is it possible for me to hide my cables more than this?
first off, apologies for this being the third thread in which i've posted a picture of my bike today.
i'm currently having trouble getting the BMC Impec off my mind (it's made by robots! i don't have 8 grand!), so i'm toying with upgrades to my current bike that i love. as you can see, i have standard ergo bars, Rival setup with the cables routed under the tape, which is nice. I'm considering switching to a traditional bend handlebar, since im starting to find the ergo bend a little annoying in the drops. can you recommend a handlebar with a traditional bend that will make it possible for even more cable hiding? http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4045/...caf2247366.jpg |
I have my Rival cabling set up just like that (with the chift cables on the rear of the bar) and I don't see any other way of cleaning up more. Are you doing the criss-cross configuration on your shifter cables? I did on mine, less bends and they don't make contact with the head tube as much.
|
well... to answer just the thread title alone:
http://www.roadbikeaction.com/conten...LanceTTde2.jpg yes you can. |
Originally Posted by Inertianinja
(Post 11202356)
first off, apologies for this being the third thread in which i've posted a picture of my bike today.
i'm currently having trouble getting the BMC Impec off my mind (it's made by robots! i don't have 8 grand!), so i'm toying with upgrades to my current bike that i love. as you can see, i have standard ergo bars, Rival setup with the cables routed under the tape, which is nice. I'm considering switching to a traditional bend handlebar, since im starting to find the ergo bend a little annoying in the drops. can you recommend a handlebar with a traditional bend that will make it possible for even more cable hiding? http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4045/...caf2247366.jpg |
Originally Posted by Inertianinja
(Post 11202356)
can you recommend a handlebar with a traditional bend that will make it possible for even more cable hiding?
|
Originally Posted by Emptei
(Post 11202762)
Just ride the damn bike.
|
Originally Posted by Inertianinja
(Post 11202779)
why would i do that? its more fun to just take pictures of it in different corners of my apartment and post them to this forum so noobs can troll my thread! i've put 2500 miles on the thing since the spring, thanks.
|
Originally Posted by Emptei
(Post 11202899)
You missed my point. Just ride the damn bike.
|
nice bike i have the same one - were your cable housing ever white or did it come in black?
|
Originally Posted by Emptei
(Post 11202899)
You missed my point. Just ride the damn bike.
|
I hate cable drag! Haha :wtf:
|
Originally Posted by SourDieseL
(Post 11202927)
nice bike i have the same one - were your cable housing ever white or did it come in black?
my bike was a bit of a weird situation - i had limited funds, couldn't afford the $3800 full price. shop was trying to clear out inventory, told me they'd swap the Red for Rival and make the price more reasonable. to me, it made sense - better frame, cheaper components that are, as far as i have read, not that much worse than Red. i've been very happy with the bike, just trying to improve it here and there as i go. |
Originally Posted by Inertianinja
(Post 11202936)
you missed my point. i do.
|
Originally Posted by Inertianinja
(Post 11202936)
you missed my point. i do.
|
Originally Posted by cshell
(Post 11202954)
he meant, to him, the cables showing isn't as important as riding.
so anyone who isn't interested in the topic should just *not reply,* rather than get all sanctimonious. if nobody cared about cable routing, there wouldn't be handlebars that offer internal cable routing. |
Where else do you think you can hide them?
|
Originally Posted by roadiejorge
(Post 11202980)
Where else do you think you can hide them?
|
Originally Posted by datlas
(Post 11203137)
Maybe they make bars drilled so you can route the cables inside them?? I wouldn't bother, but obviously it's an issue to the OP.
|
Someone explain to me how traditional vs ergo bend has anything to do with hiding cables.
|
Originally Posted by stedalus
(Post 11203222)
Someone explain to me how traditional vs ergo bend has anything to do with hiding cables.
|
Originally Posted by stedalus
(Post 11203222)
Someone explain to me how traditional vs ergo bend has anything to do with hiding cables.
|
Originally Posted by roadiejorge
(Post 11202980)
Where else do you think you can hide them?
if you want traditional (as i infer from you post, a ritchey wcs classic, a 3t rotundo, or something similar), you ain't gonna find one with internal routing. fsa offers internal routing, but they offer nothing with a traditional bend. besides, the cables are routed incorrectly: the sram shifters have an option for routing to the front or rear of the handlebar, and yours is routed to the rear then cut back to the front. this is a lousy setup. you should have no problem routing both the brake & derailleur cables to the front of the handlebar |
Originally Posted by mcjimbosandwich
(Post 11203269)
+1. unless if you route the cables through the stem & into the frame, it ain't gonna matter
if you want traditional (as i infer from you post, a ritchey wcs classic, a 3t rotundo, or something similar), you ain't gonna find one with internal routing. fsa offers internal routing, but they offer nothing with a traditional bend. besides, the cables are routed incorrectly: the sram shifters have an option for routing to the front or rear of the handlebar, and yours is routed to the rear then cut back to the front. this is a lousy setup. you should have no problem routing both the brake & derailleur cables to the front of the handlebar |
How about a 2nd cage upgrade
|
If you haven't, criss-cross the the shift cables under the downtube. It makes it a little cleaner.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:24 AM. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.