Bike Forums
1  2 
Page 1 of 2
Go to

Bike Forums (https://www.bikeforums.net/forum.php)
-   Road Cycling (https://www.bikeforums.net/road-cycling/)
-   -   what is your fork material? (https://www.bikeforums.net/road-cycling/476158-what-your-fork-material.html)

fogrider 10-12-08 11:49 PM

what is your fork material?
 
I have a steel frame with a steel fork, I'm thinking of going with carbon fork to save some weight. I'm not a weightweenie, but I think I can save almost a pound with a light carbon fork and no thread stem.

Machka 10-12-08 11:53 PM

I used to have a carbon fork ... but removed it and installed a steel fork instead. I've still got the carbon one tucked away somewhere.

pdedes 10-13-08 05:23 AM

I put a carbon fork on my 1994 concorde squadra tsx. The radially laced Mavic CXP30 rims I built into a wheelset (cross two drive side) were very stiff. The carbon up front gave me the damping I wanted.

Peter

fogrider 10-14-08 01:03 AM

ok, so there are 2 of you that checked 'other' for fork material...so what material is it?

gabdy 10-14-08 02:32 AM

Bamboo maybe?

NomadVW 10-14-08 02:39 AM

Carbon on three bikes

HAMMER MAN 10-14-08 04:38 AM

i am converting my waterford back with the orginal steel fork,mainly to see if there is really a major difference between the ride with carbon per steel fork and a somewhat reto look and asthetic value.
i expect about .75-1 Ib more but inmo that is not a big issue.

roadwarrior 10-14-08 04:42 AM

Carbon steerer, fork, and dropouts.

Jynx 10-14-08 04:43 AM

Carbon fork and steerer with aluminum dropouts

MrCrassic 10-14-08 05:20 AM

Carbon fork, aluminum steerer and dropouts.

The only other materials I can think of are Chro-Moly (HORRIBLE), Titanium, and Easton Scandium.

ElJamoquio 10-14-08 05:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrCrassic (Post 7661526)
Carbon fork, aluminum steerer and dropouts.

The only other materials I can think of are Chro-Moly (HORRIBLE), Titanium, and Easton Scandium.

Chrome-Moly is steel.

Scandium is aluminum.

You are correct about Titanium.

JoelS 10-14-08 08:28 AM

Steel fork, steel frame.

tekhna 10-14-08 08:31 AM

Why the hell would you use anything other than carbon?

celerystalksme 10-14-08 08:36 AM

4 bikes...4 carbon forks...

alanbikehouston 10-14-08 09:38 AM

Want to go faster? Turn the cranks faster. Forks don't make bikes go faster. Their job is to hold the wheel in proper alignment while steering, and all good forks do that job well. The second job of a fork is to clear road debris, such as small sticks, and absorb road shock, and absorb the force of minor crashes. Steel forks are designed with good clearance for road debris, most traditional steel forks were designed to flex to absorb road shock, and steel forks can be easily aligned after a minor crash.

In contrast, most current carbon forks leave very little clearance around the tire for clearing mud or road debris, are designed to eliminated flex, and crack or shatter in a minor crash. Carbon forks are one of those really bad design ideas that became popular...like 8-track cassette players.

BananaTugger 10-14-08 09:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alanbikehouston (Post 7662628)
Want to go faster? Turn the cranks faster. Forks don't make bikes go faster. Their job is to hold the wheel in proper alignment while steering, and all good forks do that job well. The second job of a fork is to clear road debris, such as small sticks, and absorb road shock, and absorb the force of minor crashes. Steel forks are designed with good clearance for road debris, most traditional steel forks were designed to flex to absorb road shock, and steel forks can be easily aligned after a minor crash.

In contrast, most current carbon forks leave very little clearance around the tire for clearing mud or road debris, are designed to eliminated flex, and crack or shatter in a minor crash. Carbon forks are one of those really bad design ideas that became popular...like 8-track cassette players.

Thanks for sharing, but no.

Bob Ross 10-14-08 10:37 AM

Does anyone really make an aluminum fork?

I have two bikes: the steel bike has a steel fork, the carbon bike has a carbon fork.

BananaTugger 10-14-08 10:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bob Ross (Post 7663044)
Does anyone really make an aluminum fork?

I have two bikes: the steel bike has a steel fork, the carbon bike has a carbon fork.

Everyone used to make aluminum forks.

tekhna 10-14-08 10:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alanbikehouston (Post 7662628)
Want to go faster? Turn the cranks faster. Forks don't make bikes go faster. Their job is to hold the wheel in proper alignment while steering, and all good forks do that job well. The second job of a fork is to clear road debris, such as small sticks, and absorb road shock, and absorb the force of minor crashes. Steel forks are designed with good clearance for road debris, most traditional steel forks were designed to flex to absorb road shock, and steel forks can be easily aligned after a minor crash.

In contrast, most current carbon forks leave very little clearance around the tire for clearing mud or road debris, are designed to eliminated flex, and crack or shatter in a minor crash. Carbon forks are one of those really bad design ideas that became popular...like 8-track cassette players.

http://z.about.com/d/politicalhumor/...t_off_lawn.jpg

MrCrassic 10-14-08 11:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ElJamoquio (Post 7661560)
Chrome-Moly is steel.

Scandium is aluminum.

You are correct about Titanium.

Thanks for the clarification. It certainly didn't feel like steel! Good God, that was a boneshaking fork!

MrCrassic 10-14-08 11:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alanbikehouston (Post 7662628)
Want to go faster? Turn the cranks faster. Forks don't make bikes go faster. Their job is to hold the wheel in proper alignment while steering, and all good forks do that job well. The second job of a fork is to clear road debris, such as small sticks, and absorb road shock, and absorb the force of minor crashes. Steel forks are designed with good clearance for road debris, most traditional steel forks were designed to flex to absorb road shock, and steel forks can be easily aligned after a minor crash.

In contrast, most current carbon forks leave very little clearance around the tire for clearing mud or road debris, are designed to eliminated flex, and crack or shatter in a minor crash. Carbon forks are one of those really bad design ideas that became popular...like 8-track cassette players.

Dear alanbikehouston,

Incorrect.

Sincerely,

BikeForums.

tollhousecookie 10-14-08 11:13 AM

Wooden, with a matching spoon. Ya know the big ones hanging on the wall in the kitchen........not kidding. CF on the bike.

Bob Ross 10-17-08 04:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BananaTugger (Post 7663058)
Everyone used to make aluminum forks.

Really? Every old aluminum frame I've been intimately familiar with (which admittedly isn't a lot, mostly 1980's & 90's era Cannondales) had a steel fork.

mattm 10-17-08 04:23 PM

steel frame, carbon fork.

on my other bike, it's all chromoly. which is good because that's the bike i got hit by a BMW on, and the LBS can bend the frame/fork back to being straight!

BananaTugger 10-17-08 04:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bob Ross (Post 7685297)
Really? Every old aluminum frame I've been intimately familiar with (which admittedly isn't a lot, mostly 1980's & 90's era Cannondales) had a steel fork.

My Coppi had an aluminum fork before I stuck a Columbus Carve carbon piece in it. A lot of frames made in the mid and late 1990's also used aluminum forks.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:54 PM.
1  2 
Page 1 of 2
Go to


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.