View Poll Results: Which would you pick?
Super Record 11




94
63.09%
Dura-Ace 7900




55
36.91%
Voters: 149. You may not vote on this poll
Super Record 11 vs Dura-Ace 7900
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 378
Bikes: Cervelo S3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Super Record 11 vs Dura-Ace 7900
Which would you rather? I'm looking for outfit a newly purchased Cervelo S3, and the more I research into the differences between the SR11 and DA7900, the more confused I get with which way to go. Opinions / suggestions?
#2
No matches
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Eastern PA
Posts: 11,647
Bikes: two wheeled ones
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1398 Post(s)
Liked 444 Times
in
250 Posts
If you want the best of the best, it's SR11. No question. Especially compared to DA7900, and especially if money isn't a problem.
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 378
Bikes: Cervelo S3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#4
The Truth
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Miami
Posts: 2,289
Bikes: Felt f4c, Felt RXC, Guerciotti Khaybar,Guerciotti EM-2, Cervelo P-3.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
That being said choosing either one is not a bad choice.
__________________
Sean Kelly is a god, sure a god that I can't understand a word he is saying, but a god nonetheless.
Sean Kelly is a god, sure a god that I can't understand a word he is saying, but a god nonetheless.
#5
No matches
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Eastern PA
Posts: 11,647
Bikes: two wheeled ones
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1398 Post(s)
Liked 444 Times
in
250 Posts
Actually, surprisingly, I just checked and DA is actually $40 more expensive than SR11 right now on CompetitiveCyclist. I don't look at these higher end groups much, because I can't actually afford them.
#6
No matches
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Eastern PA
Posts: 11,647
Bikes: two wheeled ones
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1398 Post(s)
Liked 444 Times
in
250 Posts
Take anything I say with a grain of salt, I haven't ridden either one, just going based on what I've read and heard from other riders. I doubt you're going to find a lot of people who have actually ridden both of these groups though.
#7
The Truth
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Miami
Posts: 2,289
Bikes: Felt f4c, Felt RXC, Guerciotti Khaybar,Guerciotti EM-2, Cervelo P-3.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Most of the arguments about which one are better are usually based on opinion and not fact.
__________________
Sean Kelly is a god, sure a god that I can't understand a word he is saying, but a god nonetheless.
Sean Kelly is a god, sure a god that I can't understand a word he is saying, but a god nonetheless.
#8
Big Blade
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 950
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Make sure you buy off eBay, best prices available.
I was a Shimano guy for many years. I mean, i LOVED Shimano, they could never do me wrong. I think they are the best components out there.
However, I recently switched to Super Record 11. First time riding Campy. I cannot be happier. Im not just saying that to justify my purchase.
Admittedly the reason I switched goes deeper than just functionality.
As Andy from Competitive Cyclist said in his review, as I get older and fiscally more responsible, Campy just lasts a lot, lot, lot longer. Plus its fully rebuild-able. If you crash and ruin your shifters, just switch the levers, but with Shimano, you have to throw away the whole damn thing. Bad for the environment too.
Secondly, I have always found the braking micro "notchy" feeling of campy nice. They seem to have added this to DA 7900 though, although not as nice as Campy.
They use ceramic bearings on Campy, again, smoother and a lot longer lasting.
I have a SCOTT CR1, so the carbon look was appealing to me. In a world full of logos and flashy bikes, this sisnt a bad thing to keep up with the Jones' a little.
Campagnolo is also like PC vs Mac. Shimano has a much bigger market share, and cheaper, just like PCs. Campy is a lot more passionate (their marketing at least) and a little more pricey, and isnt as popular (like Macs.)
In my older days, I appreciate the finer details in life, and want to enjoy the heritage and passion of cycling. Im not the young crazy cat I was that rode rainn or shine and put in mile after mile and only cared about my legs. My bike is now part of the love for the sport. So the Super Record legacy was appealing to me also.
Super Record is also a little lighter. I am a climber, so the slight weight savings appealed to me.
I also was searching for change and something new. Try something different.
And finally, "it goes to eleven"
Hope this helps.
#9
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 378
Bikes: Cervelo S3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Perhaps I should have just asked for first hand experiences. I liked the shifting on the Campy a little more, despite the fact that I've always had Shimano sets.
#11
The Truth
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Miami
Posts: 2,289
Bikes: Felt f4c, Felt RXC, Guerciotti Khaybar,Guerciotti EM-2, Cervelo P-3.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NW Burbs, Chicago
Posts: 11,881
Mentioned: 193 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2851 Post(s)
Liked 3,084 Times
in
1,221 Posts
Personally, I prefer the thumb shifting on the Campagnolo. Other than that and aesthetics (I prefer Campagnolo there too), there is not that much difference.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,296
Bikes: 2007 Orbea Onix TDF,2008 Orbea Orca in Red
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Just test both and see what you like best,this remains me the Porsche vs Ferrari,Glock vs H&K and Rolex vs Breitling... I'm a Porsche,Glock,Breitling guy............ahhhh your question.. I like Shimano all the way,by the way I know personally several cat 1 and 2 including pro riders and they ALL "prefer" Shimano.

#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 72
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have RED, D/A 7900, and SR. The first two are very good, but SR is, in my view, far superior in both precision and ergonomics. It does exactly what is supposed to do time after time, and it looks best too.
#16
Senior Member
I think a lot also has to do with the frame you will be putting the group on! Cervelo and Campy SR is an instant classic. Cervelo and Shimano - if you have the choice? Gotta go Campy.
#18
.....
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Long Island
Posts: 4,816
Bikes: 2006 Cannondale CAAD8
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
As Andy from Competitive Cyclist said in his review, as I get older and fiscally more responsible, Campy just lasts a lot, lot, lot longer. Plus its fully rebuild-able. If you crash and ruin your shifters, just switch the levers, but with Shimano, you have to throw away the whole damn thing. Bad for the environment too.

#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Kitchener, ON
Posts: 2,032
Bikes: 1994 Proctor Townsend Reynolds 753, TT S3 True North, Kona Major Jake, Kona Honky Tonk, Marinoni Puima, Cannondale BBU
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
x2
Make sure you buy off eBay, best prices available.
I was a Shimano guy for many years. I mean, i LOVED Shimano, they could never do me wrong. I think they are the best components out there.
However, I recently switched to Super Record 11. First time riding Campy. I cannot be happier. Im not just saying that to justify my purchase.
Admittedly the reason I switched goes deeper than just functionality.
As Andy from Competitive Cyclist said in his review, as I get older and fiscally more responsible, Campy just lasts a lot, lot, lot longer. Plus its fully rebuild-able. If you crash and ruin your shifters, just switch the levers, but with Shimano, you have to throw away the whole damn thing. Bad for the environment too.
Secondly, I have always found the braking micro "notchy" feeling of campy nice. They seem to have added this to DA 7900 though, although not as nice as Campy.
They use ceramic bearings on Campy, again, smoother and a lot longer lasting.
I have a SCOTT CR1, so the carbon look was appealing to me. In a world full of logos and flashy bikes, this sisnt a bad thing to keep up with the Jones' a little.
Campagnolo is also like PC vs Mac. Shimano has a much bigger market share, and cheaper, just like PCs. Campy is a lot more passionate (their marketing at least) and a little more pricey, and isnt as popular (like Macs.)
In my older days, I appreciate the finer details in life, and want to enjoy the heritage and passion of cycling. Im not the young crazy cat I was that rode rainn or shine and put in mile after mile and only cared about my legs. My bike is now part of the love for the sport. So the Super Record legacy was appealing to me also.
Super Record is also a little lighter. I am a climber, so the slight weight savings appealed to me.
I also was searching for change and something new. Try something different.
And finally, "it goes to eleven"
Hope this helps.
Make sure you buy off eBay, best prices available.
I was a Shimano guy for many years. I mean, i LOVED Shimano, they could never do me wrong. I think they are the best components out there.
However, I recently switched to Super Record 11. First time riding Campy. I cannot be happier. Im not just saying that to justify my purchase.
Admittedly the reason I switched goes deeper than just functionality.
As Andy from Competitive Cyclist said in his review, as I get older and fiscally more responsible, Campy just lasts a lot, lot, lot longer. Plus its fully rebuild-able. If you crash and ruin your shifters, just switch the levers, but with Shimano, you have to throw away the whole damn thing. Bad for the environment too.
Secondly, I have always found the braking micro "notchy" feeling of campy nice. They seem to have added this to DA 7900 though, although not as nice as Campy.
They use ceramic bearings on Campy, again, smoother and a lot longer lasting.
I have a SCOTT CR1, so the carbon look was appealing to me. In a world full of logos and flashy bikes, this sisnt a bad thing to keep up with the Jones' a little.
Campagnolo is also like PC vs Mac. Shimano has a much bigger market share, and cheaper, just like PCs. Campy is a lot more passionate (their marketing at least) and a little more pricey, and isnt as popular (like Macs.)
In my older days, I appreciate the finer details in life, and want to enjoy the heritage and passion of cycling. Im not the young crazy cat I was that rode rainn or shine and put in mile after mile and only cared about my legs. My bike is now part of the love for the sport. So the Super Record legacy was appealing to me also.
Super Record is also a little lighter. I am a climber, so the slight weight savings appealed to me.
I also was searching for change and something new. Try something different.
And finally, "it goes to eleven"
Hope this helps.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Torrance, CA
Posts: 3,043
Bikes: Homebuilt steel
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2083 Post(s)
Liked 400 Times
in
316 Posts
x2
Make sure you buy off eBay, best prices available.
I was a Shimano guy for many years. I mean, i LOVED Shimano, they could never do me wrong. I think they are the best components out there.
However, I recently switched to Super Record 11. First time riding Campy. I cannot be happier. Im not just saying that to justify my purchase.
Admittedly the reason I switched goes deeper than just functionality.
As Andy from Competitive Cyclist said in his review, as I get older and fiscally more responsible, Campy just lasts a lot, lot, lot longer. Plus its fully rebuild-able. If you crash and ruin your shifters, just switch the levers, but with Shimano, you have to throw away the whole damn thing. Bad for the environment too.
Secondly, I have always found the braking micro "notchy" feeling of campy nice. They seem to have added this to DA 7900 though, although not as nice as Campy.
They use ceramic bearings on Campy, again, smoother and a lot longer lasting.
I have a SCOTT CR1, so the carbon look was appealing to me. In a world full of logos and flashy bikes, this sisnt a bad thing to keep up with the Jones' a little.
Campagnolo is also like PC vs Mac. Shimano has a much bigger market share, and cheaper, just like PCs. Campy is a lot more passionate (their marketing at least) and a little more pricey, and isnt as popular (like Macs.)
In my older days, I appreciate the finer details in life, and want to enjoy the heritage and passion of cycling. Im not the young crazy cat I was that rode rainn or shine and put in mile after mile and only cared about my legs. My bike is now part of the love for the sport. So the Super Record legacy was appealing to me also.
Super Record is also a little lighter. I am a climber, so the slight weight savings appealed to me.
I also was searching for change and something new. Try something different.
And finally, "it goes to eleven"
Hope this helps.
Make sure you buy off eBay, best prices available.
I was a Shimano guy for many years. I mean, i LOVED Shimano, they could never do me wrong. I think they are the best components out there.
However, I recently switched to Super Record 11. First time riding Campy. I cannot be happier. Im not just saying that to justify my purchase.
Admittedly the reason I switched goes deeper than just functionality.
As Andy from Competitive Cyclist said in his review, as I get older and fiscally more responsible, Campy just lasts a lot, lot, lot longer. Plus its fully rebuild-able. If you crash and ruin your shifters, just switch the levers, but with Shimano, you have to throw away the whole damn thing. Bad for the environment too.
Secondly, I have always found the braking micro "notchy" feeling of campy nice. They seem to have added this to DA 7900 though, although not as nice as Campy.
They use ceramic bearings on Campy, again, smoother and a lot longer lasting.
I have a SCOTT CR1, so the carbon look was appealing to me. In a world full of logos and flashy bikes, this sisnt a bad thing to keep up with the Jones' a little.
Campagnolo is also like PC vs Mac. Shimano has a much bigger market share, and cheaper, just like PCs. Campy is a lot more passionate (their marketing at least) and a little more pricey, and isnt as popular (like Macs.)
In my older days, I appreciate the finer details in life, and want to enjoy the heritage and passion of cycling. Im not the young crazy cat I was that rode rainn or shine and put in mile after mile and only cared about my legs. My bike is now part of the love for the sport. So the Super Record legacy was appealing to me also.
Super Record is also a little lighter. I am a climber, so the slight weight savings appealed to me.
I also was searching for change and something new. Try something different.
And finally, "it goes to eleven"
Hope this helps.
The bold parts made me chuckle.
The parts in RED seem to be the REAL reason you switched. Nothing wrong with getting what you want, just please don't try to justify your reason with logic...because it doesn't work.
#22
Senior Member
I've used nothing but Campy since 1995, and I have two bikes setup with 11 speed. I did not chose SR because the minor differences between most SR parts and Record or Chorus are simple not worth the money.
The standout difference is the CULT bearings on the SR crank. Those are nice for increased longevity and resistance to wear from the intrusion of water or grit. Chrous cranks are only 40 grams heavier and much cheaper.
The SR shifters only have one Ti part to reduce the weight by 10-15 grams per pair - not worth the money. Record and Chorus shifters are mechanically identical.
The Ti cogs on a Record or SR cassette will last half as long as steel. I'd be in desperate to save 30 grams to fork out the extra bucks for Record or even more for SR.
If you want the best bang for the buck, buy Chorus or a Record/Chorus mix.
Check prices at Euro sources like Ribble or Shiny bikes before buying from E-bay. I bought back when the exchange rates were much better than they are now and got really low prices, like $240 for Record 11 shifters and $310 for Chorus 11 cranks. Licktons has a good price on the Chorus 11 group, but not so good on Record.
The standout difference is the CULT bearings on the SR crank. Those are nice for increased longevity and resistance to wear from the intrusion of water or grit. Chrous cranks are only 40 grams heavier and much cheaper.
The SR shifters only have one Ti part to reduce the weight by 10-15 grams per pair - not worth the money. Record and Chorus shifters are mechanically identical.
The Ti cogs on a Record or SR cassette will last half as long as steel. I'd be in desperate to save 30 grams to fork out the extra bucks for Record or even more for SR.
If you want the best bang for the buck, buy Chorus or a Record/Chorus mix.
Check prices at Euro sources like Ribble or Shiny bikes before buying from E-bay. I bought back when the exchange rates were much better than they are now and got really low prices, like $240 for Record 11 shifters and $310 for Chorus 11 cranks. Licktons has a good price on the Chorus 11 group, but not so good on Record.
Last edited by DaveSSS; 07-07-09 at 12:58 PM.
#23
pan y agua
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,229
Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1398 Post(s)
Liked 624 Times
in
331 Posts
Rather contradictory to say you went to Super Record because you're fiscally more responsible. Most of the touches that make Super Record, Super Record decrease longevity, and increase expense, such as CF front derailleur cage, and Ti in the cassette.
Sure, its a great group, but it's a little silly to say you went to SR to be more fiscally responsible. Regular Record or Chorus, would be a lot more fiscally responsible.
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,296
Bikes: 2007 Orbea Onix TDF,2008 Orbea Orca in Red
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thank you botto.. I love you too... nice to see you in picture again..

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:HyenaTanzania.JPG
In another note, those Campi pictures are a beauty ... Jezzz I like the shape of the hoods of DA much better..but no doubt Campi is a beauty..
https://www.light-bikes.de/website/ne...5/da7900_b.jpg
Last edited by PipinFan; 07-07-09 at 03:50 PM.
#25
Senior Member