Bike Forums

Bike Forums (https://www.bikeforums.net/forum.php)
-   Road Cycling (https://www.bikeforums.net/road-cycling/)
-   -   We all love a periscope >>> (https://www.bikeforums.net/road-cycling/409481-we-all-love-periscope.html)

giantcfr1 04-20-08 07:32 AM

We all love a periscope >>>
 
I thought my two spacers on my cannondale was pathetic, but I think I found a winner. ;)
Cop this...
http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y21...20Apr08004.jpg

Lecterman 04-20-08 07:33 AM

Lol...pic of the week

arcticbiker 04-20-08 07:36 AM

Reach for your water bottle and poke your eye out :eek:

wanders 04-20-08 07:41 AM


Originally Posted by arcticbiker (Post 6551134)
Reach for your water bottle and poke your eye out :eek:

"You'll (put) your eye out kid"

http://www.iansmith.co.uk/image/blog...tory_2_400.jpg

BillyD 04-20-08 07:43 AM

It's a steering column when you want to rest out of the drops. :rolleyes:

scotch 04-20-08 07:45 AM

and that computer cable is a mess

giantcfr1 04-20-08 07:59 AM

:D This one has the opposite condition.

http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y21...20Apr08011.jpg

MrCjolsen 04-20-08 09:12 AM


Originally Posted by giantcfr1 (Post 6551190)
:D This one has the opposite condition.

http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y21...20Apr08011.jpg

Don't knock it. It's what you gotta do when you have freakishly long legs and big feet.

rollin 04-20-08 10:16 AM

I don't like my stack and my inflexible back.

I'm not loosing spacers as quickly as I'd like to be.

http://i206.photobucket.com/albums/b...k/P3170010.jpg

MrCjolsen 04-20-08 10:28 AM

Isn't the rule of thumb to have the tops of the bars 1-2 inches below the top of the saddle?

clichty 04-20-08 03:25 PM


Originally Posted by MrCjolsen (Post 6551739)
Isn't the rule of thumb to have the tops of the bars 1-2 inches below the top of the saddle?

Not at all. Totally depends on the person and their geometry.

MrCjolsen 04-20-08 03:43 PM

What's the advantage of having them super low? I know when I sit up (tops or hoods) I produce more power. Not enough to offset the aerodynamics of being in the drops with my head down, but enough to notice.

It just seems that Rollin wants his bars lower for some reason, aside from comfort. My concern is that he's either sacrificing comfort for aesthetics, or chasing the aerodynamic dragon.

BackRoadsBiker 04-20-08 03:53 PM

LOL. I was afraid to cut my steerer too, but that is taking it a bit far.

Bontrager 04-20-08 04:24 PM


Originally Posted by MrCjolsen (Post 6551412)
Don't knock it. It's what you gotta do when you have freakishly long legs and big feet.

But instead of a bunch of spacers and a flipped down stem you could lose a spacer or 2 and flip it up - or get a stem with a higher rise and lose more spacers.

VosBike 04-20-08 04:29 PM


Don't knock it. It's what you gotta do when you have freakishly long legs and big feet.
Or not buy a racing bike with a short headtube if going fast isn't for you.

Feathers 04-20-08 04:33 PM

maybe the person with the bike might be temporarily borrowing it from someone and can't cut it to size? just tossing a possible theory out there to why it's uncut.

Asian Sensation 04-20-08 04:44 PM

compensation

HigherGround 04-20-08 06:44 PM


Originally Posted by Feathers (Post 6553299)
maybe the person with the bike might be temporarily borrowing it from someone and can't cut it to size? just tossing a possible theory out there to why it's uncut.

But why would the original owner not cut that steerer tube? Somebody should make a top cap with a blinking red light to warn low-flying aircraft.

Little Darwin 04-20-08 06:54 PM


Originally Posted by MrCjolsen (Post 6551739)
Isn't the rule of thumb to have the tops of the bars 1-2 inches below the top of the saddle?

For racing...

And if you follow the marketing, everyone should ride like racers...

Actually, there are several "rules of thumb" and one of them, I believe French fit, starts with the bars even with the seat. A popular configuration among people for whom speed isn't the primary objective of cycling, like tourers, and me.

milchad 04-20-08 07:10 PM

http://www.toolstation.com/images/li...bbig/66126.jpg

kill.cactus 04-20-08 07:15 PM


Originally Posted by rollin (Post 6551683)
I don't like my stack and my inflexible back.

I'm not loosing spacers as quickly as I'd like to be.

http://i206.photobucket.com/albums/b...k/P3170010.jpg

The new cover for Bicycling Mag's Swimsuit Edition?

garysol1 04-20-08 07:17 PM


Originally Posted by MrCjolsen (Post 6553082)
What's the advantage of having them super low? I know when I sit up (tops or hoods) I produce more power. Not enough to offset the aerodynamics of being in the drops with my head down, but enough to notice.

Looks like your 3rd sentence answered your first sentences question. :)
You can go faster with less power if you can get into a more aerodynamic position.

Creakyknees 04-20-08 08:30 PM

I run a tall stack, bar tops just slightly below saddle. My neck appreciates it on long rides.

I also notice that in races I spend more time on the drops than everybody else. (Meaning, greater than zero.... Hmm....). What's the point of having drop bars if you never use the drops?

Camilo 04-20-08 10:19 PM


Originally Posted by Bontrager (Post 6553257)
But instead of a bunch of spacers and a flipped down stem you could lose a spacer or 2 and flip it up - or get a stem with a higher rise and lose more spacers.

Why? Is it just aesthetics, or a functional difference. Because, my choice would be more spacers and near horizontal stem - but strictly because I think it looks better.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:50 AM.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.