Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

crank length, building up first multigear, enlighten me please.

Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

crank length, building up first multigear, enlighten me please.

Old 01-23-10, 03:57 AM
  #1  
FOBx530
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 151
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
crank length, building up first multigear, enlighten me please.

building up my first multigear bike.

i was wondering about crank length, my fixie is 165mm, but i notice that multigear bikes are 170 smallest?

i'm not a tall person, only 5'3

the bike i'm building up is going to be 48cm

can you guys recommend me a length? i saw on craigslist a guy is selling shimano 105 groupset used for 100$ w/ crank length of 175mm

can anybody tell me something or enlighten me about what i should do/get?


Thanks!
FOBx530 is offline  
Old 01-23-10, 07:53 AM
  #2  
kayakdiver
ah.... sure.
 
kayakdiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Whidbey Island WA
Posts: 4,107

Bikes: Specialized.... schwinn..... enough to fill my needs..

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
If your comfortable with 165 I would suggest finding one. If you can't then go 170. It's a big jump to 175mm. I'm 7" taller than you and run 170 cranks on all my bikes. I find 175 just not comfortable to me.
kayakdiver is offline  
Old 01-23-10, 09:10 AM
  #3  
DXchulo
Upgrading my engine
 
DXchulo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Alamogordo
Posts: 6,218
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 125 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Most road cranks are 170 or 175, but that doesn't necessarily mean those will be the best sizes for you. Fixie cranks tend to be smaller to prevent your pedal from hitting the ground when you corner.

https://www.sheldonbrown.com/cranks.html#length

And here's a calculator: https://www.machinehead-software.co.u...alculator.html

165 road cranks are harder to find, but they're out there. My guess is that a 175 would be too long for you.
DXchulo is offline  
Old 01-23-10, 02:55 PM
  #4  
jzsoup
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 329
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I would recommend 170 for ya. I'm 5'6" and I like 172.5, but have also ridden 170's without objection.
jzsoup is offline  
Old 01-23-10, 03:03 PM
  #5  
San Rensho 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,820
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 383 Post(s)
Liked 131 Times in 89 Posts
Crank size is not determined by height, its determined by pedalling style. In general, you use shorter cranks to be able to spin faster. If you mash, then use longer cranks. The reason fixies have 165s is that the immitate track bikes. On the track, spinning is everything and short cranks allow you to achieve a very high cadence that is also very smooth.
__________________
Il faut de l'audace, encore de l'audace, toujours de l'audace

1980 3Rensho-- 1975 Raleigh Sprite 3spd
1990s Raleigh M20 MTB--2007 Windsor Hour (track)
1988 Ducati 750 F1
San Rensho is offline  
Old 01-23-10, 03:07 PM
  #6  
Grumpy McTrumpy
gmt
 
Grumpy McTrumpy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Binghamton, NY
Posts: 12,509
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 45 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
lots of incorrect on this thread
Grumpy McTrumpy is offline  
Old 01-23-10, 03:11 PM
  #7  
ahsposo 
Rock Hard Member
 
ahsposo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Outside the Box
Posts: 7,136

Bikes: A Home Built All Rounder, Bianchi 928, Specialized Langster, Dahon Folder

Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5344 Post(s)
Liked 2,558 Times in 1,519 Posts
Originally Posted by jzsoup View Post
I would recommend 170 for ya. I'm 5'6" and I like 172.5, but have also ridden 170's without objection.
I agree. My inseam is 29" on a good day. My SS cranks are like 170 and I like the way they spin but my road cranks are 172.5 and I think I get a little more climbing leverage with 'em.

That said check out bikepedia. You can specify a component and details and it will come up with something like:

https://www.bikepedia.com/PA/Item.aspx?itemid=661753
ahsposo is offline  
Old 01-23-10, 10:25 PM
  #8  
Randochap
Recovering mentalist
 
Randochap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: On the Edge
Posts: 2,810

Bikes: Too many

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Grumpy McTrumpy View Post
lots of incorrect on this thread
Give us correct then, Grumpy.
Randochap is offline  
Old 01-23-10, 10:31 PM
  #9  
deep_sky
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Mountain View, CA
Posts: 1,257

Bikes: 2012 Scott CR1 Comp

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
From what I have been able to gather, how your legs are is what really determines crank length. If you have excessively long femurs in relation to your leg length, then you might be more comfortable with longer cranks. However at 5'3", I don't suspect that you likely have that problem and will want/need 175's. I am 5'8" and while my femurs are longer than would be expected for my height and inseam, I ride 170's and can pedal smoothly. I'd expect you would be happy with 165's or 170's.
deep_sky is offline  
Old 01-23-10, 10:44 PM
  #10  
thegunner
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 723
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
i pm'd you, hopefully it helps
thegunner is offline  
Old 01-23-10, 10:56 PM
  #11  
TejanoTrackie 
Veteran Racer
 
TejanoTrackie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Ciudad de Vacas, Tejas
Posts: 11,454

Bikes: 29 frames + 74 wheels

Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 918 Post(s)
Liked 250 Times in 144 Posts
I'm also 5'-3" with a 28" inseam and for 40 years have used 165mm length cranks for both road and track. The only bikes where I use 170mm cranks are my MTBs, where I turn a much lower cadence. There are many road cranks that are available in 165mm length.
TejanoTrackie is offline  
Old 01-23-10, 11:09 PM
  #12  
Dilberto
Senior Member
 
Dilberto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 970
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20 Post(s)
Liked 18 Times in 9 Posts
This is what you want...thank me later:

https://www.bikewagon.com/Drivetrain/...-p7558527.html
Dilberto is offline  
Old 01-23-10, 11:22 PM
  #13  
prathmann
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Bay Area, Calif.
Posts: 7,239
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 659 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Before you get too concerned about this I'd suggest seeing if you can arrange an extended test ride or borrow someone's bike so you can try out some longer cranks. You may well find that you're just as comfortable with 170, 172.5, or even 175mm ones, in which case you wouldn't have to limit yourself to particular cranks.

I've got a tandem with 165s, a touring bike with 170s, and a road bike with 175mm cranks and they all feel fine. My natural cadence is a little higher on the tandem with the 165s, but I don't have any strong preference for one length over the others.
prathmann is offline  
Old 01-24-10, 07:49 AM
  #14  
AnthonyG
Senior Member
 
AnthonyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Queanbeyan, Australia.
Posts: 4,103
Mentioned: 82 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3133 Post(s)
Liked 366 Times in 240 Posts
I'm an advocate for crank length being proportional to your inseam. My opinion is that most people are riding with cranks that are too long for them. At a height of 5' 3" I would be staying with 165mm cranks at most unless you have really long legs for your height. What's your actual inseam? Not pant inseam.

Anthony
AnthonyG is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Caliper
Road Cycling
15
08-05-18 11:26 AM
MacGyverBurrito
Classic & Vintage
54
05-25-15 08:36 PM
ricefarmerr
Fitting Your Bike
3
08-22-14 10:18 AM
ScottRae
Bicycle Mechanics
9
10-05-13 09:20 AM
hobkirk
Road Cycling
17
07-31-12 11:33 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright © 2021 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.