![]() |
Well, it would absolutely be better for making you stronger, but it would also be the definition of harder -- the gear ratio is higher!
|
Originally Posted by rockwell1222
(Post 17680973)
In your experience, Would it it be harder to go up hills or train with standard cranks?
|
What RMS said. My compact took a bit of getting used to, but I've never felt restricted by it in any way. I grew up on 52/42, and I couldn't possibly go back to that now on the terrain I ride on.
If you're a new rider, get a compact. If the terrain where you ride is really, really, completely and totally, Netherlands/Florida flat, then maybe get a 12/25 or 12/23 cassette so you won't have much difference between gear ratios. |
Originally Posted by rockwell1222
(Post 17680964)
thanks for the input. Any thoughts on climbing with standard cranks?
|
Originally Posted by fureshi
(Post 17676893)
Picked up the bike in stock trim at the end of 2014 for a really reasonable price while visiting family in Socal. After selling off the original groupset and wheels at the beginning of this year, I finally got around to putting it back together with other components and wheels. This is the second CAAD10 that I've had and this one rides just as well as the previous bike if not better since I'm now on tubeless tires. Now that I look back on it, I shouldn't have sold my first CAAD10 as it was the anodized black version but the Gulf Racing colorway has always been my favorite.
Steering tube still needs to be cut and stem needs to be lowered a bit. The first few rides on it feels too upright but overall, it's such a good aluminum frame. https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7614/...c56ca82d_c.jpg |
Originally Posted by rms13
(Post 17675653)
On a side note, you should not run any spacers above the stem per Cannondale's specs. I'm sure your set up is temporary while you get fit dialed in but just an fyi
|
Originally Posted by rekon
(Post 17684868)
Thanks - I did not know that. Nor, did the shop mention this when they put the spacers up there.
I wanted to be sure! Now I have zero spacer below or above. |
Originally Posted by Metieval
(Post 17684915)
I ran way more than on top of my stem, on my Synapse, for a couple hundred miles, before cutting steerer. maybe there is a difference between Carbon and Al steerers?
I wanted to be sure! Now I have zero spacer below or above. |
Cutting the steerer is easy...measure twice, hacksaw once. Getting over the "if I screw this up, I've ruined everything" feeling is the hardest part.
A shop you bought the bike from, should do it for you though. |
Originally Posted by rekon
(Post 17685077)
Did you cut the steerer yourself? I'm not sure if my shop would do this.
they both said $20, I took it to the shop I bought the bike from. He ended up charging me $35. Which irritated me as he didn't need a new star nut as I had already had it pushed down due to using a cap for carbon steer from another bike. and then he tried to swap caps on me. I have a carbon steer Cannondale slice fork. Salt in the wound was the $29 charge for adjusting front derailleur. I had been complaining about a BB30 click, he kept blowing me off. I took it apart, broke some Al. shaving off frame that came up when factory pressed bearings in I guess, fresh lube, and put it back together and no more click. It went together tighter than it had been from factory. That shop offers 2 year warranty, one time adjustments. 1 year later, all I wanted was steerer cut, and for him to look at derailleurs. Plus I was already irritated at being blown off on the BB clicking. He ***** me. It's okay, he put in some Trek Crossrips on his showroom floor, can't move them. I wanted one, so went to a third LBS in area that carries Trek and bought a Crossrip. :D If I had the tools, I'd youtube it and do it myself. I suppose I should youtube the derailleur stuff.... |
Originally Posted by SpeshulEd
(Post 17685128)
Cutting the steerer is easy...measure twice, hacksaw once. Getting over the "if I screw this up, I've ruined everything" feeling is the hardest part.
A shop you bought the bike from, should do it for you though. |
I always worry a bit when I go to do maintenance on my bike, but after watching enough youtube videos and reading enough articles, I gain the confidence to do it.
It might take me longer the first time around, but I'm usually pretty successful. I just had a friend that took her bike into the shop to get a flat tire repaired. I was flabbergasted. I told her to bring her bike over this weekend and I'd show her how to do it. She's quite excited. |
Cutting steerer is simple but most shops do it cheap and shop you just bought a bike from should do it ....free? As part of set up and adjustments.
To confuse us all, it seems all manufacturers have different recommendations for running spacers above stem on carbon steerers. Some specifically say that you should always leave a small spacer above the fork. Cannondale says not to run any spacers above the fork: (see pg 99 of manual) http://media.cannondale.com/media/Ma...ers_Manual.pdf I don't think riding it that way for a few weeks will cause damage but once you have fit dialed in , it should be cut to length. Of course remember you can't un-cut your fork so make sure it is truly comfortable before committing and also keep in mind cutting too short can effect resale |
Originally Posted by rekon
(Post 17672287)
Thanks. I went from a 52 to a 50. I'm short (5'6) and wanted a more aggressive fit.
|
Originally Posted by Metieval
(Post 17684915)
I ran way more than on top of my stem, on my Synapse, for a couple hundred miles, before cutting steerer. maybe there is a difference between Carbon and Al steerers?
I wanted to be sure! Now I have zero spacer below or above. |
I honestly don't see what difference it makes. But I am also the guy that would grind the Lawyer tabs off the front fork.
It isn't that hard to make sure your QR is tight, or that your head set is just right. |
Originally Posted by Metieval
(Post 17686205)
I honestly don't see what difference it makes. But I am also the guy that would grind the Lawyer tabs off the front fork.
It isn't that hard to make sure your QR is tight, or that your head set is just right. Is the steerer going to snap if you have spacers above? Maybe not. But when it comes to things like this I'll just listen to what the manufacturer recommends since they recommend it for a reason |
Originally Posted by Snakepit
(Post 17686201)
I also wanted to play around with slightly dropping the stem so I brought my CAAD10 to my Cannondale LBS and the owner moved one tiny spacer up top for me after it's first tune up. I just saw the Cannondale manual where it says not to run any spacers above the stem. However, I noticed that even some of the EVOs in the pro peloton have spacers positioned on top of the stem?
http://keyassets.timeincuk.net/inspi...004030-002.jpg
Originally Posted by Metieval
(Post 17684915)
I ran way more than on top of my stem, on my Synapse, for a couple hundred miles, before cutting steerer. maybe there is a difference between Carbon and Al steerers?
I wanted to be sure! Now I have zero spacer below or above. the cap itself matches the inner diameter of the steerer, so when the stem clamps, it's not just clamping a tube with no reinforcement. ALSO other companies say that as a CYA (Cover your ass) i think because if you look at other expander/top cap designs ..... the steerer needs to be slightly shorter than the stack of the stem, for compression. If the steerer is cut just a tad too* short then the steerer might be shorter than where the bolt of the stem clamps, and it's clamping 'air'. With cannondales expander again this is not a problem because of their design. http://www.cannondaleexperts.com/ass...17exploded.jpg moral of the story. Commit to the fit and just cut the steerer =) |
Originally Posted by dvdslw
(Post 17682420)
Beautiful bike, how do you like the Eastons? I'm riding my Caad10 on Ultegra's with Schwalbe One's and the ride is awesome. I've been looking at new wider wheels like the Eastons, Ardennes, Industry Nine's, and even the new tubeless Reynolds Assaults?
With that said, they've been really great wheels in the nine months that I've been riding them. I'm running 80psi f/r and along with the wide wheels, makes the ride so supple. I'm not sure if I notice a difference in rolling resistance but the ride has improved when compared to my clincher wheels. They're also stiff enough that when I'm accelerating hard there's no noticeable brake rub. Considering the low weight (1450g), width and ability to run tubeless, the EA90SLX have a good combination of features that tick the right boxes for me. |
Originally Posted by itzwill
(Post 17685624)
Nice CAAD 10. I'm around your size as well 165 / 5'6. I got recommended a 52 from one shop and some guy recommended me a 48 from another shop :/. I'm guessing either a 52 or 50 will suit me.
|
Originally Posted by rekon
(Post 17688287)
Thanks! I'm 5'6/165 as well and I really prefer the 50 over the 52. I rode a 52 for a year and didn't feel as comfortable as my 50. Try them both though!
|
Originally Posted by itzwill
(Post 17689015)
I went into another Local buy shop the guy that recommended me a 52 over a phone was really nice and we did many bike fit tests. First we did a 52 which he presume would fit me since I am 165 the same height as yours but he noted that my legs were a bit on the small size. We decided to do another bike fit test on a 50 bike a different brand, how ever after several attempts he said we might as well go for a 48 since I have the more flexibility option. So after 2 different places they have recommended me a 48. I just made a deposit and picking up my bike next week. I got the team colours, I'm pretty excited.
Edit: never mind on angles I looked them up. but how does that factor in on fit an ride characteristics? |
Originally Posted by Metieval
(Post 17689028)
just curious what are the Seat tube angle differences between 48 and 50, and how much will that change things? head tube angle also?
Edit: never mind on angles I looked them up. but how does that factor in on fit an ride characteristics? While getting bike fitted my seat and the handle bar is nearly even on the 52, and less on the 50. On the 52 there was only round 5cm of seat post showing, which meant it didn't fit me, the second test on the Pinarello had a bit more seat tube height and the 48 will give me a bit more. My legs are a bit short. |
1 Attachment(s)
Here's mine:
http://bikeforums.net/attachment.php...hmentid=443073 Not the best staging but whatever this isn't hot or not. 2014 CAAD10 105. Love this bike! A huge upgrade to what I was riding for a few years. |
aye , probably only changes....fizik r1, keo max 2, and maintenance... chainrings, cables, housings.
https://41.media.tumblr.com/2c5d0fbe...jjuo1_1280.jpg |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:56 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.