Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Does it matter where you put the magnet?

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Does it matter where you put the magnet?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-29-04, 10:21 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 105
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Does it matter where you put the magnet?

I just placed my computer magnet in the middle of the spoke. I have had it at the end of the spoke in the past. It is pretty bulky and large and my biggest concern is if the spoke is at any increased risk of breaking (such as when you hit bumps at speed and get some rim flex)? I wouldn't think it would, but just wondering.
flat tire is offline  
Old 09-29-04, 10:40 PM
  #2  
beauty in the breakdown
 
sailor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Posts: 244
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I couldnt see it being any problem at all. The thing is only touching the spoke at that tiny area, not like its gonna prevent the spoke from flexing right or anything...
sailor is offline  
Old 09-29-04, 10:50 PM
  #3  
Former Hoarder
 
55/Rad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Portland & Yachats, OR
Posts: 11,734

Bikes: Seven Axiom, Felt Z1, Dave Moulton Fuso

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Performance wise, it doesn't matter where you put it - though people have their opinions as to closer to hub or rim. I prefer closer to the hub for the simple reason that, since the magnet travels slower and less distance, it's a little less likely to come loose and fall off.

55/Rad
__________________
55/Rad is offline  
Old 09-30-04, 02:59 AM
  #4  
SSP
Software for Cyclists
 
SSP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Redding, California
Posts: 4,618

Bikes: Trek 5200, Specialized MTB

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
If you have a wireless unit, it's better to mount it high up on the fork (so the magnet will be located nearer to your tire). This shortens the distance between the transmitter and the receiver unit, which helps to avoid problems with interference with wireless cycle computers.
SSP is offline  
Old 09-30-04, 04:14 AM
  #5  
"Word Bond"
 
Whoodie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Nbi, Ken
Posts: 132

Bikes: MTB

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
it's a little less likely to come loose and fall off
55/Rad said it all.
Whoodie is offline  
Old 09-30-04, 06:30 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 105
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 55/Rad
Performance wise, it doesn't matter where you put it - though people have their opinions as to closer to hub or rim. I prefer closer to the hub for the simple reason that, since the magnet travels slower and less distance, it's a little less likely to come loose and fall off.

55/Rad
That is my thinking as well. It would also have more time to across the transmitter since it is moving slower.
flat tire is offline  
Old 09-30-04, 09:44 AM
  #7  
Hardtail
 
WorldWind's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Az. & Ca.
Posts: 663

Bikes: Richey Everest, Supercomp, Richey custom handbuilt Road, and others.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by flat tire
That is my thinking as well. It would also have more time to across the transmitter since it is moving slower.



Thats a joke right?
WorldWind is offline  
Old 09-30-04, 10:40 AM
  #8  
Vancouver, BC
 
leftnotracks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 58

Bikes: Specialized Allez, Rocky Mountain Equipe

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by WorldWind
Thats a joke right?
No, it's absolutely true. Also:
  • The closer to the hub, the less energy required to complete a revolution.
  • Further from the tire reduces the amount of road grim on the sensor.
leftnotracks is offline  
Old 09-30-04, 11:15 AM
  #9  
Love to Ride
 
-CM-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: SoCal
Posts: 201
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Placing the magnet (and therefore the sensor) closer to the hub has the advantage of removing the urge to perform the potential bonehead action of trying to adjust the sensor while you're riding.

(Those who have attempted this action understand the humor of this post.)
-CM- is offline  
Old 09-30-04, 11:40 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
venga venga's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Brecksville, OH (formerly Plano, TX)
Posts: 97

Bikes: 04 Litespeed Classic; 02 Trek 1000

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by flat tire
That is my thinking as well. It would also have more time to across the transmitter since it is moving slower.
I had to scratch my head and think about this for a bit.....in order to accurately reflect your speed, the computer calculates the frequency of the magnet passing the sensor. One revolution of your wheel = one "pass" across the sensor, no matter where the magnet is placed on your spoke....but, the closer to the hub the magnet is placed, the shorter distance it travels during each revolution of your wheel; therefore it is moving more slowly than if it were placed closer to the rim (where it would travel further during each revolution).....do i have this right?
venga venga is offline  
Old 09-30-04, 12:09 PM
  #11  
Hardtail
 
WorldWind's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Az. & Ca.
Posts: 663

Bikes: Richey Everest, Supercomp, Richey custom handbuilt Road, and others.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thank you
WorldWind is offline  
Old 09-30-04, 12:12 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
caloso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur

Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times in 1,417 Posts
I mounted mine closer to the rim simply because the sensor fit better high on the fork. YMMV, but I haven't had any problems.
caloso is offline  
Old 09-30-04, 12:49 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 105
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by venga venga
I had to scratch my head and think about this for a bit.....in order to accurately reflect your speed, the computer calculates the frequency of the magnet passing the sensor. One revolution of your wheel = one "pass" across the sensor, no matter where the magnet is placed on your spoke....but, the closer to the hub the magnet is placed, the shorter distance it travels during each revolution of your wheel; therefore it is moving more slowly than if it were placed closer to the rim (where it would travel further during each revolution).....do i have this right?

Correct. Circumference is 2("pie")r where "pie" is something like 3.141 and r is radius. The radius is much shorter if the magnet is near the hub rather than the rim. Therefore it will travel a shorter distance (measured as circumference) in the same amount of time. Speed is distance/time. Since the distance the magnet travels is decreased, then so is the speed of the magnet. The sensor should be able to pick the magnet up better (when closer to the hub) since it may take twice as long for the magnet to pass the sensor.

LOL about the bonehead sensor adjustment comment. Been there and chickened out several times. Always pictured myself getting a finger stuck and tumbling over the handlebars.

Last edited by flat tire; 09-30-04 at 01:16 PM.
flat tire is offline  
Old 09-30-04, 12:54 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
venga venga's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Brecksville, OH (formerly Plano, TX)
Posts: 97

Bikes: 04 Litespeed Classic; 02 Trek 1000

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by flat tire
Correct. circumference is 2("pie")r where "pie" is something like 3.141 and r is radius. The radius is much shorter if the magnet is near the hub rather than the rim. Therefore it will travel a shorter distance (measured as circumference) in the same amount of time. Speed is distance/time. Since distance the magnet travels is decrease, then so is the speed of the magnet. The sensor should be able to pick the magnet up better (when closer to the hub) since it may take twice as long for the magnet to past the sensor.

LOL about the bonehead sensor adjustment comment. Been there and chickened out several times. Always pictured myself getting a finger stuck and tumbling over the handlebars.
Thanks for the validation.....kick-started a few brain cells that had been dormant since college.....made my brain itch.

also can relate to the sensor adjustment comment...just like trying to disconnect a spark plug while the engine's still turning......
venga venga is offline  
Old 09-30-04, 01:24 PM
  #15  
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
As close to the sensor as possible. I had problems when my LBS mounted the magnet too far away from the sensor. What a crappola tour that was when I couldn't figure out why my cyclocomputer wouldn't give me any readouts until the last week.

Koffee
 
Old 09-30-04, 02:14 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
NeoBinary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 195

Bikes: Schwinn Sprint 1988, Roadmaster Mountain Climber mid 90's

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Wouldn't the readings be based on the magnet being a certain distance from the center of the circle (hub)? Deviating from the distance by which the calculation were made during programming would affect accuracy I would think.
NeoBinary is offline  
Old 09-30-04, 02:20 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
caloso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur

Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times in 1,417 Posts
Originally Posted by NeoBinary
Wouldn't the readings be based on the magnet being a certain distance from the center of the circle (hub)? Deviating from the distance by which the calculation were made during programming would affect accuracy I would think.
No. It doesn't matter. All the computer does is count how many times the wheel goes around. Whether you mount next to the rim or right next to the hub, it still goes around once.
caloso is offline  
Old 09-30-04, 03:20 PM
  #18  
Hardtail
 
WorldWind's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Az. & Ca.
Posts: 663

Bikes: Richey Everest, Supercomp, Richey custom handbuilt Road, and others.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Throw away your spoke mounted pos and put a thin powerful magnet between your tube and tire. Then mount the sensor appropriately.

Using optical mouse technology a sensor that read the tire brand would be nice.

A GPS driven device that was imbedded in your helmet and had its display in a small rear view mirror. One mileage computer that worked for all your bikes, that would be nice.
WorldWind is offline  
Old 09-30-04, 04:37 PM
  #19  
Sneaky Slow
 
pgreene's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 398
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
well Lance mounts it near the rim, as do all the posties. therefore i, too, shall mount it near the rim.



(ducking)
pgreene is offline  
Old 10-01-04, 07:45 AM
  #20  
We gotta go up there!?
 
daratbastid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Staten Island NY
Posts: 50

Bikes: 199? GT-RST-3 dual, 199? Specialized Hardrock rigid

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
The instruction book tells you exactly where it needs to be mounted, and the location may be different from company to company or even model to model. It is not a preference issue here. One thing for sure if its mounted in the wrong place for your specific model, you will get incorrect data
daratbastid is offline  
Old 10-01-04, 05:24 PM
  #21  
Vancouver, BC
 
leftnotracks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 58

Bikes: Specialized Allez, Rocky Mountain Equipe

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
One thing for sure if its mounted in the wrong place for your specific model, you will get incorrect data
Untrue. All a sensor does is send a signal to your computer, telling it "One rev....One rev...One rev...". Your computer times those with it's built in clock and mutiplies by Circumference/revolution. No matter where you mound the magnet, so long as the sensor detects each revolution, your data will be consistently accurate, or inaccurate, depending on what circumference your computer things you have.
leftnotracks is offline  
Old 10-01-04, 05:35 PM
  #22  
1/2 man,1/2 bear,1/2 pig
 
ManBearPig's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: .
Posts: 1,122

Bikes: .

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Specifically on a Polar brand unit, for use with bladed spokes, do y'all use the magent type (A) rotate + metal cover, or (b) screw? The screw type looks big and bulky, and I'm leary of it being so far from the hub as installed at the shop, but sounds like you guys are saying that's typical setup, eh?
ManBearPig is offline  
Old 10-01-04, 05:41 PM
  #23  
Former Hoarder
 
55/Rad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Portland & Yachats, OR
Posts: 11,734

Bikes: Seven Axiom, Felt Z1, Dave Moulton Fuso

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by pgreene
well Lance mounts it near the rim, as do all the posties. therefore i, too, shall mount it near the rim.
I'm sure Lance would tell you that the magnet needs to be mounted in that location in order to correctly balance the wheel to his personal specs. Probably to offset the weight of the tube valve.

No lie.

55/Rad
__________________
55/Rad is offline  
Old 07-15-05, 01:20 PM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
DigitalRJH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Greensburg, PA
Posts: 1,203
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I too went back and forth on this issue. I mount the magnet close to the rim, only reason, every pro in the peleton I see has it mounted high on the fork, and the magnet close to the rim. Those guys hit speeds I'll never reach, so if there was "wheel balance" issues I'm sure they'd notice it and would mount it further down the wheel.
DigitalRJH is offline  
Old 07-15-05, 01:34 PM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
tanguy frame's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland, OR metro area
Posts: 984
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by 55/Rad
I'm sure Lance would tell you that the magnet needs to be mounted in that location in order to correctly balance the wheel to his personal specs. Probably to offset the weight of the tube valve.

No lie.

55/Rad

Second that. Lance's wheels are perfectly balanced with valve stem, and spoke magnet. Rim manufacturers put a small weight in the rim opposite the valve to balance the wheel, but on Lance's rims, the weights are precicely calibrated to his exact valve and spoke magnet. He probably shaves a gram or 2 from the valve balance weight to compensate for the magnet.
tanguy frame is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.