We all love a periscope >>>
I thought my two spacers on my cannondale was pathetic, but I think I found a winner. ;)
Cop this... http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y21...20Apr08004.jpg |
Lol...pic of the week
|
Reach for your water bottle and poke your eye out :eek:
|
Originally Posted by arcticbiker
(Post 6551134)
Reach for your water bottle and poke your eye out :eek:
http://www.iansmith.co.uk/image/blog...tory_2_400.jpg |
It's a steering column when you want to rest out of the drops. :rolleyes:
|
and that computer cable is a mess
|
|
Originally Posted by giantcfr1
(Post 6551190)
|
I don't like my stack and my inflexible back.
I'm not loosing spacers as quickly as I'd like to be. http://i206.photobucket.com/albums/b...k/P3170010.jpg |
Isn't the rule of thumb to have the tops of the bars 1-2 inches below the top of the saddle?
|
Originally Posted by MrCjolsen
(Post 6551739)
Isn't the rule of thumb to have the tops of the bars 1-2 inches below the top of the saddle?
|
What's the advantage of having them super low? I know when I sit up (tops or hoods) I produce more power. Not enough to offset the aerodynamics of being in the drops with my head down, but enough to notice.
It just seems that Rollin wants his bars lower for some reason, aside from comfort. My concern is that he's either sacrificing comfort for aesthetics, or chasing the aerodynamic dragon. |
LOL. I was afraid to cut my steerer too, but that is taking it a bit far.
|
Originally Posted by MrCjolsen
(Post 6551412)
Don't knock it. It's what you gotta do when you have freakishly long legs and big feet.
|
Don't knock it. It's what you gotta do when you have freakishly long legs and big feet. |
maybe the person with the bike might be temporarily borrowing it from someone and can't cut it to size? just tossing a possible theory out there to why it's uncut.
|
compensation
|
Originally Posted by Feathers
(Post 6553299)
maybe the person with the bike might be temporarily borrowing it from someone and can't cut it to size? just tossing a possible theory out there to why it's uncut.
|
Originally Posted by MrCjolsen
(Post 6551739)
Isn't the rule of thumb to have the tops of the bars 1-2 inches below the top of the saddle?
And if you follow the marketing, everyone should ride like racers... Actually, there are several "rules of thumb" and one of them, I believe French fit, starts with the bars even with the seat. A popular configuration among people for whom speed isn't the primary objective of cycling, like tourers, and me. |
|
Originally Posted by rollin
(Post 6551683)
I don't like my stack and my inflexible back.
I'm not loosing spacers as quickly as I'd like to be. http://i206.photobucket.com/albums/b...k/P3170010.jpg |
Originally Posted by MrCjolsen
(Post 6553082)
What's the advantage of having them super low? I know when I sit up (tops or hoods) I produce more power. Not enough to offset the aerodynamics of being in the drops with my head down, but enough to notice.
You can go faster with less power if you can get into a more aerodynamic position. |
I run a tall stack, bar tops just slightly below saddle. My neck appreciates it on long rides.
I also notice that in races I spend more time on the drops than everybody else. (Meaning, greater than zero.... Hmm....). What's the point of having drop bars if you never use the drops? |
Originally Posted by Bontrager
(Post 6553257)
But instead of a bunch of spacers and a flipped down stem you could lose a spacer or 2 and flip it up - or get a stem with a higher rise and lose more spacers.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:50 AM. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.