![]() |
I have to say that I find it a little puzzling that he is at 6'2/180 and wants to be 170 or 165. But then everybody is different and every body is different. I'm 6' and I would look starved at 180. It could be at 6'2/180 the OP has a bit of a gut, as he says. Counting calories has already started working, Ive lost some stomach, a few pounds, and my appetite is supressed unless I have a heavy ride day. It also will help your Watts/KG!! |
Originally Posted by wxmcpo
(Post 11004553)
Count me as another user and believer of http://www.livestrong.com. I lost 42 lbs to get down to 161 lbs two years ago, but returned to school (plus being active duty Navy and raising a family), quit running/cycling and ballooned up to 196 lbs. After completing school and some work related travel I decided to start running/cycling again. As of today I am down to 171 lbs and pretty happy where I'm at right now. The real trick now is eating enough to maintain the weight I'm at. I need to eat around 3000 calories daily and that's before taking into account my calories burned through my workouts. I could easily eat 3000-4000 calories a day, but part of my "lifestyle change" is changing my diet as well and eating healthier. I still have an occasional snack such as cheeseburgers (had them for dinner last night) or ice cream, but the difference is moderation and not eating them every day.
http://i51.photobucket.com/albums/f3...09/Myplate.jpg |
Alright I'm giving the livestrong thing a shot
|
Originally Posted by Prairie Native
(Post 11012553)
Not sure how you would look starved at 6' foot 180, I would consider it fit looking.
|
Fit looking? LOL. Livestrong's BMI calculator says I should be 140 pounds and that I'm obese. At 5'9" I can say the last time I weighed 140 was in grade 8 most likely. I was 180 and fit as hell at 18.
I'm 40 wearing 34 jeans and have a 4 pack. To drop 70 pounds I'd look like I could kill Bruce Lee. Ignore BMI calculators and go for a target heart rate. At my fittest I had a resting rate of 49. I'd like to get there again. |
Originally Posted by aham23
(Post 11012395)
eat less, ride more.
if tracking to drop pounds, over estimate intake and under estimate expenditures. Sure, "just eat less and exercise more, quit worrying about it." But most people who have successfully lost weight will tell you it requires careful planning, because in a way you're going contrary to your instincts every step of the way. And truthfully, the mantra should be "eat more, make better and informed choices, take in fewer calories, get regular moderate exercise". |
Well I used to use livestrong. It said to reach my aggressive goal I'd have to consume 2400 calories a day. I actually didn't lose any weight. I kept at it for 2 months. Nothing.
Switched to back loseit and adjusted their exercise calculations to a more realistic wattage output and I dropped weight quickly. Again, as above - do it smart, do it as a permanent lifestyle change. Crash calorie restriction works for some, is damaging for others. Experiment and make sure that you can wake up the next day and not be dizzy. It's very true that just eating less is not really going to help you. Careful planning and methodical examination of what your body is doing is very critical. There is a direct correlation between desire and results. A very PC way to say lazy people stay fat. |
Originally Posted by krazygl00
(Post 11012706)
I would be curious to know what your experience with weight loss is. Not maintaining a fit weight, but significant loss. "Eat less, ride [exercise] more" is a familiar old saw, and a recipe for disaster if you're trying to lose a significant amount.
Sure, "just eat less and exercise more, quit worrying about it." But most people who have successfully lost weight will tell you it requires careful planning, because in a way you're going contrary to your instincts every step of the way. And truthfully, the mantra should be "eat more, make better and informed choices, take in fewer calories, get regular moderate exercise". |
There was a Nova episode a few years ago "Marathon Challenge." They took 12 sedentary people and trained them to run a marathon in six (?) months. With a body scan before training started, all but one were declared obese based on body fat %.
After they finished their first 12-mile run, which was maybe 8 or 12 weeks into some pretty serious training, they did another body scan. Only one runner was no longer obese, and she was the only one who made intentional changes to her diet. Everyone's VO2Max had improved, but they were generally still just as fat as when they were sedentary. Same thing with the body scans after they ran the Boston Marathon -- that same woman was the only one who was no longer obese. (other than one genetically gifted participant who went in sedentary with a naturally impressive VO2Max and little body fat). |
Originally Posted by DScott
(Post 11008714)
I have nothing meaningful to add to the actual topic at hand. But, I wanted to thank the OP for starting this thread, since weight loss threads always seem to bring up pics of Jillian Michaels, and she's smokin' hot. :thumb:
http://blog.whocanisue.com/wp-conten...n-michaels.jpg |
Originally Posted by navyasw02
(Post 11013060)
She would be hotter if she didnt have hands that look like mine. I bet she has other man parts that look like mine too.
|
as I relayed it to my wife: she's attractive, sure. She's not sexy, though. (not to me anyway).
|
Anything like this for Blackberry? |
Jillian Michaels has a hot body, but a horse face. Just my $0.02.
http://www.fancast.com/blogs/files/2...n-michaels.jpg |
Originally Posted by cshell
(Post 11014096)
Jillian Michaels has a hot body, but a horse face. Just my $0.02.
http://www.fancast.com/blogs/files/2...n-michaels.jpg |
If you're focusing on her hands, or even her face, you're doing it wrong. May I draw your attention to those abs? ;)
|
Originally Posted by DScott
(Post 11015710)
If you're focusing on her hands, or even her face, you're doing it wrong. May I draw your attention to those abs? ;)
|
Originally Posted by cshell
(Post 11014076)
Anything like this for Blackberry?
|
Originally Posted by navyasw02
(Post 11014543)
Every time I see her I think she's the prettiest drag queen I've ever seen.
|
Originally Posted by DScott
(Post 11008714)
I have nothing meaningful to add to the actual topic at hand. But, I wanted to thank the OP for starting this thread, since weight loss threads always seem to bring up pics of Jillian Michaels, and she's smokin' hot. :thumb:
http://blog.whocanisue.com/wp-conten...n-michaels.jpg |
Originally Posted by cshell
(Post 11014096)
Jillian Michaels has a hot body, but a horse face. Just my $0.02.
http://www.fancast.com/blogs/files/2...n-michaels.jpg Everything looks good "butter" face. :lol: |
Today i did a 34 mile ride with 2000 FT of climbing and burned 1039 calories.
The reason i know the exact amount is i wear a bodybug like on biggest loser, so far i have lost 101 lbs and am maintaining it for the last 4 mos. i also weigh most of what i eat (A little over kill but that's just me) 500 calorie deficit a day = 1lb weight loss a week 1000 calorie deficit a day = 2lbs weight loss a week |
Originally Posted by wxmcpo
(Post 11026114)
So she's a "butter" face.
Everything looks good "butter" face. :lol: Nice to know i'm not the only one that thinks this. |
Originally Posted by sinclac
(Post 11027724)
Today i did a 34 mile ride with 2000 FT of climbing and burned 1039 calories.
Congrats on losing a century of weight my friend. |
Originally Posted by Dr. Banzai
(Post 11027848)
Wow, that seems awfully low. How long did it take you? Average speed?
Congrats on losing a century of weight my friend. Thank you. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:40 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.