Bikeorexia ... Cannondale purging
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,639
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Bikeorexia ... Cannondale purging
The Theater of the Absurd now includes road bikes; the destructive extent of bikeorexia has finally been revealed.
Over the weekend, during Tour coverage, Versus had a short piece on the Liquigas Cannondales. In the segment a Cannondale product manager revealed that their bikes weigh only twelve pounds. He then proudly raised his hand to display a three inch piece of metal pipe that had to be added to the bikes in order for them to comply with UCI regulations.
What a ridiculous demonstration that was. My mind began to spin with wonder.
Do people who buy those bikes look at the dead weight as rare earth, costing hundreds of dollars an ounce?
Do they wonder how much safety was given up to have a piece of scrap metal strapped to their bike in order to make it racing legal?
If I'm passed on a climb by a Cannondale rider should I demand that he display his silly axillary pipe or just assume he's cheating?
Over the weekend, during Tour coverage, Versus had a short piece on the Liquigas Cannondales. In the segment a Cannondale product manager revealed that their bikes weigh only twelve pounds. He then proudly raised his hand to display a three inch piece of metal pipe that had to be added to the bikes in order for them to comply with UCI regulations.
What a ridiculous demonstration that was. My mind began to spin with wonder.
Do people who buy those bikes look at the dead weight as rare earth, costing hundreds of dollars an ounce?
Do they wonder how much safety was given up to have a piece of scrap metal strapped to their bike in order to make it racing legal?
If I'm passed on a climb by a Cannondale rider should I demand that he display his silly axillary pipe or just assume he's cheating?
#2
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 28,387
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
I don't understand what you are asking. They add the weight to the tour bikes, not to the ones they sell. If some guy passes you on that bike, you can assume it doesn't have the added weight. However it probably doesn't have all the other light crap that made it underweight in the first place.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Lafayette, IN
Posts: 149
Bikes: Redline R750, 1974 Raleigh International
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I don't see why they would even have a min weight regulation. As long as the bike has the required components, brakes and whatnot, why not let it stand at that?
#4
Certifiable Bike "Expert"
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 5,647
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Cannondale is marketing to people who won't be racing in situations where the UCI minimum weight rule is enforced. Is that hard to understand?
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 3,198
Bikes: 2007 Orbea Onix, 2007 Windsor The Hour, 2008 Kona Jake
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The idea is similar to what NASCAR does. You can't gain an advantage by reducing weight beyond a certain point.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times
in
1,417 Posts
#7
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,639
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I don't understand what you are asking. They add the weight to the tour bikes, not to the ones they sell. If some guy passes you on that bike, you can assume it doesn't have the added weight. However it probably doesn't have all the other light crap that made it underweight in the first place.
#8
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,639
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Valencia, CA
Posts: 261
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
They should have put the weight into the bottom bracket to make it as low on the frame as possible to lower the center of gravity. I wasnt sure if he said he put it on the seatpost or the bottom of the seat tube which would be better.
#10
Senior Member
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: pacific beach, ca
Posts: 97
Bikes: giant defy 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
What part of lighter faster better stronger do you not understand in the world of evolution?
#12
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 28,387
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Formula 1 will also build their cars under the weight limit and add ballast. There is a benefit to controlling where the weight goes, as it affects handling. I imagine this would the same for bikes as well as cars. Regardless, you made it sound like the bikes they were selling would also have this ballast and people were paying extra for it.
#14
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,639
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Formula 1 will also build their cars under the weight limit and add ballast. There is a benefit to controlling where the weight goes, as it affects handling. I imagine this would the same for bikes as well as cars. Regardless, you made it sound like the bikes they were selling would also have this ballast and people were paying extra for it.
Here's the big difference, and the essential point I'm making. Cannondale is not making those bikes for other professional riders. They are making those bikes (and you can purchase an exact copy of what is being ridden in the Tour) for non-professional cyclists who pay big $$ for what is essentially a cheat. Think of it as a golfer with fifteen clubs in his bag or a swimmer with fins.
#15
Certifiable Bike "Expert"
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 5,647
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Yes, but bikes aren't like cars: bike lean into turns. So maybe you'd get "better handling" by keeping the dead weight as close to the center of mass of the bike+rider as possible (lower polar moment of inertia).
#16
Senior Member
Here's the big difference, and the essential point I'm making. Cannondale is not making those bikes for other professional riders. They are making those bikes (and you can purchase an exact copy of what is being ridden in the Tour) for non-professional cyclists who pay big $$ for what is essentially a cheat. Think of it as a golfer with fifteen clubs in his bag or a swimmer with fins.
#17
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 28,387
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
UMD, I honestly like most of your comments and think you have a lot of good knowledge to share on a variety of topics. But on this one, we don't see eye to eye.
Here's the big difference, and the essential point I'm making. Cannondale is not making those bikes for other professional riders. They are making those bikes (and you can purchase an exact copy of what is being ridden in the Tour) for non-professional cyclists who pay big $$ for what is essentially a cheat. Think of it as a golfer with fifteen clubs in his bag or a swimmer with fins.
Here's the big difference, and the essential point I'm making. Cannondale is not making those bikes for other professional riders. They are making those bikes (and you can purchase an exact copy of what is being ridden in the Tour) for non-professional cyclists who pay big $$ for what is essentially a cheat. Think of it as a golfer with fifteen clubs in his bag or a swimmer with fins.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Just this side of insanity.
Posts: 575
Bikes: Too many
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
UMD, I honestly like most of your comments and think you have a lot of good knowledge to share on a variety of topics. But on this one, we don't see eye to eye.
Here's the big difference, and the essential point I'm making. Cannondale is not making those bikes for other professional riders. They are making those bikes (and you can purchase an exact copy of what is being ridden in the Tour) for non-professional cyclists who pay big $$ for what is essentially a cheat. Think of it as a golfer with fifteen clubs in his bag or a swimmer with fins.
Here's the big difference, and the essential point I'm making. Cannondale is not making those bikes for other professional riders. They are making those bikes (and you can purchase an exact copy of what is being ridden in the Tour) for non-professional cyclists who pay big $$ for what is essentially a cheat. Think of it as a golfer with fifteen clubs in his bag or a swimmer with fins.
If people like riding around on a 12 pound bike, then shouldn't that be their choice?
Anyway, a lot (if not most) of this is marketing hype designed to sell products to people who don't necessarily understand the subtleties of geometry, weight distribution, or for that matter anatomy in the choice of a bike. They can understand weight because its a very obvious metric. Bike A weighs a pound less than Bike B so Bike A must be better.
It works the same way in so many other consumer marketing fields, like digital cameras where more megapixels are supposed to be the be-all and end-all, or stereo equipment where more wattage is always better, or cars where more horsepower is definitely a must, or computer CPUs where more Mhz are always faster, and on and on.
#19
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 28,387
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Anyway, a lot (if not most) of this is marketing hype designed to sell products to people who don't necessarily understand the subtleties of geometry, weight distribution, or for that matter anatomy in the choice of a bike. They can understand weight because its a very obvious metric. Bike A weighs a pound less than Bike B so Bike A must be better.
It works the same way in so many other consumer marketing fields, like digital cameras where more megapixels are supposed to be the be-all and end-all, or stereo equipment where more wattage is always better, or cars where more horsepower is definitely a must, or computer CPUs where more Mhz are always faster, and on and on.
It works the same way in so many other consumer marketing fields, like digital cameras where more megapixels are supposed to be the be-all and end-all, or stereo equipment where more wattage is always better, or cars where more horsepower is definitely a must, or computer CPUs where more Mhz are always faster, and on and on.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Syracuse, NY
Posts: 1,018
Bikes: 2018 Lynskey R 260 Disc; 2008 Trek 4.7 Madone; 2017 Framed Minnesota 3.0 Fat Bike; 1984 Nishiki International
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 111 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I think half the problem with this forum is that people don't recognize posts that are satire/sarcasm/tongue-firmly planted-in-cheek.
To quote that great American statesman Rodney King, why can't we all just get along?
To quote that great American statesman Rodney King, why can't we all just get along?
#21
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 10,978
Bikes: aggressive agreement is what I ride.
Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 967 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
UMD, I honestly like most of your comments and think you have a lot of good knowledge to share on a variety of topics. But on this one, we don't see eye to eye.
Here's the big difference, and the essential point I'm making. Cannondale is not making those bikes for other professional riders. They are making those bikes (and you can purchase an exact copy of what is being ridden in the Tour) for non-professional cyclists who pay big $$ for what is essentially a cheat. Think of it as a golfer with fifteen clubs in his bag or a swimmer with fins.
Here's the big difference, and the essential point I'm making. Cannondale is not making those bikes for other professional riders. They are making those bikes (and you can purchase an exact copy of what is being ridden in the Tour) for non-professional cyclists who pay big $$ for what is essentially a cheat. Think of it as a golfer with fifteen clubs in his bag or a swimmer with fins.
I mean, cost vs. weight exists at all levels, right?
#22
Bikes, Biology, Breakfast
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Istanbul
Posts: 98
Bikes: 1980s Raleigh, new Masi 1x9 commuter, newer raleigh single-speed
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
P.S. If you ever need to get rid of your 1D or some L lenses, let me know.
P.P.S. If you ever need to get rid of a ~13-15 pound bike, let me know.
#25
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 28,387
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
All the Rebel users I've seen usually leave it on the green box. Some have figured out the picture modes like sport, portrait, etc. None that I've talked to even knew what the P, Tv, Av, etc. did.
One nice thing about the 1 series bodies and L series lenses is the weather sealing. I've shot in pouring rain and watched while others tried to deal with plastic baggies.
And to keep it relevant, it's a Canondale!
One nice thing about the 1 series bodies and L series lenses is the weather sealing. I've shot in pouring rain and watched while others tried to deal with plastic baggies.
And to keep it relevant, it's a Canondale!