![]() |
Originally Posted by FlashBazbo
(Post 10622176)
Ignorance rears its ugly head . . . sigh.
Let's just say . . . Al Gore lives not too far down the street. He's made a little over $1 billion in a little environmental sideline since leaving public service. And Al's got one of the "little" houses. Always happy to contribute an ignorant comment; it's my specialty. Still sounds like Al ought to buy his bikes on BikesDirect instead of going to the local shop. |
Originally Posted by patentcad
(Post 10620077)
Cheap wheels make the MSRP of the bike lower, and ultimately I want to pick out my own nice wheel set anyway.
I have always thought you should start with the best quality frame you can afford, wheels next and then the drive train. Other than weight and bling is there really that much functional difference between 105 and DA? It does bug me however when you see a very high end frame with the lowest end wheels out there. |
That cheapo wheel strategy made the 2009 Cervelo S2 more attractive, with a very competitive (with its competition) MSRP of $5500 (I paid $5K even at the time). The only shortcut components were the cheesy R80 Shimano hoops and the Ultegra cassette. I didn't care about the wheels (bought Williams 38c's for $999 and sold the R80's on ebay for $250 or so) and I eventually got a D.A. cassette. So I wound up with a bike that cost about $6K with precisely the component mix I wanted, and at the time that was actually a bit cheaper than competing models from Scott and Cannondale, and I thought the S2 was a better bike, at least for me. The Scott and Cannondale models in the same range came with Mavic wheels I didn't want and had MSRPs of $6500+ as I recall. That did factor into my decision to go with the S2 at the time.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:03 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.