Newbie
i would like some opinions on what is a good aero rim depth for all around road racing/crits. i have a pair of ksyriums but would like a deeper profile for racing. i have been looking at several 66mm depth but don't want a wheel that is overly cumbersome. Also considering 46mm depth. Any insight appreciated. Thx!
Senior Member
Rim depth should be determined by 3 things
1 Your weight
the larger you are the deeper rim you can handle
2 The wind patterns where you live
the windier it is in your area the harder a deep rim will be to handle
3 how much climbing you do
The more you climb the more a lighter, and by nature shallow wheel will make sense
Example
I weigh 190
The winds are frequent and high in Boulder Co
I climb a lot
I ride Edge 68 clinchers for training.
If you respond to 1-3 then we will be able to provide you with sound advice.
1 Your weight
the larger you are the deeper rim you can handle
2 The wind patterns where you live
the windier it is in your area the harder a deep rim will be to handle
3 how much climbing you do
The more you climb the more a lighter, and by nature shallow wheel will make sense
Example
I weigh 190
The winds are frequent and high in Boulder Co
I climb a lot
I ride Edge 68 clinchers for training.
If you respond to 1-3 then we will be able to provide you with sound advice.
Senior Member
Well not to thread jack, but I have the same question. I have an Excel doc I have been throwing wheelsets into to get an idea of the different ones when it comes to price/weight/aero/etc.
1. Weight - 135lbs (Height - 5'9")
2. Winds - Generally have constant wind. I do a lot of riding in farm lands so there can be some pretty good crosswinds at times. Nothing too crazy though.
3. I do climb pretty often, but they are not huge climbs by any means. Not many 'mountains' in Central PA.
I'll be doing a mixture of crits and RRs.
1. Weight - 135lbs (Height - 5'9")
2. Winds - Generally have constant wind. I do a lot of riding in farm lands so there can be some pretty good crosswinds at times. Nothing too crazy though.
3. I do climb pretty often, but they are not huge climbs by any means. Not many 'mountains' in Central PA.
I'll be doing a mixture of crits and RRs.
Senior Member
^^^^I would suggest some Edge 45s. A nice mid-depth rim would be perfect for all around riding/racing. The 45 would build up into a very stiff wheel in a 20/24 count.
Tubys would weigh about 1045 grams
Clinchers would weigh about 1325 grams
You would could beat the hell out of them no problem
Tubys would weigh about 1045 grams
Clinchers would weigh about 1325 grams
You would could beat the hell out of them no problem
Senior Member
Quote:
Tubys would weigh about 1045 grams
Clinchers would weigh about 1325 grams
You would could beat the hell out of them no problem
Thanks for the quick reply and advice! However I think those might be out of my price range at the moment. Any other lower-cost suggestions? Soul 4.0s are 40mm, I was looking at them. I'd say my budget for now (college student) would be around $500 or so.Originally Posted by Zen Cyclery
^^^^I would suggest some Edge 45s. A nice mid-depth rim would be perfect for all around riding/racing. The 45 would build up into a very stiff wheel in a 20/24 count. Tubys would weigh about 1045 grams
Clinchers would weigh about 1325 grams
You would could beat the hell out of them no problem
Batüwü Creakcreak
ridethecliche
Batüwü Creakcreak
close
- Join DateJan 2007
- LocationThe illadelph
- Posts:20,802
-
iTrader Positive Feedback0
-
iTrader Feedback Score(0)
-
Likes:658
-
Liked:294 Times in 164 Posts
I like my 4.0's.
Not terribly expensive. Have served me well in races, and have been fine for training.
College student here as well, which is why I went for them.
Not terribly expensive. Have served me well in races, and have been fine for training.
College student here as well, which is why I went for them.
Senior Member
Quote:
Not terribly expensive. Have served me well in races, and have been fine for training.
College student here as well, which is why I went for them.
Yeah I have read many good things about the Soul wheels. I was debating between them and the 3.0s. I wasn't sure if the extra 10mm of rim depth and my weight would cause me to be blown over.Originally Posted by ridethecliche
I like my 4.0's. Not terribly expensive. Have served me well in races, and have been fine for training.
College student here as well, which is why I went for them.
Senior Member
Quote:
My experience is that they feel wierd and unstable at first, then you get used to it and don't notice it any more. Just remember not to ride no hands in a gusty side wind.Originally Posted by admcptch
I wasn't sure if the extra 10mm of rim depth and my weight would cause me to be blown over.
i got nothing.
so now there is a rider weight to rim depth ratio chart...i can't keep up anymore 

Senior Member
Quote:
Yeah that's what I was thinking, eventually get used to it.Originally Posted by ericm979
My experience is that they feel wierd and unstable at first, then you get used to it and don't notice it any more. Just remember not to ride no hands in a gusty side wind.
So go for the 4.0s even though they weigh a little more? Difference between the 3.0 and 3.0SL is that they have the lighter spokes and also the lighter hubs that Soul offers. I know there have recently been countless threads on aero vs. weight. Seems the consensus is aero > weight. Either way they are lighter than my R500s.
SOUL S3.0 - Price: $350 - Weight (g): 1540
SOUL S3.0SL - Price: $435 - Weight (g): 1390
SOUL S4.0 - Price: $420 - Weight (g): 1680
No matches
Flatballer
No matches
close
- Join DateAug 2008
- LocationEastern PA
- Posts:11,647
-
iTrader Positive Feedback0
-
iTrader Feedback Score(0)
-
Likes:587
-
Liked:444 Times in 250 Posts
Quote:
Actually, it's a complicated 5 factor formula. It can't be graphed by conventional means.Originally Posted by Crash716
so now there is a rider weight to rim depth ratio chart...i can't keep up anymore
You have to take into account rider weight, climbing feet per 50 mile ride, average windspeed of the terrain, a multiplier that accounts for riding style, and your FTP.
It's a secret formula though, I can't tell you.
Senior Member
Quote:
So go for the 4.0s even though they weigh a little more? Difference between the 3.0 and 3.0SL is that they have the spokes and also the lighter hubs that Soul offers. I know there have recently been countless threads on aero vs. . Seems the consensus is aero > . Either way they are lighter than my R500s.
SOUL S3.0 - Price: $350 - Weight (g): 1540
SOUL S3.0SL - Price: $435 - Weight (g): 1390
SOUL S4.0 - Price: $420 - Weight (g): 1680
this has been a question of mine as well...interested to hear comments on this.Originally Posted by admcptch
Yeah that's what I was thinking, eventually get used to it.So go for the 4.0s even though they weigh a little more? Difference between the 3.0 and 3.0SL is that they have the spokes and also the lighter hubs that Soul offers. I know there have recently been countless threads on aero vs. . Seems the consensus is aero > . Either way they are lighter than my R500s.
SOUL S3.0 - Price: $350 - Weight (g): 1540
SOUL S3.0SL - Price: $435 - Weight (g): 1390
SOUL S4.0 - Price: $420 - Weight (g): 1680
going roundy round
Quote:
1 Your weight
the larger you are the deeper rim you can handle
...
Originally Posted by Zen Cyclery
Rim depth should be determined by 3 things1 Your weight
the larger you are the deeper rim you can handle
...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crash716
so now there is a rider weight to rim depth ratio chart...i can't keep up anymore
Quote:
You have to take into account rider weight, climbing feet per 50 mile ride, average windspeed of the terrain, a multiplier that accounts for riding style, and your FTP.
It's a secret formula though, I can't tell you.
I found the formula. I need a disk front and rear.Originally Posted by Flatballer
Actually, it's a complicated 5 factor formula. It can't be graphed by conventional means.You have to take into account rider weight, climbing feet per 50 mile ride, average windspeed of the terrain, a multiplier that accounts for riding style, and your FTP.
It's a secret formula though, I can't tell you.
Dirt-riding heretic
404s, or if you're on a budget, some Williams 58 tubulars from the same molds...
Junior Member
Quote:
me too. i actually did a search earlier today for this exact topic. i'm running aksiums right now so any wheel will probably be a weight improvement and/or aero improvement. to me, the 3.0sl's seem to be the best bet; roughly 2/3 of a pound lighter than the 4.0s and only 1cm difference in depth (assuming i'm understanding the depths correctly). am i off base in my logic? i have a pair of xero xr-1 wheels but am not a fan and will be selling them but i do like the deep rim though.Originally Posted by pkpsu
this has been a question of mine as well...interested to hear comments on this.