Hot r Not
09-22-18, 11:22 AM
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Santa Fe, NM
Posts: 4,692
Bikes: Vassago Moosknuckle Ti 29+ XTR, 90's Merckx Corsa-01 9sp Record, PROJECT: 1954 Frejus SuperCorsa
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 174 Post(s)
Liked 149 Times
in
70 Posts
Originally Posted by robbyville
I adore that frame, and admire the set up. I agree with a previous poster that the wheels don't do it any justice appearance wise. I love tall people, I envy them, and I wish I was one... but sadly tall bikes for tall people just look plain out of proportion and that has a negative effect on "hot factor" (I think I just coined that term). You hit all the right marks though, you just need something like 32 inch wheels!
.
The trade off for being tall 🤓
I think 60cm is about the limit for proportion.
09-22-18, 12:55 PM
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Nashville, Tennessee
Posts: 340
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 43 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Originally Posted by robbyville
Poor stagin aside, I love the moots, is the handlebar tape something cool and funky or is it just the lighting that seems to have it match the Moots logo? Are you running those wheels tubeless and if so how are those Specialized Turbo's? I ask because that's my next set to try, I really liked the tubed variation.
The bar tape is new stuff from Specialized that changes color some depending on the light. One side looks more blue and the other gray. Matches the logo pretty good which I why I got it. I don't have those wheels setup tubeless, but really like the Turbos - I have them in 26c. I was all about the GT 4000s ii until I tried the Turbos and have switched. To be honest though if you swapped my tires back to the Conti's I'm not sure I'd notice. I do have a set of Stan's Grail rims that I have tubeless that I have a set of 37c WTB Riddler on. Those are pretty nice riding tires and are quite on the road. Haven't had a chance to put them through their paces off-road yet though.
09-22-18, 03:55 PM
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 8,914
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4697 Post(s)
Liked 1,868 Times
in
993 Posts
Originally Posted by robbyville
tall bikes for tall people just look plain out of proportion
09-22-18, 05:49 PM
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Santa Fe, NM
Posts: 4,692
Bikes: Vassago Moosknuckle Ti 29+ XTR, 90's Merckx Corsa-01 9sp Record, PROJECT: 1954 Frejus SuperCorsa
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 174 Post(s)
Liked 149 Times
in
70 Posts
Originally Posted by noodle soup
I disagree. Anything less than a 56cm frame looks pathetic. Like they are made for members of the lollipop guild.
I agree, anything smaller than 55-56 hits similar proportional challenges. I think 56-60 cm is the sweet spot.
Throwing an outdoor shot from a different angle into the mix.
I personally like the Archetypes on the bike, but agree a sexy set of carbon tubulars would up the game significantly, though (to me) there is something about the 32 sparkly spokes in each wheel that echoes the bike's classic roots.
Last edited by canyoneagle; 09-22-18 at 06:05 PM.
09-22-18, 06:02 PM
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 8,914
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4697 Post(s)
Liked 1,868 Times
in
993 Posts
Originally Posted by canyoneagle
I agree - taller frames aren’t as proportionally sexy as smaller ones...
The trade off for being tall ��
I think 60cm is about the limit for proportion.
My 60cm Guerciotti looks pretty nice, but my 60cm Trek Domane looks odd, and the disc brakes don't help it's appearance either.
09-22-18, 08:10 PM
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Santa Fe, NM
Posts: 4,692
Bikes: Vassago Moosknuckle Ti 29+ XTR, 90's Merckx Corsa-01 9sp Record, PROJECT: 1954 Frejus SuperCorsa
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 174 Post(s)
Liked 149 Times
in
70 Posts
Originally Posted by noodle soup
56-60cm frames with level TTs are IMO the best looking.
My 60cm Guerciotti looks pretty nice, but my 60cm Trek Domane looks odd, and the disc brakes don't help it's appearance either.
My 60cm Guerciotti looks pretty nice, but my 60cm Trek Domane looks odd, and the disc brakes don't help it's appearance either.
On "old school" level TT bikes, 58-60 seems to work very well.
Modern carbon frames offer up a variety - some look amazing in the smaller sizes, but not many look great in the larger sizes. This is where I think a horizontal TT can allow slightly larger frames to look aesthetically good.
OK, last shot....... promise..... well, maybe not, but outdoor shot from the side, again, for scrutiny
09-22-18, 08:26 PM
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 15,327
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 120 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9674 Post(s)
Liked 6,048 Times
in
3,477 Posts
Originally Posted by canyoneagle
I tend to agree.
On "old school" level TT bikes, 58-60 seems to work very well.
Modern carbon frames offer up a variety - some look amazing in the smaller sizes, but not many look great in the larger sizes. This is where I think a horizontal TT can allow slightly larger frames to look aesthetically good.
OK, last shot....... promise..... well, maybe not, but outdoor shot from the side, again, for scrutiny
On "old school" level TT bikes, 58-60 seems to work very well.
Modern carbon frames offer up a variety - some look amazing in the smaller sizes, but not many look great in the larger sizes. This is where I think a horizontal TT can allow slightly larger frames to look aesthetically good.
OK, last shot....... promise..... well, maybe not, but outdoor shot from the side, again, for scrutiny
significantly better than the murdered out matte black on matte black on matte black with comically slammed stem look.
09-22-18, 09:52 PM
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Palm Desert, CA
Posts: 2,496
Bikes: Speedvagen Steel
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 427 Post(s)
Liked 237 Times
in
153 Posts
Originally Posted by noodle soup
I disagree. Anything less than a 56cm frame looks pathetic. Like they are made for members of the lollipop guild.
https://youtu.be/QhjRUKCKIG4
https://youtu.be/QhjRUKCKIG4
09-22-18, 10:14 PM
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Palm Desert, CA
Posts: 2,496
Bikes: Speedvagen Steel
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 427 Post(s)
Liked 237 Times
in
153 Posts
Originally Posted by noodle soup
56-60cm frames with level TTs are IMO the best looking.
My 60cm Guerciotti looks pretty nice, but my 60cm Trek Domane looks odd, and the disc brakes don't help it's appearance either.
My 60cm Guerciotti looks pretty nice, but my 60cm Trek Domane looks odd, and the disc brakes don't help it's appearance either.
Originally Posted by canyoneagle
I tend to agree.
On "old school" level TT bikes, 58-60 seems to work very well.
Modern carbon frames offer up a variety - some look amazing in the smaller sizes, but not many look great in the larger sizes. This is where I think a horizontal TT can allow slightly larger frames to look aesthetically good.
OK, last shot....... promise..... well, maybe not, but outdoor shot from the side, again, for scrutiny
On "old school" level TT bikes, 58-60 seems to work very well.
Modern carbon frames offer up a variety - some look amazing in the smaller sizes, but not many look great in the larger sizes. This is where I think a horizontal TT can allow slightly larger frames to look aesthetically good.
OK, last shot....... promise..... well, maybe not, but outdoor shot from the side, again, for scrutiny
09-24-18, 07:02 AM
Port
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Boston
Posts: 9,136
Bikes: 2022 Soma Fog Cutter, 2021 Calfee Draqonfly 44, 1984 Peter Mooney, 2017 Soma Stanyan, 1990 Fuji Ace, 1990 Bridgestone RB-1, 1995 Independent Fabrications Track, 2003 Calfee Dragonfly Pro
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 873 Post(s)
Liked 1,319 Times
in
797 Posts
I think we all think our own sized bike looks best or "right".
That said, this bike looks like it is almost perfectly set up for me. Longer stem, black tape & bars and it would be perfect.
Record hubs laced to Archetypes are VERY nice wheels. And they look right on a classic steel frame.
Originally Posted by canyoneagle
LOL
I agree, anything smaller than 55-56 hits similar proportional challenges. I think 56-60 cm is the sweet spot.
Throwing an outdoor shot from a different angle into the mix.
I personally like the Archetypes on the bike, but agree a sexy set of carbon tubulars would up the game significantly, though (to me) there is something about the 32 sparkly spokes in each wheel that echoes the bike's classic roots.
I agree, anything smaller than 55-56 hits similar proportional challenges. I think 56-60 cm is the sweet spot.
Throwing an outdoor shot from a different angle into the mix.
I personally like the Archetypes on the bike, but agree a sexy set of carbon tubulars would up the game significantly, though (to me) there is something about the 32 sparkly spokes in each wheel that echoes the bike's classic roots.
__________________
https://rowdml.tripod.com/panmass
https://rowdml.tripod.com/panmass
09-24-18, 09:45 AM
6-4 Titanium
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 330
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 92 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 36 Times
in
31 Posts
The lack of taste in this thread is concerning
Originally Posted by Paul Barnard
That's one of the hottest bikes ever posted in this thread.
as for canyon eagle there isn’t a slight weight penalty. your probably looking at a 6lb penalty in comparison to my vortex. your lying to yourself! I’d prefer the light carbon rides in here to heavy steel unless I’m bicycle touring or commuting and you know how I feel about carbon in general. But I like the yellow and look of the bike overall. at least it’s not pink.
09-24-18, 10:17 AM
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 8,914
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4697 Post(s)
Liked 1,868 Times
in
993 Posts
Originally Posted by MyTi
as for canyon eagle there isn’t a slight weight penalty. your probably looking at a 6lb penalty in comparison to my vortex. your lying to yourself! I’d prefer the light carbon rides in here to heavy steel unless I’m bicycle touring or commuting and you know how I feel about carbon in general. But I like the yellow and look of the bike overall. at least it’s not pink.
09-24-18, 10:21 AM
Duke Ulysses
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Southern California
Posts: 799
Bikes: An old orange one for dirt, and for the other stuff: a white one, a kinda mint green one, and a black one.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 165 Post(s)
Liked 175 Times
in
86 Posts
Originally Posted by MyTi
how is this two/three tone mess of a bike even warm. it can’t be helped due to the paint job. I’m finding that people here simply lack good taste. my goodness may the lord have mercy on my eyes. growlerdinky must of had his acid reflux cured after seeing this thing. Ok the blue is nice but blue and neon green? No.
as for canyon eagle there isn’t a slight weight penalty. your probably looking at a 6lb penalty in comparison to my vortex. your lying to yourself! I’d prefer the light carbon rides in here to heavy steel unless I’m bicycle touring or commuting and you know how I feel about carbon in general. But I like the yellow and look of the bike overall. at least it’s not pink.
09-24-18, 10:29 AM
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Santa Fe, NM
Posts: 4,692
Bikes: Vassago Moosknuckle Ti 29+ XTR, 90's Merckx Corsa-01 9sp Record, PROJECT: 1954 Frejus SuperCorsa
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 174 Post(s)
Liked 149 Times
in
70 Posts
Originally Posted by MyTi
as for canyon eagle there isn’t a slight weight penalty. your probably looking at a 6lb penalty in comparison to my vortex. your lying to yourself! I’d prefer the light carbon rides in here to heavy steel unless I’m bicycle touring or commuting and you know how I feel about carbon in general. But I like the yellow and look of the bike overall. at least it’s not pink.
good dig. 
Weight penalty is not 6 lbs, as this frame/fork is almost exactly 6 lbs (6.2). Unless your frame is is 0 lbs, the difference is (at most) a few pounds given similar build. Most carbon frame/fork combos are 1-1.5 kilos (2.2 - 3.3 lbs).
This bike came in at 20 lbs as equipped, and I didn't go with weight weenie components for the most part. I could easily get that to 19 or less with lightweight wheels, and edging towards 18 with other component choices. Not my bag.
As a point of comparison, my previous Fuji GranFondo with Ultegra and a 1600g wheelset weighed in at 18.2 pounds for the 60cm bike. So, I've given up 1.8 pounds to a nice (not not top end) carbon bike.
I doubt your bike is 14 pounds.
I weigh 195 lbs, so the difference is inconsequential. I don't feel the weight at all - in fact, the bike feels incredible. Lively.
Again, I think weight for weight's sake is folly - many resources online that address the relatively insignificant impact of weight - the only place it even begins to matter is on very long climbs, and I really don't care about a few seconds (or even a minute). If I were still racing, I'd probably have a climbing-only bike for mountainous events. Actually, probably not. Just wheels. In the flats, it makes essentially no difference. Rider aerodynamics are the biggest factor there. Especially for a tall guy like me.
Anyway, glad you love your bike. Nothing wrong with Ti.
Ride on!
Last edited by canyoneagle; 09-24-18 at 10:52 AM.
09-24-18, 10:54 AM
NYC
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,718
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1168 Post(s)
Liked 102 Times
in
59 Posts
Originally Posted by growlerdinky
How much does your bike weigh? I don't think I've seen the weight posted anywhere.
He can't weigh it without his ego attached and so far it's broken every scale he's tried.
09-24-18, 11:11 AM
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 8,914
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4697 Post(s)
Liked 1,868 Times
in
993 Posts
Originally Posted by nycphotography
He can't weigh it without his ego attached and so far it's broken every scale he's tried.
09-24-18, 11:26 AM
- Soli Deo Gloria -
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Northwest Georgia
Posts: 14,782
Bikes: 2018 Rodriguez Custom Fixed Gear, 2017 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2015 Bianchi Pista, 2002 Fuji Robaix
Mentioned: 235 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6840 Post(s)
Liked 728 Times
in
462 Posts
H+Son wheels, 2 cross lacing and 80 mm valve stems are not hot.
The deck needs a coat of Olympic.
-Tim-
The deck needs a coat of Olympic.
-Tim-
09-24-18, 11:36 AM
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Santa Fe, NM
Posts: 4,692
Bikes: Vassago Moosknuckle Ti 29+ XTR, 90's Merckx Corsa-01 9sp Record, PROJECT: 1954 Frejus SuperCorsa
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 174 Post(s)
Liked 149 Times
in
70 Posts
Originally Posted by TimothyH
H+Son wheels, 2 cross lacing and 80 mm valve stems are not hot.
The deck needs a coat of Olympic.
-Tim-
The deck needs a coat of Olympic.
-Tim-
2x front, 3x rear - perhaps not hot, but holds down the classic theme. Sort of like Singer's Porsches with Fuchs remakes.
The deck, however, needs a sawzall
Last edited by canyoneagle; 09-24-18 at 11:40 AM.
09-24-18, 12:30 PM
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Palm Desert, CA
Posts: 2,496
Bikes: Speedvagen Steel
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 427 Post(s)
Liked 237 Times
in
153 Posts
Originally Posted by MyTi
how is this two/three tone mess of a bike even warm. it can’t be helped due to the paint job. I’m finding that people here simply lack good taste. my goodness may the lord have mercy on my eyes. growlerdinky must of had his acid reflux cured after seeing this thing. Ok the blue is nice but blue and neon green? No.
as for canyon eagle there isn’t a slight weight penalty. your probably looking at a 6lb penalty in comparison to my vortex. your lying to yourself! I’d prefer the light carbon rides in here to heavy steel unless I’m bicycle touring or commuting and you know how I feel about carbon in general. But I like the yellow and look of the bike overall. at least it’s not pink.
I know Canyon Eagle said that his was just sub 20 which for that size bike and steel is freaking awesome.
I know that you've got a nice little stick in your butt these days, that's ok it happens, sometimes I sit on something that hurts too...
Last edited by robbyville; 09-24-18 at 12:36 PM.
09-24-18, 06:00 PM
6-4 Titanium
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 330
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 92 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 36 Times
in
31 Posts
Originally Posted by MyTi
how is this two/three tone mess of a bike even warm. it can’t be helped due to the paint job. I’m finding that people here simply lack good taste. my goodness may the lord have mercy on my eyes. growlerdinky must of had his acid reflux cured after seeing this thing. Ok the blue is nice but blue and neon green? No.
as for canyon eagle there isn’t a slight weight penalty. your probably looking at a 6lb penalty in comparison to my vortex. your lying to yourself! I’d prefer the light carbon rides in here to heavy steel unless I’m bicycle touring or commuting and you know how I feel about carbon in general. But I like the yellow and look of the bike overall. at least it’s not pink.
09-24-18, 06:21 PM
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 8,914
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4697 Post(s)
Liked 1,868 Times
in
993 Posts
Originally Posted by MyTi
My bike weighs 16 with pedals, cages.. This is thin wallled 6-4 Ti. Your bike is 22 pounds I estimate. You’ve never weighed that bike and if you did you are contradicting your own belief system!!!! You are a lightweight at 195lbs. I’m 292 pounds and I feel the difference on a lightweight bike.
that Speedvagen is under 17 pounds, A guy I ride with has a very similar Speedvagen, and it’s 16.8 pounds.
09-24-18, 06:35 PM
Senior Member
Originally Posted by MyTi
My bike weighs 16 with pedals, cages.. This is thin wallled 6-4 Ti.
09-24-18, 06:42 PM
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,330
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 353 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20611 Post(s)
Liked 9,283 Times
in
4,597 Posts
Originally Posted by joejack951
Pics or it didn’t happen. But I can say with near 100% certainty that it didn’t happen. While light for Ti, it’s still a 1300+ gram frame and you have zero weight weenie parts on it. I’m giving it 18 lbs. at best ready to ride.
Originally Posted by MyTi
09-24-18, 06:49 PM
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: PHL
Posts: 9,948
Bikes: Litespeed Catalyst, IRO Rob Roy, All City Big Block
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1332 Post(s)
Liked 394 Times
in
190 Posts
Ah yes, I can see the pounds quite clearly.
09-24-18, 06:53 PM
Senior Member
Originally Posted by WhyFi
In its glory -
Originally Posted by seau grateau
Ah yes, I can see the pounds quite clearly.
