Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Would You Buy These?

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Would You Buy These?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-16-04, 05:53 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 93
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Would You Buy These?

Hey Everyone,

I've been on the hunt for some sunglasses that fit my rather puny head. After trying on lots of Rudy Projects, Oakleys, Smiths, etc. I've found only two styles that fit my face and would be an adequate replacement for my old shades(smith toasters).

1. Oakley Half Jacket XLJ 2. Oakley Lance Armstrong Edition

Here's the thing though: The main reason I'm discarding my Smith Toasters is because they're fogging up like crazy, I think partly due to the fact that they sit so close to my face(those of you who own these will understand what I mean). I wanted some sunglasses that wouldn't fog, I tried on lots of pairs, looking for a pair that sat far enough off my face while not being waaay to big for my head. These 2 were the best I could do. I really like the XLJ's, and I could find them online for a fairly reasonable price. However, there is no venting in the lenses like the Lance Armstrongs so I'm wondering if I'd be in the exact same boat if I bought them(with the fogging that is). Also the Lance Oakleys are outrageously more money than I think they're worth so I had pretty much ruled them out until...

I got the chance to pick up a pair of Lance Armstrong shades for about $140 including shipping, making the price a lot more reasonable. I'd be spending about 20 bucks more on these if I bought them.. is it worth it or do you think these shades are all marketing and not much substance? What would you do?
BeardedMonk is offline  
Old 01-16-04, 06:08 PM
  #2  
Dude who rides bike
 
BikeInMN's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: U S of A
Posts: 642
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
The vented G30 Hybrid S lens that comes with the LA Oakleys is fantastic. I have one for my Pro M Frames and it's the most versatile lens I own. No fogging issues for me.
BikeInMN is offline  
Old 01-16-04, 07:03 PM
  #3  
Just Pedaling
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 81

Bikes: Trek 5500 & Colnago Asso

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BeardedMonk
Hey Everyone,



1. Oakley Half Jacket XLJ 2. Oakley Lance Armstrong Edition

I got the chance to pick up a pair of Lance Armstrong shades for about $140 including shipping, making the price a lot more reasonable. I'd be spending about 20 bucks more on these if I bought them.. is it worth it or do you think these shades are all marketing and not much substance? What would you do?
If you really really liked it and really needed it in your situation, i will go ahead and purchase it regardless of the price. Price and marketing is not what you go by with. You go by with what makes you feel good about buying one. If you buy the second choice, theres always a posiblity of saying " i wished i bought the half jacket xlj2 lance armstrong oakleys " and we do it often. BUY WHAT YOU THINK IS BEST FOR YOU.

Last edited by ezryder03; 01-16-04 at 08:05 PM.
ezryder03 is offline  
Old 01-16-04, 07:34 PM
  #4  
Member
 
Owen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Tucson
Posts: 31
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I have a small cranium too. 6 3/4 hat size. I have found the best sunglasses for me that fit snug and fit under the helmet straps I bought for my 5 yr old son at walmart from the kids rack. Uva and uvb rated, comfortable, and only cost $8 and everyone ask where I got my cool aerodynamic, lightweight specs. Holes in the ear stems to prevent fogging and no uncomfortable earpieces. At some tris I have people assume they were some exotic brand that cost $200 and ask me if I liked my (brandname) and was it worth it.
Owen is offline  
Old 01-16-04, 08:48 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 93
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Owen
I have a small cranium too. 6 3/4 hat size. I have found the best sunglasses for me that fit snug and fit under the helmet straps I bought for my 5 yr old son at walmart from the kids rack. Uva and uvb rated, comfortable, and only cost $8 and everyone ask where I got my cool aerodynamic, lightweight specs. Holes in the ear stems to prevent fogging and no uncomfortable earpieces. At some tris I have people assume they were some exotic brand that cost $200 and ask me if I liked my (brandname) and was it worth it.
Hahah that's hilarious!!! I'll have to head to walmart and try them on!
BeardedMonk is offline  
Old 01-16-04, 09:39 PM
  #6  
Are we having fun yet?
 
Prosody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Chesterfield, Missouri
Posts: 930

Bikes: Fuji Roubaix, Trek 7200

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
You might try the Bolle Parole sunglasses. I have the larger version, the Vigilante, that I use with prescription inserts. Fogging hasn't been an issue so far with them. I bought the glasses from Nashbar for about $40, and that included gray and amberish lenses.
__________________
You're east of East St. Louis
And the wind is making speeches.
Prosody is offline  
Old 01-17-04, 02:21 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: NC
Posts: 3,602
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 129 Post(s)
Liked 97 Times in 51 Posts
Originally Posted by BeardedMonk
Hey Everyone,

I've been on the hunt for some sunglasses that fit my rather puny head. After trying on lots of Rudy Projects, Oakleys, Smiths, etc. I've found only two styles that fit my face and would be an adequate replacement for my old shades(smith toasters).

1. Oakley Half Jacket XLJ 2. Oakley Lance Armstrong Edition

Here's the thing though: The main reason I'm discarding my Smith Toasters is because they're fogging up like crazy, I think partly due to the fact that they sit so close to my face(those of you who own these will understand what I mean). I wanted some sunglasses that wouldn't fog, I tried on lots of pairs, looking for a pair that sat far enough off my face while not being waaay to big for my head. These 2 were the best I could do. I really like the XLJ's, and I could find them online for a fairly reasonable price. However, there is no venting in the lenses like the Lance Armstrongs so I'm wondering if I'd be in the exact same boat if I bought them(with the fogging that is). Also the Lance Oakleys are outrageously more money than I think they're worth so I had pretty much ruled them out until...

I got the chance to pick up a pair of Lance Armstrong shades for about $140 including shipping, making the price a lot more reasonable. I'd be spending about 20 bucks more on these if I bought them.. is it worth it or do you think these shades are all marketing and not much substance? What would you do?
that is the exact same decision I am trying to make right now. For some reason, the oakley's just fit my face really well, and I am torn between the m-frames or the half-jackets. The price is similar, but here are the pros and cons to me right now:

half-jackets:
pros: good looking, good lens selection, comfortable
cons: smaller lens means less visibility in drops, a tad heavier
M-frames:
pros: really light, comfortable, big lens with good clarity, Rx compatible
cons:goofy looking for regular street use.

this has me tied up in knots, b/c this is a lot of money for some sunglasses, and I am unsure...
Phatman is offline  
Old 01-17-04, 03:50 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 93
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Ahh the woes of us sunglass buyers... How about I buy one set, you buy the other and we trade after 6 months!

What's the best price you could find on the M Frames and the Half Jackets? I'm shopping around...


Originally Posted by Phatman
that is the exact same decision I am trying to make right now. For some reason, the oakley's just fit my face really well, and I am torn between the m-frames or the half-jackets. The price is similar, but here are the pros and cons to me right now:

half-jackets:
pros: good looking, good lens selection, comfortable
cons: smaller lens means less visibility in drops, a tad heavier
M-frames:
pros: really light, comfortable, big lens with good clarity, Rx compatible
cons:goofy looking for regular street use.

this has me tied up in knots, b/c this is a lot of money for some sunglasses, and I am unsure...
BeardedMonk is offline  
Old 01-18-04, 03:10 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: NC
Posts: 3,602
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 129 Post(s)
Liked 97 Times in 51 Posts
105 for the m-frames, 110 for the half-jackets. thats for plain black ones with one set of plain black lenses. thats at rei.
Phatman is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.