Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

5'7"-madone

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

5'7"-madone

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-07-09 | 02:07 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
5'7"-madone

any fellow members that are 5'7" and have a madone performance fit...what size are you riding???
fitch99 is offline  
Reply
Old 08-07-09 | 02:10 PM
  #2  
roadiejorge's Avatar
stole your bike
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,907
Likes: 27
From: North Bergen, NJ

Bikes: Orbea Orca, Ridley Compact

There are a lot of variables to bike fit than just your height, your body proportions are more telling so check the fit calculator here to get a better sense of what size frame you need to be on. Keep in mind this is only a guide, but is sure is better than guessing just by height.
__________________
I like pie
roadiejorge is offline  
Reply
Old 08-08-09 | 01:08 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
From: kenosha wi

Bikes: madone 5.1, lemond croix de fer, fuji touring

I am 60, 5' 7" and ride a 52 cm madone 5.2. Great bike but please take it out for a long ride (> 30 minutes) before buying AND have your LBS do a bike fit to make sure you have the correct length stem and to see if you need a straight or a set-back seat post.
Good luck.
Lonewolf48 is offline  
Reply
Old 08-08-09 | 01:14 PM
  #4  
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Sunnyvale, CA
I'm 5'7" and just picked up a Madone 5.5 54cm _Pro_ fit about a week ago.

Size and geometry are perfect for me.
Trader_Joe is offline  
Reply
Old 08-08-09 | 03:40 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 7,296
Likes: 577
From: Loveland, CO

Bikes: Cervelo Rouvida x 2

As already noted, just your height is not enough information. Cycling inseam is more relevant.

Most likely though, a 54cm will be the proper size. Note that there is a big difference in the head tube length between the 6 series and the 5 series. The 5 series has a 30mm taller head tube for the more recreationally inclined rider and the 6 series is for those who want a more aggressive position.

I'm a half inch short of 5'-7" tall, but I have long legs with an 83cm cycling inseam and 73 cm saddle height. With my short torso, I'd have to go with the 52cm 6 series. I could use an 84 degree stem and no spacers to get the 11-12cm saddle to bar drop I use. Most people would choose the 54cm, but the reach is on the long side (for me). The 52cm 5 series is another option with 20mm more head tube length and only about 5mm less reach.

Last edited by DaveSSS; 08-09-09 at 07:55 AM.
DaveSSS is offline  
Reply
Old 08-08-09 | 05:10 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by DaveSSS
As already noted, just your height is not enough information. Cycling inseam is more relevant.

Most likely though, a 54cm will be the proper size. Note that there is a big difference in the head tube length between the 6 series and the 5 series. The 5 series has a 30mm taller head tube for the more recreationally inclined rider and the 6 series is for those who want a more aggressive position.

I'm a half inch short of 5'-7" tall, but I have long legs with an 83cm cycling inseam and 73 cm saddle height. With my short torso, I'd have to go with the 52cm 6 series. I could use an 84 degree stem and no spacers to get the 11-12cm saddle to bar drop I use. Most people would choose the 54cm, but the reach is on the long side. The 52cm 5 series is another option with 20mm more head tube length and only about 5mm less reach.
Having half a foot of saddle to handlebar drop isn't necessary. Nothing says you can't get a shorter stem. I'm 5'10" and ride a 58cm 5.2 Madone. I chose this size because I have a long inseam and didn't want a skyjacker seat post. I'm fine with a 90mm or 100mm stem. I've been fit on a Retul and that's where I'm according to that as well.
jay0k is offline  
Reply
Old 08-09-09 | 08:27 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 7,296
Likes: 577
From: Loveland, CO

Bikes: Cervelo Rouvida x 2

Originally Posted by jay0k
Having half a foot of saddle to handlebar drop isn't necessary. Nothing says you can't get a shorter stem. I'm 5'10" and ride a 58cm 5.2 Madone. I chose this size because I have a long inseam and didn't want a skyjacker seat post. I'm fine with a 90mm or 100mm stem. I've been fit on a Retul and that's where I'm according to that as well.
The large drop is necessary if you're interested in the most aerodynamic position.

Saddle to bar drop can be reduced with stem angle and spacers, not just by buying a larger frame. I use a horizontal (73 degree) stem and only 5mm of spacer to produce the large drop that I prefer. Switching to a more common 84 degree stem will raise the bars about 2cm and produce a 9-10cm drop. I used that setup for many years, with the same head tube length and 5mm spacer under the stem.

Adding 2cm of spacer (during the initial build) will raise the bars another 2cm. Flipping that same 84 degree stem to 96 degrees gains another 2cm of rise, but also reduces the stem length by 8-9mm, so a flipped stem might need to be one size longer. There are lots of options.

They key is to figure out what kind of fit you want and buy the frame size and model that produces that fit without resorting to a stem/spacer setup that's too far on the Fred side of those options. If you need higher bars, pick the 5 series frame, not the 6 series, to start with. Then you won't have to use a high rise stem with a lot of spacer under it.

Last edited by DaveSSS; 08-09-09 at 11:29 AM.
DaveSSS is offline  
Reply
Old 08-09-09 | 08:33 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 4,886
Likes: 0
From: Near Sacramento
I went through the fit calculator listed above and in all the samples, it put me on too big a frame. I like a 51cm TopTube, and so would go with a bike that was within 1 cm of this.
__________________
-------

Some sort of pithy irrelevant one-liner should go here.
JoelS is offline  
Reply
Old 08-09-09 | 11:26 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 7,296
Likes: 577
From: Loveland, CO

Bikes: Cervelo Rouvida x 2

^^^^

Top tube length means nothing without considering the seat tube angle that goes with it. The two work together to create the frame's reach. A longer 52cm TT can fit the same a a 51cm is the STA on the former is a little over 1 degree less.
DaveSSS is offline  
Reply
Old 08-09-09 | 10:58 PM
  #10  
terrymorse's Avatar
climber has-been
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 9,140
Likes: 6,037
From: Palo Alto, CA

Bikes: Scott Addict RC Pro & R1, Felt Z1

Take your height in inches: 67"

Subtract 14: 53

Statistically speaking, that's the average ideal frame size in cm for your height, so I'd say you could fit fine on either a 52 or a 54. Unless you're a statistical outlier, which is doubtful.
__________________
Ride, Rest, Repeat. ROUVY: terrymorse


terrymorse is online now  
Reply
Old 08-10-09 | 05:59 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,018
Likes: 1
From: Syracuse, NY

Bikes: 2018 Lynskey R 260 Disc; 2008 Trek 4.7 Madone; 2017 Framed Minnesota 3.0 Fat Bike; 1984 Nishiki International

54 performance fit with a short stem.
gettingold is offline  
Reply
Old 08-10-09 | 06:13 AM
  #12  
Ridelots24's Avatar
Clinging to guns/religion
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
From: Pgh, PA

Bikes: Litspd Cyx/ Paragon/ LHT/ Madone 5.2/ Spclzd TT/ Boone/ Lynskey 27.5/ Pugs / Colnago CLX

5'7" when im not intoxicated.
6'3" 220lbs with a beer in my hand.

54cm Pro Fit. I ordered the 5mm set back seat mast. Stock is like 25mm set back.
Swap out 100mm stem for a 90mm
I also ordered 170mm cranks.
Dialed in and feels great.

Biggest problem i had was adjusting to the longer body of the ultegra shifter. I have since been told that Sram with the ergo adjustments are the way to go.
Ridelots24 is offline  
Reply
Old 08-10-09 | 06:50 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 7,296
Likes: 577
From: Loveland, CO

Bikes: Cervelo Rouvida x 2

Originally Posted by terrymorse
Take your height in inches: 67"

Subtract 14: 53

Statistically speaking, that's the average ideal frame size in cm for your height, so I'd say you could fit fine on either a 52 or a 54. Unless you're a statistical outlier, which is doubtful.
The number 53 means nothing unless it's got more definition. In the old days it was more clear whether a frame was measured center to center or center to top. My 51cm LOOK is the same as a 53cm frame measured center to top. Trek uses the most oddball method of all brands, so their 54cm 6 series has the same head tube length and vertical size as some 51cm LOOK frames, like my KG 461. Both have the same 120mm head tube length. The size numbers are pretty worthless.
DaveSSS is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.