I have "wide" sit bones and I found a great saddle. Woohoo!
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Rio Rancho, NM
Posts: 36
Bikes: '03 Burley Duet Tandem
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have "wide" sit bones and I found a great saddle. Woohoo!
So far so good. According to the Specialized "Ass-ometer" I have wide sit bones.
I bought a Forte Classic (310 grams) for $34.99 at Performance and it seems to be doing the job. I was going to go for the Pro SLX or the Selle SMP but saw that the cut out on the classic was huge compared to the Pro SLX and I've been having numbness on the old saddle (no cut out) and the width was a tad wider than the SLX.
Mind you, I have not taken it for a hard ride, just up the road and back for 10 miles, but so far with my wide bones, it seems to be working well. I didn't get on and go "ow" like I do with the really narrow seat that came with the bike.
So, wide boned riders rejoice, there is an alternative to numbness.
PS. I had a professional "bike fit" when I bought the bike so it was all dialed in. Saddle just way too narrow for my bones.
I bought a Forte Classic (310 grams) for $34.99 at Performance and it seems to be doing the job. I was going to go for the Pro SLX or the Selle SMP but saw that the cut out on the classic was huge compared to the Pro SLX and I've been having numbness on the old saddle (no cut out) and the width was a tad wider than the SLX.
Mind you, I have not taken it for a hard ride, just up the road and back for 10 miles, but so far with my wide bones, it seems to be working well. I didn't get on and go "ow" like I do with the really narrow seat that came with the bike.
So, wide boned riders rejoice, there is an alternative to numbness.
PS. I had a professional "bike fit" when I bought the bike so it was all dialed in. Saddle just way too narrow for my bones.
#2
Mitcholo
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Oost Vlaanderen in mind, Cleveland in body
Posts: 8,850
Bikes: 2010 Mitcholo w/ Sram Force/Red
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
San Marco Rolls, San Marco Regal. One will work for you.
#4
Mitcholo
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Oost Vlaanderen in mind, Cleveland in body
Posts: 8,850
Bikes: 2010 Mitcholo w/ Sram Force/Red
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Most likely.
If he ends up disliking this next saddle, of course.
If he ends up disliking this next saddle, of course.
#5
South Carolina Ed
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Greer, SC
Posts: 3,889
Bikes: Holdsworth custom, Macario Pro, Ciocc San Cristobal, Viner Nemo, Cyfac Le Mythique, Giant TCR, Tommasso Mondial, Cyfac Etoile
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 344 Post(s)
Liked 291 Times
in
138 Posts
Regal is wider than the Rolls and for me more comfortable.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St Peters, Missouri
Posts: 30,225
Bikes: Catrike 559 I own some others but they don't get ridden very much.
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1572 Post(s)
Liked 643 Times
in
364 Posts
OK, I've got to know:
Is that "WooHoo" because you finally found a saddle that you like or is it due to something the saddle is doing for you?
If it's the second, what brand and model saddle is it?
Is that "WooHoo" because you finally found a saddle that you like or is it due to something the saddle is doing for you?
If it's the second, what brand and model saddle is it?
#7
Descends Like Avalanche
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Somewhere between Funkytown and Margaritaville, PA
Posts: 5,769
Bikes: Lynskey R240, Sportive, and a Helix Sport disc model in the works; Eddy Merckx MX Leader; Specialized Rock Hopper Comp (1988!)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
#8
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Rio Rancho, NM
Posts: 36
Bikes: '03 Burley Duet Tandem
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Model: Forte Classic. 34.99 at Performance
#9
Quarq shill
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 3,962
Bikes: 08 Felt F4, 05 Fuji Team SL, 08 Planet X Stealth, 10 Kona Jake the Snake, 03 Giant OCR flat bar.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
You know that means they'll quit making it now, right? ;p
#11
Mitcholo
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Oost Vlaanderen in mind, Cleveland in body
Posts: 8,850
Bikes: 2010 Mitcholo w/ Sram Force/Red
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The Max Flite is wider in the rear. I don't know if it's been around long enough to have proven itself as a classic yet.
Kind of like a Dodge Viper V10 engine in a pickup truck. It's a cool idea, but has it been executed properly?
Kind of like a Dodge Viper V10 engine in a pickup truck. It's a cool idea, but has it been executed properly?
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 253
Bikes: 2009 Specialized Tarmac Elite, 2001 CCM Heat
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#13
Mitcholo
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Oost Vlaanderen in mind, Cleveland in body
Posts: 8,850
Bikes: 2010 Mitcholo w/ Sram Force/Red
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Laguna Hills
Posts: 301
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#15
Descends Like Avalanche
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Somewhere between Funkytown and Margaritaville, PA
Posts: 5,769
Bikes: Lynskey R240, Sportive, and a Helix Sport disc model in the works; Eddy Merckx MX Leader; Specialized Rock Hopper Comp (1988!)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Another difference from the standard Flite is that the base of the Max Flite saddle curls in underneath itself where the tail end of the saddle rails attach. It's kind of hard to describe, so here's the best picture I could find:
In theory this is designed to add some suspension. In my case, I think the comfort comes primarily from the shape and size of the saddle.
__________________
The rider in my avatar is David Etxebarria, not me.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,892
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Central Coast, CA
Posts: 3,392
Bikes: Surly LHT, Specialized Rockhopper, Nashbar Touring (old), Specialized Stumpjumper (older), Nishiki Tourer (model unknown)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Around 30 miles the difference in saddles starts to become more obvious. With some saddles I'm ready to get off after 30; it's a huge relief to get off after 30; if I want to go more miles I at least need to get off and take a break before resuming my ride.
With my present saddle - a Brooks B-17 - after 30 miles I still have no saddle issues. Unless I remember to think about it, my saddle doesn't enter my mind. That's significant. With an uncomfortable saddle, there comes a point where you have trouble taking your mind off the discomfort you're feeling.
The longest I've ridden on the B-17 so far is 44 miles. At the end of that ride there was still no discomfort, although I got off the bike for about an hour after 22 miles. I'll be riding a century in September, so I'll know more then.
I have a Brooks Champion Flyer (the B-17 with coil springs) on my tourer. It was pretty comfortable initially, although on tour after about 10 days of daily long rides (50-60 miles) my butt was starting to get sore.
So far the B-17 actually seems more comfortable than the Champion Flyer.
#19
Guest
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)