mapmyride.com calorie calculation accuracy!?!?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 95
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
mapmyride.com calorie calculation accuracy!?!?
Any comments? I am just curious. I have been mapping out my morning rides the past few days and putting my info in, it of course regurgitates it and throws out what I assume to be an estimate for the number of calories I burned during the course of my ride. How accurate do you think these calculations are?!?!
For sake of comparison, I am about 5'10, 195 lbs and rode 27.1 miles this morning at a avg speed of 17.80mph. There were 3-4 pretty difficult climbs in the ride. Any estimates on what I should have burned?
Thanks!
For sake of comparison, I am about 5'10, 195 lbs and rode 27.1 miles this morning at a avg speed of 17.80mph. There were 3-4 pretty difficult climbs in the ride. Any estimates on what I should have burned?
Thanks!
#2
...
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Huntington Beach, Ca
Posts: 6,948
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Not accurate at all.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Portland
Posts: 136
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Not sure how you can figure out that you use 40 calories for a mile. I am no expert but I would assume that if one mile was climbing and your heart rate was at say 160bpm and the next mile you are on flat ground and your heart rate is at 135bpm you would not burn as many calories as you did while climbing the hill. Does that sound reasonable or am I incorrect on this?
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 1,021
Bikes: KHS Flite 750
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Are you saying you average 40 calories a mile?
Not sure how you can figure out that you use 40 calories for a mile. I am no expert but I would assume that if one mile was climbing and your heart rate was at say 160bpm and the next mile you are on flat ground and your heart rate is at 135bpm you would not burn as many calories as you did while climbing the hill. Does that sound reasonable or am I incorrect on this?
Not sure how you can figure out that you use 40 calories for a mile. I am no expert but I would assume that if one mile was climbing and your heart rate was at say 160bpm and the next mile you are on flat ground and your heart rate is at 135bpm you would not burn as many calories as you did while climbing the hill. Does that sound reasonable or am I incorrect on this?
That's why it's an estimate. If you're climbing 500 feet/mile and are at 90% max heartrate, adjust upward accordingly.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Northern California
Posts: 10,879
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 104 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
40 calories/mile is just a rough estimate, but I have not seen a formula that is significantly more accurate without using a power meter. Obviously, a faster speed gives you more miles/hour and thus more calories. Slacking off gives you less miles/hour and less calories. Hills climbs and descents tend to average out. Heavier riders may use more than 40 calories/mile on a hilly loop.
#7
Making a kilometer blurry
I just did a quick spot-check with a couple of my commutes, comparing to my PowerTap, and it overestimates.
It's also not consistent. I get got 312 kC with a 19:21 duration, 340kC with an 18:21 duration, and 322kC with a 20:21 duration. So a steady climb in effort is met with a valley in estimates.
So, it's worthless.
It's also not consistent. I get got 312 kC with a 19:21 duration, 340kC with an 18:21 duration, and 322kC with a 20:21 duration. So a steady climb in effort is met with a valley in estimates.
So, it's worthless.
#8
grilled cheesus
Are you saying you average 40 calories a mile?
Not sure how you can figure out that you use 40 calories for a mile. I am no expert but I would assume that if one mile was climbing and your heart rate was at say 160bpm and the next mile you are on flat ground and your heart rate is at 135bpm you would not burn as many calories as you did while climbing the hill. Does that sound reasonable or am I incorrect on this?
Not sure how you can figure out that you use 40 calories for a mile. I am no expert but I would assume that if one mile was climbing and your heart rate was at say 160bpm and the next mile you are on flat ground and your heart rate is at 135bpm you would not burn as many calories as you did while climbing the hill. Does that sound reasonable or am I incorrect on this?
the only true way to measure calories burned would be in a science lab. so we work with estimates and move on. later.
__________________
#9
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 95
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thanks for the input. Just for the record, the mapmyride.com estimate for my ride as outlined above was 1522 calories. Using the estimate of 40calories/mile = 1084.
#10
Newbie
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Hr
My ride home is uphill all the way and takes me 20 minutes longer with an average HR of 160/ max 180 yet Mepmyride claims I only burn 619 calories on the uphill climb vs 880 going downhill. This tells me something is terribly wrong with their calculations.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Missouri
Posts: 2,690
Bikes: Giant Propel, Cannondale SuperX, Univega Alpina Ultima
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 672 Post(s)
Liked 416 Times
in
248 Posts
Any comments? I am just curious. I have been mapping out my morning rides the past few days and putting my info in, it of course regurgitates it and throws out what I assume to be an estimate for the number of calories I burned during the course of my ride. How accurate do you think these calculations are?!?!
For sake of comparison, I am about 5'10, 195 lbs and rode 27.1 miles this morning at a avg speed of 17.80mph. There were 3-4 pretty difficult climbs in the ride. Any estimates on what I should have burned?
Thanks!
For sake of comparison, I am about 5'10, 195 lbs and rode 27.1 miles this morning at a avg speed of 17.80mph. There were 3-4 pretty difficult climbs in the ride. Any estimates on what I should have burned?
Thanks!
BB
__________________
Formerly fastest rider in the grupetto, currently slowest guy in the peloton
Formerly fastest rider in the grupetto, currently slowest guy in the peloton
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,415
Bikes: 2010 Litespeed Icon, 1987 Nishiki Olympic 12
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Dang necroposts! i thought Brandy was back for a second!
#13
Senior Member
I think I read somewhere that road cycling burns about 600 calories an hour. ON a recent 49 mile ride MapMyRide said I burned 3490 calories, Strava said 1745 calories. I can assure you that there is no way I burned 1163 calories an hour. I would cut MMR calories in half at least.
#15
Yeah, you betcha!
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 171
Bikes: 2014 Cannondale EVO 5, 2006 Trek 1000, and early 70's Manufrance Hirondelle
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
6 Posts
I rode 37 miles last Saturday, with some good hills, and averaged 17mph. My Sigma ROX 5.0 with weight entered, temperature, a heart rate monitor, cadence counter, altimeter and speedometer, reported 1782kcal. I entered the ride into MapMyRide and got 2539kcal?!?!
Well, I trust the Sigma data and assumed the difference in calorie count with MapMyRide is the lack of real data (besides the ride profile, weight, and distance/speed). Without knowing their respective formulas for calculating calories (certainly that is proprietary), who knows.
Last edited by Minnesota Expat; 05-22-14 at 10:09 PM.
#16
Yeah, you betcha!
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 171
Bikes: 2014 Cannondale EVO 5, 2006 Trek 1000, and early 70's Manufrance Hirondelle
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
6 Posts
jbishhh. So you are synched into MapMyRide with your Wahoo HR belt and cadence counter? And you're still getting squirrely data? Cause, my Sigma doesn't synch with MapMyRide and I assumed that explained the difference in calorie counts. Sigma has it's own data analysis program.
#18
Beer >> Sanity
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Colorado
Posts: 3,449
Bikes: 2014 Evo DA2, 2010 Caad9-4, 2011 Synapse-4, 2013 CaadX-disc
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
You might give ridewithgps.com a try. I always thought their calorie data was kind of high compared to Garmin Connect which I thought might be the most accurate given it's their computer I'm using. However, now that I have a power meter I see that ridewithgps is fairly close to the power meter data.
#19
Asleep at the bars
Join Date: May 2006
Location: San Francisco, CA and Treasure Island, FL
Posts: 1,743
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 234 Post(s)
Liked 203 Times
in
135 Posts
At 160 lbs I go by 25 per mile plus ascent divided by four. 100 flat miles = 2500 kcal. 60 miles and 6k ft = 1500 + 1500 = 3000 kcal. If you weigh 10% more just add 10% to the total.
Close enough.
Close enough.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 8,951
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
12 Posts
For me, 700/hr for my riding is close enough based on using a PM for few weeks. Some rides were higher and some lower, but overall, 700/hr is close enough for my purposes.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Lake Havasu City AZ
Posts: 152
Bikes: Cavalo Corsa Ultegra Road Bike, Diamondback Insight 1, Nashbar Flat bar road bike
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 56 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
Okay two year bump, sorry for using the search feature SO has map my ride gotten any better? I'm 6'1 190 lbs. I've used it on three rides so far, different routes but all three rides were 16 miles, on the 1st two it said I burned 858 calories each ride at 1 hr 20 min and elevation gains of 619 ft and 888 ft , the third ride it shows 974 calories at 1 hr 10 min and an elevation gain of 583 ft.
#22
Senior Member
Any comments? I am just curious. I have been mapping out my morning rides the past few days and putting my info in, it of course regurgitates it and throws out what I assume to be an estimate for the number of calories I burned during the course of my ride. How accurate do you think these calculations are?!?!
For sake of comparison, I am about 5'10, 195 lbs and rode 27.1 miles this morning at a avg speed of 17.80mph. There were 3-4 pretty difficult climbs in the ride. Any estimates on what I should have burned?
Thanks!
For sake of comparison, I am about 5'10, 195 lbs and rode 27.1 miles this morning at a avg speed of 17.80mph. There were 3-4 pretty difficult climbs in the ride. Any estimates on what I should have burned?
Thanks!