Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Bikeorexia ... Cannondale purging

Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Bikeorexia ... Cannondale purging

Old 07-14-09, 02:18 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
bigtea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,639
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Bikeorexia ... Cannondale purging

The Theater of the Absurd now includes road bikes; the destructive extent of bikeorexia has finally been revealed.

Over the weekend, during Tour coverage, Versus had a short piece on the Liquigas Cannondales. In the segment a Cannondale product manager revealed that their bikes weigh only twelve pounds. He then proudly raised his hand to display a three inch piece of metal pipe that had to be added to the bikes in order for them to comply with UCI regulations.

What a ridiculous demonstration that was. My mind began to spin with wonder.

Do people who buy those bikes look at the dead weight as rare earth, costing hundreds of dollars an ounce?

Do they wonder how much safety was given up to have a piece of scrap metal strapped to their bike in order to make it racing legal?

If I'm passed on a climb by a Cannondale rider should I demand that he display his silly axillary pipe or just assume he's cheating?
bigtea is offline  
Old 07-14-09, 02:23 PM
  #2  
umd
Banned
 
umd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 28,387

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
I don't understand what you are asking. They add the weight to the tour bikes, not to the ones they sell. If some guy passes you on that bike, you can assume it doesn't have the added weight. However it probably doesn't have all the other light crap that made it underweight in the first place.
umd is offline  
Old 07-14-09, 02:23 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
RLRider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Lafayette, IN
Posts: 149

Bikes: Redline R750, 1974 Raleigh International

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I don't see why they would even have a min weight regulation. As long as the bike has the required components, brakes and whatnot, why not let it stand at that?
RLRider is offline  
Old 07-14-09, 02:26 PM
  #4  
Certifiable Bike "Expert"
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 5,647
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Cannondale is marketing to people who won't be racing in situations where the UCI minimum weight rule is enforced. Is that hard to understand?
Phantoj is offline  
Old 07-14-09, 02:31 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
kwrides's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 3,198

Bikes: 2007 Orbea Onix, 2007 Windsor The Hour, 2008 Kona Jake

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RLRider
I don't see why they would even have a min weight regulation. As long as the bike has the required components, brakes and whatnot, why not let it stand at that?
The idea is similar to what NASCAR does. You can't gain an advantage by reducing weight beyond a certain point.
kwrides is offline  
Old 07-14-09, 02:31 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
caloso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur

Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times in 1,417 Posts
Originally Posted by Phantoj
Cannondale is marketing to people who won't be racing in situations where the UCI minimum weight rule is enforced. Is that hard to understand?
Or people who could lose the equivalent of a lead pipe by eating less and riding more.
caloso is offline  
Old 07-14-09, 02:35 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
bigtea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,639
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by umd
I don't understand what you are asking. They add the weight to the tour bikes, not to the ones they sell. If some guy passes you on that bike, you can assume it doesn't have the added weight. However it probably doesn't have all the other light crap that made it underweight in the first place.
My questions were rhetorical, intended to provoke a conversation about what I see as an absurd pursuit of weight reduction for the pure sake of it and at a cost that only benefits the sellers of bicycles.
bigtea is offline  
Old 07-14-09, 02:37 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
bigtea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,639
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by caloso
Or people who could lose the equivalent of a lead pipe by eating less and riding more.
Okay, I admit I occasionally suffer from vengeful bowel syndrome (VBS), but I wouldn't describe the symptoms as a lead pipe.
bigtea is offline  
Old 07-14-09, 02:38 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Georgebowen's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Valencia, CA
Posts: 261
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
They should have put the weight into the bottom bracket to make it as low on the frame as possible to lower the center of gravity. I wasnt sure if he said he put it on the seatpost or the bottom of the seat tube which would be better.
Georgebowen is offline  
Old 07-14-09, 02:38 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: DFW
Posts: 1,556
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Liked 597 Times in 105 Posts
Originally Posted by RLRider
I don't see why they would even have a min weight regulation. As long as the bike has the required components, brakes and whatnot, why not let it stand at that?
If they didn't people would make the frames so light that they became unsafe
hammond9705 is offline  
Old 07-14-09, 02:38 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
embe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: pacific beach, ca
Posts: 97

Bikes: giant defy 2

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
What part of lighter faster better stronger do you not understand in the world of evolution?
embe is offline  
Old 07-14-09, 02:42 PM
  #12  
umd
Banned
 
umd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 28,387

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by bigtea
My questions were rhetorical, intended to provoke a conversation about what I see as an absurd pursuit of weight reduction for the pure sake of it and at a cost that only benefits the sellers of bicycles.
Formula 1 will also build their cars under the weight limit and add ballast. There is a benefit to controlling where the weight goes, as it affects handling. I imagine this would the same for bikes as well as cars. Regardless, you made it sound like the bikes they were selling would also have this ballast and people were paying extra for it.
umd is offline  
Old 07-14-09, 02:47 PM
  #13  
Cardiac Case
 
Drag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Dropped... about 5 miles back...
Posts: 2,893

Bikes: Trek, Cannondale, Litespeed, Lynskey

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Georgebowen
They should have put the weight into the bottom bracket to make it as low on the frame as possible to lower the center of gravity...
I thought the same thing when I saw that episode.
__________________
TITANIUMDIVISION
BF Great Lakes Forum
Drag is offline  
Old 07-14-09, 02:51 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
bigtea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,639
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by umd
Formula 1 will also build their cars under the weight limit and add ballast. There is a benefit to controlling where the weight goes, as it affects handling. I imagine this would the same for bikes as well as cars. Regardless, you made it sound like the bikes they were selling would also have this ballast and people were paying extra for it.
UMD, I honestly like most of your comments and think you have a lot of good knowledge to share on a variety of topics. But on this one, we don't see eye to eye.

Here's the big difference, and the essential point I'm making. Cannondale is not making those bikes for other professional riders. They are making those bikes (and you can purchase an exact copy of what is being ridden in the Tour) for non-professional cyclists who pay big $$ for what is essentially a cheat. Think of it as a golfer with fifteen clubs in his bag or a swimmer with fins.
bigtea is offline  
Old 07-14-09, 02:54 PM
  #15  
Certifiable Bike "Expert"
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 5,647
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Georgebowen
They should have put the weight into the bottom bracket to make it as low on the frame as possible to lower the center of gravity. I wasnt sure if he said he put it on the seatpost or the bottom of the seat tube which would be better.
Yes, but bikes aren't like cars: bike lean into turns. So maybe you'd get "better handling" by keeping the dead weight as close to the center of mass of the bike+rider as possible (lower polar moment of inertia).
Phantoj is offline  
Old 07-14-09, 03:06 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
telebianchi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,310

Bikes: 2014/17 Trek Domane 5.2, 2003 Fuji Cross, 2019 Trek Fuel EX8 27.5 Plus, 2012 Raleigh XXIX single-speed, 2017 Access Gravel

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Liked 22 Times in 12 Posts
Originally Posted by bigtea
Here's the big difference, and the essential point I'm making. Cannondale is not making those bikes for other professional riders. They are making those bikes (and you can purchase an exact copy of what is being ridden in the Tour) for non-professional cyclists who pay big $$ for what is essentially a cheat. Think of it as a golfer with fifteen clubs in his bag or a swimmer with fins.
But if the non-professional cyclist is racing in an event that has a weight limit, then the bike could/should be put on a scale and that person dq'd. They cheated and got caught. If the they race an event with no weight limit, then how is it cheating?
telebianchi is offline  
Old 07-14-09, 03:10 PM
  #17  
umd
Banned
 
umd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 28,387

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by bigtea
UMD, I honestly like most of your comments and think you have a lot of good knowledge to share on a variety of topics. But on this one, we don't see eye to eye.

Here's the big difference, and the essential point I'm making. Cannondale is not making those bikes for other professional riders. They are making those bikes (and you can purchase an exact copy of what is being ridden in the Tour) for non-professional cyclists who pay big $$ for what is essentially a cheat. Think of it as a golfer with fifteen clubs in his bag or a swimmer with fins.
I know nothing of golfing so your example is lost on me. I ride a ~13-15 pound bike (depending on trim). There is no minimum weight in amateur racing, so it's not cheating. There is certainly no minimum weight for recreational road cycling.
umd is offline  
Old 07-14-09, 03:15 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Just this side of insanity.
Posts: 575

Bikes: Too many

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by bigtea
UMD, I honestly like most of your comments and think you have a lot of good knowledge to share on a variety of topics. But on this one, we don't see eye to eye.

Here's the big difference, and the essential point I'm making. Cannondale is not making those bikes for other professional riders. They are making those bikes (and you can purchase an exact copy of what is being ridden in the Tour) for non-professional cyclists who pay big $$ for what is essentially a cheat. Think of it as a golfer with fifteen clubs in his bag or a swimmer with fins.
It isn't cheating if you aren't competing in anything.

If people like riding around on a 12 pound bike, then shouldn't that be their choice?

Anyway, a lot (if not most) of this is marketing hype designed to sell products to people who don't necessarily understand the subtleties of geometry, weight distribution, or for that matter anatomy in the choice of a bike. They can understand weight because its a very obvious metric. Bike A weighs a pound less than Bike B so Bike A must be better.

It works the same way in so many other consumer marketing fields, like digital cameras where more megapixels are supposed to be the be-all and end-all, or stereo equipment where more wattage is always better, or cars where more horsepower is definitely a must, or computer CPUs where more Mhz are always faster, and on and on.
challaday is offline  
Old 07-14-09, 03:32 PM
  #19  
umd
Banned
 
umd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 28,387

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by challaday
Anyway, a lot (if not most) of this is marketing hype designed to sell products to people who don't necessarily understand the subtleties of geometry, weight distribution, or for that matter anatomy in the choice of a bike. They can understand weight because its a very obvious metric. Bike A weighs a pound less than Bike B so Bike A must be better.

It works the same way in so many other consumer marketing fields, like digital cameras where more megapixels are supposed to be the be-all and end-all, or stereo equipment where more wattage is always better, or cars where more horsepower is definitely a must, or computer CPUs where more Mhz are always faster, and on and on.
Very true, seems like the first thing people ask about someone else's bike is "how much does it weigh". I can't even count how many times I've been photographing something with my 1D and some guy with a Rebel comes up and asks me how many megapixels it has. "Eight" I say. "Mine is ten" they reply smugly...
umd is offline  
Old 07-14-09, 03:37 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Syracuse, NY
Posts: 1,018

Bikes: 2018 Lynskey R 260 Disc; 2008 Trek 4.7 Madone; 2017 Framed Minnesota 3.0 Fat Bike; 1984 Nishiki International

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 111 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I think half the problem with this forum is that people don't recognize posts that are satire/sarcasm/tongue-firmly planted-in-cheek.

To quote that great American statesman Rodney King, why can't we all just get along?
gettingold is offline  
Old 07-14-09, 03:52 PM
  #21  
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
 
Ygduf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 10,978

Bikes: aggressive agreement is what I ride.

Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 967 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by bigtea
UMD, I honestly like most of your comments and think you have a lot of good knowledge to share on a variety of topics. But on this one, we don't see eye to eye.

Here's the big difference, and the essential point I'm making. Cannondale is not making those bikes for other professional riders. They are making those bikes (and you can purchase an exact copy of what is being ridden in the Tour) for non-professional cyclists who pay big $$ for what is essentially a cheat. Think of it as a golfer with fifteen clubs in his bag or a swimmer with fins.
Cheat? Like everyone who chooses DA over Ultegra? Red over Rival?

I mean, cost vs. weight exists at all levels, right?
Ygduf is offline  
Old 07-14-09, 03:54 PM
  #22  
Bikes, Biology, Breakfast
 
AlexGSU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Istanbul
Posts: 98

Bikes: 1980s Raleigh, new Masi 1x9 commuter, newer raleigh single-speed

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by umd
I can't even count how many times I've been photographing something with my 1D and some guy with a Rebel comes up and asks me how many megapixels it has. "Eight" I say. "Mine is ten" they reply smugly...
But he knows how to use "P!!"


P.S. If you ever need to get rid of your 1D or some L lenses, let me know.
P.P.S. If you ever need to get rid of a ~13-15 pound bike, let me know.
AlexGSU is offline  
Old 07-14-09, 04:03 PM
  #23  
Killing Rabbits
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,697
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 278 Post(s)
Liked 217 Times in 102 Posts
Originally Posted by umd
There is no minimum weight in amateur racing, so it's not cheating.
At least in the states. A lot of amateurs have to follow UCI regs. I've actually had my bike weighed at the start of a hill climb TT.
Enthalpic is offline  
Old 07-14-09, 04:06 PM
  #24  
Cat 3 Meter - Don't Care
 
fauxto nick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 3,893
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
All aboard the fail ship.
fauxto nick is offline  
Old 07-14-09, 04:09 PM
  #25  
umd
Banned
 
umd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 28,387

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by AlexGSU
But he knows how to use "P!!"
All the Rebel users I've seen usually leave it on the green box. Some have figured out the picture modes like sport, portrait, etc. None that I've talked to even knew what the P, Tv, Av, etc. did.

One nice thing about the 1 series bodies and L series lenses is the weather sealing. I've shot in pouring rain and watched while others tried to deal with plastic baggies.

And to keep it relevant, it's a Canondale!



umd is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.