![]() |
Winds are NOT like hills.
For starters, the harder you push, the harder the wind pushes back. Secondly, light hill-climbers are at an even greater disadvantage against the wind; your reduced mass is pushed around more, and while your power-to-weight may be really great, pure power might be relatively low. On a flat road in a headwind, this equals serious pain. I know about this. At 138lbs but with a pretty decent power-to-weight, I usually kill my riding buddies on hills. But I remember when I moved to TX I just could not hang with some of those TX power-riders on flat roads on windy days. Even now in Kansas, the guys I ride with/against usually find a way to peel me off on a flat road with a headwind, so they won't have to fight me up hill. (Yes, there are some climbs in NE Kansas. My normal route is 26miles with almost 2k of climbing, most of that on about 2 fairly steep climbs.) |
Originally Posted by Banzai
(Post 14999274)
Winds are NOT like hills.
For starters, the harder you push, the harder the wind pushes back. Secondly, light hill-climbers are at an even greater disadvantage against the wind; your reduced mass is pushed around more, and while your power-to-weight may be really great, pure power might be relatively low. On a flat road in a headwind, this equals serious pain. I know about this. At 138lbs but with a pretty decent power-to-weight, I usually kill my riding buddies on hills. But I remember when I moved to TX I just could not hang with some of those TX power-riders on flat roads on windy days. Even now in Kansas, the guys I ride with/against usually find a way to peel me off on a flat road with a headwind, so they won't have to fight me up hill. (Yes, there are some climbs in NE Kansas. My normal route is 26miles with almost 2k of climbing, most of that on about 2 fairly steep climbs.) I agree. As a big legged somewhat generously portioned person, I love the flats. Even without particularly strong wind, I seem to drop the light hill climbers without even trying. I rode with some good climbers back in the UK and on the flats coming up to the start of hills, I sometimes looked back and found they weren't there. |
Originally Posted by Sallom89
(Post 11407133)
hi all, today I was out cycling happily without so much effort in 30's (kph) suddenly a strong wind faces me directly, it was KILLER. The wind drop my speed from probably a avg. speed of 35 kph in the first 4Km to 20! wow it was so strong.. so I took the nearest U-turn which would make my ride long but with less wind and it was fine for like 1-2km and suddenly the wind faced me again :S
It was my first experience in wind, so advices are welcomed! plus the temperature was 37-38c :innocent: ... |
Originally Posted by Sallom89
(Post 11407133)
It was my first experience in wind, so advices are welcomed!
"Don't try to fight Geology (hills) or Meteorology (wind), they've had 4 billion years more practice than you." iow, if you are confronted with a headwind, maintain your perceived effort, not your actual power output. Slow down; don't fight it, you'll just lose. (Note, that applies to group riding. If you're riding solo and want to get a killer workout, go ahead and try to fight the headwind. Knock yourself out.) |
Originally Posted by Bob Ross
(Post 15000659)
aintain your perceived effort, not your actual power output.
|
Originally Posted by cyclezealot
(Post 14996097)
3 days now of wind over 60 mph
|
There is a law in biking,It's this {Whichever way you turn,the wind will change and become a head wind**
|
Originally Posted by Jandro
(Post 15002775)
You can still be putting out the same power, but not traveling as fast, right?
|
The wind is your friend and training partner for it makes you a stronger rider.
|
Embrace the wind, make it your friend.
|
Originally Posted by Carbonfiberboy
(Post 15003582)
Good question for the PM folks. What does your equipment tell you? Power = force X velocity, right? So pedaling into a 30 mph wind, you maybe have a velocity of 10 mph. Force (RPE) is the same as doing about 30 but because of lower frictional losses you actually have a 40 mph headwind. So your PM should say about 1/3 of your usual still air power at 30, right? Something like that anyway. I'm making some assumptions with a large range of inaccuracy.
One other note regarding wind speeds and using on-line calculators, the reported wind speeds are measured higher above the ground than bicycle height. So a 30mph reported wind speed will actually produce lower wind speed on the ground. |
thats comparing 30 mph to 40 mph.
|
Originally Posted by Machka
(Post 11408951)
If you can maintain 18 km/h into a wind ... it isn't much of a wind. Keep riding, you're fine.
If you can maintain 15 km/h into a wind ... there's a bit of a breeze. Shift into an easier gear and relax. It's like a very gradual hill. |
Originally Posted by surgeonstone
(Post 15004678)
thats comparing 30 mph to 40 mph.
|
10 mph into a 30 mph headwind = an apparent headwind of 40 mph. versus cycling 30 mph with no wind = an apparent headwind of 30 mph.
|
Originally Posted by surgeonstone
(Post 15004696)
10 mph into a 30 mph headwind = an apparent headwind of 40 mph. versus cycling 30 mph with no wind = an apparent headwind of 30 mph.
|
Originally Posted by gregf83
(Post 15004712)
Yes, the point is it's much easier to ride 10mph into an apparent headwind of 40 than 30mph into an apparent headwind of 30.
But what I want to know is what does your PM say when you're doing that? Do you get 300w-400w at 10 mph? Because physics says you shouldn't. Reductio, if you were in a wind where you could hardly turn the cranks, the PM should say near zero, regardless of RPE. |
Use the on-line calculators and you'll see.
It's true thAt the drag force goes up with the square of apparent wind velocity, but your actual velocity is much lower. P = F x velcity (actual not apparent wind speed). |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:11 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.