Shimano Pulverizes Campagnolo?
#26
Senior Member
Speaking as a pragmatist (a rarity in cycling, I know), switching groups isn't something to take lightly, especially if you have multiple bikes. All your wheels are Shimano, all your tools are for Shimano, all your extras are Shimano.
Granted Campy has a reputation of being easier to work on, but it's also MUCH more expensive. At any vendor that sells both Campy and Shimano, you'll be paying more for brand C.
At least figure a way to do some thorough testing before you switch.
BL
Edit: https://www.bikesdirect.com/products/...mp_campy08.htm
Granted Campy has a reputation of being easier to work on, but it's also MUCH more expensive. At any vendor that sells both Campy and Shimano, you'll be paying more for brand C.
At least figure a way to do some thorough testing before you switch.
BL
Edit: https://www.bikesdirect.com/products/...mp_campy08.htm
Campy chain life is so much greater that the cost per mile is usually no greater.
#28
Clinging to guns/religion
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Pgh, PA
Posts: 283
Bikes: Litspd Cyx/ Paragon/ LHT/ Madone 5.2/ Spclzd TT/ Boone/ Lynskey 27.5/ Pugs / Colnago CLX
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I get it.
Its just like my wife. Works good....but i wonder if there is anything lighter,faster,better?
Its just like my wife. Works good....but i wonder if there is anything lighter,faster,better?
#30
Dough Mestique
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 355
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Not interested in a debate about the cost/benefit ratio of Campy versus Shimano.
BL
#31
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: ATL
Posts: 583
Bikes: 2000 Trek 5200, 2007 Bianchi Pista
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Yet you've thrown out the blanket statement its more expensive, when it isn't that clear cut.
#32
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 443
Bikes: 3Rensho SRA
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
If you're going to compare groups on weight alone, Rival, Centaur, and Dura-Ace would all be in the same category:
https://www.totalcycling.com/index.ph...t-weights.html
By that logic, Shimano is far more expensive than either SRAM or Campy.
However, weight isn't all your are buying in a group. I like campy because I like how their shifters feel the best and I love being able to dump multiple gears at a time.
Just find the company that has the best shifting for you and buy the groupo that is in your price range.
There's really no sense in making threads with inflammatory titles like this.
https://www.totalcycling.com/index.ph...t-weights.html
By that logic, Shimano is far more expensive than either SRAM or Campy.
However, weight isn't all your are buying in a group. I like campy because I like how their shifters feel the best and I love being able to dump multiple gears at a time.
Just find the company that has the best shifting for you and buy the groupo that is in your price range.
There's really no sense in making threads with inflammatory titles like this.
#33
Senior Member
Respectfully disagree regarding chain life. There's no magic in Campy chains. Metal is metal. They wear just like Shimano and SRAM chains. You can run them longer, sure, but you pay the price. I got 8500 miles out of an Ultegra chain once with no loss of shifting performance, but of course ended up having to replace the chainrings and cassette as well as the chain.
BL
BL
Not true at all. All metals are NOT the same. Campy chains wear differently than any other brand I've ever tested. Ridden in the same conditions, with the same lube, a Shimano chain will elongate about four times faster than a Campy chain. That does not mean that the Campy chain will last four times longer, since the rollers still wear out, but the rollers also wear at a slower rate. Ultimately you can get 30-50% more mileage from a Campy chain. Even after 6,000 miles of use, my Campy chains have no more than 1/3 of the "allowable" .5% elongation. Unfortunately, the roller spacing has increased by about .040 inch by then, so I arbitrarily trash the chain at that point, despite the small amount of elongation.
You can get more mileage from any chain and cassette by alternating the use of several chains rather than leaving one on until it's shot and then hoping the second, third or fourth new chain doesn't skip when it's installed on used cogs. What ends a cassette's life is chain skip when a new chain is installed.
If I start with a new cassette and three chains, I'll use the each one until the roller spacing increases by about .020 inch, which might take 2,000 miles for each new chain. After 6,000 miles, I'll have three partially worn chains that will NEVER skip if I continue to alternate their use at regular intervals. When the roller spacing increase to about .040 inch, I'll toss all three chains and the cassette. I would expect at least 12,000 miles of use and perhaps as many as 18,000.
If you happen to use a single chain on a cassette for a little too long and get chain skip on only one cog, you might consider keeping that cassette. A chain with only a few hundred miles of break-in can usually be mated to that worn cassette and not skip on the most-worn cog.
Last edited by DaveSSS; 05-26-09 at 09:03 AM.
#34
Mr. Dopolina
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 10,217
Bikes: KUUPAS, Simpson VR
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 149 Post(s)
Liked 117 Times
in
41 Posts
What the OP is seeing is how the three main component makers approach the OE market.
Shimano dominates because they give fantastic support to the OE factories and VERY aggressive pricing at the OE level. Sram does to some extent but not nearly as much as Shimano.
Campagnolo pretty much ignored the OE factories until only recently. In fact, they issued their first factory manual only this year. It still pales by comparison to what Shimano offers but it is a step for them.
IMHO Campagnolo will still remain an aftermarket company unless they dramatically increase their capacity and start working more closely with the OE, frame makers etc.
Shimano dominates because they give fantastic support to the OE factories and VERY aggressive pricing at the OE level. Sram does to some extent but not nearly as much as Shimano.
Campagnolo pretty much ignored the OE factories until only recently. In fact, they issued their first factory manual only this year. It still pales by comparison to what Shimano offers but it is a step for them.
IMHO Campagnolo will still remain an aftermarket company unless they dramatically increase their capacity and start working more closely with the OE, frame makers etc.
#35
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Los Angeles/Aveyron France
Posts: 5,308
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
I do know Sram wants BADLY to steal a big chunk of the OEM market from Shimano and I'd bet in the next few years they do. Teams switching to Sram mid-season, Lance on Sram, riders like Sastre opting for 7800- people are going to start demanding Sram and it'll trickle down to the OEM market.
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 632
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
My Ridley (bought in late '07) came stock with Centaur. According to their site they still spec Campy (yes, even Centaur) on several of their bikes.
#37
Mr. Dopolina
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 10,217
Bikes: KUUPAS, Simpson VR
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 149 Post(s)
Liked 117 Times
in
41 Posts
I do know Sram wants BADLY to steal a big chunk of the OEM market from Shimano and I'd bet in the next few years they do. Teams switching to Sram mid-season, Lance on Sram, riders like Sastre opting for 7800- people are going to start demanding Sram and it'll trickle down to the OEM market.
Sram does want more of the OE market. They want it because OE drives aftermarket (where the margins are) not the other way around.
Most people don't make buying decisions based on what some pro rides. They buy a bike and replace parts as they wear out.
Those who buy complete groups, and who are aware of who the pros are and what they ride are a tiny minority of buyers.
#38
Newbie
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Titusville, FL
Posts: 71
Bikes: LOOK KG361 / Ultegra SL
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I am not as well seasoned in the minute details of the sport at the top professional level as some of you may be, however I have built many top level manufacturer show vehicles in my day (albeit years ago)... And the equipment they supply us for building their demo cars, are highly modified and nothing like what is available to the general public...
Is it the same with your top level competitor's bikes/parts? Is the wheelset model Lance Armstrong runs the same you or I could buy? Are the dérailleurs the same? Or are they, like in many other competitive industries, manufactured to different exacting specs, with materials superior to what they use in the same line, that we can buy?
I am guessing that a make/model any top level pro uses, is not the same any of us Joe Schmoes could buy... But, I could be wrong...
#39
Mr. Dopolina
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 10,217
Bikes: KUUPAS, Simpson VR
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 149 Post(s)
Liked 117 Times
in
41 Posts
For pros (their team mechanics) will modify products for the specific needs of a rider and sometimes companies will produce limited numbers for this same reason. Pro will also test new products or changes in existing products before they are released to the general public.
These cases are the exception, not the rule.
#40
Newbie
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Titusville, FL
Posts: 71
Bikes: LOOK KG361 / Ultegra SL
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Excellent info and insight Bob.. Very much appreciated, and very good to know!
Thanks!!
Thanks!!
#42
just tryin' to keep up
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 452
Bikes: Marin Portofino - Foco Steel built by Billato
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
i know i should know this....please remind me what OEM is?!
Thanks!
Thanks!
#43
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,522
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1422 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
5 Posts
Shimano has the manufacturing capacity to deliver the quality/price level and quantity anytime you want it.
#44
Custom User Title
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Winnipeg, Canada
Posts: 1,913
Bikes: 2006 Marin Stelvio, 1990s Steve Bauer, Marin Palisades Trail
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#45
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 309
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#46
Senior Member
Right now, Licktons has about the best US price on Chorus 11.
#47
Mr. Dopolina
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 10,217
Bikes: KUUPAS, Simpson VR
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 149 Post(s)
Liked 117 Times
in
41 Posts
Also, they don't can't deliver the same quantity as Shimano. We had a vendor that bugged us for years about putting their component in our product. Finally we said yes and said, we need 10 million of them. They had no way to deliver that many so we went back to the existing supplier. (Eventually they ramped up their capacity and we now use both vendors)
Shimano has the manufacturing capacity to deliver the quality/price level and quantity anytime you want it.
Shimano has the manufacturing capacity to deliver the quality/price level and quantity anytime you want it.
#48
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Seems I hit a nerve with most of the replies.
I had (still do) 1991 campy record w/ delta brakes on my Basso Lotto (downtube shifting, ergo) and I loved it.
My buddies and I would argue daily between Dura-Ace and Record.
My preference has always been campy....NOT for the glamour or bragging rites but for their quality, precision, craftmanship and Italian pedigree.
Shimano Dura Ace/Ultegra; which I mainly ride is top notch in every respect and I admire it dearly.
Variety is all I want. Centaur or chorus is almost 20 years newer than my record and would like to see the improvements.
SRAM, I only have as a 3 speed i-motion system on my so cool swobo otis with grip twist shift. Its OK for trailering my puppies around the area.
I had (still do) 1991 campy record w/ delta brakes on my Basso Lotto (downtube shifting, ergo) and I loved it.
My buddies and I would argue daily between Dura-Ace and Record.
My preference has always been campy....NOT for the glamour or bragging rites but for their quality, precision, craftmanship and Italian pedigree.
Shimano Dura Ace/Ultegra; which I mainly ride is top notch in every respect and I admire it dearly.
Variety is all I want. Centaur or chorus is almost 20 years newer than my record and would like to see the improvements.
SRAM, I only have as a 3 speed i-motion system on my so cool swobo otis with grip twist shift. Its OK for trailering my puppies around the area.
#49
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 675
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have campagnolo mirage on my trek 1000 build and i have only spent 450 and that includes my campagnolo record and mavic open pro rims.