Seat angle keeps moving upward
I'm still trying to dial in my seat settings on my Campy Record carbon seatpost. I've tried having the nose higher than the rear, but that didn't work. So now I'm trying to level the nose and the rear, parallel to the top tube.
I've tighten seat to the seatpost as hard as I could, but the seat nose keeps raising up over the duration of my ride (about two hours). Thoughts? |
I assume it's a single-bolt seatpost.
Check the splines aren't stripped? Also, how are you tightening it? The seatpost bolt is at an odd angle to tighten. |
Originally Posted by ShadowGray
(Post 7348625)
I assume it's a single-bolt seatpost.
Check the splines aren't stripped? Also, how are you tightening it? The seatpost bolt is at an odd angle to tighten. |
Originally Posted by axelfox
(Post 7348616)
Thoughts?
|
What type of post are you using? It sounds like you need one with larger splines or (better yet) a two-bolt system like Thomson as mentioned above.
|
Originally Posted by CharlieWoo
(Post 7348682)
Thomson posts FTW.
|
Thomson. No further discussion needed.
|
Originally Posted by CharlieWoo
(Post 7348682)
Thomson posts FTW.
Originally Posted by urbanknight
(Post 7349236)
What type of post are you using? It sounds like you need one with larger splines or (better yet) a two-bolt system like Thomson as mentioned above.
Originally Posted by dark13star
(Post 7349514)
Couldn't agree more. Best upgrade I put on my bike. Infinitely adjustable and relatively light.
Originally Posted by mloywhite
(Post 7349555)
Thomson. No further discussion needed.
|
Sorry, I didn't notice the OP said it was Campy Record. I'm shocked. I have a setback seatpost with the saddle as far back as possible and have not had any problems with slip with the exception of a really cheap post which made noise.
|
I like the Thomson that came on my new bike, but I don't see it as being any better than my infinitely adjustable Ritchey post that had a proper setback. In 8 years, I never had trouble with it slipping, and it was always easy to adjust, even if I changed saddles to a different rail elevation angle:
http://www.ritcheylogic.com/dimg/thm...01f146257c.jpg |
Originally Posted by WheresWaldo
(Post 7349800)
Can't anyone in America read! |
I'm already stretched out as far as I can on the bike, so I'm not sure a set back seatpost would be a good idea. I'm already looking at seatposts with two bolts (so, Thomson? :) :))
|
Originally Posted by axelfox
(Post 7348616)
I'm still trying to dial in my seat settings on my Campy Record carbon seatpost. I've tried having the nose higher than the rear, but that didn't work. So now I'm trying to level the nose and the rear, parallel to the top tube.
I've tighten seat to the seatpost as hard as I could, but the seat nose keeps raising up over the duration of my ride (about two hours). Thoughts? |
Originally Posted by dark13star
(Post 7350155)
Since when is this forum just for "America"? Yes, I did read it and there is nothing about "Campy" (can't anyone spell Campagnolo?) that precludes the Thomson. The setback post works great, despite your assessment that it is "fugly." The only real open question should be whether it has enough setback.
+1 on the Ritchey WCS mentioned by Waterrockets. |
Originally Posted by axelfox
(Post 7350924)
I'm already stretched out as far as I can on the bike, so I'm not sure a set back seatpost would be a good idea. I'm already looking at seatposts with two bolts (so, Thomson? :) :))
|
Originally Posted by WheresWaldo
(Post 7351622)
Ugh, all the posters I quoted have US locations in their profiles, so apparently you are not very observant either. Thomson setback seat posts only have 16 mm of setback, that is not very much, and they are still fugly. I am a Thomson fan, both my single bikes have Thomsons, one Masterpiece and one Elite. My daughter's bike has a Thomson Masterpiece also.
Originally Posted by axelfox
(Post 7350924)
I'm already stretched out as far as I can on the bike, so I'm not sure a set back seatpost would be a good idea. I'm already looking at seatposts with two bolts (so, Thomson? :) :))
|
Originally Posted by dark13star
(Post 7351758)
Nevertheless, the OP hadn't written anything that would rule out the Thomson ...
Originally Posted by dark13star
(Post 7351758)
OP, your amount of setback should be determined by your placement over the pedals and not on how stretched out you are. You can change your stem for the latter.
|
Originally Posted by WheresWaldo
(Post 7352769)
Ok so you are a Thomson fanboy, I can live with that.
OP, I am just offering something that worked in my experience. |
Originally Posted by dark13star
(Post 7351758)
It still seemed like the type of generalization I expect around here. Nevertheless, the OP hadn't written anything that would rule out the Thomson and now has written:
OP, your amount of setback should be determined by your placement over the pedals and not on how stretched out you are. You can change your stem for the latter. The Thomson is quite easy to adjust and even the setback model looks just fine, IMHO. |
Originally Posted by axelfox
(Post 7353525)
OK. I think was confused on what type of seatposts there are; I thought there was "standard" and "set-back", and I thought my Campy was a "standard".
|
Originally Posted by WheresWaldo
(Post 7352769)
Ok so you are a Thomson fanboy, I can live with that.
http://www.demotivateus.com/posters/...nal-poster.jpg |
It's a little known fact that bike saddles can actually enjoy stimulation and are easily aroused.
Does it scream at you "Faster, faster"! |
Originally Posted by waterrockets
(Post 7353897)
The cool spelling is "fanboi"
So axelfox, your Campagnolo Record seat post is a setback seatpost. The question remains, is you arse comfortable where it is or do you slide forward/backward to find that one comfortable spot on the saddle. If it is in the correct spot then measure from the centerline of the seat post to the center of the clamping area. If that measurement is more than 16 mm then forget that anyone ever mentioned Thomson! Here is a picture of the dimension we need: http://www.bikeforest.com/CAD/faq/se..._dimension.gif Now if you are constantly pushing yourself back to find a comfortable spot, maybe your saddle needs to come forward and less setback is appropriate. If that is true and the subsequent measurement is about 16mm give or take 3 or 4 mm then reconsider the Thomson. Obviously if the opposite is true then more setback might be better, in this case the Thomson will not work. The reason for such a small range on the Thomson is that one of the best things about it also makes it work on the narrowest range of saddles. The Thomson has just about the biggest, if not the biggest, clamp on the market and really does not allow as much fore/aft movement as many other seat posts. This is not entirely a bad thing as it also spreads out the contact points with the saddle rails offering more support for the saddle, if you have sufficiently long rails. After you have finally decided that your saddle is in the correct position we can work on whether you are stretched out too much or not enough, as that still isn't clear from any of your posts. |
Originally Posted by WheresWaldo
(Post 7355408)
Fanboi or fanboy, dark13star is just too cool for me. Still offering advise when admittedly the OP doesn't even know what he needs.
So axelfox, your Campagnolo Record seat post is a setback seatpost. The question remains, is you arse comfortable where it is or do you slide forward/backward to find that one comfortable spot on the saddle. If it is in the correct spot then measure from the centerline of the seat post to the center of the clamping area. If that measurement is more than 16 mm then forget that anyone ever mentioned Thomson! Here is a picture of the dimension we need: http://www.bikeforest.com/CAD/faq/se..._dimension.gif Now if you are constantly pushing yourself back to find a comfortable spot, maybe your saddle needs to come forward and less setback is appropriate. If that is true and the subsequent measurement is about 16mm give or take 3 or 4 mm then reconsider the Thomson. Obviously if the opposite is true then more setback might be better, in this case the Thomson will not work. The reason for such a small range on the Thomson is that one of the best things about it also makes it work on the narrowest range of saddles. The Thomson has just about the biggest, if not the biggest, clamp on the market and really does not allow as much fore/aft movement as many other seat posts. This is not entirely a bad thing as it also spreads out the contact points with the saddle rails offering more support for the saddle, if you have sufficiently long rails. After you have finally decided that your saddle is in the correct position we can work on whether you are stretched out too much or not enough, as that still isn't clear from any of your posts. Having tried two Selle Italias (max flite and Flite Ti) and a Terry Fly, I think I might need a wider seat. I really enjoy my Terry Liberator at 165mm wide (a traditionally MTB/hybrid seat), so I think I'm going to throw that on there and see how it works. If 165mm suits me, then I'll look for another 165mm road set. |
Although lots of people like the Thompson, it's tough to beat either a Salsa Shaft or a Race Face seatpost. Both have decoupled the tilt and the rail clamping mechanism. I find that the Race Face works a little better than the Salsa.
http://www.raceface.com/comp/28/full.png |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:08 AM. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.