Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Interesting article on tires

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Interesting article on tires

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-21-08, 07:03 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Flatland NC
Posts: 253

Bikes: Cervelo P2C, 1982 Univega, Moto Messenger

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Interesting article on tires

I found this very interesting.

https://www.rouesartisanales.com/article-1503651.html

I wondered why my road bike seemed so much harder to pedal. Rolling resistance.
mgbguy is offline  
Old 04-21-08, 07:07 PM
  #2  
100% Fred
 
LanceFanBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 843

Bikes: 2005 Trek 1500 - Postal Service Edition

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
crazy, i really thought the narrower tires has less resistance
LanceFanBoy is offline  
Old 04-21-08, 07:12 PM
  #3  
Mad Town Biker
 
Murrays's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 974
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by LanceFanBoy
crazy, i really thought the narrower tires has less resistance
Don't worry, you're not alone, it's a very common misconception.

OTOH, you can generally pump narrower tires to higher pressure which can reduce the rolling resistance...if the road is really smooth

The only real advantages of narrower tires? They weigh less and they have slightly lower air resistance.

-murray
Murrays is offline  
Old 04-21-08, 07:16 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
AnthonyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Queanbeyan, Australia.
Posts: 4,135
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3450 Post(s)
Liked 420 Times in 289 Posts
Originally Posted by mgbguy
I found this very interesting.

https://www.rouesartisanales.com/article-1503651.html

I wondered why my road bike seemed so much harder to pedal. Rolling resistance.
This had been discussed many times before. Yes slightly larger tires have slightly less rolling resistance when ALL other factors are equal (construction and tire pressure to name 2 factors) so they shouldn't be written off and you shouldn't just assume that smaller tires are faster however the trick is that you need to run smaller tires at higher pressures which compensates but then you do end up with a slightly harsher ride.

What can you take out of this? 700 x 25c tires are better for most riders than 700 x 23c tires but fashion dictates that 700 x 23c tires have taken over.

Regards, Anthony
AnthonyG is offline  
Old 04-21-08, 07:21 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Flatland NC
Posts: 253

Bikes: Cervelo P2C, 1982 Univega, Moto Messenger

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Yeah, but my bike came with Hutchinson Top Speeds. The worst according to the clincher ratings at the bottom. Put the Pro Race 3s on it and the difference is really noticeable.

I guess the tire ratings at the bottom were what really got me.
mgbguy is offline  
Old 04-21-08, 07:23 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
PipinFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,296

Bikes: 2007 Orbea Onix TDF,2008 Orbea Orca in Red

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Interesting,I know by know that if I want really lower resistance and a super fast/light tire I'll go with Schwalbe Ultremo,but every day riding I'll go Continental attack and force,these 2 set I mentioned before are in my opinion an excellent choice for anybody,even Pro riders loves them...
700X23C and 700X22C rules.

This is a very hard tire to beat..ahh they make a very light tube as well.

https://www.totalcycling.com/index.ph...urrency&id=USD

Last edited by PipinFan; 04-21-08 at 07:29 PM.
PipinFan is offline  
Old 04-21-08, 07:30 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
CCFISH81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Galveston, Tx
Posts: 678

Bikes: Specialized Allez

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Since when did Pro Race 2's have "very good" puncture resistance....
CCFISH81 is offline  
Old 04-21-08, 07:31 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 5,250
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Twenty years ago, it was common for tire companies to publish data on rolling resistance and other performance factors. But, the chart in the article was the first multi-brand comparison I've seen in many years.

The results were similar to what Schwinn found in tests back around 1970...two tires of the same size and weight may vary in rolling resistance by a factor of two to one...yet there is no easy way for a customer to find out that information.

The chart in the article seems to have been done by Continental, which is interesting, because Continental tires did not get the best results in the tests.

Tests done twenty years ago showed, not surprisingly, that many 28mm tires outperform some 23mm tires, plus have a "plush" ride, last twice as long, and have twice the flat resistance.

The bike industry responded to the evidence that 28mm tires are the best size for non-racing purposes by designing frames and forks that make it difficult to use 28mm tires, and impossible to use 28mm tires with real fenders.

The pros use 23mm tires, so the other 99% of us are supposed to use them too.
alanbikehouston is offline  
Old 04-21-08, 07:36 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Flatland NC
Posts: 253

Bikes: Cervelo P2C, 1982 Univega, Moto Messenger

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by CCFISH81
Since when did Pro Race 2's have "very good" puncture resistance....
Apparently when compared to Hutchinson top speeds

If my calculations are correct, you should get an extra 1 mph difference between the pro race 2 and say hutchinson top speed, ceterus parabis.
mgbguy is offline  
Old 04-21-08, 07:39 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Flatland NC
Posts: 253

Bikes: Cervelo P2C, 1982 Univega, Moto Messenger

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by alanbikehouston
Twenty years ago, it was common for tire companies to publish data on rolling resistance and other performance factors. But, the chart in the article was the first multi-brand comparison I've seen in many years.

The results were similar to what Schwinn found in tests back around 1970...two tires of the same size and weight may vary in rolling resistance by a factor of two to one...yet there is no easy way for a customer to find out that information.

The chart in the article seems to have been done by Continental, which is interesting, because Continental tires did not get the best results in the tests.

Tests done twenty years ago showed, not surprisingly, that many 28mm tires outperform some 23mm tires, plus have a "plush" ride, last twice as long, and have twice the flat resistance.

The bike industry responded to the evidence that 28mm tires are the best size for non-racing purposes by designing frames and forks that make it difficult to use 28mm tires, and impossible to use 28mm tires with real fenders.

The pros use 23mm tires, so the other 99% of us are supposed to use them too.

Actually this is from a custom wheel building website. A little more info.

https://www.rouesartisanales.com/article-15441821.html
mgbguy is offline  
Old 04-21-08, 08:20 PM
  #11  
Mad Town Biker
 
Murrays's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 974
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by AnthonyG
This had been discussed many times before. Yes slightly larger tires have slightly less rolling resistance when ALL other factors are equal (construction and tire pressure to name 2 factors) so they shouldn't be written off and you shouldn't just assume that smaller tires are faster however the trick is that you need to run smaller tires at higher pressures which compensates but then you do end up with a slightly harsher ride.

What can you take out of this? 700 x 25c tires are better for most riders than 700 x 23c tires but fashion dictates that 700 x 23c tires have taken over.

Regards, Anthony


OTOH, that "harsher ride" from the higher pressure, narrow tires may also be sapping energy. On a bumpy road, lower pressure may actually take less energy. (sorry, I don't have a study to back it up)

-murray
Murrays is offline  
Old 04-21-08, 10:40 PM
  #12  
Uber Goober
 
StephenH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Dallas area, Texas
Posts: 11,758
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 190 Post(s)
Liked 41 Times in 32 Posts
"If my calculations are correct, you should get an extra 1 mph difference between the pro race 2 and say hutchinson top speed, ceterus parabis."

The comparison was still assuming equal pressure in each- so if one tire is rated for higher pressure than the other, that isn't taken into account.
__________________
"be careful this rando stuff is addictive and dan's the 'pusher'."
StephenH is offline  
Old 04-21-08, 11:51 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
sunburst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 1,762

Bikes: Giant, Peugeots, Motobecanes, Kona, Specialized, Bike Friday, Ironhorse, Royal Scot, Schwinns

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 188 Post(s)
Liked 96 Times in 51 Posts
Originally Posted by alanbikehouston

The bike industry responded to the evidence that 28mm tires are the best size for non-racing purposes by designing frames and forks that make it difficult to use 28mm tires, and impossible to use 28mm tires with real fenders.
I managed to just barely squeeze a 28mm Conti gatorskin on my spare road bike ('87 Trek) and I thought it was rubbing at first. Turns out it was just those little rubber "hairs" that stick out on new tires - they were hitting the frame. No way I could get a fender in there. Bicycling recommended them as a way to "plush" your bike for centuries and long rides.

I was glad to see my new Giant OCR came with 25mm Michelin Pro2's, rather than 23mm. Now those are nice tires! They feel really compliant ... but then again, so does the carbon frame.
sunburst is offline  
Old 04-22-08, 02:43 AM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
shayel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Jerusalem, Israel
Posts: 128

Bikes: '06 Giant TCR Alliance

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by sunburst
I managed to just barely squeeze a 28mm Conti gatorskin on my spare road bike ('87 Trek) and I thought it was rubbing at first. Turns out it was just those little rubber "hairs" that stick out on new tires - they were hitting the frame. No way I could get a fender in there. Bicycling recommended them as a way to "plush" your bike for centuries and long rides.
OT, but I don't understand what the big fuss about riding centuries is. In the last few months I did a couple of centuries every month, some on consecutive days.

I'm riding an alu-carbon Giant TCR with 23mm tires inflated to ~120psi, Flite saddle, and got about 9cm of drop from the saddle to the bars. I'd never be mistaken for a hardman, yet I never felt any discomfort. True, sitting in La-Z-boy would probably be more comfortable, but where the fun in that?

Maybe when I'll do 500km time trials I'd think of it differently, but I belive the best way to "plush" your rides is simply to ride more (assuming the bike fits.)
shayel is offline  
Old 04-22-08, 04:03 AM
  #15  
Mr. Dopolina
 
Bob Dopolina's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 10,217

Bikes: KUUPAS, Simpson VR

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 149 Post(s)
Liked 117 Times in 41 Posts
Is this darn thing resurfacing AGAIN.

Throw all the results out the window. The tires tested are all 1 or 2 generations out of date.

Also not included in the article was the conclusion reached by Continental AG (who actually did the testing) 23c tires were the best ALL ROUND performer. This included some things not mentioned in the article or published in the charts.

AGAIN, This is OLD data. Don't purchase tires based on this information.
__________________
BDop Cycling Company Ltd.: bdopcycling.com, facebook, instagram



Bob Dopolina is offline  
Old 04-22-08, 05:04 AM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,133
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Maybe I should show this to my boss with his 700x18c tires on his old racing bike.
roy5000x2 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.