Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Fuji vs Cannondale

Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Fuji vs Cannondale

Old 07-29-09, 09:36 AM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 35
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Fuji vs Cannondale

Oh man, tough choice, and there's somewhat of a time limit.

I have the option of two bikes. First, my LBS has a 2009 cannondale caad9-5 left. They want 1199. I might be able to take off another 50 if I buy pedals.

Option 2 is a 2009 Fuji Roubaix Pro at Performance. They have it for 1200, and there's a 15% coupon. And I could do the Performance membership to get 10% in store credit.

What would you guys do? One part of me loves the idea of the CAAD9 frame, but the Fuji has Ultegra in the rear (full ultegra? The woman on the phone wasn't sure, but the website just says rear), and it would be cheaper to boot. What would you guys do?
Toasterthief is offline  
Old 07-29-09, 09:58 AM
  #2  
A Free Radical
 
ImRael's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 446
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
In the grand scheme of things, you probably will not notice any difference between 105 and Ultegra.
You will, however, notice the difference between a Roubaix and a crit frame.
ImRael is offline  
Old 07-29-09, 10:16 AM
  #3  
fuggitivo solitario
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 9,107
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 243 Post(s)
Liked 13 Times in 9 Posts
Originally Posted by Toasterthief
Oh man, tough choice, and there's somewhat of a time limit.

I have the option of two bikes. First, my LBS has a 2009 cannondale caad9-5 left. They want 1199. I might be able to take off another 50 if I buy pedals.

Option 2 is a 2009 Fuji Roubaix Pro at Performance. They have it for 1200, and there's a 15% coupon. And I could do the Performance membership to get 10% in store credit.

What would you guys do? One part of me loves the idea of the CAAD9 frame, but the Fuji has Ultegra in the rear (full ultegra? The woman on the phone wasn't sure, but the website just says rear), and it would be cheaper to boot. What would you guys do?
The Roubaix Pro has only an ultegra RD, so you won't notice much difference as far as shifting is concerned.
echappist is offline  
Old 07-29-09, 10:25 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Paarl, South Africa
Posts: 143
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ImRael
In the grand scheme of things, you probably will not notice any difference between 105 and Ultegra.
Agreed! If I can add my recent experience. I had a Fuji Roubaix Pro, 2005 version I think. They do mix components. So full Ultegra is doubtful, as confirmed above. In Jan I decided to change my frameset, slight crack. Went for (and I know it's not a CAAD 9) a Cannondale Six 13. You will struggle to confince me to ride anything else. Ever. Frame makes a huge difference.
SeaBee is offline  
Old 07-29-09, 10:33 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,316
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Get the CAAD9, they hold up their value reasonably well. If 2 years from now you want to sell it, you won't have a problem, and Performance will have another sale. Cannondale may not be making CAAD9 frames in the US by then anymore. I also doubt the Fuji is full Ultegra, cranks and brakes in particular is where manufacturers like to cheap out.

If you're going to go for a Fuji, Performance will have better deals (lower up front price + 20% off). But i'd still get the CAAD9 even if it costs a bit more.
intence is offline  
Old 07-29-09, 11:44 AM
  #6  
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 43

Bikes: Caad9

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I have the Caad9 and my dad has the Roubaix (not pro). I've ridden both, and I must say I really love both bikes. I have higher aspirations in the sport than my 56 year old father though, so a crit bike that I can build up seemed right for me. I don't think you can go wrong, but if you plan on racing at some point in the future, you might thank yourself then for buying the Caad9. That said - the Roubaix is a bit more comfortable, and the carbon seat stays are a nice bonus.
bstern is offline  
Old 07-29-09, 12:22 PM
  #7  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 35
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Yeah, I'm looking at getting into racing in the fall. Seems like the caad is the way to go then? I'm not familiar with the Fuji frames and didn't know that was their touring frame.
Toasterthief is offline  
Old 07-29-09, 01:36 PM
  #8  
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 43

Bikes: Caad9

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I think the Roubaix is considered a racing frame, but the Caad9 feels more aggressive to me. I also know that on these forums, there are many who use the Caad9 for that very purpose. Somebody correct me if I'm wrong about the Roubaix, though...
bstern is offline  
Old 07-29-09, 01:41 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Bearonabike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Huntsville/Decatur/Florence Alabama
Posts: 1,080

Bikes: Jamis Aurora, Fuji S10S (X2), Jamis Coda

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 31 Post(s)
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Cannondale will be appearing in Wal-Mart soon. I say go Fuji.
Bearonabike is offline  
Old 07-29-09, 01:44 PM
  #10  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Southwest Ohio
Posts: 87

Bikes: 2010 Trek 2.1, 2022 Trek Domane SL5

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by bstern
I think the Roubaix is considered a racing frame, but the Caad9 feels more aggressive to me. I also know that on these forums, there are many who use the Caad9 for that very purpose. Somebody correct me if I'm wrong about the Roubaix, though...
I may be a complete newb here, but the Roubaix has essentially the same wheelbase, fork rake, seat and head tube angles, and top tube length as the CAAD9. If the CAAD9 is a racing frame, then it looks like the Fuji is too?

The Fuji has a carbon uni-stay seat stay so maybe that makes it feel a little less aggressive?
millarj is offline  
Old 07-29-09, 02:28 PM
  #11  
A Free Radical
 
ImRael's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 446
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by millarj
I may be a complete newb here, but the Roubaix has essentially the same wheelbase, fork rake, seat and head tube angles, and top tube length as the CAAD9. If the CAAD9 is a racing frame, then it looks like the Fuji is too?

The Fuji has a carbon uni-stay seat stay so maybe that makes it feel a little less aggressive?
Without doing any research I'm going to guess that the Roubaix has a sloping top tube and taller head tube. This puts the rider in a lesser aggressive position than the CAAD with a shorter head tube.

The Roubaix is still considered a racer (someone correct me if I'm wrong) but it is more suited to rougher roads at longer distances.
ImRael is offline  
Old 07-29-09, 02:31 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
JonnyV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bellwood, Pa
Posts: 1,679

Bikes: 2012 Fuji Altamira 1.0. 2017 Lynskey R250

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Liked 14 Times in 5 Posts
The Roubaix is in their "performance" line. It's not a full blown race bike like the SL1 or SST models but it's definitely not a touring bike. It's also not a full Ultegra, it is an Ultegra/105 mix with a Gossamer compact crank. The geometry should make it very similar to that of the Caad9 as someone stated earlier.
JonnyV is offline  
Old 07-29-09, 02:37 PM
  #13  
Arsehole
 
PlatyPius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,280
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Bearonabike
Cannondale will be appearing in Wal-Mart soon. I say go Fuji.
Fuji has been appearing on Bikesdirect.com for quite a while.

Either buy the Cannondale or save some money and buy the BD version of the Roubaix. I know they have one....almost all of their bikes are Fujis.
PlatyPius is offline  
Old 07-29-09, 02:58 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,316
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Look at the tubing of both bikes, you'll see how the tubes are shaped on the CAAD9. I haven't looked at the Fuji in a while, so can't comment, but do know from experience that Cannondale shapes the tubes to get more stiffness/compliance etc. where needed.

Also the CAAD is a very lightweight aluminum frame.
intence is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.