Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Something for the tall guys...

Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Something for the tall guys...

Old 07-14-10, 03:14 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 124

Bikes: Custom Zinn Dolomite Ti

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Something for the tall guys...

I've got some of these and it's made an amazing difference to my riding (I'm 6'6")

So thought I'd share when they put out this nice 1min vid that sums up in a minute the benefits of long cranks for tall riders.


Honestly - going back to my old bike with its 175mm cranks feels like riding a kids bike. (I now ride 210mm cranks)

If you're tall - my bet is that you'll watch this vid a few times...

Adrian.
Sassonian is offline  
Old 07-14-10, 03:54 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Cambridge, UK
Posts: 1,051

Bikes: Specialized Allez (2007)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Yeah, the commonly available sizes (170-175) really don't give any proportionality to actual leg length. I'm 6', ride 175's, and haven't gone with anything longer mostly because it means getting four new sets of cranks. It does seem ridiculous that we spend so much time getting other aspects of bike fit right, but all ride pretty much the same cranks. 2.5mm difference is not a real adjustment. I think the french company TA make a selection of decent lengths.

One issue to consider is that frame manufacturers don't really allow for the use of cranks beyond the standard range, so pedal clearance in corners may be reduced. Unless of course you get a lovely frame made for you with plenty of BB clearance. Also if you ride track, I think many indoor velodromes require 170mm cranks, so you'll have to get used to switching over when you go to the track.
Basil Moss is offline  
Old 07-14-10, 06:55 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 257
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I think I pass Zinn Cycles pretty much every day... not short or tall enough to wander inside though.

What's the cornering clearance like? (Not sure if you're on a Zinn frame or factory-spec one)
Do the tall guys at the tour (Hincapie, Wiggins, etc.) ride extra-long cranks?
wanlogan is offline  
Old 07-14-10, 07:27 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,204

Bikes: Colnago C59 Italia Di2

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Id quite like to try some 180mm cranks, im 6'2" and think that the 5mm reduced seat height would help cope with short head tubes on bikes these days. Also I struggle with reach generally so sitting 5mm further forward would also help. Of course there is the pedalling efficiency thing to take into account as well, so it kind of makes sence for all round bike fit for me.
lazerzxr is offline  
Old 07-14-10, 09:07 AM
  #5  
Banned.
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Uncertain
Posts: 8,651
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by lazerzxr
Id quite like to try some 180mm cranks, im 6'2" and think that the 5mm reduced seat height would help cope with short head tubes on bikes these days. Also I struggle with reach generally so sitting 5mm further forward would also help. Of course there is the pedalling efficiency thing to take into account as well, so it kind of makes sence for all round bike fit for me.
The "pedalling efficiency thing" is a myth, imo. Longer cranks give greater leverage, yes, so you can probably push a bigger gear. But they slow your cadence, so you may not accelerate as well, there's a bigger "dead spot" at the top of the stroke (which is inefficient) and they'll be harder on your knees. If anything I'd say we should be investigating the benefits of shorter cranks for shorter cyclists rather than longer ones for us tall guys, because there are likely to be efficiency advantages in reducing the acuteness of the angle through which the knee has to bend at the top of the stroke.
chasm54 is offline  
Old 07-14-10, 11:21 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Boston
Posts: 4,556
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by lazerzxr
Id quite like to try some 180mm cranks, im 6'2" and think that the 5mm reduced seat height would help cope with short head tubes on bikes these days. Also I struggle with reach generally so sitting 5mm further forward would also help. Of course there is the pedalling efficiency thing to take into account as well, so it kind of makes sence for all round bike fit for me.
I don't think 180 is unusual. Rival's cranks come in 180. Dura Ace comes in 180.
crhilton is offline  
Old 07-14-10, 11:35 AM
  #7  
Uber Goober
 
StephenH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Dallas area, Texas
Posts: 11,758
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 190 Post(s)
Liked 41 Times in 32 Posts
I've got a cargo bike with longer cranks (feels longer, I guess they are, at least.) It feels different, but I've never been able to tell it was really any better or worse, either, so not a lot of reason to change.
__________________
"be careful this rando stuff is addictive and dan's the 'pusher'."
StephenH is offline  
Old 07-14-10, 12:57 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
SteelCan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: So. Jersey
Posts: 596

Bikes: LeMond Reno

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by wanlogan
Do the tall guys at the tour (Hincapie, Wiggins, etc.) ride extra-long cranks?
Going from memory, I recall reading that Hincapie rides a 175 crank in a road race and 172.5 when TT. However those were the specs on bikes from a couple years ago. (Since I am a similar height/build I was curious as to how he would have his bike setup. BTW the bike was a 57cm. Yes 57cm)

Last edited by SteelCan; 07-14-10 at 02:19 PM. Reason: LOL. mm vs cm whats the difference?
SteelCan is offline  
Old 07-14-10, 01:06 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Shimagnolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Zang's Spur, CO
Posts: 9,086
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3355 Post(s)
Liked 5,434 Times in 2,812 Posts
Originally Posted by SteelCan
BTW the bike was a 57mm. Yes 57mm)
Shimagnolo is offline  
Old 07-15-10, 09:40 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 124

Bikes: Custom Zinn Dolomite Ti

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Basil Moss - yep I agree about the proportionality. We have short cranks when we get our first bike as kids and they get bigger as we get bigger - up to a point and then they stop. Same with wheel size - but that's a little more difficult to solve.

wanlogan - custom Zinn titanium frame too - so it's built around the custom cranks and has a higher bottom bracket to accommodate them. (it's my dream bike) So no problems at all with clearance - same as for any other road bike. And RE pro riders - don't know what they have - but I believe that Magnus Backsted had a set of Zinn custom cranks - 190's I think. He's a bit taller than hincape & wiggins.

Chasm54 - Yep - definitely can push a bigger gear. Does slow your cadence - but only for a while - until you get used to the bigger pedaling circle. Proportionally it's the same sized circle as a smaller rider would ride with say 170's or 175's so there should be no difference in cadence ability. But I hear what you are saying - and it did take a bit of getting used to - but my cadence is back to where it was before. I completely disagree with you on the acceleration though. It's one of the key benefits imo. I can now accelerate way way better than before - and thats because of the greater leverage. Accelerations that used to spit me out the back are now handled easily. And climbing is way way better for the same reason. I race regularly and since getting this bike I've jumped up 2 groups to now ride in the B grade - and have won the most improved rider award in my club as well as our summer series of racing (I've even had a couple of people question whether the long cranks are legal as they are giving an unfair advantage). I think the key is that I can finally use the leverage advantage that I have as a taller rider - the long cranks enable me to use that advantage. And I've had absolutely no problems at all with my knees jumping from the 175s to the 210s (and I'm currently riding about 350kms / week). Zinn does make shorter cranks for shorter riders - they are all about proportional length cranks - but the video was focusing on tall riders because it shows the proportionality argument better I guess (It's Lennard Zinn in the video I think - so I guess he's a cheap model and is 6'6")

So as you can see - I'm a zealot! But for good reason.



Adrian.

Last edited by Sassonian; 07-15-10 at 09:48 PM.
Sassonian is offline  
Old 07-15-10, 09:58 PM
  #11  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 21
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
and many tall guys who switch to the long cranks, report feeling more natural at a slightly slower cadence, which makes sense for longer legs.
wigston is offline  
Old 07-15-10, 10:07 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
andrewluke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 444
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I agree with the post above about length in relation to cadence and motion... I'm 6'2" with a 33" inseam and that calculator says I'm about 12mm short on my cranks but I love my 172.5's.

I used to have a 175mm crank but I honestly feel far more stable at a higher cadence (110+) and my sprint picked up a little bit of speed as well.
andrewluke is offline  
Old 07-15-10, 10:38 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Northern Nevada
Posts: 3,811
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by chasm54
The "pedalling efficiency thing" is a myth, imo. Longer cranks give greater leverage, yes, so you can probably push a bigger gear. But they slow your cadence, so you may not accelerate as well, there's a bigger "dead spot" at the top of the stroke (which is inefficient) and they'll be harder on your knees. If anything I'd say we should be investigating the benefits of shorter cranks for shorter cyclists rather than longer ones for us tall guys, because there are likely to be efficiency advantages in reducing the acuteness of the angle through which the knee has to bend at the top of the stroke.

FWIW, I got a great deal on a used bike 15 years or so ago, exactly what I wanted except the previous owner had built it up with 170 cranks. He was 6'2"; I'm 6'4" and had always ridden 175s. I rode it a fair amount (it wasn't my only bike) for four or five years untilI destroyed it in a crash. I could spin like crazy on it, but it always felt a little cramped. I'm a lousy climber anyway, but I really couldn't go uphill on that bike. If I ever do another build (I have way more bikes than I need already), I'm going to try 180s.
Velo Dog is offline  
Old 07-16-10, 06:35 AM
  #14  
Member
 
Daerkon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 42

Bikes: Seven Odonata

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 1 Post
I am 6'4" and have ridden 180 cranks for more than 20 years. If lengths longer than that were commonly available and did not add complexity to custom frame manufacture, clearance, etc, I think I might have gone longer. That said 20 years ago I rode all of the surrounding terrain using an 11-23 cassette, my cadence was low and I 'felt' efficient grinding out the hills (Boulder, Colorado, so reasonable climbs). With age and multiple knee surgeries on both legs I have slowly increased cadence and changed gearing. I now ride a 12-27 and sometimes wish I had a 28. I don't think I have slowed down noticeably, just don't enjoy the pain that I used to and I believe longer cranks, with higher gears are more destructive on ones body irrespective of inseam. I hate to think how little cartilage I would have left were I actually riding 195 cranks!
Daerkon is offline  
Old 07-16-10, 06:48 AM
  #15  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: CT
Posts: 20

Bikes: 2010 Jamis Ventura Comp Femme

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'm 5'3" with a 28" inseam, so those 130mm cranks look pretty nice. But for over $500, I'll ride on longer cranks and suck it up.
CB88 is offline  
Old 07-16-10, 07:59 AM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 2,745

Bikes: S-Works Roubaix SL2^H4, Secteur Sport, TriCross, Kaffenback, Lurcher 29er

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by andrewluke
I agree with the post above about length in relation to cadence and motion... I'm 6'2" with a 33" inseam and that calculator says I'm about 12mm short on my cranks but I love my 172.5's.

I used to have a 175mm crank but I honestly feel far more stable at a higher cadence (110+) and my sprint picked up a little bit of speed as well.
I'm close to identical dimensions and have to say that I too prefer a 172.5mm crank based on my experience with one on a bike I just sold. I was able to spin out much more smoothly than with a 175, and I didn't feel like they hurt my climbing (such as it is) at all. But everyone who makes frames my size thinks I should have 175s so that's what I usually end up with.
svtmike is offline  
Old 07-16-10, 08:30 AM
  #17  
Still can't climb
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Limey in Taiwan
Posts: 23,024
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 6 Posts
do really tall people who find those cranks necessary also need custom bikes built?
__________________
coasting, few quotes are worthy of him, and of those, even fewer printable in a family forum......quote 3alarmer

No @coasting, you should stay 100% as you are right now, don't change a thing....quote Heathpack
coasting is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
samlochner
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
6
04-10-16 03:35 PM
JAJ0404
Bicycle Mechanics
14
09-11-13 04:58 PM
mtnbke
Classic & Vintage
10
05-05-11 06:43 AM
Sassonian
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
2
03-26-10 08:39 PM
bigfred
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
19
01-16-10 01:48 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.