average speeds and age
#1
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
average speeds and age
I am 46 yo male who rides 3-5 25-35 mile rides per week. On the flats near the water I can average about 18-19 and about 17 in the hillier areas and I am just wondering how that stacks up with some of the other guys out there my age. Thanks
#2
Former Hoarder

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,734
Likes: 9
From: Portland & Yachats, OR
Bikes: Steve Rex, Seven Axiom, Felt Z1, Dave Moulton Fuso
#3
Senior Member

Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
From: NEBRASKA
Bikes: Merlin Extralight/Giant TCR2
I'm the same age and am about exactly the same speed as you, maybe I am a little slower if your talking about computer avg., but once I get out on the open road I run about 18-19 solo.
#5
rider of small bicycles

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,687
Likes: 1
From: Rochester, New York
Bikes: Cannondale
I'm 33 and can spin all day at 20mph. However, I can't think of a single one of my regular routes that doesn't include some tough hills. Consequently, a good average speed for me is around 18.5.
-mark
-mark
#6
I'm 31 yrs old, 5'10", and about 190lbs. I just started riding August 1st and can avg 18mph solo and about 19mph with a friend. This is for about a 15 mile trip. I as increase mileage, I have to reduce speed a little. Right now I'm still way out of shape but I'm working on it. 
Edit: My averages are computer avg, not cruising speeds...

Edit: My averages are computer avg, not cruising speeds...
Last edited by willieb; 09-04-04 at 12:43 PM.
#7
Originally Posted by ridetime257
I am 46 yo male who rides 3-5 25-35 mile rides per week. On the flats near the water I can average about 18-19 and about 17 in the hillier areas and I am just wondering how that stacks up with some of the other guys out there my age. Thanks
That said, I'm usually in the 18's on my moderately hilly 22 mile course (19.85 tops this year). I'm 39 yo and get in around 130 miles a week. I could probably do better if I tried, it just gets too painful to go for PR's every ride

-murray
#8
Just started riding seriously about six weeks ago. I'm 56 yrs old, 6 ft tall, and weigh 225. I do a 14 mile loop four times a week and some shorter rides on the other days. I'm still building a base. I am riding a knobby-tired Univega pseudo-mountain bike w/26x1.75 tires that I got at a garage sale. (I'm thinking road bike for Christmas.) So far, here's where I'm at:
- With the exception of one hill, I ride the big ring on the whole loop - just use 7 gears
- On the flats by the river, I average 16 mph for 5 miles
- The whole loop takes me an hour and I average 13.5 mph
- Fastest speed on a downhill is 33.5 mph
- So far, I haven't died
It's not nearly the struggle it was when I started (Duh!) It's nice to be able to recover from the ride in a few minutes. And when I'm done and get off the bike, I don't feel like my legs are rubber bands that won't support me.
So far, so good!
Dean
- With the exception of one hill, I ride the big ring on the whole loop - just use 7 gears
- On the flats by the river, I average 16 mph for 5 miles
- The whole loop takes me an hour and I average 13.5 mph
- Fastest speed on a downhill is 33.5 mph
- So far, I haven't died
It's not nearly the struggle it was when I started (Duh!) It's nice to be able to recover from the ride in a few minutes. And when I'm done and get off the bike, I don't feel like my legs are rubber bands that won't support me.
So far, so good!
Dean
#9
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 947
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, CA
Bikes: Albert Eisentraut custom w/DA, Kestrel RT 700 w/Ultegra, Jamis Tangier
I don't think average speed tells me much, personally, unless I take a split for a specific part of the ride. For me, rolling/flat terrain is a much better judge of speed and effort expended. I'm 44, 6'1" and 200+lbs and try to do a lot of hill work, as improving my climbing is one of the most challenging things for me. Power-to-weight ratio puts me at somewhat of a disadvantage to my lighter brethren, but I can scream on the descents. So I'm fairly crawling up some of these grades and flying down the other side...I try not to pay as much attention to the numbers as how I'm doing for time and how I feel relative to my best and not-so-good rides on the same grades. I don't really have to expend much energy to go really fast downhill. However, on flat and rolling I can push a pretty big gear and average 20-25 for a fair number of miles. Lots of times though, after a day of being indoors/in meetings, I just want to get out and ride - not paying any attention to the numbers, and just enjoying the solitary effort
Last edited by Steelrider; 09-04-04 at 01:37 AM.
#10
I'm 48, 6'2", 223 lbs. I average approximately 170 total miles on my Saturday and Sunday rides. I don't get to ride during the week because of the huge amount of hours that I have to put in at work. On the flats I average between 18-20 mph, but because of my weight and lack of riding time during the week, the hills slow me to a crawl.
#11
Wow, lots of OF's around here. I'm 48, been roading for the past 1.5 years, did a lot of MTB for three years before that, and 20 years before that, rode very hard in college. These days, I usually get in 2 - 3 rides a week, 20 to 25 miles.
Across moderate rolling hills, I can average around 18mph. On the flats, around 20. When I started road riding two years ago, I was averaging around 13mph over the same routes.
I've been working on a sprint on the moderate downhill in front of my house. Best speed to date is 46.8, and I'm aiming for 50. Have to up the gearing more, with a 53/12 gear, I just can't crank any faster.
Across moderate rolling hills, I can average around 18mph. On the flats, around 20. When I started road riding two years ago, I was averaging around 13mph over the same routes.
I've been working on a sprint on the moderate downhill in front of my house. Best speed to date is 46.8, and I'm aiming for 50. Have to up the gearing more, with a 53/12 gear, I just can't crank any faster.
#12
Motor, not the bike
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
From: Chester County, PA
Bikes: Trek 2200, '83 Schwinn Super leTour, Trek Mountain Bike
Seems to be the trend. I'm 42 6'3" 210 lbs. On flats I run 19-20 over 45 miles. I have a weekday 15 mile with lots of climbs, 15-16. Riding on a well maintaned 22 yr old CroMoly Schwinn. ( I love this bike and just can't part with it!)
I also ride mid week on my Trek MTB to mix it up.
I also ride mid week on my Trek MTB to mix it up.
#13
Senior Member

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 687
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by ridetime257
I am 46 yo male who rides 3-5 25-35 mile rides per week. On the flats near the water I can average about 18-19 and about 17 in the hillier areas and I am just wondering how that stacks up with some of the other guys out there my age. Thanks
#15
Senior Member

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 925
Likes: 0
From: Latitude 42○13'44" Longitude 71○41'42" Elevation 223 ft.
Bikes: 2006 Merlin CR Works w/DA 10
44 yo 6'2" 192 lbs .. about the same as the other guys - averaged 17.5 on a solo hundo in rolling hill terrain earlier in the year .. faster of course for shorter rides.
I also only look at avg mph at the completion of the ride, so I have no idea what I avg on flats. For that matter, I have been concentrating more on hill climbs, strength and endurance training, etc. and focusing less on miles per week.
I also only look at avg mph at the completion of the ride, so I have no idea what I avg on flats. For that matter, I have been concentrating more on hill climbs, strength and endurance training, etc. and focusing less on miles per week.
#17
Senior Member

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 925
Likes: 0
From: Latitude 42○13'44" Longitude 71○41'42" Elevation 223 ft.
Bikes: 2006 Merlin CR Works w/DA 10
Originally Posted by Corrupted
19 yrs old, doing on average (take the total trip distance/time) 22mph on a kinda flat course. usually around 25 miles trip.
:-)
#18
jeez.. we should do some sort of forum-wide poll for just height and weight!
cycling is a smaller persons sport and i think most of the ppl who responded to this thread are over 6ft and 200lbs!
i'm not surprised that so many folks here are in their 40s, but i expected.. well.. smaller ppl i guess.
i'm almost 34, very tall and skinny, and slow as poo. i just got a computer when i got my new bike a few months ago and i only seem to avg 15-16mph. i'm thinking (hoping) that might be because so much of the riding i do is on paved bike paths which i believe are just inherently slower than car roads. i live in DC though, so i definitely don't have hills as an excuse.
been off the bike for a few years with overuse injuries (which in case you're curious were pretty much eradicated by going to back to eating meat after years of being vegetarian) so maybe when i have more than a season of riding in my legs the speed and strength will come up on it's own.
cycling is a smaller persons sport and i think most of the ppl who responded to this thread are over 6ft and 200lbs!
i'm not surprised that so many folks here are in their 40s, but i expected.. well.. smaller ppl i guess.
i'm almost 34, very tall and skinny, and slow as poo. i just got a computer when i got my new bike a few months ago and i only seem to avg 15-16mph. i'm thinking (hoping) that might be because so much of the riding i do is on paved bike paths which i believe are just inherently slower than car roads. i live in DC though, so i definitely don't have hills as an excuse.
been off the bike for a few years with overuse injuries (which in case you're curious were pretty much eradicated by going to back to eating meat after years of being vegetarian) so maybe when i have more than a season of riding in my legs the speed and strength will come up on it's own.
#19
Originally Posted by Boze
cycling is a smaller persons sport
Guess I better sell my bikes!
What sport might I be best suited for? I am 5'11.5" and weigh 225 lbs. Sumo wrestling?
Help!
Have I been outlawed?
Last edited by DnvrFox; 09-04-04 at 10:14 AM.
#20
Senior Member

Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 13,237
Likes: 75
From: Fallbrook,Calif./Palau del Vidre, France
Bikes: Klein QP, Fuji touring, Surly Cross Check, BCH City bike
I do not think age has that much to do with it..Conditioning,training and genetics...I have known some pretty strong riders in their 60's and they had the body of a twenty year old...Around here , we have challenging hills with 2 mile long grades at maybe 8 %...That slows me down..
I am in your same age group. On flats I average about 15-18 mph , depending if I am fighting a 20 mph on shore wind.
I am in your same age group. On flats I average about 15-18 mph , depending if I am fighting a 20 mph on shore wind.
#22
Senior Member

Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Another clydesdale here.
I just started riding again this March.
44, 276.5 (at last weigh in) and there is no such thing as a flat ride here in Colorado.
I have been averageing just over 16 MPH on my rides lately (31 Miles), the further i go, the higher my average speed is. The two routes i do have climbs in them at 11 to 15 miles that really slow me down. The more I do after that of the rolling stuff around here, the higher my average goes.
Back in my younger days (30's) when I lived in So. Cal. i used to average about 18 MPH.
I just started riding again this March.
44, 276.5 (at last weigh in) and there is no such thing as a flat ride here in Colorado.
I have been averageing just over 16 MPH on my rides lately (31 Miles), the further i go, the higher my average speed is. The two routes i do have climbs in them at 11 to 15 miles that really slow me down. The more I do after that of the rolling stuff around here, the higher my average goes.
Back in my younger days (30's) when I lived in So. Cal. i used to average about 18 MPH.
#23
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 947
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, CA
Bikes: Albert Eisentraut custom w/DA, Kestrel RT 700 w/Ultegra, Jamis Tangier
Originally Posted by boze
...ppl who responded to this thread are over 6ft and 200lbs!... but i expected.. well.. smaller ppl i guess.
...were pretty much eradicated by going to back to eating meat after years of being vegetarian
...were pretty much eradicated by going to back to eating meat after years of being vegetarian
Also, are you saying that your overuse injuries went away after you started eating meat again?! Are you stating this as coincidental, or do you attribute this to something specific (if something specific, gotta' use that one on my wife, who is a non-red meat eater).
#24
Senior Member

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 687
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by boze
jeez.. we should do some sort of forum-wide poll for just height and weight!
cycling is a smaller persons sport and i think most of the ppl who responded to this thread are over 6ft and 200lbs!
i'm not surprised that so many folks here are in their 40s, but i expected.. well.. smaller ppl i guess.
i'm almost 34, very tall and skinny, and slow as poo. i just got a computer when i got my new bike a few months ago and i only seem to avg 15-16mph. i'm thinking (hoping) that might be because so much of the riding i do is on paved bike paths which i believe are just inherently slower than car roads. i live in DC though, so i definitely don't have hills as an excuse.
been off the bike for a few years with overuse injuries (which in case you're curious were pretty much eradicated by going to back to eating meat after years of being vegetarian) so maybe when i have more than a season of riding in my legs the speed and strength will come up on it's own.
cycling is a smaller persons sport and i think most of the ppl who responded to this thread are over 6ft and 200lbs!
i'm not surprised that so many folks here are in their 40s, but i expected.. well.. smaller ppl i guess.
i'm almost 34, very tall and skinny, and slow as poo. i just got a computer when i got my new bike a few months ago and i only seem to avg 15-16mph. i'm thinking (hoping) that might be because so much of the riding i do is on paved bike paths which i believe are just inherently slower than car roads. i live in DC though, so i definitely don't have hills as an excuse.
been off the bike for a few years with overuse injuries (which in case you're curious were pretty much eradicated by going to back to eating meat after years of being vegetarian) so maybe when i have more than a season of riding in my legs the speed and strength will come up on it's own.
#25
hey yeah, no offense intended. i'm just saying that while any body shape is fine for riding you get ppl like "big george hincapie" and "big mig" just because they're like 6'1" or 6'2". we look more like a college football squad by comparison =)
oh, and SteelRider - yeah, i'm definitely stating causality or whatever about eating meat again. i had been a veg for 8 or 9 years and i would get into something healthy like running, cycling, weights - whatever - and then end up with some dumb overuse injury like plantar fasciitis in my feet or ITB-syndrome in my quads or cubital-tunnel in my elbows. then i started eating meat sometime early last summer - mostly just chicken at first but with no real plan - i eat anything now. i've bulked up a bit (granted i'm super skinny, so that means going from like 168 to 182), but more than anything i notice that i don't worry about my overuse injuries flaring up anymore. i mean the feet and itb thing are years old and i still had to look out if i ran a 5k or be careful to stretch thoroughly afterwards. i still try to cross-train - not doing the same type of workout two days in a row. but my feet don't ever really complain like they used to and the quads are better off - i think i was just a bit stringy from not getting enough ballanced nutrition or fats and proteins or something.
not to scientific - sorry about that. but yeah, while i'm not proud of the meat industry i have to admit that it gave me back my fitness life to quit being veg.
oh, and SteelRider - yeah, i'm definitely stating causality or whatever about eating meat again. i had been a veg for 8 or 9 years and i would get into something healthy like running, cycling, weights - whatever - and then end up with some dumb overuse injury like plantar fasciitis in my feet or ITB-syndrome in my quads or cubital-tunnel in my elbows. then i started eating meat sometime early last summer - mostly just chicken at first but with no real plan - i eat anything now. i've bulked up a bit (granted i'm super skinny, so that means going from like 168 to 182), but more than anything i notice that i don't worry about my overuse injuries flaring up anymore. i mean the feet and itb thing are years old and i still had to look out if i ran a 5k or be careful to stretch thoroughly afterwards. i still try to cross-train - not doing the same type of workout two days in a row. but my feet don't ever really complain like they used to and the quads are better off - i think i was just a bit stringy from not getting enough ballanced nutrition or fats and proteins or something.
not to scientific - sorry about that. but yeah, while i'm not proud of the meat industry i have to admit that it gave me back my fitness life to quit being veg.








