Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Hot r Not

Notices
Road Cycling ďIt is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.Ē -- Ernest Hemingway

Hot r Not

Old 09-22-18, 11:22 AM
  #27176  
canyoneagle
Senior Member
 
canyoneagle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Santa Fe, NM
Posts: 4,692

Bikes: Vassago Moosknuckle Ti 29+ XTR, 90's Merckx Corsa-01 9sp Record, PROJECT: 1954 Frejus SuperCorsa

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 174 Post(s)
Liked 149 Times in 70 Posts
Originally Posted by robbyville View Post


I adore that frame, and admire the set up. I agree with a previous poster that the wheels don't do it any justice appearance wise. I love tall people, I envy them, and I wish I was one... but sadly tall bikes for tall people just look plain out of proportion and that has a negative effect on "hot factor" (I think I just coined that term). You hit all the right marks though, you just need something like 32 inch wheels!
.
I agree - taller frames arenít as proportionally sexy as smaller ones...
The trade off for being tall 🤓

I think 60cm is about the limit for proportion.
canyoneagle is offline  
Old 09-22-18, 12:55 PM
  #27177  
ttusomeone
Senior Member
 
ttusomeone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Nashville, Tennessee
Posts: 340
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 43 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by robbyville View Post
Poor stagin aside, I love the moots, is the handlebar tape something cool and funky or is it just the lighting that seems to have it match the Moots logo? Are you running those wheels tubeless and if so how are those Specialized Turbo's? I ask because that's my next set to try, I really liked the tubed variation.
Yeah sorry about the staging. I didn't take that picture with the intent of posting it here, but I never seem to remember the thread rules when I'm out and can get a pic.

The bar tape is new stuff from Specialized that changes color some depending on the light. One side looks more blue and the other gray. Matches the logo pretty good which I why I got it. I don't have those wheels setup tubeless, but really like the Turbos - I have them in 26c. I was all about the GT 4000s ii until I tried the Turbos and have switched. To be honest though if you swapped my tires back to the Conti's I'm not sure I'd notice. I do have a set of Stan's Grail rims that I have tubeless that I have a set of 37c WTB Riddler on. Those are pretty nice riding tires and are quite on the road. Haven't had a chance to put them through their paces off-road yet though.
ttusomeone is offline  
Old 09-22-18, 03:55 PM
  #27178  
noodle soup
Senior Member
 
noodle soup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 8,914
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4697 Post(s)
Liked 1,868 Times in 993 Posts
Originally Posted by robbyville View Post
tall bikes for tall people just look plain out of proportion
I disagree. Anything less than a 56cm frame looks pathetic. Like they are made for members of the lollipop guild.

noodle soup is offline  
Old 09-22-18, 05:49 PM
  #27179  
canyoneagle
Senior Member
 
canyoneagle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Santa Fe, NM
Posts: 4,692

Bikes: Vassago Moosknuckle Ti 29+ XTR, 90's Merckx Corsa-01 9sp Record, PROJECT: 1954 Frejus SuperCorsa

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 174 Post(s)
Liked 149 Times in 70 Posts
Originally Posted by noodle soup View Post
I disagree. Anything less than a 56cm frame looks pathetic. Like they are made for members of the lollipop guild.
LOL
I agree, anything smaller than 55-56 hits similar proportional challenges. I think 56-60 cm is the sweet spot.

Throwing an outdoor shot from a different angle into the mix.
I personally like the Archetypes on the bike, but agree a sexy set of carbon tubulars would up the game significantly, though (to me) there is something about the 32 sparkly spokes in each wheel that echoes the bike's classic roots.

Last edited by canyoneagle; 09-22-18 at 06:05 PM.
canyoneagle is offline  
Old 09-22-18, 06:02 PM
  #27180  
noodle soup
Senior Member
 
noodle soup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 8,914
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4697 Post(s)
Liked 1,868 Times in 993 Posts
Originally Posted by canyoneagle View Post


I agree - taller frames aren’t as proportionally sexy as smaller ones...
The trade off for being tall ��

I think 60cm is about the limit for proportion.

56-60cm frames with level TTs are IMO the best looking.

My 60cm Guerciotti looks pretty nice, but my 60cm Trek Domane looks odd, and the disc brakes don't help it's appearance either.
noodle soup is offline  
Old 09-22-18, 08:10 PM
  #27181  
canyoneagle
Senior Member
 
canyoneagle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Santa Fe, NM
Posts: 4,692

Bikes: Vassago Moosknuckle Ti 29+ XTR, 90's Merckx Corsa-01 9sp Record, PROJECT: 1954 Frejus SuperCorsa

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 174 Post(s)
Liked 149 Times in 70 Posts
Originally Posted by noodle soup View Post
56-60cm frames with level TTs are IMO the best looking.

My 60cm Guerciotti looks pretty nice, but my 60cm Trek Domane looks odd, and the disc brakes don't help it's appearance either.
I tend to agree.
On "old school" level TT bikes, 58-60 seems to work very well.
Modern carbon frames offer up a variety - some look amazing in the smaller sizes, but not many look great in the larger sizes. This is where I think a horizontal TT can allow slightly larger frames to look aesthetically good.

OK, last shot....... promise..... well, maybe not, but outdoor shot from the side, again, for scrutiny

canyoneagle is offline  
Old 09-22-18, 08:26 PM
  #27182  
mstateglfr 
Sunshine
 
mstateglfr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 15,327

Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo

Mentioned: 120 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9674 Post(s)
Liked 6,048 Times in 3,477 Posts
Originally Posted by canyoneagle View Post
I tend to agree.
On "old school" level TT bikes, 58-60 seems to work very well.
Modern carbon frames offer up a variety - some look amazing in the smaller sizes, but not many look great in the larger sizes. This is where I think a horizontal TT can allow slightly larger frames to look aesthetically good.

OK, last shot....... promise..... well, maybe not, but outdoor shot from the side, again, for scrutiny

I think its fantastic. Good colors, cool paint, and nice components. Nice threadless conversion too.

significantly better than the murdered out matte black on matte black on matte black with comically slammed stem look.
mstateglfr is offline  
Old 09-22-18, 09:52 PM
  #27183  
robbyville
Senior Member
 
robbyville's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Palm Desert, CA
Posts: 2,496

Bikes: Speedvagen Steel

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 427 Post(s)
Liked 237 Times in 153 Posts
Originally Posted by noodle soup View Post
I disagree. Anything less than a 56cm frame looks pathetic. Like they are made for members of the lollipop guild.

https://youtu.be/QhjRUKCKIG4
ha touchť (again)!
robbyville is offline  
Old 09-22-18, 10:14 PM
  #27184  
robbyville
Senior Member
 
robbyville's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Palm Desert, CA
Posts: 2,496

Bikes: Speedvagen Steel

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 427 Post(s)
Liked 237 Times in 153 Posts
Originally Posted by noodle soup View Post
56-60cm frames with level TTs are IMO the best looking.

My 60cm Guerciotti looks pretty nice, but my 60cm Trek Domane looks odd, and the disc brakes don't help it's appearance either.
Its true, Noodleís Trek is incredibly odd looking! Still a great bike though.

Originally Posted by canyoneagle View Post
I tend to agree.
On "old school" level TT bikes, 58-60 seems to work very well.
Modern carbon frames offer up a variety - some look amazing in the smaller sizes, but not many look great in the larger sizes. This is where I think a horizontal TT can allow slightly larger frames to look aesthetically good.

OK, last shot....... promise..... well, maybe not, but outdoor shot from the side, again, for scrutiny

The other 3/4 shot makes the bike look hot, the side shots....
robbyville is offline  
Old 09-24-18, 07:02 AM
  #27185  
Rocket-Sauce 
Port
 
Rocket-Sauce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Boston
Posts: 9,136

Bikes: 2022 Soma Fog Cutter, 2021 Calfee Draqonfly 44, 1984 Peter Mooney, 2017 Soma Stanyan, 1990 Fuji Ace, 1990 Bridgestone RB-1, 1995 Independent Fabrications Track, 2003 Calfee Dragonfly Pro

Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 873 Post(s)
Liked 1,319 Times in 797 Posts

I think we all think our own sized bike looks best or "right".

That said, this bike looks like it is almost perfectly set up for me. Longer stem, black tape & bars and it would be perfect.

Record hubs laced to Archetypes are VERY nice wheels. And they look right on a classic steel frame.


Originally Posted by canyoneagle View Post
LOL
I agree, anything smaller than 55-56 hits similar proportional challenges. I think 56-60 cm is the sweet spot.

Throwing an outdoor shot from a different angle into the mix.
I personally like the Archetypes on the bike, but agree a sexy set of carbon tubulars would up the game significantly, though (to me) there is something about the 32 sparkly spokes in each wheel that echoes the bike's classic roots.
Rocket-Sauce is offline  
Old 09-24-18, 09:45 AM
  #27186  
MyTi
6-4 Titanium
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 330
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 92 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 36 Times in 31 Posts
The lack of taste in this thread is concerning

Originally Posted by Paul Barnard View Post
That's one of the hottest bikes ever posted in this thread.
how is this two/three tone mess of a bike even warm. it canít be helped due to the paint job. Iím finding that people here simply lack good taste. my goodness may the lord have mercy on my eyes. growlerdinky must of had his acid reflux cured after seeing this thing. Ok the blue is nice but blue and neon green? No.

as for canyon eagle there isnít a slight weight penalty. your probably looking at a 6lb penalty in comparison to my vortex. your lying to yourself! Iíd prefer the light carbon rides in here to heavy steel unless Iím bicycle touring or commuting and you know how I feel about carbon in general. But I like the yellow and look of the bike overall. at least itís not pink.
MyTi is offline  
Old 09-24-18, 10:17 AM
  #27187  
noodle soup
Senior Member
 
noodle soup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 8,914
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4697 Post(s)
Liked 1,868 Times in 993 Posts
Originally Posted by MyTi View Post
as for canyon eagle there isnít a slight weight penalty. your probably looking at a 6lb penalty in comparison to my vortex. your lying to yourself! Iíd prefer the light carbon rides in here to heavy steel unless Iím bicycle touring or commuting and you know how I feel about carbon in general. But I like the yellow and look of the bike overall. at least itís not pink.
6 pound weight penalty?

noodle soup is offline  
Old 09-24-18, 10:21 AM
  #27188  
growlerdinky
Duke Ulysses
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Southern California
Posts: 799

Bikes: An old orange one for dirt, and for the other stuff: a white one, a kinda mint green one, and a black one.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 165 Post(s)
Liked 175 Times in 86 Posts
Originally Posted by MyTi View Post


how is this two/three tone mess of a bike even warm. it canít be helped due to the paint job. Iím finding that people here simply lack good taste. my goodness may the lord have mercy on my eyes. growlerdinky must of had his acid reflux cured after seeing this thing. Ok the blue is nice but blue and neon green? No.

as for canyon eagle there isnít a slight weight penalty. your probably looking at a 6lb penalty in comparison to my vortex. your lying to yourself! Iíd prefer the light carbon rides in here to heavy steel unless Iím bicycle touring or commuting and you know how I feel about carbon in general. But I like the yellow and look of the bike overall. at least itís not pink.
How much does your bike weigh? I don't think I've seen the weight posted anywhere.
growlerdinky is offline  
Old 09-24-18, 10:29 AM
  #27189  
canyoneagle
Senior Member
 
canyoneagle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Santa Fe, NM
Posts: 4,692

Bikes: Vassago Moosknuckle Ti 29+ XTR, 90's Merckx Corsa-01 9sp Record, PROJECT: 1954 Frejus SuperCorsa

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 174 Post(s)
Liked 149 Times in 70 Posts
Originally Posted by MyTi View Post

as for canyon eagle there isn’t a slight weight penalty. your probably looking at a 6lb penalty in comparison to my vortex. your lying to yourself! I’d prefer the light carbon rides in here to heavy steel unless I’m bicycle touring or commuting and you know how I feel about carbon in general. But I like the yellow and look of the bike overall. at least it’s not pink.




Yes, not pink good dig.

Weight penalty is not 6 lbs, as this frame/fork is almost exactly 6 lbs (6.2). Unless your frame is is 0 lbs, the difference is (at most) a few pounds given similar build. Most carbon frame/fork combos are 1-1.5 kilos (2.2 - 3.3 lbs).
This bike came in at 20 lbs as equipped, and I didn't go with weight weenie components for the most part. I could easily get that to 19 or less with lightweight wheels, and edging towards 18 with other component choices. Not my bag.
As a point of comparison, my previous Fuji GranFondo with Ultegra and a 1600g wheelset weighed in at 18.2 pounds for the 60cm bike. So, I've given up 1.8 pounds to a nice (not not top end) carbon bike.
I doubt your bike is 14 pounds.

I weigh 195 lbs, so the difference is inconsequential. I don't feel the weight at all - in fact, the bike feels incredible. Lively.
Again, I think weight for weight's sake is folly - many resources online that address the relatively insignificant impact of weight - the only place it even begins to matter is on very long climbs, and I really don't care about a few seconds (or even a minute). If I were still racing, I'd probably have a climbing-only bike for mountainous events. Actually, probably not. Just wheels. In the flats, it makes essentially no difference. Rider aerodynamics are the biggest factor there. Especially for a tall guy like me.

Anyway, glad you love your bike. Nothing wrong with Ti.
Ride on!

Last edited by canyoneagle; 09-24-18 at 10:52 AM.
canyoneagle is offline  
Old 09-24-18, 10:54 AM
  #27190  
nycphotography
NYC
 
nycphotography's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,718
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1168 Post(s)
Liked 102 Times in 59 Posts
Originally Posted by growlerdinky View Post
How much does your bike weigh? I don't think I've seen the weight posted anywhere.

He can't weigh it without his ego attached and so far it's broken every scale he's tried.
nycphotography is offline  
Old 09-24-18, 11:11 AM
  #27191  
noodle soup
Senior Member
 
noodle soup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 8,914
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4697 Post(s)
Liked 1,868 Times in 993 Posts
Originally Posted by nycphotography View Post
He can't weigh it without his ego attached and so far it's broken every scale he's tried.
noodle soup is offline  
Old 09-24-18, 11:26 AM
  #27192  
TimothyH
- Soli Deo Gloria -
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Northwest Georgia
Posts: 14,782

Bikes: 2018 Rodriguez Custom Fixed Gear, 2017 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2015 Bianchi Pista, 2002 Fuji Robaix

Mentioned: 235 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6840 Post(s)
Liked 728 Times in 462 Posts
H+Son wheels, 2 cross lacing and 80 mm valve stems are not hot.

The deck needs a coat of Olympic.


-Tim-
TimothyH is offline  
Old 09-24-18, 11:36 AM
  #27193  
canyoneagle
Senior Member
 
canyoneagle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Santa Fe, NM
Posts: 4,692

Bikes: Vassago Moosknuckle Ti 29+ XTR, 90's Merckx Corsa-01 9sp Record, PROJECT: 1954 Frejus SuperCorsa

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 174 Post(s)
Liked 149 Times in 70 Posts
Originally Posted by TimothyH View Post
H+Son wheels, 2 cross lacing and 80 mm valve stems are not hot.

The deck needs a coat of Olympic.


-Tim-
Agreed on the stems. Way too long.
2x front, 3x rear - perhaps not hot, but holds down the classic theme. Sort of like Singer's Porsches with Fuchs remakes.

The deck, however, needs a sawzall

Last edited by canyoneagle; 09-24-18 at 11:40 AM.
canyoneagle is offline  
Old 09-24-18, 12:30 PM
  #27194  
robbyville
Senior Member
 
robbyville's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Palm Desert, CA
Posts: 2,496

Bikes: Speedvagen Steel

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 427 Post(s)
Liked 237 Times in 153 Posts
Originally Posted by MyTi View Post


how is this two/three tone mess of a bike even warm. it can’t be helped due to the paint job. I’m finding that people here simply lack good taste. my goodness may the lord have mercy on my eyes. growlerdinky must of had his acid reflux cured after seeing this thing. Ok the blue is nice but blue and neon green? No.

as for canyon eagle there isn’t a slight weight penalty. your probably looking at a 6lb penalty in comparison to my vortex. your lying to yourself! I’d prefer the light carbon rides in here to heavy steel unless I’m bicycle touring or commuting and you know how I feel about carbon in general. But I like the yellow and look of the bike overall. at least it’s not pink.

It's not green, it's "Citron" ok that's marketing speak perhaps, but definitely a lemon yellow. Two colors of slate, for the above citron sections. mine is a steel/carbon blend, carbon seat tube, seat post, fork, and bar/stem combo. Mix of True Temper and Prestige I think on the rest of the bike. came in at 16lbs 4oz with my saddle bag, pedals, and bottle cages. Not too bad.

I know Canyon Eagle said that his was just sub 20 which for that size bike and steel is freaking awesome.

I know that you've got a nice little stick in your butt these days, that's ok it happens, sometimes I sit on something that hurts too...

Last edited by robbyville; 09-24-18 at 12:36 PM.
robbyville is offline  
Old 09-24-18, 06:00 PM
  #27195  
MyTi
6-4 Titanium
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 330
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 92 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 36 Times in 31 Posts
Originally Posted by MyTi View Post


how is this two/three tone mess of a bike even warm. it canít be helped due to the paint job. Iím finding that people here simply lack good taste. my goodness may the lord have mercy on my eyes. growlerdinky must of had his acid reflux cured after seeing this thing. Ok the blue is nice but blue and neon green? No.

as for canyon eagle there isnít a slight weight penalty. your probably looking at a 6lb penalty in comparison to my vortex. your lying to yourself! Iíd prefer the light carbon rides in here to heavy steel unless Iím bicycle touring or commuting and you know how I feel about carbon in general. But I like the yellow and look of the bike overall. at least itís not pink.
My bike weighs 16 with pedals, cages.. This is thin wallled 6-4 Ti. Your bike is 22 pounds I estimate. Youíve never weighed that bike and if you did you are contradicting your own belief system!!!! You are a lightweight at 195lbs. Iím 292 pounds and I feel the difference on a lightweight bike.
MyTi is offline  
Old 09-24-18, 06:21 PM
  #27196  
noodle soup
Senior Member
 
noodle soup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 8,914
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4697 Post(s)
Liked 1,868 Times in 993 Posts
Originally Posted by MyTi View Post


My bike weighs 16 with pedals, cages.. This is thin wallled 6-4 Ti. Your bike is 22 pounds I estimate. Youíve never weighed that bike and if you did you are contradicting your own belief system!!!! You are a lightweight at 195lbs. Iím 292 pounds and I feel the difference on a lightweight bike.
Who are you talking to?

that Speedvagen is under 17 pounds, A guy I ride with has a very similar Speedvagen, and itís 16.8 pounds.
noodle soup is offline  
Old 09-24-18, 06:35 PM
  #27197  
joejack951
Senior Member
 
joejack951's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 12,083

Bikes: 2016 Hong Fu FM-079-F, 1984 Trek 660, 2005 Iron Horse Warrior Expert, 2009 Pedal Force CX1, 2016 Islabikes Beinn 20 (son's)

Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1231 Post(s)
Liked 85 Times in 59 Posts
Originally Posted by MyTi View Post


My bike weighs 16 with pedals, cages.. This is thin wallled 6-4 Ti.
Pics or it didnít happen. But I can say with near 100% certainty that it didnít happen. While light for Ti, itís still a 1300+ gram frame and you have zero weight weenie parts on it. Iím giving it 18 lbs. at best ready to ride.
joejack951 is offline  
Old 09-24-18, 06:42 PM
  #27198  
WhyFi
Senior Member
 
WhyFi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,330

Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo

Mentioned: 353 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20611 Post(s)
Liked 9,283 Times in 4,597 Posts
Originally Posted by joejack951 View Post
Pics or it didn’t happen. But I can say with near 100% certainty that it didn’t happen. While light for Ti, it’s still a 1300+ gram frame and you have zero weight weenie parts on it. I’m giving it 18 lbs. at best ready to ride.
In its glory -

Originally Posted by MyTi View Post



WhyFi is offline  
Old 09-24-18, 06:49 PM
  #27199  
seau grateau
Senior Member
 
seau grateau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: PHL
Posts: 9,948

Bikes: Litespeed Catalyst, IRO Rob Roy, All City Big Block

Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1332 Post(s)
Liked 394 Times in 190 Posts
Ah yes, I can see the pounds quite clearly.
seau grateau is offline  
Old 09-24-18, 06:53 PM
  #27200  
joejack951
Senior Member
 
joejack951's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 12,083

Bikes: 2016 Hong Fu FM-079-F, 1984 Trek 660, 2005 Iron Horse Warrior Expert, 2009 Pedal Force CX1, 2016 Islabikes Beinn 20 (son's)

Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1231 Post(s)
Liked 85 Times in 59 Posts
Originally Posted by WhyFi View Post
In its glory -
Originally Posted by seau grateau View Post
Ah yes, I can see the pounds quite clearly.
Ha! Yeah, I meant a scale shot.
joejack951 is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information -

Copyright © 2023 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.