Bike Forums

Bike Forums (https://www.bikeforums.net/forum.php)
-   Road Cycling (https://www.bikeforums.net/road-cycling/)
-   -   Average speed? (https://www.bikeforums.net/road-cycling/630744-average-speed.html)

Jive Turkey 03-23-10 07:42 AM


Originally Posted by botto (Post 10564462)
i'd prefer to tell the OP to use the search engine, so they can discover that this inane question has been asked again, and again, and again.

.....and you have responded with the same answer again, and again and again.

botto 03-23-10 07:55 AM


Originally Posted by Jive Turkey (Post 10564843)
.....and you have responded with the same answer again, and again and again.

don't like it? don't read it. :thumb:

Dheorl 03-23-10 07:56 AM


Originally Posted by merlinextraligh (Post 10564822)
But you're looking at the wrong metric. Time trial speeds for the Tour de France are closer to 30mph, with the record being over 33mph.

If you can't do 25mph solo, on a conventional road bike for a couple of hours you really shouldn't go to Europe.

I just typed in tour de france average speed into google and it says the winners average speed was 41kph in 2009.

merlinextraligh 03-23-10 08:04 AM


Originally Posted by Dheorl (Post 10564889)
I just typed in tour de france average speed into google and it says the winners average speed was 41kph in 2009.

Didn't dispute that. But its not the right measure. That's the total time for the total race, which includes a whole bunch of time where they are not riding very hard at all. It's no indication of how fast those guys actually ride when it maters.

Local Cat 4 road races often have average speeds higher than that.

My point is that if you want to compare the Op's times for his 40 mile solo effort to TDF riders (which is absurd in the first place) the better comparison is to TT speeds, which are substantially above 25 mph.

Colonelmom 03-23-10 08:17 AM


Originally Posted by Fagro (Post 10564425)
I know there are a lot of variables to this, but, I wondering what your avg speed is for say a 40 mile ride?
I'm new to road cycling and have about 800 miles on my bike and can't seem to break 17 mph avg. I have bettered my avg since starting , but seemed to have plataeud/peaked.
Real world, honest averages please!

OK.. so add some more detail to you post and you might get more honest answers..

17mph over what type of ride.. hilly... flat... rolling....
you said 800 miles.. this year.. this month.. this century?
how old are you? how many miles/ hours per week do you ride...
cycling is an endurance sport that take time to build.. what you're doing now you will see the real benefits NEXT YEAR.... I can look back at my training log and see in 2007 when 17 mph was FAST for me.. that's now a recovery ride..

BUT yes.. the easiest way is to get faster is to ride with faster folks.. get spit out the back... repeat until you can hang on ... you'll get faster...

Jive Turkey 03-23-10 09:18 AM


Originally Posted by botto (Post 10564883)
don't like it? don't read it. :thumb:

don't like it, don't post it.

Yaniel 03-23-10 09:48 AM


Originally Posted by Jive Turkey (Post 10565272)
don't like it, don't post it.

How is that differnt from what you're doing?

Cat4Lifer 03-23-10 09:50 AM

Depends, but my avg could be between 16 - 20 mph, and as I get in better shape I'm sure it could get up to 22 or 23. When I was in my teens and early twenties, I used to push to get a high avg speed over a certain distance. Now I just ride for time and have certain training goals on my ride. Avg speed is now more of a "afterthought," except when I'm timing myself on a course I've done over and over.

Cat4Lifer 03-23-10 09:52 AM


Originally Posted by jgf310 (Post 10564452)
prepare to be ridiculed by a bunch of know-it-all's who will tell you, or point you to a thread where you can read, that paying attention to your average speed is a waste of time, and not what anyone who knows anything about cycling would do.

:lol:
Yeah, there do seem to be a few people here who act like blowhards now and again. Ah well...

njkayaker 03-23-10 09:59 AM


Originally Posted by RomeRider (Post 10564786)
Okay so no one can start a thread huh? Everyone just needs to search and respond, eh? Blah blah blah. If you don't like it just let it die.

No, you can start any thread you like. You just can't be picky/whiny about the responses you get. (And you are free to ignore the response that you don't like.)

Riding with a (faster) group might help you.

youcoming 03-23-10 10:04 AM


Originally Posted by botto (Post 10564462)
i'd prefer to tell the OP to use the search engine, so they can discover that this inane question has been asked again, and again, and again.

and you've replied to it again and again and again

tspek 03-23-10 10:05 AM


Originally Posted by Jive Turkey (Post 10565272)
don't like it, don't post it.

I don't think he doesn't like what he posts...

Dheorl 03-23-10 12:20 PM


Originally Posted by merlinextraligh (Post 10564920)
My point is that if you want to compare the Op's times for his 40 mile solo effort to TDF riders (which is absurd in the first place) the better comparison is to TT speeds, which are substantially above 25 mph.

Well yes, but TT speeds are on specific bikes, on aero bars, and generally seem to be on pretty flat ground and less distance.

umd 03-23-10 12:35 PM


Originally Posted by merlinextraligh (Post 10564920)
Didn't dispute that. But its not the right measure. That's the total time for the total race, which includes a whole bunch of time where they are not riding very hard at all. It's no indication of how fast those guys actually ride when it maters.

Local Cat 4 road races often have average speeds higher than that.

My point is that if you want to compare the Op's times for his 40 mile solo effort to TDF riders (which is absurd in the first place) the better comparison is to TT speeds, which are substantially above 25 mph.

And of course the goal of a race is not to go as fast as possible, but to cross the finish line first.

umd 03-23-10 12:54 PM


Originally Posted by Fagro (Post 10564425)
Real world, honest averages please!

Although the question is silly on it's face, it's a common one, so here is some real world honest data:

Workout with some tempo & anaerobic intervals. No real hills, just a lot of rollers.
Code:

        Duration:          2:26:53
        Work:              1749 kJ
        TSS:              184.8 (intensity factor 0.869)
        Norm Power:        252
        VI:                1.27
        Distance:          49.959 mi
        Elevation Gain:            2064 ft
        Elevation Loss:          2153 ft
        Grade:            -0.0 %  (-88 ft)
                        Min        Max        Avg
        Power:              0        863        198        watts
        Heart Rate:          73        179        143        bpm
        Cadence:            20        130        93        rpm
        Speed:              2.2        40.1        20.4        mph
        Altitude:            -12        199        86        ft

"Easy" ride this morning. Much of the same route as the previous data, but I turned around sooner.
Code:

        Duration:          1:32:51 (1:33:34)
        Work:              981 kJ
        TSS:              60.1 (intensity factor 0.623)
        Norm Power:        181
        VI:                1.03
        Distance:          32.115 mi
        Elevation Gain:            1333 ft
        Elevation Loss:          1341 ft
        Grade:            -0.0 %  (-9 ft)
                        Min        Max        Avg
        Power:              0        373        176        watts
        Heart Rate:          75        155        140        bpm
        Cadence:            21        116        93        rpm
        Speed:              0.5        34.8        20.7        mph
        Altitude:            21        194        106        ft

The tail end of a century after I was "dropped". This was solo, but was preceeded by 60 miles with a group.
Code:

        Duration:          1:45:20 (1:45:27)
        Work:              1250 kJ
        TSS:              101.4 (intensity factor 0.76)
        Norm Power:        220
        VI:                1.11
        Distance:          36.91 mi
        Elevation Gain:            2804 ft
        Elevation Loss:          2862 ft
        Grade:            -0.0 %  (-57 ft)
                        Min        Max        Avg
        Power:              0        551        198        watts
        Heart Rate:          113        171        154        bpm
        Cadence:            21        128        92        rpm
        Speed:              1.2        47.8        21.0        mph
        Altitude:            389        1554        797        ft


Jive Turkey 03-23-10 01:07 PM


Originally Posted by umd (Post 10566392)
Although the question is silly on it's face, it's a common one, so here is some real world honest data:

Workout with some tempo & anaerobic intervals. No real hills, just a lot of rollers.
Code:

Duration: 2:26:53
Work: 1749 kJ
TSS: 184.8 (intensity factor 0.869)
Norm Power: 252
VI: 1.27
Distance: 49.959 mi
Elevation Gain: 2064 ft
Elevation Loss: 2153 ft
Grade: -0.0 % (-88 ft)
Min Max Avg
Power: 0 863 198 watts
Heart Rate: 73 179 143 bpm
Cadence: 20 130 93 rpm
Speed: 2.2 40.1 20.4 mph
Altitude: -12 199 86 ft

"Easy" ride this morning. Much of the same route as the previous data, but I turned around sooner.
Code:

Duration: 1:32:51 (1:33:34)
Work: 981 kJ
TSS: 60.1 (intensity factor 0.623)
Norm Power: 181
VI: 1.03
Distance: 32.115 mi
Elevation Gain: 1333 ft
Elevation Loss: 1341 ft
Grade: -0.0 % (-9 ft)
Min Max Avg
Power: 0 373 176 watts
Heart Rate: 75 155 140 bpm
Cadence: 21 116 93 rpm
Speed: 0.5 34.8 20.7 mph
Altitude: 21 194 106 ft

The tail end of a century after I was "dropped". This was solo, but was preceeded by 60 miles with a group.
Code:

Duration: 1:45:20 (1:45:27)
Work: 1250 kJ
TSS: 101.4 (intensity factor 0.76)
Norm Power: 220
VI: 1.11
Distance: 36.91 mi
Elevation Gain: 2804 ft
Elevation Loss: 2862 ft
Grade: -0.0 % (-57 ft)
Min Max Avg
Power: 0 551 198 watts
Heart Rate: 113 171 154 bpm
Cadence: 21 128 92 rpm
Speed: 1.2 47.8 21.0 mph
Altitude: 389 1554 797 ft


Maybe if you spent less time trying to impress people with numbers most don't understand or care about, you wouldn't be a middle category, middle of the road rider as you proclaim.

You're guilty of hanging around with a bunch of hardcore bikers and congratulating each other about your numbers and typing it on a blog that only your other hardcore buddies read and then get out into a race with others and don't live up to your expectations.

You can claim your not trying to impress anybody with this stuff but your actions speak otherwise.

WHOOOSSHHH... 03-23-10 01:08 PM


Originally Posted by coasting (Post 10564834)
i managed 27 mph over 60 miles last weekend.

If that was solo....I quit......

umd 03-23-10 01:10 PM


Originally Posted by Jive Turkey (Post 10566458)
Maybe if you spent less time trying to impress people with numbers most don't understand or care about, you wouldn't be a middle category, middle of the road rider as you proclaim.

You're guilty of hanging around with a bunch of hardcore bikers and congratulating each other about your numbers and typing it on a blog that only your other hardcore buddies read and then get out into a race with others and don't live up to your expectations.

You can claim your not trying to impress anybody with this stuff but your actions speak otherwise.

The OP asked for real-world numbers. I'm not trying to impress anyone, I know I'm "average"

What's your problem anyway?

Jive Turkey 03-23-10 01:11 PM


Originally Posted by umd (Post 10566301)
And of course the goal of a race is not to go as fast as possible, but to cross the finish line first.

Not totally true is stage racing.

Jive Turkey 03-23-10 01:12 PM


Originally Posted by umd (Post 10566472)
The OP asked for real-world numbers. I'm not trying to impress anyone, I know I'm "average"

What's your problem anyway?

You're not average, you're above average and seem to love posting numbers so people on here can tell you how good you are.

We all know you're good.

You're much better than I can ever dream of being.

umd 03-23-10 01:16 PM


Originally Posted by Jive Turkey (Post 10566476)
Not totally true is stage racing.

Still true in stage racing. The goal is to have the lowest time of everyone, but that still isn't the same as going as fast as possible. Stage racing awards consistency above anything else.


Originally Posted by Jive Turkey (Post 10566482)
You're not average, you're above average and seem to love posting numbers so people on here can tell you how good you are.

We all know you're good.

You're much better than I can ever dream of being.

I know I'm an average racer. I wasn't aware that the OP only wanted real-world numbers from slow people.

Edit: and I post the full data so that it's clear it's not just a number I pulled out of my ass.

WHOOOSSHHH... 03-23-10 01:17 PM


Originally Posted by Jive Turkey (Post 10566458)
Maybe if you spent less time trying to impress people with numbers most don't understand or care about, you wouldn't be a middle category, middle of the road rider as you proclaim.

You're guilty of hanging around with a bunch of hardcore bikers and congratulating each other about your numbers and typing it on a blog that only your other hardcore buddies read and then get out into a race with others and don't live up to your expectations.


You can claim your not trying to impress anybody with this stuff but your actions speak otherwise.

Who pissed in your cornflakes? The OP asked for some averages. Instead of the normal BS umd gave him some real life numbers. Don't see your point.

Jive Turkey 03-23-10 01:25 PM

You can win a stage racing event like the Tour and never win a stage.

umd 03-23-10 01:31 PM


Originally Posted by Jive Turkey (Post 10566547)
You can win a stage racing event like the Tour and never win a stage.

Of course, that's why I said consistency. You never to do really well or be really fast, you just can never mess up. One bad day generally spells the end of your chances.

It's even worse for amateur stage races like I just did over the weekend. The time cuts can be really harsh, and any mishaps like a flat tire or a gap in a corner can be the end of the whole weekend.

Jive Turkey 03-23-10 01:33 PM


Originally Posted by umd (Post 10566567)
Of course, that's why I said consistency. You never to do really well or be really fast, you just can never mess up. One bad day generally spells the end of your chances.

It's even worse for amateur stage races like I just did over the weekend. The time cuts can be really harsh, and any mishaps like a flat tire or a gap in a corner can be the end of the whole weekend.

Did you get a flat?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:34 PM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.