Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

So some think we should pay a road tax to use the streets.

Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

So some think we should pay a road tax to use the streets.

Old 10-08-10, 06:51 PM
  #1  
Century bound
Thread Starter
 
Phil85207's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Mesa Arizona
Posts: 2,262

Bikes: Felt AR4 and Cannondale hybrid

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
So some think we should pay a road tax to use the streets.

This is an interesting read. The next time someone says, we should pay a tax remember this article.

https://www.grist.org/article/2010-09...uld-be-unfair/
Phil85207 is offline  
Old 10-08-10, 06:55 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Orange County - SoCal
Posts: 1,480

Bikes: 2011 Cannondale CAAD10

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Didn't even open your link.

I drive a couple of cars. I live in SoCal. I make some decent money. I pay a freaking boatload of taxes.

I'll ride my bike wherever damn I'd like.
Accordion is offline  
Old 10-08-10, 06:57 PM
  #3  
Maximus
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,846
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Good article.
Gluteus is offline  
Old 10-08-10, 07:03 PM
  #4  
umd
Banned
 
umd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 28,387

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Accordion
Didn't even open your link.

I drive a couple of cars. I live in SoCal. I make some decent money. I pay a freaking boatload of taxes.

I'll ride my bike wherever damn I'd like.
The article agrees with you.
umd is offline  
Old 10-08-10, 07:06 PM
  #5  
20+mph Commuter
 
JoeyBike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Greenville. SC USA
Posts: 7,510

Bikes: Surly LHT, Surly Lowside, a folding bike, and a beater.

Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1429 Post(s)
Liked 330 Times in 218 Posts
I will happily pay road use taxes on my 6 bikes so long as they charge every road user by the weight of their vehicle. I could easily afford $1/lb each year. Since weight is a function of wear and tear on road surfaces, that would be fair. Also, I should get a tax credit or rebate for my green footprint. Or there should be a nice surcharge for stinky Diesels, Hummers, and motor vehicles with more than 4 wheels.
JoeyBike is offline  
Old 10-08-10, 07:20 PM
  #6  
Pedalphile
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 258
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I say go a step further and include an additional tax based on driver and passenger weight.
The_Cretin is offline  
Old 10-08-10, 07:32 PM
  #7  
Slogging along
 
rubic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: San Fernando Valley, SoCal
Posts: 1,148

Bikes: Cannondale Synapse '06, Mongoose titanium road bike '00--my commuter. Yes, Mongoose once made a decent ti road bike.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Accordion
Didn't even open your link.

I drive a couple of cars. I live in SoCal. I make some decent money. I pay a freaking boatload of taxes.

I'll ride my bike wherever damn I'd like.
Agreed!! Why should we pay twice?
rubic is offline  
Old 10-08-10, 07:48 PM
  #8  
No matches
 
Flatballer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Eastern PA
Posts: 11,647

Bikes: two wheeled ones

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1398 Post(s)
Liked 444 Times in 250 Posts
Originally Posted by JoeyBike
I will happily pay road use taxes on my 6 bikes so long as they charge every road user by the weight of their vehicle. I could easily afford $1/lb each year. Since weight is a function of wear and tear on road surfaces, that would be fair. Also, I should get a tax credit or rebate for my green footprint. Or there should be a nice surcharge for stinky Diesels, Hummers, and motor vehicles with more than 4 wheels.
fail.
Flatballer is offline  
Old 10-08-10, 07:53 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
CHAS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Silverthorne, Colorado
Posts: 636

Bikes: Rawlings Drakkar, Specialized Roubaix, Pivot, Challenge Trike, Tandem

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Have read that most highway maintenance and repair money, as well as money for new roads comes from property taxes. By riding a bike we are subsidizing those driving motor vehicles.
CHAS is offline  
Old 10-08-10, 07:54 PM
  #10  
Freddin' it
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Wichita
Posts: 807
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Sure, I'll pay the same $94/yr I pay on my POS '97 Grand Am. And I will ride it like that, too. Right down the middle of the d@%n lane. If I'm payin' like a car, I'm ridin' like a car.
akansaskid is offline  
Old 10-08-10, 07:55 PM
  #11  
No matches
 
Flatballer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Eastern PA
Posts: 11,647

Bikes: two wheeled ones

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1398 Post(s)
Liked 444 Times in 250 Posts
Originally Posted by CHAS
Have read that most highway maintenance and repair money, as well as money for new roads comes from property taxes. By riding a bike we are subsidizing those driving motor vehicles.
why don't you actually read the article? It says basically this exact same thing.
Flatballer is offline  
Old 10-08-10, 08:11 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
rekmeyata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NE Indiana
Posts: 8,683

Bikes: 2020 Masi Giramondo 700c; 2013 Lynskey Peloton; 1992 Giant Rincon; 1989 Dawes needs parts; 1985 Trek 660; 1985 Fuji Club; 1984 Schwinn Voyager; 1984 Miyata 612; 1977 Raleigh Competition GS

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1125 Post(s)
Liked 248 Times in 199 Posts
As long as I drive a car I already pay road taxes. And even if a person doesn't own a car a bicycle isn't putting any stress on the road. Bike paths are paid for by combination of federal grants which the money comes from my income taxes, and the rest of the money comes from property taxes within the community. So whether you own a car or not a portion of your taxes are going to help cyclists ride their bikes.
rekmeyata is offline  
Old 10-08-10, 08:11 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
snowman40's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 1,173

Bikes: Fuji

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by accordion
didn't even open your link.

I drive a couple of cars. I live in socal. I make some decent money. I pay a freaking boatload of taxes.

I'll ride my bike wherever damn i'd like.
preach it brotha!!!!

snowman40 is offline  
Old 10-08-10, 08:54 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
bhchdh's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Hampton Roads VA
Posts: 1,787

Bikes: '07 Trek 520, '09 Gary Fisher Triton, '04 Trek 8000, '85 Trek 500, '84 Trek 610, '85 Trek 510, '88 Trek 660, '92 Trek 930, Trek Multitrack 700

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Even if you do not own or ever drive a car you pay plenty in "road taxes". Just about everything you buy is shipped via truck at some point, and those guys pay plenty, and the cost is passed along to the end consumer.
__________________
"When I hear another express an opinion, which is not mine, I say to myself, He has a right to his opinion, as I to mine; why should I question it. His error does me no injury, and shall I become a Don Quixot to bring all men by force of argument, to one opinion? If a fact be misstated, it is probable he is gratified by a belief of it, and I have no right to deprive him of the gratification."

T. Jefferson
bhchdh is offline  
Old 10-08-10, 08:56 PM
  #15  
Gunner.
 
robncircus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Santa Clarita, CA
Posts: 1,735

Bikes: Giant TCR, Spooky Skeletor, Pivot Mach 6

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times in 3 Posts
Meh. I'm in the minority here but I don't think it's such a bad idea. While many of us have cars, there are many that don't. If a registration fee would give the impression that we have "rights", allow us some more bike lanes, and help improve the respect barrier between us and motorists, why the hell not?!
robncircus is offline  
Old 10-08-10, 09:37 PM
  #16  
Sua Ku
 
rollin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hot as hell, Singapore
Posts: 5,705

Bikes: Trek 5200, BMC SLC01, BMC SSX, Specialized FSR, Holdsworth Criterium

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by robncircus
Meh. I'm in the minority here but I don't think it's such a bad idea. While many of us have cars, there are many that don't. If a registration fee would give the impression that we have "rights", allow us some more bike lanes, and help improve the respect barrier between us and motorists, why the hell not?!
Agree.
rollin is offline  
Old 10-08-10, 09:40 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Near Sacramento
Posts: 4,886
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I pay more than enough to the govt in taxes and fees on everything from my phone, electricity, gas, income, sales, etc. Danged if I want them to force me to give them any more.
__________________
-------

Some sort of pithy irrelevant one-liner should go here.
JoelS is offline  
Old 10-08-10, 09:42 PM
  #18  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: san jose
Posts: 12
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
CASE #1: "The use of the highway for the purpose of travel and transportation is not a mere privilege, but a common fundamental right of which the public and individuals cannot rightfully be deprived." Chicago Motor Coach v. Chicago, 169 NE 221.
CASE #2: "The right of the citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, either by carriage or by automobile, is not a mere privilege which a city may prohibit or permit at will, but a common law right which he has under the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." Thompson v. Smith, 154 SE 579.
CASE #3: "The right to travel is a part of the liberty of which the citizen cannot be deprived without due process of law under the Fifth Amendment." Kent v. Dulles, 357 US 116, 125.
CASE #4: "The right to travel is a well-established common right that does not owe its existence to the federal government. It is recognized by the courts as a natural right." Schactman v. Dulles 96 App DC 287, 225 F2d 938, at 941.

The state cannot diminish rights of the people."

Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them." Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436, 491.

Public roads are for public use, not profit.

Personal liberty -- consists of the power of locomotion, of changing situations, of removing one's person to whatever place one's inclination may direct, without imprisonment or restraint unless by due process of law." 1 Blackstone's Commentary 134; Hare, Constitution__.777; Bovier's Law Dictionary, 1914 ed., Black's Law Dictionary, 5th ed.

Streets and highways are established and maintained for the purpose of travel and transportation by the public. Such travel may be for business or pleasure.

There can be no SANCTION or PENALTY imposed upon one because of this exercise of constitutional Rights." Snerer vs. Cullen, 481 F. 946.
bikeformoney is offline  
Old 10-08-10, 09:51 PM
  #19  
just pokin' along
 
desertdork's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: the desert
Posts: 1,095
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Elly Blue
Yet the myth of bicyclists as freeloaders is gaining ground. Proposals for bicycle registration schemes crop up every few months, usually from conservative politicians looking for someone to blame, but also at times from well-meaning bicycle advocates. Never mind that no such program has ever managed to pay for its own administrative costs. Nothing is accomplished by putting up barriers to active transportation. Instead, these barriers need to be removed.
So conservatives are the force behind bicycle registration? Since the author was able to include so many other statistics (almost all without citation, though), would it have been too much for her to provide something specific to back up this blanket statement? As for the heart of the article, the explanation of how public roads are funded has been printed again and again. Nothing new.
desertdork is offline  
Old 10-08-10, 09:55 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
trustnoone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Edmonton AB
Posts: 520

Bikes: 2011 Colnago World Cup, 2012 Eddy Merckx AMX-2

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'll happily pay a cycling tax when motorists are given a questionnaire at vehicle registration that asks "Should cyclists pay an additional road tax?" and answering 'yes' automatically levies a life time tax of $3,360 per year (adjusted annually for Cost of Living.)
trustnoone is offline  
Old 10-08-10, 10:00 PM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
Seattle Forrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times in 6,054 Posts
Originally Posted by robncircus
If a registration fee would give the impression that we have "rights", allow us some more bike lanes, and help improve the respect barrier between us and motorists, why the hell not?!
If the law stating that we have those rights doesn't give that impression, why would paying a small tax do it? It takes a brute obstinacy to think cyclists have no rights as a group, when common sense and civil and criminal law say otherwise. I don't think a person who's that mentally stubborn is going to change their mind just because we're suddenly paying registration on our bikes.

The people who buzz cyclists intentionally do it because we're in their way, not because of philosophical differences over how tax funds should be distributed.
Seattle Forrest is offline  
Old 10-08-10, 10:29 PM
  #22  
Steel is real, baby!
 
frpax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 2,532

Bikes: 1984 Pinarello, 1986 Bianchi Portofino, 1988 Bianchi Trofeo, 1989 Specialized Allez, 1989 Specialized Hard Rock, 2001 Litespeed Tuscany

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by Accordion
I drive a couple of cars. I live in SoCal. I make some decent money. I pay a freaking boatload of taxes.

I'll ride my bike wherever damn I'd like.
This, except I live in Arizona.
frpax is offline  
Old 10-08-10, 10:41 PM
  #23  
Maximus
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,846
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
For those that clearly didn't read the article before commenting...

The point is that you're already paying taxes for those roads. The articles makes some good points.
Gluteus is offline  
Old 10-08-10, 11:00 PM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
rekmeyata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NE Indiana
Posts: 8,683

Bikes: 2020 Masi Giramondo 700c; 2013 Lynskey Peloton; 1992 Giant Rincon; 1989 Dawes needs parts; 1985 Trek 660; 1985 Fuji Club; 1984 Schwinn Voyager; 1984 Miyata 612; 1977 Raleigh Competition GS

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1125 Post(s)
Liked 248 Times in 199 Posts
Originally Posted by Gluteus
For those that clearly didn't read the article before commenting...

The point is that you're already paying taxes for those roads. The articles makes some good points.
That's exactly what I said in my last post...I'm already paying taxes for roads.
rekmeyata is offline  
Old 10-09-10, 06:27 AM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
Bearonabike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Huntsville/Decatur/Florence Alabama
Posts: 1,080

Bikes: Jamis Aurora, Fuji S10S (X2), Jamis Coda

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 31 Post(s)
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by JoeyBike
I will happily pay road use taxes on my 6 bikes so long as they charge every road user by the weight of their vehicle. I could easily afford $1/lb each year. Since weight is a function of wear and tear on road surfaces, that would be fair. Also, I should get a tax credit or rebate for my green footprint. Or there should be a nice surcharge for stinky Diesels, Hummers, and motor vehicles with more than 4 wheels.
Not a FAIL

an EPIC FAIL!
Bearonabike is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.