Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

54cm vs 56cm

Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

54cm vs 56cm

Old 03-17-09, 11:15 AM
  #26  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 19
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I've been sized on a 54 for cx and road, but ride a 56 roubaix because I have a long torso. Since the synapse has a similar geometry to the roubaix, what you're saying makes sense.
rumpole is offline  
Old 03-17-09, 04:39 PM
  #27  
Fred-ish
 
rogerstg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 1,800
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I'm about the same size, 5'8", 32" cycling inseam. I'm most comfortable on bikes 52 to 54cm. YMMV
rogerstg is offline  
Old 03-17-09, 04:42 PM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
Avalanche325's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Pasadena, CA
Posts: 3,162

Bikes: Litespeed Firenze / GT Avalanche

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by yogi13
Suggest you go through the measurement process and fitting program on the competitive cyclist or wrench science sites and use that as a basis for comparison with the geometry of the bike you're looking at. On the competitive cyclist site, I'd probably use the "Eddy" fit.
Yes. Yes. Yes.

Using height or inseam alone, or even both is not what you need to do.
Avalanche325 is offline  
Old 03-17-09, 06:07 PM
  #29  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,848
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1139 Post(s)
Liked 1,239 Times in 784 Posts
Originally Posted by wcoastbikr
I'm about the same height/inseam as you. I wish I had gotten a 54. I feel too stretched out, I have my saddle slammed all the way forward, and have to put 20mm of spacers under the stem(100mm) to keep my back from killing me on longer rides.

I can't afford to buy a new bike/frameset now, so in the meantime I'm thinking about getting a no offset seatpost and a 90mm stem.

My next bike will be a 54.
Are you trying to adjust the reach to the handlebars by putting your saddle forward? That is the wrong way to adjust things. You should adjust your saddle positon to get your positon over the crank spindle correct (start at KOPS, adjust forward or rearward depending on taste), THEN adjust your reach with the stem and/or changing bars. You can easily go to a shorter 90 or 80 mm stem and maybe find some shorter reach bars also to make that bike fit better. Definitely can get those new parts for less than $100 for top quality, more like less than $50 for good mid range stuff. Don't let anyone fool you, 80mm stems have perfectly fine handling.
Camilo is offline  
Old 03-17-09, 06:55 PM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Schaumburg, IL
Posts: 395

Bikes: Trek 5000

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'm just over 5'10" and have a 30" inseam. I have a long torso and short legs. I use a 120mm stem on my 56 Madone 5.5 pro. This model has a shorter head tube than the other 5.5. Given my long upper body, I need the extra length. I was fitted between 54 and 56. I rode the 56 (I had a 54) and felt comfortable so went with the 56.
RJBTrek is offline  
Old 03-17-09, 07:45 PM
  #31  
Passista
 
Reynolds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,642

Bikes: 1998 Pinarello Asolo, 1992 KHS Montaña pro, 1980 Raleigh DL-1, IGH Hybrid, IGH Utility

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 884 Post(s)
Liked 741 Times in 407 Posts
I'm 5'8" - 32.5" and ride a 54 x 54.5 and a 55 x 54.5, both fit OK.
Reynolds is offline  
Old 03-17-09, 07:57 PM
  #32  
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 27
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'm 5'6.5 and have a 32" inseam and am struggling with this as well. LBS fitted me smack in the middle of the 53cm and 55cm Gary Fisher ARC Super frame. We're going with the 55. I'm a little worried, but he thinks I'm going to prefer the length and more relaxed geometry. The 53 head tube would drop me quite a bit over the 55. He also said the bigger frame would keep my center of gravity lower, aiding in stability. (I'm a new rider, if you can't tell already).
moefam is offline  
Old 03-18-09, 12:00 AM
  #33  
tkm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 524
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 37 Post(s)
Liked 54 Times in 22 Posts
I'm amazed that no one has brought up the fact that different bike manufactures all use different geometry; hence, frame sizing is a good guideline, but certainly it can't be compared across makes.

For instance, in a (new) Trek Madone, I felt most comfortable on a 58cm. I'm ~5'11". However, on a Cannondale, depending upon the model, I'm a 54-56cm.

Sloping top-tube, virtual vs. actual size, etc. All of these need to be taken into consideration.
tkm is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.