![]() |
Rollers vs. Trainers Pros and Cons
I used the search function, but it didn't seem to work out well for me. So I wanted to ask what are the general differences between a roller and a trainer; their pros and cons?
|
I have both. I first picked up a trainer, Cycleops fluid model. I used it for a winter. I was happy with the way it simulated resistance. Out of curiosity I got a set of rollers with a mag resistance unit . If I train indoors, I primarily ride rollers. I think it keeps the workout more interesting, plus rollers build balance and pedal stroke. The only thing I can't do on my rollers is hard out of saddle sprints. I just jump of the drums. I'm going to remedy this with building a DIY emotion setup.
|
Rollers in the morning, Trainer in the evening
They really serve two different purposes. If you want to just spin around or do a lighter workout, rollers fit that task. Also you can do longer intervals on rollers since your wattage won't be as high. If you want to do maximal intervals, definitely the trainer. This is your 30s-5min intervals. I would start out getting a trainer (look for deals now since the winter is over for most places) since its easier to do group indoor training with a trainer. Then next year look for rollers. If you buy quality equipment, it'll last for a long time (especially rollers) so think of it as a longterm investment in your cycling. |
Kreitler rollers with flywheel and Killer Head Wind unit. :thumb:
More realistic resistance than a trainer and helps with balance and bike handling skills. |
Take a look at the E-Motion Rollers. They offer more resistence than most trainers, you can stand and sprint out of the saddle and you can't ride off of them. The down side, they are not cheap, but from what I have heard, they heard they are worth the price of admission.
|
Originally Posted by Carbon Unit
(Post 8565866)
Take a look at the E-Motion Rollers. They offer more resistence than most trainers, you can stand and sprint out of the saddle and you can't ride off of them. The down side, they are not cheap, but from what I have heard, they heard they are worth the price of admission.
|
Originally Posted by sushijoe
(Post 8565046)
kreitler rollers with flywheel and killer head wind unit. :thumb:
More realistic resistance than a trainer and helps with balance and bike handling skills. |
Originally Posted by Fat Boy
(Post 8565923)
+100
|
Originally Posted by SushiJoe
(Post 8565873)
gsteinb likes them. Good endorsement.
|
They're for different functions. The rollers are for working on your pedaling form -- you'll notice pretty quickly how balanced your pedaling is on rollers. The trainer is for working on your muscles/heart/lungs (your "engine").
|
Originally Posted by otakux
(Post 8564283)
I used the search function, but it didn't seem to work out well for me. So I wanted to ask what are the general differences between a roller and a trainer; their pros and cons?
Trainers are easier to pack and store Rollers Rock! |
Trainers are for training. You can do any kind of workout on a trainer.
Rollers are more interesting and more fun, in my opinion, since you feel more like you're on the road. Rollers help to develop a very smooth and powerful stroke, which is a very important skill. But, out of the saddle, all-out sprints on rollers are a great way to injure yourself or your bike. |
Originally Posted by donrhummy
(Post 8566075)
The trainer is for working on your muscles/heart/lungs (your "engine").
|
Originally Posted by SushiJoe
(Post 8565046)
Kreitler rollers with flywheel and Killer Head Wind unit. :thumb:
More realistic resistance than a trainer and helps with balance and bike handling skills. |
I got a KK "rock and roll", I don't know if it really compares to rollers, but the unit works well for it's intent.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:05 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.