can't fault them for that. It is impossible to build, sell and profit from a domestically produced $500 bike and have it still sell for $500. That's why nobody does it.
Go up to Waterloo. Gary still walks the halls and designs his bikes. He's not just a name....and I don't think he's unhappy about the bikes that have his name on them.
Klein isn't killed. It's just less relevant in the carbon crazed US market. His frames are expensive to make because of all the tube manipulation he specs, and in an age where cheap AL bikes flood the market, it's hard to sell really expensive ones. The riders that understand the difference are few in number. I believe the LeMond bikes will be offered under the Klein name so there's a little more diversity there.
And this:
and this:
....are utterly without a clue.
LeMonds were lugged steel before Trek bought them. Real innovative. And Fisher? He now has access to fabrication capabilities that would likely have remained out of reach were he still operating independently. Same with Klein who can be seen wandering the halls in his white tube socks and pocket protector in Waterloo from time to time. These aren't just brand names-they're people!
You guys need to do a little fact checking. Maybe take a factory tour, and see just how much R&D goes on there on a daily basis. You would not believe the racks of frames and components from other manufacturers that are tested to destruction to find out how they fail, and if they don't fail, they learn why and try to incorporate ideas. That costs money, and takes time, but they feel it's worth it.
I've ridden lots and lots of bikes. There are lots of great ones that Trek doesn't make! On the other hand, Trek doesn't suck, and it's ignorant to claim they do out of supposition.
Outsourced? Sure, but mostly only the low end to mid-level and you can't fault them for that. It is impossible to build, sell and profit from a domestically produced $500 bike and have it still sell for $500. That's why nobody does it.
Go up to Waterloo. Gary still walks the halls and designs his bikes. He's not just a name....and I don't think he's unhappy about the bikes that have his name on them.
Klein isn't killed. It's just less relevant in the carbon crazed US market. His frames are expensive to make because of all the tube manipulation he specs, and in an age where cheap AL bikes flood the market, it's hard to sell really expensive ones. The riders that understand the difference are few in number. I believe the LeMond bikes will be offered under the Klein name so there's a little more diversity there.
And this:
and this:
....are utterly without a clue.
LeMonds were lugged steel before Trek bought them. Real innovative. And Fisher? He now has access to fabrication capabilities that would likely have remained out of reach were he still operating independently. Same with Klein who can be seen wandering the halls in his white tube socks and pocket protector in Waterloo from time to time. These aren't just brand names-they're people!
You guys need to do a little fact checking. Maybe take a factory tour, and see just how much R&D goes on there on a daily basis. You would not believe the racks of frames and components from other manufacturers that are tested to destruction to find out how they fail, and if they don't fail, they learn why and try to incorporate ideas. That costs money, and takes time, but they feel it's worth it.
I've ridden lots and lots of bikes. There are lots of great ones that Trek doesn't make! On the other hand, Trek doesn't suck, and it's ignorant to claim they do out of supposition.
but this exercise/discussion is actually about branding, and about the destruction of the klein name as a brand due to the mishandling by trek. you see, trek has a pretty crappy brand, and they just can't seem to shake the reputation of being mass-produced, non-innovative, bland design, etc etc. They are doing amazing things on the engineering front, but on the enthusiast side they are perceived as lacking soul.
it doesn't matter that mr. klein is still walking the halls. what matters is that people don't know that mr klein is walking the halls. trek buys klein. klein takes a HUGE hit in perceived value. trek does nothing to counter this perception, and the brand becomes less viable.
i still have an old klein in the garage, it's white with HUGE aluminum tubes and super cool 80s neonish coloring. it's incredibly stylized, and still speaks to me on a very personal level like a mass produced trek never could.
selling consumer products is actually selling a lifestyle. you are selling sex. you are selling inspiration. you are selling freedom, hope, or adventure. trek sells bikes with bad paint jobs, and that doesn't inspire people on a fundamental level. what does trek stand for? if trek was at a dinner party, what would he be wearing? would he get the girls? would he be cool? iconic? annoying? if trek lived on your street would he be a successful athlete or would he be an annoying accountant (nothing against CPAs )
in a crowded marketplace full of choices, consumers have many reasons to make buying decisions. i mean, how much difference is there? but what gets us to open our wallets is EXACTLY the thing that trek destroys when it buys the brand. and trek doesn't seem to understand this. we want to buy the bike made by the people who live their lives as passionately as we do. the trek guys might be the biggest cycling nerds in the industry, but the brand certainly doesn't reflect that.
#68
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: SE Minnesota
Posts: 12,275
Bikes: are better than yours.
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
You're mistaking the confused opinion of a small minority of bike weenies for popular perception. The popular perception is that Trek makes some of the world's best and most well-known bikes. That's why they sell so many and, quite frankly, it's why the grumpy minority doesn't like them. You'll never feel "special" on the same bike everyone else rides.
#69
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Someplace trying to figure it out
Posts: 10,664
Bikes: Cannondale EVO, CAAD9, Giant cross bike.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 67 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
6 Posts
TREK is a great brand and they produce very good bikes. Honda is a great brand and they produce very good cars. Personally I didn't want a brand that I see by the dozens in a group ride. Hence, TREK, Specialized, Giant, and Cannondale were eliminated. Also, the Euro brands were off the table due to their pseudo-chic marketing. I bought a Litespeed; made in the USA by expert craftsmen. Of course I paid a premium, but don't regret it in the least.
#70
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 821
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Before Trek got into carbon, they were the first (only?) American bike maker to bring silver-brazed lugged machine-built frames to the masses. That was cutting-edge technology at a time when everybody else was silver-brazing by hand or brazing with brass. Their early MTBs were boring, middle-of-the-road or misfires (e.g. early rear suspension) but their top-end road bikes have always been good.
The main problem is they seem to be ubiquitous nowadays.
The main problem is they seem to be ubiquitous nowadays.
#71
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 789
Bikes: 09 Pinarello Prince, 09 Cervelo P3, 10 Stevens Team Carbon
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Markets including bicycle markets are dynamic. Technology changes. One cannot blame a business for making business decisions if technology and/or demand for a given bike changes. All companies do that or they would not stay in business.
The Trek Madone is great bicycle using state of the art design and technology. The ride and performance of the bike is fantastic. I looked at a lot of bikes before I bought my Madone because as an architect I am analytical by nature. The Madone with its Dura-Ace components was a wonderfully performing bike and a great value. And the frame was built in the USA and the bike was assembled here. Trek also does not get enough recognition for its excellent customer service. Their customer service people are readily accessible, knowledgeable, and really helpful. In comparison, a friend of mine has Cervelo and they are impossible in terms of customer support. The Trek Madone is a great bicycle with world class carbon technology that other companies are scrambling to catch up with. As a company Trek has been very responsive to dealers and customers alike.
The Trek Madone is great bicycle using state of the art design and technology. The ride and performance of the bike is fantastic. I looked at a lot of bikes before I bought my Madone because as an architect I am analytical by nature. The Madone with its Dura-Ace components was a wonderfully performing bike and a great value. And the frame was built in the USA and the bike was assembled here. Trek also does not get enough recognition for its excellent customer service. Their customer service people are readily accessible, knowledgeable, and really helpful. In comparison, a friend of mine has Cervelo and they are impossible in terms of customer support. The Trek Madone is a great bicycle with world class carbon technology that other companies are scrambling to catch up with. As a company Trek has been very responsive to dealers and customers alike.
#72
CAT6 UTP 568B
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bellingham / Vancouver
Posts: 2,548
Bikes: 2005 Allez Elite
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I don't know where you guys are, but in the pacific northwest Fisher is still very popular for XC mountain bikes. Less so in the freeride and downhill segment because of Trek's refusal to license any of the more modern, non-single-pivot rear suspension technologies (Horst link, Giant Maestro, etc). Take a look at the Santa Cruz Nomad, Specialized Demo7/8, Giant Reign X1 for example.
Fisher is far from dead. I met Gary at a trade show booth in 2005 where they were showing off the latest bikes, he's very much still involved in the company. This is the 2007 Ferrous I bought last year, same geometry and specs as a Paragon but in 853 steel with eccentric bottom bracket.
Fisher is far from dead. I met Gary at a trade show booth in 2005 where they were showing off the latest bikes, he's very much still involved in the company. This is the 2007 Ferrous I bought last year, same geometry and specs as a Paragon but in 853 steel with eccentric bottom bracket.
#73
Mad scientist w/a wrench
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chucktown
Posts: 760
Bikes: none working atm
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
You guys are really forgetting the basic fact of business aquisitions: Klein, Lemond, Fisher and Bontrager weren't just bought, they also made decisions to SELL.
Hostile takeovers do happen, but since nobody has stories of ninjas on black madones firebombing a Klein warehouse, I think we can safely assume that all of the names absorbed into the Trek family did so of their own free will and at their own best judgement.
Maybe one or two of them sold out (giving up a dream in the name of absurd amounts of money) but you can't go thrashing trek for trying to make a buck without slinging a little vitriol at Klein, Fisher, LeMond and Bontrager themselves.
That said, I don't see any real synergy in my Pilot that makes me want to buy another pre-assembled multi-speed road bike. Track bikes OTOH, well I might just go back to Trek on that one. :grin:
Hostile takeovers do happen, but since nobody has stories of ninjas on black madones firebombing a Klein warehouse, I think we can safely assume that all of the names absorbed into the Trek family did so of their own free will and at their own best judgement.
Maybe one or two of them sold out (giving up a dream in the name of absurd amounts of money) but you can't go thrashing trek for trying to make a buck without slinging a little vitriol at Klein, Fisher, LeMond and Bontrager themselves.
That said, I don't see any real synergy in my Pilot that makes me want to buy another pre-assembled multi-speed road bike. Track bikes OTOH, well I might just go back to Trek on that one. :grin:
#75
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 909
Bikes: Klein
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I went on the Klein factory tour last week. The guide told the group that Trek killed Klein. They have removed all of the LeMond stuff because of ongoing litigation.