So some think we should pay a road tax to use the streets.
#1
Century bound
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Mesa Arizona
Posts: 2,262
Bikes: Felt AR4 and Cannondale hybrid
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
So some think we should pay a road tax to use the streets.
This is an interesting read. The next time someone says, we should pay a tax remember this article.
https://www.grist.org/article/2010-09...uld-be-unfair/
https://www.grist.org/article/2010-09...uld-be-unfair/
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Orange County - SoCal
Posts: 1,480
Bikes: 2011 Cannondale CAAD10
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Didn't even open your link.
I drive a couple of cars. I live in SoCal. I make some decent money. I pay a freaking boatload of taxes.
I'll ride my bike wherever damn I'd like.
I drive a couple of cars. I live in SoCal. I make some decent money. I pay a freaking boatload of taxes.
I'll ride my bike wherever damn I'd like.
#5
20+mph Commuter
I will happily pay road use taxes on my 6 bikes so long as they charge every road user by the weight of their vehicle. I could easily afford $1/lb each year. Since weight is a function of wear and tear on road surfaces, that would be fair. Also, I should get a tax credit or rebate for my green footprint. Or there should be a nice surcharge for stinky Diesels, Hummers, and motor vehicles with more than 4 wheels.
#7
Slogging along
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: San Fernando Valley, SoCal
Posts: 1,148
Bikes: Cannondale Synapse '06, Mongoose titanium road bike '00--my commuter. Yes, Mongoose once made a decent ti road bike.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#8
No matches
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Eastern PA
Posts: 11,647
Bikes: two wheeled ones
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1398 Post(s)
Liked 444 Times
in
250 Posts
I will happily pay road use taxes on my 6 bikes so long as they charge every road user by the weight of their vehicle. I could easily afford $1/lb each year. Since weight is a function of wear and tear on road surfaces, that would be fair. Also, I should get a tax credit or rebate for my green footprint. Or there should be a nice surcharge for stinky Diesels, Hummers, and motor vehicles with more than 4 wheels.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Silverthorne, Colorado
Posts: 636
Bikes: Rawlings Drakkar, Specialized Roubaix, Pivot, Challenge Trike, Tandem
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Have read that most highway maintenance and repair money, as well as money for new roads comes from property taxes. By riding a bike we are subsidizing those driving motor vehicles.
#10
Freddin' it
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Wichita
Posts: 807
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Sure, I'll pay the same $94/yr I pay on my POS '97 Grand Am. And I will ride it like that, too. Right down the middle of the d@%n lane. If I'm payin' like a car, I'm ridin' like a car.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NE Indiana
Posts: 8,849
Bikes: 2020 Masi Giramondo 700c; 2013 Lynskey Peloton; 1992 Giant Rincon; 1989 Dawes needs parts; 1985 Trek 660; 1985 Fuji Club; 1984 Schwinn Voyager; 1984 Miyata 612; 1977 Raleigh Competition GS
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 905 Post(s)
Liked 141 Times
in
118 Posts
As long as I drive a car I already pay road taxes. And even if a person doesn't own a car a bicycle isn't putting any stress on the road. Bike paths are paid for by combination of federal grants which the money comes from my income taxes, and the rest of the money comes from property taxes within the community. So whether you own a car or not a portion of your taxes are going to help cyclists ride their bikes.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 1,173
Bikes: Fuji
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Hampton Roads VA
Posts: 1,788
Bikes: '07 Trek 520, '09 Gary Fisher Triton, '04 Trek 8000, '85 Trek 500, '84 Trek 610, '85 Trek 510, '88 Trek 660, '92 Trek 930, Trek Multitrack 700
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Even if you do not own or ever drive a car you pay plenty in "road taxes". Just about everything you buy is shipped via truck at some point, and those guys pay plenty, and the cost is passed along to the end consumer.
__________________
"When I hear another express an opinion, which is not mine, I say to myself, He has a right to his opinion, as I to mine; why should I question it. His error does me no injury, and shall I become a Don Quixot to bring all men by force of argument, to one opinion? If a fact be misstated, it is probable he is gratified by a belief of it, and I have no right to deprive him of the gratification."
T. Jefferson
"When I hear another express an opinion, which is not mine, I say to myself, He has a right to his opinion, as I to mine; why should I question it. His error does me no injury, and shall I become a Don Quixot to bring all men by force of argument, to one opinion? If a fact be misstated, it is probable he is gratified by a belief of it, and I have no right to deprive him of the gratification."
T. Jefferson
#15
Gunner.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Santa Clarita, CA
Posts: 1,735
Bikes: Giant TCR, Spooky Skeletor, Pivot Mach 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times
in
3 Posts
Meh. I'm in the minority here but I don't think it's such a bad idea. While many of us have cars, there are many that don't. If a registration fee would give the impression that we have "rights", allow us some more bike lanes, and help improve the respect barrier between us and motorists, why the hell not?!
#16
Sua Ku
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hot as hell, Singapore
Posts: 5,705
Bikes: Trek 5200, BMC SLC01, BMC SSX, Specialized FSR, Holdsworth Criterium
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Meh. I'm in the minority here but I don't think it's such a bad idea. While many of us have cars, there are many that don't. If a registration fee would give the impression that we have "rights", allow us some more bike lanes, and help improve the respect barrier between us and motorists, why the hell not?!
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Near Sacramento
Posts: 4,886
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I pay more than enough to the govt in taxes and fees on everything from my phone, electricity, gas, income, sales, etc. Danged if I want them to force me to give them any more.
__________________
-------
Some sort of pithy irrelevant one-liner should go here.
-------
Some sort of pithy irrelevant one-liner should go here.
#18
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: san jose
Posts: 12
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
CASE #1: "The use of the highway for the purpose of travel and transportation is not a mere privilege, but a common fundamental right of which the public and individuals cannot rightfully be deprived." Chicago Motor Coach v. Chicago, 169 NE 221.
CASE #2: "The right of the citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, either by carriage or by automobile, is not a mere privilege which a city may prohibit or permit at will, but a common law right which he has under the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." Thompson v. Smith, 154 SE 579.
CASE #3: "The right to travel is a part of the liberty of which the citizen cannot be deprived without due process of law under the Fifth Amendment." Kent v. Dulles, 357 US 116, 125.
CASE #4: "The right to travel is a well-established common right that does not owe its existence to the federal government. It is recognized by the courts as a natural right." Schactman v. Dulles 96 App DC 287, 225 F2d 938, at 941.
The state cannot diminish rights of the people."
Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them." Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436, 491.
Public roads are for public use, not profit.
Personal liberty -- consists of the power of locomotion, of changing situations, of removing one's person to whatever place one's inclination may direct, without imprisonment or restraint unless by due process of law." 1 Blackstone's Commentary 134; Hare, Constitution__.777; Bovier's Law Dictionary, 1914 ed., Black's Law Dictionary, 5th ed.
Streets and highways are established and maintained for the purpose of travel and transportation by the public. Such travel may be for business or pleasure.
There can be no SANCTION or PENALTY imposed upon one because of this exercise of constitutional Rights." Snerer vs. Cullen, 481 F. 946.
CASE #2: "The right of the citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, either by carriage or by automobile, is not a mere privilege which a city may prohibit or permit at will, but a common law right which he has under the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." Thompson v. Smith, 154 SE 579.
CASE #3: "The right to travel is a part of the liberty of which the citizen cannot be deprived without due process of law under the Fifth Amendment." Kent v. Dulles, 357 US 116, 125.
CASE #4: "The right to travel is a well-established common right that does not owe its existence to the federal government. It is recognized by the courts as a natural right." Schactman v. Dulles 96 App DC 287, 225 F2d 938, at 941.
The state cannot diminish rights of the people."
Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them." Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436, 491.
Public roads are for public use, not profit.
Personal liberty -- consists of the power of locomotion, of changing situations, of removing one's person to whatever place one's inclination may direct, without imprisonment or restraint unless by due process of law." 1 Blackstone's Commentary 134; Hare, Constitution__.777; Bovier's Law Dictionary, 1914 ed., Black's Law Dictionary, 5th ed.
Streets and highways are established and maintained for the purpose of travel and transportation by the public. Such travel may be for business or pleasure.
There can be no SANCTION or PENALTY imposed upon one because of this exercise of constitutional Rights." Snerer vs. Cullen, 481 F. 946.
#19
just pokin' along
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: the desert
Posts: 1,095
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Elly Blue
Yet the myth of bicyclists as freeloaders is gaining ground. Proposals for bicycle registration schemes crop up every few months, usually from conservative politicians looking for someone to blame, but also at times from well-meaning bicycle advocates. Never mind that no such program has ever managed to pay for its own administrative costs. Nothing is accomplished by putting up barriers to active transportation. Instead, these barriers need to be removed.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Edmonton AB
Posts: 520
Bikes: 2011 Colnago World Cup, 2012 Eddy Merckx AMX-2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'll happily pay a cycling tax when motorists are given a questionnaire at vehicle registration that asks "Should cyclists pay an additional road tax?" and answering 'yes' automatically levies a life time tax of $3,360 per year (adjusted annually for Cost of Living.)
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 87 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18880 Post(s)
Liked 10,640 Times
in
6,050 Posts
The people who buzz cyclists intentionally do it because we're in their way, not because of philosophical differences over how tax funds should be distributed.
#22
Steel is real, baby!
#23
Maximus
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,846
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
For those that clearly didn't read the article before commenting...
The point is that you're already paying taxes for those roads. The articles makes some good points.
The point is that you're already paying taxes for those roads. The articles makes some good points.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NE Indiana
Posts: 8,849
Bikes: 2020 Masi Giramondo 700c; 2013 Lynskey Peloton; 1992 Giant Rincon; 1989 Dawes needs parts; 1985 Trek 660; 1985 Fuji Club; 1984 Schwinn Voyager; 1984 Miyata 612; 1977 Raleigh Competition GS
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 905 Post(s)
Liked 141 Times
in
118 Posts
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Space Coast of Florida
Posts: 1,066
Bikes: Jamis Aurora, Fuji S10S (Primary Bike), Nishiki Prestige (in rebuild)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
I will happily pay road use taxes on my 6 bikes so long as they charge every road user by the weight of their vehicle. I could easily afford $1/lb each year. Since weight is a function of wear and tear on road surfaces, that would be fair. Also, I should get a tax credit or rebate for my green footprint. Or there should be a nice surcharge for stinky Diesels, Hummers, and motor vehicles with more than 4 wheels.
an EPIC FAIL!