Scott Speedster S40 - good choice?
06-09-09, 04:38 PM
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Scott Speedster S40 - good choice?
Upgrading from a Nishiki Century Road bike, and I think i've made my final decision on a Scott Speedster S40. I've compared it to a Trek 1.2, Giant Defy 2, and Cannondale Synapse 7. I like it because it's very snappy, quick, comfortable saddle and has Taiga all around. On top of that, I can get it for 10% off it's $999.99 price tag, so for only $899. I'm not an all out bike guru, so before I spend the money i'm just looking for some opinions on this bike to make sure I won't regret my decision to pick it over the other bikes mentioned. Thanks for your help!
06-09-09, 05:49 PM
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 2,146
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I liked the look of the frame...the weird top tube is different for an alum bargin bike. I like the color too.
06-09-09, 06:00 PM
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 434
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I started on an S40. I paid ~$950, after taxes. This was about 2.5 yrs ago.
The only downside to the purchase were the wheels. Back then I was ~250lbs, the shop I bought them from didn't bother checking the tension and I ended up breaking spokes on the rear. I stuck with the frame, upgrading components, until a car collided with me and dented it. It was stiff as hell, I think a bit heavy compared to a CAAD. I thought and still think it's a good valued bike.
This was what my bike looked like prior to its demise:
The only downside to the purchase were the wheels. Back then I was ~250lbs, the shop I bought them from didn't bother checking the tension and I ended up breaking spokes on the rear. I stuck with the frame, upgrading components, until a car collided with me and dented it. It was stiff as hell, I think a bit heavy compared to a CAAD. I thought and still think it's a good valued bike.
This was what my bike looked like prior to its demise:
06-10-09, 04:50 PM
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 91
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have an 08 S40 and I love it. I looked at a Trek 1.2 last year and something about the Scott just seemed so much better when I rode it. I would never regret upgrading the components on it either. It has been a great comfortable bike for me, and I am far from in ideal biking shape.
Go For It!!!!
Go For It!!!!
06-10-09, 07:14 PM
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Rochester, New York
Posts: 86
Bikes: none yet
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I also have a 08 S40 and can say only good things about it. Got it for a awesome price so really no other bike compared at the time. I would say the same applies for you, The Scott has better components than all others, a stiff and lively frame, and sexy looks.... Go for it..
