Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

surly pacer or bridgestone 400 ?

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

surly pacer or bridgestone 400 ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-21-08, 10:55 AM
  #1  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
surly pacer or bridgestone 400 ?

I want a road bike after years of mountain biking (santa cruz superlight) and commuting (on an old converted rigid mountain). My dream bike is a vanilla bicycles bike that that would cost way too much. The next best thing for my wallet is a surly pacer that i estimate to cost about $1500 after i finish putting it together.
There is a pretty nice '85 bridgestone 400 available for $400. The reason i like the Surly is for the wide tires option, i owned a better road bike once (old lugged Raleigh) that was pretty harsh with the tiny road tires. If i could fit wide tires on the bridgestone would it be an equivalent or better frame to use than the surly? the bridgestone is complete and ride-able and while the 400 is nothing special it does look pretty nice. What should i do?
zmiles is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.